Last Updated: May 10, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR SPRYCEL


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for SPRYCEL

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00036738 ↗ Fludarabine Phosphate and Total-Body Irradiation Followed by Donor Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia or Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia That Has Responded to Treatment With Imatinib Mesylate, D Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 2 2001-07-13 This phase II trial is studying how well fludarabine phosphate and total-body irradiation followed by donor peripheral blood stem cell transplant work in treating patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia or chronic myelogenous leukemia that has responded to previous treatment with imatinib mesylate, dasatinib, or nilotinib. Giving low doses of chemotherapy, such as fludarabine phosphate, and total-body irradiation (TBI) before a donor peripheral blood stem cell transplant helps stop the growth of cancer cells. It may also stop the patient's immune system from rejecting the donor's stem cells. The donated stem cells may replace the patient's immune system and help destroy any remaining cancer cells (graft-versus-tumor effect). Giving an infusion of the donor's T cells (donor lymphocyte infusion) after the transplant may help increase this effect. Sometimes the transplanted cells from a donor can also make an immune response against the body's normal cells. Giving mycophenolate mofetil and cyclosporine after the transplant may stop this from happening.
NCT00036738 ↗ Fludarabine Phosphate and Total-Body Irradiation Followed by Donor Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia or Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia That Has Responded to Treatment With Imatinib Mesylate, D Completed Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Phase 2 2001-07-13 This phase II trial is studying how well fludarabine phosphate and total-body irradiation followed by donor peripheral blood stem cell transplant work in treating patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia or chronic myelogenous leukemia that has responded to previous treatment with imatinib mesylate, dasatinib, or nilotinib. Giving low doses of chemotherapy, such as fludarabine phosphate, and total-body irradiation (TBI) before a donor peripheral blood stem cell transplant helps stop the growth of cancer cells. It may also stop the patient's immune system from rejecting the donor's stem cells. The donated stem cells may replace the patient's immune system and help destroy any remaining cancer cells (graft-versus-tumor effect). Giving an infusion of the donor's T cells (donor lymphocyte infusion) after the transplant may help increase this effect. Sometimes the transplanted cells from a donor can also make an immune response against the body's normal cells. Giving mycophenolate mofetil and cyclosporine after the transplant may stop this from happening.
NCT00070499 ↗ Imatinib Mesylate or Dasatinib in Treating Patients With Previously Untreated Chronic Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Active, not recruiting National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 2 2004-08-15 This randomized phase IIB trial studies imatinib mesylate at two different doses and dasatinib to see how well they work in treating patients with previously untreated chronic phase chronic myelogenous leukemia. Imatinib mesylate or dasatinib may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for SPRYCEL

Condition Name

Condition Name for SPRYCEL
Intervention Trials
Leukemia 12
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia 10
Breast Cancer 9
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for SPRYCEL
Intervention Trials
Leukemia 81
Leukemia, Myeloid 56
Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive 53
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for SPRYCEL

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for SPRYCEL
Location Trials
United States 996
Canada 74
United Kingdom 59
Australia 43
Japan 33
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for SPRYCEL
Location Trials
Texas 67
California 47
Illinois 40
New York 39
Pennsylvania 37
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for SPRYCEL

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for SPRYCEL
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 4
Phase 3 11
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for SPRYCEL
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 83
Terminated 31
Recruiting 21
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for SPRYCEL

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for SPRYCEL
Sponsor Trials
Bristol-Myers Squibb 74
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 57
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center 24
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for SPRYCEL
Sponsor Trials
Other 164
Industry 108
NIH 58
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

SPRYCEL Market Analysis and Financial Projection

Last updated: April 28, 2026

Sprycel (dasatinib) Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection

What is Sprycel and what is its current clinical position?

Sprycel is dasatinib, an oral kinase inhibitor used primarily in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The marketed label has evolved around adult and pediatric populations and includes both newly diagnosed and resistant or intolerant disease categories, with dosing historically based on regimen, prior therapy, and disease phase (CML chronic/accelerated/blast crisis; Ph+ ALL).

Key clinical trial track (high level)

  • CML (front-line and sequential lines): Trials have established dasatinib’s role as a potent first-line option versus comparators in early chronic phase settings, and as an option after failure of prior therapy (including imatinib failure/intolerance).
  • CML progression settings: Studies in accelerated and blast phase CML and in Ph+ ALL support dasatinib activity across advanced disease, typically with response endpoints tied to cytogenetic and molecular milestones.
  • Combination and special populations: Multiple clinical programs have evaluated dasatinib with other agents, dose or schedule modifications, and use in broader demographic cohorts (including pediatric subsets).

Where the evidence is concentrated

  • Most pivotal evidence is anchored in long-running, phase 2/3 datasets from earlier eras of CML targeted therapy.
  • Post-approval activity has increasingly shifted toward label refinement, comparative effectiveness in real-world practice, and incremental combinations rather than platform-defining new efficacy readouts.

What to use for “current” clinical-trial monitoring

  • Model the pipeline using trial registries rather than publications alone because dasatinib’s late-stage approvals and long tail of studies often show up as registry updates, recruiting/withdrawn status changes, and protocol amendments rather than new phase-defining publications.
  • The monitoring approach is to track: (i) active interventional studies, (ii) pediatric cohort enrollments, and (iii) combination studies with endpoints tied to molecular response and survival.

What does the market look like for dasatinib (Sprycel) today?

Dasatinib is a mature branded oncology asset with sustained demand driven by:

  • entrenched clinical use in CML and Ph+ ALL
  • long-duration therapy in eligible patients
  • switching dynamics within TKI classes (patients move between inhibitors based on tolerability, resistance, and comorbidities)

Market structure

  • The dasatinib market has shifted over time from pure brand dominance toward broader competition from other TKIs across CML and Ph+ ALL. Competitive pressure is strongest from agents that offer:
    • strong efficacy with different resistance profiles
    • improved tolerability in key adverse-effect domains
    • different dosing schedules that reduce treatment burden

Revenue engine (practical drivers)

  • Continued prescribing for chronic phase CML and for patients who failed or were intolerant to earlier lines.
  • Ongoing patient retention due to the chronic nature of CML management with TKIs.
  • Periodic refills and treatment continuity that blunt short-term revenue volatility.

Supply and payer dynamics

  • As patents expired and generics entered markets in key geographies, brand pricing has faced pressure, with sales increasingly supported by rebates, contracting, and specialty pharmacy channels rather than premium list pricing.

How should investors project Sprycel sales over the next 5 years?

Projection must treat Sprycel as a mature oncology chronic-therapy asset under generics and within a competitive class. The base case mechanics are:

1) Core assumption: patient retention stays stable, but net price continues to decline

  • Generic competition and payer pressure reduce net price.
  • Patient persistence tempers volume declines unless guideline shifts or substitution materially increase cross-TKI switching.

2) Competitive substitution is the key swing factor

  • Patients commonly switch among TKIs due to:
    • inadequate response or intolerance
    • comorbidities (cardiopulmonary, pleural effusion risk management, cytopenias)
    • guideline-driven preferences by response depth and safety profile

3) Clinical-trial-driven substitution is unlikely to re-rate the asset materially

  • In mature TKIs, new trial readouts tend to shift second-line preferences and sequencing modestly.
  • Major re-rating requires a clear survival-quality differentiator or a new registrational indication, which is not the dominant pattern for mature dasatinib programs.

Projection framework (directional)

  • Base case: Slow revenue erosion driven by net price decline, offset partially by stable persistence and modest volume resilience.
  • Bear case: Accelerated net price compression from intensifying generic/channel competition and faster substitution within the TKI class.
  • Bull case: Stabilization if payer contracting favors brand access, if generic penetration slows in specific regions, or if updated evidence strengthens dasatinib’s positioning in certain subgroups.

What are the main geographies and channel dynamics that impact revenue?

Without region-specific net pricing and shipment data, the decision-relevant projection still relies on channel mechanics typical for mature branded TKIs:

  • US: Generic competition tends to compress net price; brand typically survives through specialty contracts and patient continuity.
  • EU5 and UK: Similar dynamics with national formulary decisions; adoption of generics is usually steady and affects net realizations.
  • Japan and other regulated markets: Brand resilience can be stronger depending on local approvals, pricing frameworks, and generic substitution pace.

What should R&D and commercial teams watch in the clinical landscape?

For Sprycel, “update” in practice means monitoring protocol-level changes and new studies rather than expecting large discontinuous efficacy jumps.

High-signal trial categories for monitoring

  • Pediatric efficacy and dosing cohorts (where enrollment and outcomes can change labeling and payer access).
  • Combination regimens aimed at improved molecular depth (tracked by response rates and safety signals).
  • Real-world evidence studies tied to tolerability management and switching patterns (useful for forecasting substitution speed).

How does Sprycel compare within the TKI competitive set?

Dasatinib competes with multiple second-generation and third-generation CML TKIs and with newer agents in Ph+ ALL contexts.

Competitive positioning levers

  • Efficacy depth vs. safety tradeoffs: Dasatinib has a strong track record for response; tolerability management is a recurring driver of switching.
  • Resistance profile: Patients with specific resistance mutations may cluster toward particular TKIs based on in vitro sensitivity and prior exposure.
  • Dosing and adherence: Regimens that reduce discontinuations and dose interruptions can drive persistence and revenue retention.

Market and clinical risk map (actionable)

The risk map below is built from what typically changes in mature TKI markets: net price, persistence, and substitution.

Risk driver What changes it Impact on Sprycel
Net price compression Generic penetration, payer renegotiations, formulary shifts High
Substitution within TKI class New sequencing preferences, tolerability-driven switching Medium to High
Safety management events Pleural effusion and other class-related tolerability issues affect adherence Medium
Label or guideline shifts New indications or subgroup positioning Medium
Trial-driven subgroup adoption Evidence for specific molecular or clinical subsets Low to Medium

Clinical trials update: status-based readout (what to track operationally)

Sprycel’s operational trial relevance typically sits in:

  • Recruiting or active interventional studies that still enroll patients into dasatinib-based regimens (often combinations or specific subgroups).
  • Pediatric follow-on studies and long-term follow-up registries.
  • Comparative effectiveness and outcomes (often non-randomized) that can influence payer and guideline discussions.

Where does value likely concentrate in the next cycle?

Given maturity and class competition, value concentrates in:

  • payer contracting and specialty access
  • switching management programs that maintain persistence
  • patient support to manage adverse events (especially those that drive discontinuation)

Key Takeaways

  • Sprycel (dasatinib) remains a mature, clinically entrenched TKI for CML and Ph+ ALL, with most defining evidence from earlier phase 2/3 programs.
  • Market outcomes are driven less by new clinical breakthroughs and more by mature-drug economics: net price compression from generics and payer contracting, offset partially by patient persistence.
  • A credible 5-year projection depends on the speed of net price erosion and substitution dynamics within the broader TKI class; trial-driven discontinuous re-rating is unlikely without a new registrational indication or major survival-quality differentiator.
  • For R&D and commercial planning, the highest-signal monitoring categories are pediatric and subgroup studies, combination regimens with clear clinical endpoints, and real-world evidence that quantifies persistence and switching.

FAQs

  1. What are Sprycel’s main approved use areas?
    CML (including chronic phase and advanced phases) and Philadelphia chromosome-positive ALL, including adult and pediatric populations depending on local approvals.

  2. Why does Sprycel remain a revenue contributor despite competition?
    Therapy persistence in chronic CML and established prescribing patterns support sustained demand even as net pricing declines.

  3. What is the biggest driver of near-term revenue decline risk?
    Net price compression from generic entry and payer formulary pressure.

  4. Do new trials typically change dasatinib market share materially?
    Usually not in a step-function way for a mature TKI; trial relevance more often affects sequencing decisions and specific subgroups.

  5. What trial categories matter most for forecasting?
    Recruiting interventional updates, pediatric cohorts, combination regimens with clinically meaningful endpoints, and real-world switching/persistence evidence.


References

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Sprycel (dasatinib) Prescribing Information. FDA label.
[2] European Medicines Agency. Sprycel (dasatinib): Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC).
[3] National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov (dasatinib search results and study status updates).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.