Last Updated: September 24, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR SORIATANE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for SORIATANE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00156247 ↗ Acitretin and Etanercept in Psoriasis Completed Connetics Corp. Phase 2 2005-09-01 To determine whether acitretin plus etanercept is more effective than etanercept alone in clearing psoriasis plaques in adults.
NCT00156247 ↗ Acitretin and Etanercept in Psoriasis Completed University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey Phase 2 2005-09-01 To determine whether acitretin plus etanercept is more effective than etanercept alone in clearing psoriasis plaques in adults.
NCT01545284 ↗ Pilot Study on the Use of Acitretin for the Treatment of Severe Chronic Hand Dermatitis Completed Tribute Pharmaceuticals Phase 2/Phase 3 2012-03-01 This pilot, phase II, 24-week study will recruit a total of 10 patients and will evaluate the efficacy and safety of acitretin in patients with severe chronic hand dermatitis .
NCT01545284 ↗ Pilot Study on the Use of Acitretin for the Treatment of Severe Chronic Hand Dermatitis Completed Innovaderm Research Inc. Phase 2/Phase 3 2012-03-01 This pilot, phase II, 24-week study will recruit a total of 10 patients and will evaluate the efficacy and safety of acitretin in patients with severe chronic hand dermatitis .
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for SORIATANE

Condition Name

Condition Name for SORIATANE
Intervention Trials
Chronic Hand Dermatitis 1
Dermatomyositis, Adult Type 1
Malignant Melanoma 1
Netherton Syndrome 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for SORIATANE
Intervention Trials
Netherton Syndrome 1
Melanoma 1
Dermatitis 1
Psoriasis 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for SORIATANE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for SORIATANE
Location Trials
United States 2
Canada 2
France 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for SORIATANE
Location Trials
Louisiana 1
Arizona 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for SORIATANE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for SORIATANE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
Phase 2 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for SORIATANE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 4
Terminated 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for SORIATANE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for SORIATANE
Sponsor Trials
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris 1
Tulane University 1
Connetics Corp. 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for SORIATANE
Sponsor Trials
Other 6
Industry 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

SORIATANE (acitretin) Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Generic/Biosimilar & Patent Outlook (U.S. and Major Markets)

Last updated: July 30, 2026

SORIATANE is an FDA-approved oral retinoid (acitretin) for severe manifestations of chronic plaque psoriasis in adults who are unresponsive to other therapies. The current IP and clinical-trial activity landscape for acitretin is dominated by legacy patent estates and ongoing real-world safety monitoring, rather than large late-stage registrational programs. Market outlook is driven by (1) limited remaining on-patent exposure in developed markets, (2) strong generic penetration, and (3) continued safety, pregnancy-prevention, and administration constraints that restrict substitution and uptake in certain patient cohorts.

What is SORIATANE (acitretin) FDA-approved for, and what is the current regulatory position?

SORIATANE’s core indication is severe psoriasis in adults requiring systemic therapy when other treatments are inadequate. As a systemic retinoid, acitretin carries pregnancy prevention requirements for patients and partners due to teratogenicity. This creates a high administrative and adherence burden that limits conversion in some settings and slows switching once a patient is stabilized.

What FDA label constraints affect uptake and prescribing?

Key practical restrictions impacting market utilization include:

  • Strong teratogenic risk profile requiring stringent pregnancy prevention programs.
  • Long drug elimination and washout considerations affecting timing for conception planning.
  • Monitoring expectations in systemic retinoid use: lipids and liver function are standard in clinical practice.
  • Drug interaction and alcohol co-administration considerations commonly emphasized in label and risk-management materials for retinoids.

What is the market implication of risk management?

The pregnancy prevention burden influences prescriber behavior and insurer authorization criteria. Even where low-cost generics exist, real-world uptake can be constrained by patient-specific risk factors and by the time required to implement contraception and documentation workflows.

What clinical trials are ongoing for acitretin/SORIATANE, and what is the status of new evidence?

No registrational Phase 3 program with a clearly identifiable endpoint and timeline comparable to newer biologics or oral small molecules is evident as a mainline driver for acitretin. The clinical research base is shaped by:

  • Long-established use requiring periodic safety re-evaluation in practice.
  • Comparative regimen studies in specific psoriasis phenotypes in smaller cohorts.
  • Pharmacovigilance and pregnancy-risk management studies that do not typically re-open the patent cycle.

What trial types dominate the acitretin evidence base?

Across the acitretin literature, the most common “update” categories are:

  • Safety and effectiveness in real-world cohorts (registry and observational studies).
  • Dose optimization and comparative tolerability in systemic psoriasis populations.
  • Special populations (older adults, hepatic risk, metabolic comorbidity) rather than new mechanistic claims.
  • Combination therapy comparisons (e.g., with topical agents or other systemic modalities) that generally do not trigger new exclusivity.

How big is the SORIATANE (acitretin) market, and what drives demand?

Demand for acitretin is structurally smaller than newer psoriasis systemic categories because:

  • Narrower modern positioning versus biologics and targeted oral therapies.
  • Higher risk management friction (pregnancy prevention).
  • Safety monitoring and adherence requirements.

Market drivers

  • Use remains concentrated in patients who require systemic therapy but do not respond to or cannot use alternatives.
  • Prescribing tends to be stabilized in dermatology practices with existing workflows for systemic retinoids.
  • Cost competitiveness from generics supports continued access, but cost alone does not expand eligible populations.

Market sinks and substitution dynamics

  • In many formularies, biologics and newer oral agents displace older systemic therapies after step-therapy rules.
  • Generic availability helps maintain a base level of use, but it does not fully overcome risk and monitoring overhead.

What is the generic entry risk for acitretin, and are there any biosimilar issues?

Acitretin is a small molecule, not a biologic, so biosimilar risk does not apply. Generic entry risk is low in the sense that acitretin has largely moved through legacy exclusivity. The relevant question is not “whether” generic substitution happens, but “what” residual formulary and regulatory friction limits substitution in certain plans or subpopulations.

What is the practical impact of generic availability?

  • With generics broadly available, market share shifts mostly track formulary positioning, patient stability, and prescriber familiarity rather than exclusivity barriers.
  • Switching costs are influenced by tolerability and monitoring. Retinoids can require close follow-up during initiation, which may slow therapeutic interchange.

How does SORIATANE compare with other systemic psoriasis options on efficacy and safety trade-offs?

Acitretin efficacy is clinically established for selected psoriasis subtypes, but its role is constrained by adverse effect management and administrative requirements. Compared with:

  • Biologics: biologics often offer higher efficacy with more targeted risk profiles, shifting first-line systemic choices for many patients.
  • New oral small molecules: modern oral agents can have fewer pregnancy constraints, faster administrative workflows, and different monitoring burdens.

Where does acitretin still fit?

Acitretin tends to be considered when:

  • The patient has contraindications or insufficient response to other systemic options.
  • Clinicians favor retinoid mechanisms for specific psoriasis phenotypes.
  • Long-standing disease control achieved with retinoids makes switching undesirable.

What patents protect acitretin/SORIATANE, and when do key exclusivity windows end?

SORIATANE’s core IP is mostly legacy. For a precise, litigation-grade patent estate map with filing and expiration dates, Orange Book listings, and Paragraph IV exposure, a complete Orange Book and patent-number level dataset is required. Without that dataset, a definitive expiration timetable and count of active, enforceable patents cannot be produced to a standard suitable for licensing, litigation, or investment decisions.

What is the Orange Book status of SORIATANE (acitretin) in the U.S.?

A current Orange Book “listed drug” and patent-family status view is required to state:

  • Whether patents are listed by formulation, use, or method-of-manufacture.
  • Which patents are still listed as active.
  • Whether any exclusivity extends beyond the baseline patents.

Without that Orange Book listing table, a definitive status summary cannot be provided.

What patent litigation affects SORIATANE (acitretin), and are there settlements?

Patent litigation and settlement terms must be mapped from:

  • Federal court dockets for Paragraph IV cases
  • Settlement agreements filed or described in public records
  • Claims charts and judgments to determine which patents were asserted and which were dismissed or stayed

A litigation-grade update cannot be produced without a sourced case list and docket references.

What formulation and dosing are involved, and what are the IP barriers for new entrants?

For generic manufacturers, entry barriers are typically:

  • Patent coverage that is tied to specific strengths or dosage forms.
  • Method-of-use claims related to psoriasis treatment.
  • Any formulation-specific claims that can complicate design-around.

To evaluate IP barriers, a dosage-form-by-dose-form patent map and Orange Book listing is required.

When does acitretin lose exclusivity, and how long is residual market protection?

For small molecules with generic penetration, residual protection usually comes from:

  • Last expiring formulation or method-of-use patents
  • Enforcement timing (stays, injunctions)
  • Any special exclusivities tied to a change in labeling or new clinical use

A timeline with specific loss-of-exclusivity dates requires Orange Book and patent-family data at the number level.

How strong is the patent estate for acitretin, and what does it mean for licensing?

Without a curated list of active patents and their expiration dates, the patent estate cannot be scored in a defensible way (for example: “strong” based on breadth of independent claims, number of active families, or remaining life in core jurisdictions).

What is the competitive landscape for acitretin/SORIATANE, and how are companies positioned?

The competitive landscape is structurally:

  • Branded product holding a legacy niche in certain formularies
  • Generic manufacturers supplying broad coverage in most developed markets
  • Clinical switching governed by monitoring logistics and patient stability

To name specific manufacturers, market shares, and acquisition or launch strategies with data support, a sourced product-availability and prescription dataset is required.

What is the clinical development outlook for acitretin in 2026 and beyond?

Near-term development is likely to remain incremental:

  • Observational and safety monitoring studies
  • Subpopulation efficacy and tolerability updates
  • Real-world outcomes after guideline or step-therapy policy changes

Registrational expansion into new indications would require a higher trial effort than acitretin’s current market role typically warrants, especially given generic availability and limited commercial headroom.

Market projection: baseline, downside, and upside scenarios for SORIATANE/acitretin

A defensible projection requires at least one of:

  • Sourced current sales (U.S. and/or global)
  • Prescription volume and NBRx trajectory
  • Public payer formulary share or net sales by segment

Without those inputs, any numeric forecast would be speculative. What can be stated at a structural level for planning purposes is:

  • Base-case: flat-to-declining demand for branded SORIATANE in developed markets due to ongoing generic substitution and step-therapy pressures.
  • Downside: continued formulary erosion and patient preference migration to newer systemic classes that reduce administrative burdens.
  • Upside: localized stabilization where retinoid use remains guideline-supported and where payer policies retain systemic retinoids as options for specific clinical constraints.

Key Takeaways

  • SORIATANE (acitretin) sits in a legacy systemic psoriasis space with sustained but limited demand shaped by pregnancy prevention requirements and monitoring obligations.
  • Clinical “updates” for acitretin are more likely to be real-world safety and comparative use studies than new late-stage registrational programs.
  • Generic substitution is the dominant economic force; biosimilar risk does not apply.
  • A patent and Orange Book exclusivity timeline, litigation update, and enforceable-patent strength assessment require a sourced Orange Book and docket-level dataset to be decision-grade.

FAQs

1) Is SORIATANE still prescribed for chronic plaque psoriasis, or has it been replaced by newer oral drugs?
It remains used for selected patients who require systemic therapy when other treatments are inadequate, but newer oral agents and biologics have displaced retinoids in many step-therapy pathways.

2) What monitoring is typically required for patients on acitretin?
Clinicians commonly monitor liver function and lipids during systemic retinoid therapy, alongside overall tolerability and adverse event tracking.

3) Why does acitretin have stricter pregnancy-related restrictions than many other psoriasis drugs?
Its teratogenic risk drives pregnancy prevention requirements and workflow constraints for both patients and partners.

4) Can patients switch from branded SORIATANE to generic acitretin without losing control?
Switching is often feasible, but tolerability, monitoring schedules, and patient stability can slow interchange in practice.

5) Are there any biosimilars for acitretin?
No. Acitretin is a small molecule, so biosimilar frameworks do not apply.


References (APA)

  1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations.
  2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. SORIATANE (acitretin) prescribing information.
  3. FDA. Drug trials snapshots and related clinical trial resources (public listings).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.