Last Updated: June 9, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR SOLU-MEDROL


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for SOLU-MEDROL

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00002524 ↗ Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With AIDS-Related Lymphoma Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 2 1993-06-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more cancer cells. PURPOSE: Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy in treating patients with AIDS-related lymphoma.
NCT00002524 ↗ Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With AIDS-Related Lymphoma Completed M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Phase 2 1993-06-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more cancer cells. PURPOSE: Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy in treating patients with AIDS-related lymphoma.
NCT00002831 ↗ Chemotherapy Plus Peripheral Stem Cell Transplantation in Treating Patients With Chronic Myelogenous or Acute Leukemia Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 1/Phase 2 1995-08-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining chemotherapy with peripheral stem cell transplantation may allow the doctor to give higher doses of chemotherapy drugs and kill more cancer cells. PURPOSE: Phase I/II trial to study the effectiveness of high-dose chemotherapy plus peripheral stem cell transplantation in treating patients with chronic myelogenous or acute leukemia.
NCT00002831 ↗ Chemotherapy Plus Peripheral Stem Cell Transplantation in Treating Patients With Chronic Myelogenous or Acute Leukemia Completed M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Phase 1/Phase 2 1995-08-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining chemotherapy with peripheral stem cell transplantation may allow the doctor to give higher doses of chemotherapy drugs and kill more cancer cells. PURPOSE: Phase I/II trial to study the effectiveness of high-dose chemotherapy plus peripheral stem cell transplantation in treating patients with chronic myelogenous or acute leukemia.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for SOLU-MEDROL

Condition Name

Condition Name for SOLU-MEDROL
Intervention Trials
Leukemia 15
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia 6
Osteoarthrosis 6
Graft Versus Host Disease 6
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for SOLU-MEDROL
Intervention Trials
Leukemia 22
Leukemia, Lymphoid 16
Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma 15
Syndrome 13
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for SOLU-MEDROL

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for SOLU-MEDROL
Location Trials
United States 425
Canada 42
China 16
Denmark 14
Australia 12
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for SOLU-MEDROL
Location Trials
Texas 30
California 21
Ohio 17
Georgia 16
New York 16
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for SOLU-MEDROL

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for SOLU-MEDROL
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 3
PHASE3 1
PHASE2 2
[disabled in preview] 18
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for SOLU-MEDROL
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 58
Recruiting 20
Active, not recruiting 12
[disabled in preview] 11
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for SOLU-MEDROL

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for SOLU-MEDROL
Sponsor Trials
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 20
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center 16
Bispebjerg Hospital 7
[disabled in preview] 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for SOLU-MEDROL
Sponsor Trials
Other 139
Industry 40
NIH 32
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: April 28, 2026

Solu-Medrol (methylprednisolone sodium succinate): clinical trials update, market analysis, and projections

What is Solu-Medrol and why does it matter for R&D and market sizing?

Solu-Medrol is the brand name for methylprednisolone sodium succinate, a systemic corticosteroid delivered by injection (commonly IV/IM). It is used across acute inflammatory, autoimmune, and allergic indications. Because methylprednisolone sodium succinate is a generic-capable, off-patent molecule in most markets, commercial value is driven less by patent exclusivity and more by:

  • formulary positioning in hospitals,
  • procurement contracts for injectable steroids,
  • supply reliability,
  • line extensions (presentation, concentration, packaging),
  • and any remaining process or formulation IP in specific jurisdictions.

Clinical development intensity is usually low for established systemic steroids; trial activity often clusters around new indications, comparative efficacy for acute settings, dose strategy, or steroid-sparing protocols.


What clinical trials are currently active or recently reported for Solu-Medrol (methylprednisolone sodium succinate)?

No complete, auditable trial inventory can be produced from the information available in this request. A correct “clinical trials update” requires a structured search and citation trail (e.g., ClinicalTrials.gov NCT records, EU CTR IDs, publication-linked trial registries), plus mapping of “Solu-Medrol” to:

  • the generic molecule (methylprednisolone sodium succinate),
  • exact formulations and strengths,
  • and inclusion/exclusion that distinguishes methylprednisolone base vs sodium succinate salt.

With the current input set, a precise, complete update would risk omitting relevant studies or misattributing unrelated methylprednisolone products.

Accordingly, a complete and accurate clinical-trials update cannot be delivered here.


What is the market reality for systemic methylprednisolone injection today?

Market analysis for Solu-Medrol is fundamentally a market for injectable methylprednisolone sodium succinate in acute care settings. The commercial model is dominated by:

  • generic manufacturers supplying hospital tenders,
  • multi-source availability in many countries,
  • pricing pressure from procurement frameworks,
  • substitution by therapeutically equivalent corticosteroids in many protocols.

Market value drivers (hospital-centric)

Driver Mechanism Impact on demand
Acute admission volumes ED, inpatient, ICU caseload Raises baseline steroid usage
Guideline adherence Standard-of-care for flares and inflammatory crises Stabilizes category demand
Tender cycles Contracting compresses manufacturer margins Volatile pricing, stable volumes
Shortages and supply Sterile injectable interruptions Temporary demand shifts and stockpiling
SKU and packaging Unit dosing, traceability, labeling Affects formulary adoption

Competitive set

Solu-Medrol competes primarily with:

  • generic methylprednisolone sodium succinate injections,
  • other systemic corticosteroid injectables used in similar acute pathways (e.g., dexamethasone, hydrocortisone, prednisone equivalents used after IV-to-PO transitions),
  • biosimilar-free; this is small-molecule steroid space with high substitution.

How should investors and R&D teams project Solu-Medrol demand and pricing?

Because the product is not the kind of molecule where durable brand monopoly drives multi-year returns, projections need to be framed as category volume plus pricing/market-share effects rather than “new product ramp.”

Projection framework

A workable projection for Solu-Medrol assumes three layers:

1) Category volume trend

  • tied to acute-care utilization and steroid use intensity,
  • not tied to a unique mechanism that would create elastic demand.

2) Pricing and gross margin trend

  • governed by generic competition and tender repricing,
  • typically showing downward or flat price trends in mature markets unless supply constraints appear.

3) Share stability

  • procurement-driven selection favors reliable supply and compliant sterile production,
  • brand premiums persist where supply, distribution, or formulary inertia matters.

Base-case scenario (typical for off-patent injectables)

  • Volume: stable to low single-digit growth (utilization growth offsets substitution risk).
  • Price: flat to mild decline under tender pressure.
  • Revenue: roughly tracks volume, with margin compression or stabilization depending on procurement and cost of goods.

Upside scenario

  • supply disruptions in competing suppliers,
  • hospital formulary preference changes due to availability,
  • local IP enforcement on certain presentations where applicable (rare but possible by jurisdiction).

Downside scenario

  • increased multi-source contracting leading to steeper price cuts,
  • substitution by alternate corticosteroids in clinical pathways,
  • regulatory or manufacturing quality events impacting allocation.

However, without market baseline data tied to geography (e.g., US, EU5, UK, Japan), revenue history, and current tender pricing, numeric projections cannot be produced accurately. The request does not include that baseline.


What should be modeled for R&D going forward in systemic corticosteroids?

R&D for established systemic steroids usually targets differentiation without expecting breakthrough exclusivity. Likely commercial levers:

  • Formulation and device differentiation

    • stability improvements,
    • lower reconstitution burden or better administration workflow,
    • container and packaging optimization for hospital traceability and dosing accuracy.
  • Protocol-driven evidence generation

    • comparative studies across steroid regimens in acute settings,
    • dose strategy optimization to reduce adverse event risk while preserving efficacy.
  • Indication refinement

    • narrower subsets where specific steroid pharmacokinetics and dosing schedules align with outcomes.

A defensible R&D thesis needs trial data, endpoint discipline, and a clear pathway to formulary uptake. In practice, it often results in incremental value rather than large market expansion.


Key Takeaways

  • Solu-Medrol is methylprednisolone sodium succinate injection, a mature systemic corticosteroid category with generic substitution central to market economics.
  • A complete, accurate clinical trials update cannot be provided from the information in the request because it requires a trial-by-trial registry and publication mapping to the specific formulation and salt.
  • Market projections for Solu-Medrol should be modeled as category volume + tender-driven pricing + supply-driven share, not as a brand monopoly ramp.
  • For R&D, differentiation typically comes from presentation/formulation, administration workflow, and protocol evidence that speeds formulary decisions rather than patent-driven exclusivity.

FAQs

1) Is Solu-Medrol still protected by patents?
In most jurisdictions, methylprednisolone sodium succinate is largely off-patent; value typically hinges on formulary placement and supply reliability rather than long-duration patent exclusivity.

2) What clinical trial activity is typical for established systemic steroids?
Trials usually focus on acute protocol optimization, comparative steroid regimens, dose strategies, and sometimes targeted indication refinements.

3) What drives Solu-Medrol demand most?
Hospital and acute-care utilization patterns, guideline adherence, and procurement contracting cycles.

4) How do generic competitors affect Solu-Medrol pricing?
Tender-based procurement and multi-source contracting typically compress prices and margins over time.

5) What kind of R&D creates commercial impact in off-patent injectables?
Formulation/presentation improvements, administration workflow enhancements, and evidence that improves clinician decision-making and formulary adoption.


References

[1] No sources were provided in the request, and no registry or publication search results were supplied to support a clinical trials update or quantified market projection.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.