Last Updated: June 25, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR SOLODYN


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for SOLODYN

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00473083 ↗ Systemic and Topical Treatments for Rash Secondary to Erlotinib in Lung Cancer Completed Hoffmann-La Roche Phase 2 2009-01-01 The purpose of this trial is to determine if rash caused by erlotinib can be successfully treated and if so to determine the optimal treatment approach. Hypothesis: Hypothesis 1: If the incidence of rash is 50% while on erlotinib, prophylactic monotherapy with minocycline can prevent occurrence in 50% of these patients. Hypothesis 2: Treatment of rash is successful in improving rash by at least one Grade in 80% of patients. Hypothesis 3: In patients with untreated rash, the rash will be self-limiting in 25% of patients, and 65% will be grade 1, 2A, and 2b. Ten percent will be grade 3 requiring treatment with monotherapy intervention.
NCT00473083 ↗ Systemic and Topical Treatments for Rash Secondary to Erlotinib in Lung Cancer Completed British Columbia Cancer Agency Phase 2 2009-01-01 The purpose of this trial is to determine if rash caused by erlotinib can be successfully treated and if so to determine the optimal treatment approach. Hypothesis: Hypothesis 1: If the incidence of rash is 50% while on erlotinib, prophylactic monotherapy with minocycline can prevent occurrence in 50% of these patients. Hypothesis 2: Treatment of rash is successful in improving rash by at least one Grade in 80% of patients. Hypothesis 3: In patients with untreated rash, the rash will be self-limiting in 25% of patients, and 65% will be grade 1, 2A, and 2b. Ten percent will be grade 3 requiring treatment with monotherapy intervention.
NCT01048983 ↗ Reducing Symptom Burden - Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Withdrawn National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 1/Phase 2 1969-12-31 The goal of this clinical research study is to compare armodafinil, bupropion, curcumin, and minocycline when given alone or in combination to learn which is better for controlling symptoms, such as the side effects of chemoradiation, when given to treat lung cancer.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for SOLODYN

Condition Name

Condition Name for SOLODYN
Intervention Trials
Myeloma 2
Head And Neck Cancer 2
Lung Cancer 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for SOLODYN
Intervention Trials
Lung Neoplasms 4
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung 3
Multiple Myeloma 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for SOLODYN

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for SOLODYN
Location Trials
United States 30
Germany 4
Canada 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for SOLODYN
Location Trials
Texas 11
North Carolina 2
Michigan 2
Massachusetts 2
Kentucky 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for SOLODYN

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for SOLODYN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 2
Phase 2 12
Phase 1/Phase 2 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for SOLODYN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 11
Active, not recruiting 3
Recruiting 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for SOLODYN

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for SOLODYN
Sponsor Trials
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center 11
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 10
British Columbia Cancer Agency 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for SOLODYN
Sponsor Trials
Other 25
NIH 11
Industry 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

SOLODYN (minocycline) clinical trials update, market analysis and exclusivity timeline

Last updated: May 23, 2026

SOLODYN (minocycline hydrochloride) is a branded, oral extended-release minocycline indicated for acne vulgaris. Public clinical-trials activity is limited in recent years, and the commercial profile is driven by aging exclusivity, erosion from generics, and the broader tetracycline/acne market shift toward newer dermatology agents.


What is SOLODYN (minocycline ER) FDA status and current label indications?

SOLODYN is FDA-approved for acne vulgaris. Its core positioning is oral minocycline in an extended-release formulation designed to improve dosing tolerability versus immediate-release regimens.

Which formulations and strengths are on-label?

SOLODYN is marketed as an oral extended-release tablet across multiple strengths (historically 35 mg, 45 mg, 55 mg). The exact strength and dosing range reflected in labeling should be confirmed via the current package insert and FDA labeling history.

What FDA approvals and labeling changes matter for market access?

Key market relevance is driven by:

  • Whether the label restricts use by age and dosing regimen (affects prescriber uptake).
  • Whether there are safety communication updates that alter patient selection.
  • Whether new dosing guidance influences comparative effectiveness versus other systemic acne therapies.

(Where a business user needs a current label snapshot, it is typically validated against the FDA Label and DailyMed record for SOLODYN.)


What clinical trials have been run for SOLODYN, and what is the most recent update?

SOLODYN’s publicly visible trial footprint is dominated by early pivotal and supportive studies comparing extended-release minocycline exposure, tolerability, and acne efficacy versus comparator regimens. Recent years generally show a lower volume of new, registrational-grade trials compared with dermatology pipeline drugs that are seeking new indications.

What are the main trial endpoints used for SOLODYN acne studies?

Typical acne-vulgaris endpoints in minocycline oral programs include:

  • Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) or similar composite acne grading.
  • Lesion counts (inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesions).
  • Treatment success proportion at defined timepoints (often through week 12 and beyond).
  • Safety: gastrointestinal events, photosensitivity, dizziness, vestibular effects, laboratory signals.

What is the commercial read-through from trial design and endpoints?

Because SOLODYN is not a novel mechanism therapy and acne labeling is established, the business relevance of newer clinical activity is usually tied to:

  • Formulation refinements and pharmacokinetic bridging.
  • Comparative tolerability versus other oral tetracyclines.
  • Real-world persistence and adherence drivers rather than new clinical differentiation.

Is SOLODYN facing new clinical competition from other systemic acne therapies?

SOLODYN’s competitive risk is primarily class-competition and category substitution:

  • Other oral tetracyclines and doxycycline-based regimens (including extended-release doxycycline products).
  • Hormonal therapies in eligible patient populations.
  • Biologic and targeted agents for specific acne subtypes, where adopted, shift systemic prescribing patterns.

The practical effect: even if SOLODYN maintains adequate efficacy, competitor innovation can reduce incremental demand growth and accelerate share loss.


What patents protect SOLODYN (minocycline ER), and how many are in force?

SOLODYN is a mature product with a likely condensed remaining patent estate in the oral acne tetracycline space. Patent coverage for such products usually includes:

  • Active-ingredient and composition-of-matter concepts (older filings).
  • Formulation and extended-release matrix patents.
  • Specific particle size, excipient, and manufacturing-process claims.
  • Method-of-use or dosing regimen claims for acne.

A complete and accurate count of “in-force” patents requires a current FDA Orange Book harvest for SOLODYN’s active ingredient(s), dosage forms, and strengths.

How to think about patent claim categories for extended-release minocycline

For business and litigation readiness, the useful claim taxonomy is:

  • Formulation patents: matrix, polymer system, release profile, and stability.
  • Manufacturing-process patents: granulation, coating, or tablet compression conditions producing controlled release.
  • Method-of-use patents: patient populations, acne severity stratification, or dosing schedules.

Without a current Orange Book list tied to each listed drug, a complete “how many patents” answer cannot be provided.


When does SOLODYN lose exclusivity, and what is the generic launch risk window?

SOLODYN is widely considered a mature brand with generic availability in the market, which means exclusivity is largely a historical driver rather than a forward-looking barrier. The remaining “risk window” for any new generic entry would typically relate to:

  • Any remaining listed patents (Orange Book) not expired.
  • Any product-specific regulatory exclusivities (if any were granted for later supplements).
  • Pending or active litigation that affects generic launch timing.

Because a definitive exclusivity timeline must be grounded in the current Orange Book patent-expiration and FDA exclusivity fields, this section cannot be completed accurately without the specific Orange Book data fields.


What is the Orange Book status of SOLODYN, including listed patents and expiration dates?

Orange Book status is the gating dataset for:

  • Patent expiration by NDA and strength.
  • Exclusivity end dates (including marketing exclusivity).
  • Which patents are “listed for” which dosage forms and strengths.

A full table of Orange Book-listed patents with expiration dates, patent numbers, assignees, and claim types is not deliverable without the current Orange Book record for SOLODYN.


Have any ANDA Paragraph IV challenges been filed for SOLODYN?

Paragraph IV filings are the leading forward indicator of:

  • Likely generic entry timing.
  • Which patents are being contested.
  • Settlement vs litigation outcomes that can extend or accelerate launch.

A credible “which patents were challenged” answer requires the Orange Book “Hatch-Waxman” litigation and ANDA history fields, typically surfaced via Orange Book and legal dockets tied to the same NDA.

Without that dataset, this section cannot be completed without risking factual errors.


What SOLODYN patent litigation affects generic entry and settlements?

SOLODYN’s market access has largely normalized under generic competition, but specific litigation outcomes can still matter if:

  • Remaining formulation/process patents extend control.
  • A settlement agreement triggers a launch date.
  • Injunctions delay a generic launch even after partial expiration.

A definitive litigation summary must cite:

  • Parties (brand and ANDA applicants).
  • Court/case number and filing dates.
  • Settlement agreement terms, including any “carve-outs” for strengths or dosage forms.

This cannot be produced accurately without the current litigation record tied to SOLODYN’s listed patents.


How does SOLODYN’s market performance compare with doxycycline or other systemic acne brands?

SOLODYN competes in a crowded systemic acne market where:

  • Doxycycline products hold significant category share due to dosing convenience and broad prescribing familiarity.
  • Oral minocycline competes with doxycycline through perceived tolerability differences and formulary preference.

The commercial read-through for market analysis is typically:

  • Brand erosion: loss of price and volume as generics enter.
  • Limited upside: incremental demand relies on differentiated tolerability and formulary placement rather than mechanism novelty.

A numeric market projection requires current brand prescription data, retail vs mail split, and competitive share, none of which can be stated accurately here.


What market size and sales projection is realistic for SOLODYN through patent and exclusivity cycles?

A reliable projection requires:

  • Current unit volume or TRx trend.
  • Net sales net of rebates under current payer conditions.
  • Generic penetration and pricing trajectory.
  • Competitive landscape shifts (formulary policies, guideline updates, competitor launches).

This article cannot provide hard-year projections without those inputs grounded in a data source. Public narrative without numbers would fail the “hard data” requirement for business decision-making.


What biosimilar or biologic risk exists for SOLODYN?

SOLODYN is a small-molecule antibiotic product. There is no biosimilar pathway risk comparable to biologics. Competition comes from small-molecule acne and antibiotic agents, not biosimilars.


What formulation or manufacturing IP barriers exist for generic SOLODYN tablets?

For an extended-release oral product, generic manufacturing barriers are usually:

  • Achieving equivalent release characteristics (in vitro dissolution profiles, release kinetics).
  • Controlling critical material attributes affecting release and bioavailability.
  • Bridging across strengths if formulation changes occur.

In practice, once FDA has approved ANDAs and generics are on-market, the remaining barriers are more about:

  • Patent enforcement outcomes
  • Data exclusivity (if any) for specific supplements
  • Infringement risk tied to specific process details

A specific mapping of SOLODYN’s manufacturing patents is not possible without the Orange Book formulation/process patent list.


Key Takeaways

  • SOLODYN is an FDA-approved oral extended-release minocycline product for acne vulgaris, positioned as an established systemic tetracycline option.
  • Recent clinical-trials activity appears limited in publicly visible registrational form relative to newer dermatology pipeline drugs; differentiation is likely tolerability and adherence rather than new indications.
  • Commercial outlook is dominated by mature product dynamics: generic erosion, payer/formulary preferences, and competition from other systemic acne antibiotics.
  • A complete exclusivity and litigation timeline for SOLODYN must be constructed from the current FDA Orange Book and associated Hatch-Waxman litigation records, including patent-by-patent expiration and any ANDA Paragraph IV activity.

FAQs

  1. Does SOLODYN have any remaining pediatric exclusivity or age-restriction changes that affect demand?
  2. What dissolution and release-kinetics data are typically required for generic approval of extended-release minocycline products?
  3. How do formulary restrictions for oral antibiotics in acne (stewardship policies) affect SOLODYN prescribing?
  4. Which competing oral agents most frequently substitute for minocycline ER in acne formularies?
  5. What strengths of SOLODYN are most exposed to generic substitution and price pressure?

References (APA)

  1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations.
  2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Drugs@FDA: SOLODYN (minocycline hydrochloride).
  3. DailyMed. SOLODYN (minocycline hydrochloride) label information.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.