Last Updated: May 12, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR SODIUM SULFATE, POTASSIUM SULFATE AND MAGNESIUM SULFATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for SODIUM SULFATE, POTASSIUM SULFATE AND MAGNESIUM SULFATE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT01928082 ↗ The Effects of Estrogen Replacement Therapy in Postmenopausal Women With Hypercalciuria and Low Bone Mass Terminated University of Chicago Phase 2 2013-08-01 The purpose of this study is to assess if estrogen replacement normalizes urinary calcium excretion in postmenopausal women with hypercalciuria and low bone mass and to assess for differences in response to estrogen replacement in women with familial hypercalciuria compared to nonfamilial hypercalciuria.
NCT02124447 ↗ Single Center Comparison of 4 FDA Approved, Commercially Available Bowel Purgatives for Colonoscopy Withdrawn Medical College of Wisconsin N/A 2014-06-01 This will be a 4-way comparison to prospectively evaluate the efficacy and patient tolerability of four commercially available bowel preparations among patients undergoing colonoscopy for screening and surveillance in a single tertiary academic medical center.
NCT02523911 ↗ Efficacy and Tolerability of Suprep With and Without Simethicone for Routine Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening Withdrawn Mercy Medical Center, Des Moines, Iowa N/A 2016-03-01 The purpose of this study is to investigate Suprep bowel preparation, with and without the anti-gas medication simethicone, in terms of efficacy and patient tolerability in the preparation of patients undergoing routine colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening.
NCT02523911 ↗ Efficacy and Tolerability of Suprep With and Without Simethicone for Routine Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening Withdrawn MercyOne Des Moines Medical Center N/A 2016-03-01 The purpose of this study is to investigate Suprep bowel preparation, with and without the anti-gas medication simethicone, in terms of efficacy and patient tolerability in the preparation of patients undergoing routine colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for SODIUM SULFATE, POTASSIUM SULFATE AND MAGNESIUM SULFATE

Condition Name

Condition Name for SODIUM SULFATE, POTASSIUM SULFATE AND MAGNESIUM SULFATE
Intervention Trials
Hypercalciuria 1
Hypercalciuria, Familial Idiopathic 1
Kidney Stones 1
Metastatic Cancer 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for SODIUM SULFATE, POTASSIUM SULFATE AND MAGNESIUM SULFATE
Intervention Trials
Colonic Diseases 1
Neoplasm Metastasis 1
Colorectal Neoplasms 1
Osteoporosis 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for SODIUM SULFATE, POTASSIUM SULFATE AND MAGNESIUM SULFATE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for SODIUM SULFATE, POTASSIUM SULFATE AND MAGNESIUM SULFATE
Location Trials
United States 5
China 3
Russian Federation 1
Egypt 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for SODIUM SULFATE, POTASSIUM SULFATE AND MAGNESIUM SULFATE
Location Trials
Utah 1
Iowa 1
Florida 1
Wisconsin 1
Illinois 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for SODIUM SULFATE, POTASSIUM SULFATE AND MAGNESIUM SULFATE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for SODIUM SULFATE, POTASSIUM SULFATE AND MAGNESIUM SULFATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE1 1
Phase 4 1
Phase 3 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for SODIUM SULFATE, POTASSIUM SULFATE AND MAGNESIUM SULFATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Not yet recruiting 3
Recruiting 2
Withdrawn 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for SODIUM SULFATE, POTASSIUM SULFATE AND MAGNESIUM SULFATE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for SODIUM SULFATE, POTASSIUM SULFATE AND MAGNESIUM SULFATE
Sponsor Trials
Hebei Provincial People's Hospital 1
Daewoong Pharmaceutical Co. LTD. 1
MercyOne Des Moines Medical Center 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for SODIUM SULFATE, POTASSIUM SULFATE AND MAGNESIUM SULFATE
Sponsor Trials
Other 25
Industry 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

SODIUM SULFATE, POTASSIUM SULFATE AND MAGNESIUM SULFATE Market Analysis and Financial Projection

Last updated: April 27, 2026

Sodium Sulfate, Potassium Sulfate and Magnesium Sulfate: Clinical-Stage Status, Market Dynamics, and Demand Projection

What is the drug and how is it used commercially?

“Sodium Sulfate, Potassium Sulfate And Magnesium Sulfate” is a bowel cleansing combination indicated for preparation prior to colonoscopy and other colorectal procedures. The market is largely driven by elective GI endoscopy volume, guideline-based bowel-prep standards, and product differentiation around taste, dosing burden, and tolerability.

Typical commercial positioning

  • Formulation class: oral osmotic bowel cleansing salts (Sodium sulfate, Potassium sulfate, Magnesium sulfate)
  • Therapeutic use: bowel preparation for colonoscopy
  • Regimen behavior: single-dose or split-dose administration depending on label and product line

Regulatory and label structure (high-level) Bowel-prep products are typically supported by clinical data in the context of colonoscopy efficacy and tolerability. In the US, bowel-prep labeling is commonly structured around:

  • Efficacy endpoints: adequate cleansing scale scores and proportion of adequate preparations
  • Safety endpoints: adverse events such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and dehydration/electrolyte effects

Where is the clinical pipeline right now?

A full “clinical trials update” requires a trial registry and sponsor-level tracking. The necessary trial-level data for this exact combination (across ClinicalTrials.gov and other registries) is not provided in the prompt, and a complete, accurate update cannot be produced without it.

No verifiable trial-stage claims (phase, enrollment status, readouts, or timelines) are included below.

How does the market work for bowel-cleansing salts?

The market for bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy is structured around three drivers:

  1. Procedure volume and screening intensity (more colonoscopy drives higher demand)
  2. Adherence and tolerability (patients avoid poor-tasting or complex regimens)
  3. Pricing and payer dynamics (GI prep is often a covered outpatient expense)

Competitive landscape Bowel cleansing products compete across:

  • Osmotic agents (including sulfate and magnesium-based preparations)
  • Low-volume and tablet-based regimens
  • Polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based solutions
  • Sodium picosulfate plus magnesium oxide plus citric acid (where available)

Sodium sulfate/potassium sulfate/magnesium sulfate products tend to compete on efficacy consistency and practical dosing rather than “no-citrate/no-magnesium” differentiation.


Market analysis: demand drivers, payer forces, and risk factors

What drives demand for bowel prep combinations?

1) Colonoscopy frequency and screening

  • Increasing CRC screening uptake and surveillance intervals raise the total bowel-prep count.
  • Any shift toward earlier screening and increased surveillance for adenoma history lifts demand for effective bowel cleansing.

2) Procedure substitution and scheduling

  • Higher throughput in GI outpatient centers increases short-notice colonoscopy volume, which favors regimens that support reliable completion.
  • Bowel-prep failure leads to repeat colonoscopy, which increases downstream demand for effective products.

3) Patient adherence

  • Poor taste, large volumes, and multi-step dosing reduce completion rates.
  • Adherence improvements support higher effective utilization of the “cleaning day” regimen, including sulfate-based products.

What restrains growth?

Safety and tolerability risks

  • Dehydration and electrolyte disturbances are recurring safety considerations for osmotic bowel prep categories.
  • These risks can lead to conservative use in patients with renal impairment, heart failure, or baseline electrolyte abnormalities.

Regimen burden

  • Low tolerability creates substitution to alternative bowel preps.
  • If adverse events increase, providers may shift prescribing patterns.

Procurement and payer formularies

  • Pharmacy benefit management (PBM) placement and outpatient procurement contracts can rapidly change the share of prescription products.

Market sizing and projection

A precise market forecast for this exact combination depends on:

  • product-specific sales, geography, and formulary position,
  • whether branded, private label, or generic,
  • and how much share sulfate/potassium/magnesium regimens capture within bowel-prep regimens in each region.

Those inputs are not supplied in the prompt. As a result, a complete and accurate numerical projection cannot be produced.

No numeric market size, CAGR, or forecast ranges are stated.


Clinical and regulatory implications for R&D strategy

Even without trial registry specifics, bowel-prep product development is constrained by a narrow acceptance funnel:

What evidence is typically required for differentiation?

  • Cleansing adequacy using validated colon cleansing scoring systems
  • Tolerability and tolerability-related endpoints (nausea, vomiting, abdominal discomfort)
  • Safety monitoring for electrolyte shifts and dehydration-related signals

Where differentiation usually happens

  • Dose timing (single vs split dosing)
  • Volume reduction or easier preparation mechanics
  • Palatability controls
  • Subgroup performance (e.g., adherence-impaired patients)

Commercial outlook: pricing power and share dynamics

Without product-level sales and geography, only structurally grounded directional points can be stated:

Share drivers

  • formulary inclusion in outpatient endoscopy
  • perceived efficacy in “repeat clean” avoidance
  • improved patient completion (lower failure rates)

Share inhibitors

  • adverse-event frequency in routine use
  • stricter electrolyte safety cautions in comorbid subpopulations
  • substitution by PEG or tablet regimens when adherence is challenged

Key Takeaways

  • Sodium sulfate, potassium sulfate, and magnesium sulfate is an oral osmotic bowel-cleansing combination used for bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy.
  • Demand is primarily driven by colonoscopy and surveillance volume, with adherence and tolerability determining effective utilization.
  • A complete clinical trials update with phase, enrollment, and readout timelines cannot be provided from the information in the prompt.
  • A complete, numeric market size and projection for the exact combination cannot be produced without product-level sales and geography inputs.

FAQs

What is the main indication for Sodium Sulfate, Potassium Sulfate And Magnesium Sulfate?

Bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy.

What are the key efficacy endpoints for bowel prep products?

Adequate colon cleansing rates measured by validated cleansing scales and proportions of preparations meeting adequacy thresholds.

What safety issues matter most for sulfate-based bowel preps?

Dehydration and electrolyte disturbances, particularly in at-risk patients.

How do competing bowel-prep formats affect market dynamics?

PEG-based and lower-burden regimens can shift prescribing when tolerability and regimen completion improve.

Can a reliable market forecast be produced from this prompt alone?

No. A numerical projection for this exact combination requires product-level sales, geography, and formulary share data.


References (APA)

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Drug Safety-related information and labeling resources for bowel cleansing products (accessed 2026-04-27). https://www.fda.gov/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.