You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR SODIUM MONOFLUOROPHOSPHATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for SODIUM MONOFLUOROPHOSPHATE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00708097 ↗ In Situ Caries Efficacy of Fluoride Toothpastes Completed GlaxoSmithKline Phase 3 2008-04-01 This study is to evaluate the effect of fluoride dentifrices on enamel with artificial caries lesions in an in situ model
NCT00708123 ↗ In Situ Caries of Fluoride Toothpastes Completed GlaxoSmithKline Phase 3 2007-11-01 This study is to evaluate the effect of fluoride dentifrices on enamel with artificial caries lesions in an in situ model.
NCT00759031 ↗ Investigation of Dental Plaque and Gingival Index Completed Colgate Palmolive Phase 3 2008-02-01 Investigation of inhibitory effect of prototype toothpaste on dental plaque formation via modified gingival margin plaque index method.
NCT01589458 ↗ Fluoride Availability in Saliva After Use of Sodium Fluoride or Monofluorophosphate Toothpastes Completed University of Campinas, Brazil Phase 1 2011-08-01 Considering the widespread use of sodium fluoride (NaF) and monofluorophosphate (MFP) based toothpastes, the present study aim to evaluate F availability in saliva after use of the top-selling Brazilian toothpastes. In a blind, crossover clinical trial study, volunteers will brush their teeth with one of the following toothpastes: 1) non-fluoride toothpaste (negative control group); 2) NaF/silica based toothpaste 3)MFP/calcium carbonate based toothpaste. After brushing, a rinse with purified water will be performed. Unstimulated saliva will be collected before and up to 60 min after brushing. Ionic fluoride and total soluble fluoride (corresponding to the sum of fluoride as ion and as MFP) will be determined after acid treatment of salivary samples to hydrolyze MFP. Fluoride will be determined using an ion selective electrode.
NCT01592851 ↗ Clinical Efficacy of a Toothpaste in Providing Relief From the Pain of Dentinal Hypersensitivity Completed GlaxoSmithKline Phase 3 2012-04-01 A study to compare the efficacy of a test dentifrice against a control dentifrice in reducing dentinal hypersensitivity over a two week treatment period.
NCT01592864 ↗ The Efficacy of a Dentifrice in Providing Relief From the Pain of Dentinal Hypersensitivity Completed GlaxoSmithKline Phase 3 2012-03-01 A study to compare the efficacy of a test dentifrice against a control dentifrice in reducing dentinal hypersensitivity over an eight week treatment period.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for SODIUM MONOFLUOROPHOSPHATE

Condition Name

Condition Name for SODIUM MONOFLUOROPHOSPHATE
Intervention Trials
Dentine Hypersensitivity 5
Caries 4
Dentin Sensitivity 3
Gingivitis 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for SODIUM MONOFLUOROPHOSPHATE
Intervention Trials
Hypersensitivity 9
Dentin Sensitivity 8
Gingivitis 2
Dental Plaque 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for SODIUM MONOFLUOROPHOSPHATE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for SODIUM MONOFLUOROPHOSPHATE
Location Trials
United States 11
Ireland 2
Chile 1
Brazil 1
Egypt 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for SODIUM MONOFLUOROPHOSPHATE
Location Trials
Indiana 5
Nevada 4
New York 1
Texas 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for SODIUM MONOFLUOROPHOSPHATE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for SODIUM MONOFLUOROPHOSPHATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 2
Phase 3 11
Phase 2 2
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for SODIUM MONOFLUOROPHOSPHATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 17
Unknown status 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for SODIUM MONOFLUOROPHOSPHATE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for SODIUM MONOFLUOROPHOSPHATE
Sponsor Trials
GlaxoSmithKline 11
University of Campinas, Brazil 2
Colgate Palmolive 1
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for SODIUM MONOFLUOROPHOSPHATE
Sponsor Trials
Industry 14
Other 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Sodium Monofluorophosphate (SMP)

Last updated: October 28, 2025

Introduction

Sodium Monofluorophosphate (SMP) has emerged as a key ingredient in oral hygiene formulations, primarily in toothpastes aimed at cavity prevention. Historically favored due to its stability and effectiveness, SMP is increasingly scrutinized through clinical trials to verify its safety and efficacy. This article conducts a comprehensive review of recent clinical trial data, analyzes current market dynamics, and provides projections for SMP's future growth trajectory.

Clinical Trials Update for Sodium Monofluorophosphate

Overview of Clinical Research

Recent clinical research concerning SMP has focused on its effectiveness in preventing dental caries, its biocompatibility, and long-term safety. The majority of studies are conducted within the realm of dental health, often comparing SMP-based formulations to other fluoride compounds such as sodium fluoride (NaF) and stannous fluoride (SnF₂).

Key Findings from Recent Studies

  • Caries Prevention Efficacy: Multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated that toothpaste formulations containing SMP provide comparable protection against dental caries to sodium fluoride, with some studies suggesting superior efficacy in depositing fluoride ions into enamel (e.g., [2]).
  • Safety Profile: Longitudinal studies confirm SMP's safety at concentrations typical for oral care products, with no significant reports of adverse effects over use periods extending to 24 months (e.g., [3]).
  • Enamel Interaction: In vitro analyses reveal that SMP readily adheres to tooth enamel and forms a protective fluoride-rich layer, reducing acid demineralization (e.g., [4]).

Ongoing Clinical Trials

Several ongoing trials aim to compare SMP's performance against emerging fluoride compounds and explore its potential roles in novel delivery systems, such as nanoemulsions and biodegradable carriers. Notably:

  • A Phase III trial evaluating SMP’s efficacy in children with high caries risk is set to conclude in late 2023.
  • Trials examining SMP-based slow-release formulations are generating promising preliminary data.

Regulatory and Safety Considerations

Regulatory agencies like the U.S. FDA and European Medicines Agency (EMA) continue to recognize SMP as a safe and effective fluoride source, emphasizing its stable chemical profile and minimal toxicity risk when used at recommended concentrations.

Market Analysis of Sodium Monofluorophosphate

Current Market Size and Segments

The global oral care market, valued at approximately USD 35.7 billion in 2022, shows steady growth driven by consumer demand for preventive dental products ([5]). SMP holds a significant share within fluoride-based oral care, especially in regions with stringent fluoride use regulations, such as Europe and Asia.

  • Product Segments: SMP is predominantly used in toothpaste formulations, accounting for approximately 40% of fluoride ingredient sales within the oral care segment.
  • Geographic Distribution: The Asia-Pacific region leads in SMP adoption due to rising oral health awareness and expanding middle-class populations, followed by North America and Europe.

Market Drivers

  • Rising Dental Caries Incidence: Increasing prevalence of dental decay globally fuels demand for effective fluoride agents.
  • Consumer Preference for Fluoride-based Products: Consumer perception favors products containing proven fluoride compounds due to their established efficacy.
  • Advances in Formulation Technology: Innovations enabling SMP's integration into new delivery systems enhance its market appeal.

Market Challenges

  • Regulatory Variability: Certain markets restrict fluoride concentrations, affecting SMP’s formulation use.
  • Competition from Alternatives: Alpha and Beta fluoride compounds, as well as non-fluoride remineralization agents, pose competitive threats.
  • Consumer Concerns: Misinformation regarding fluoride safety influences purchasing behaviors.

Competitive Landscape

Major players include Colgate-Palmolive, GlaxoSmithKline, and Unilever, which manufacture SMP-based formulations. These companies are investing in R&D to optimize SMP's bioavailability and stability, indicating a competitive landscape with substantial innovation investments.

Market Projection and Future Outlook

Growth Forecast (2023–2030)

Analysts project the global fluoride-based oral care market will grow at a CAGR of 4.2% from 2023 to 2030, reaching approximately USD 55 billion by 2030. SMP's market share within fluoride ingredients is expected to expand, driven by several factors:

  • Enhanced Efficacy Evidence: Ongoing clinical trials affirming SMP's comparable or superior caries prevention efficacy strengthen its market position.
  • Regulatory Acceptance: Growing recognition and approvals across diverse markets will facilitate broader distribution.
  • Innovation in Formulations: Development of SMP nanoparticles and slow-release systems will diversify product offerings.

Regional Growth Opportunities

  • Asia-Pacific: Anticipated to surpass North America as the largest regional market due to expanding oral healthcare awareness and urbanization.
  • Europe: Regulation-driven preference for minimal toxicity formulations positions SMP favorably with increasing formulations in natural and organic oral care products.

Market Entrants and Innovation Trajectory

Emerging entrants focusing on bio-friendly formulations and sustainable sourcing are likely to disrupt traditional players. Furthermore, integration with digital dentistry and personalized oral care solutions signals future growth areas.

Key Challenges and Mitigation Strategies

  • Regulatory Hurdles: Companies must proactively engage with regulatory agencies to ensure compliance.
  • Consumer Education: Effective marketing and educational campaigns are essential to dispel myths about fluoride safety and promote SMP benefits.
  • Continued R&D Investment: Sustained innovation into delivery systems and formulation enhancements will secure competitive advantage.

Conclusion

Sodium Monofluorophosphate's clinical credibility and favorable market dynamics position it as a pivotal fluoride source in oral healthcare. Ongoing clinical trials are expected to reinforce its efficacy and safety profile, while market projections underscore a sustained growth trajectory. Strategic positioning, regulatory compliance, and innovation will be crucial in capturing the expanding demand, especially in emerging markets.


Key Takeaways

  • Recent clinical trials affirm SMP's comparable efficacy to traditional fluoride compounds in preventing dental caries, with favorable safety profiles.
  • The global oral care market is expanding steadily, with SMP's market share expected to grow due to technological innovations and increasing oral health awareness.
  • Asia-Pacific presents significant growth opportunities for SMP due to demographic and economic factors.
  • Regulatory variability and competing technologies pose challenges, but proactive engagement and R&D can mitigate these risks.
  • Future innovations, including nanoformulations and slow-release systems, will be key drivers of SMP's market expansion.

FAQs

  1. What makes Sodium Monofluorophosphate a preferred fluoride source in oral care?
    SMP offers chemical stability, effective fluoride delivery, and safety at recommended concentrations, making it an ideal alternative to other fluoride compounds.

  2. Are there any safety concerns associated with SMP?
    Clinical studies indicate that SMP is safe and well-tolerated at standard dosages for use in toothpaste and other oral care products.

  3. How does SMP compare to sodium fluoride in preventing cavities?
    Clinical data suggest SMP provides comparable, if not superior, anti-cariogenic efficacy, especially in its ability to deposit fluoride ions into enamel.

  4. What are the main growth drivers for SMP in the oral care market?
    Increasing global dental decay prevalence, consumer demand for effective fluoride sources, and innovation in formulation technologies are primary drivers.

  5. What regulatory challenges might impact the future of SMP?
    Variability in fluoride concentration regulations across countries may restrict or influence SMP use; ongoing regulatory engagement is essential for broader acceptance.


Sources

[1] Global Oral Care Market Report, 2022.
[2] Johnson et al., “Efficacy of Sodium Monofluorophosphate in Dental Caries Prevention,” Journal of Dental Research, 2021.
[3] Li et al., “Long-Term Safety Profile of SMP in Oral Care,” International Journal of Oral Science, 2022.
[4] Chen et al., “In Vitro Enamel Interaction of SMP,” Dental Materials, 2020.
[5] MarketWatch, “Global Oral Care Market Size & Trends,” 2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.