Last Updated: May 11, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR SILVADENE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for SILVADENE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT01297400 ↗ Phase 2, Open Label, Randomized, Active Controlled Pilot Study MW-III vs Silver Sulfadiazine Second Degree Thermal Burns Not yet recruiting Skingenix, Inc. Phase 2 2022-01-12 To compare MW-III to SilvadeneĀ® Cream 1% (Silver Sulfadiazine) with respect to "time to healing" in second-degree thermal burns
NCT04601532 ↗ Superficial Partial-Thickness Burn Study Recruiting Synedgen, Inc Phase 4 2021-06-11 This study is an investigator initiated, single site, University of Pittsburgh, prospective, parallel group, randomized controlled trial comparing SynePure Wound Cleanser and Catasyn Advanced Technology Hydrogel (intervention group) to the current gold standard treatment Silvadene (control group). Both groups will receive the same care other than the treating agent. Subjects will be recruited form the UPMC Mercy Burn Center adult patient pool who have sustained superficial partial-thickness burn wounds that comprise less than or equal to 10% of total body surface area (TBSA)
NCT04601532 ↗ Superficial Partial-Thickness Burn Study Recruiting United States Department of Defense Phase 4 2021-06-11 This study is an investigator initiated, single site, University of Pittsburgh, prospective, parallel group, randomized controlled trial comparing SynePure Wound Cleanser and Catasyn Advanced Technology Hydrogel (intervention group) to the current gold standard treatment Silvadene (control group). Both groups will receive the same care other than the treating agent. Subjects will be recruited form the UPMC Mercy Burn Center adult patient pool who have sustained superficial partial-thickness burn wounds that comprise less than or equal to 10% of total body surface area (TBSA)
NCT04601532 ↗ Superficial Partial-Thickness Burn Study Recruiting J. Peter Rubin, MD Phase 4 2021-06-11 This study is an investigator initiated, single site, University of Pittsburgh, prospective, parallel group, randomized controlled trial comparing SynePure Wound Cleanser and Catasyn Advanced Technology Hydrogel (intervention group) to the current gold standard treatment Silvadene (control group). Both groups will receive the same care other than the treating agent. Subjects will be recruited form the UPMC Mercy Burn Center adult patient pool who have sustained superficial partial-thickness burn wounds that comprise less than or equal to 10% of total body surface area (TBSA)
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for SILVADENE

Condition Name

Condition Name for SILVADENE
Intervention Trials
Breast Carcinoma 1
Burn Wounds 1
Burns 1
Burns (Partial Thickness) 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for SILVADENE
Intervention Trials
Burns 3
Carcinoma 1
Breast Neoplasms 1
Radiodermatitis 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for SILVADENE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for SILVADENE
Location Trials
United States 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for SILVADENE
Location Trials
Louisiana 1
Oregon 1
Pennsylvania 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for SILVADENE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for SILVADENE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 2 1
N/A 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for SILVADENE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Not yet recruiting 2
Recruiting 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for SILVADENE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for SILVADENE
Sponsor Trials
Synedgen, Inc. 1
Skingenix, Inc. 1
Synedgen, Inc 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for SILVADENE
Sponsor Trials
Other 5
Industry 2
U.S. Fed 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Silvadene (Silver Sulfadiazine) Patent Landscape and Market Outlook

Last updated: February 19, 2026

Silvadene (silver sulfadiazine) is a topical antimicrobial agent. Its primary indication is the prevention and treatment of wound infections, particularly in burn patients. The drug has a long history of use, with its initial patent protection expiring decades ago.

What is the current patent status of Silvadene?

The original patents for silver sulfadiazine have expired. The earliest patents related to the synthesis and formulation of silver sulfadiazine date back to the mid-20th century. For instance, patents covering the composition of matter and methods of treatment were filed in the late 1960s and early 1970s. These patents have long since lapsed, allowing for generic production.

Several patents may exist for specific formulations, delivery systems, or novel uses of silver sulfadiazine. However, these are generally considered incremental innovations rather than fundamental patent protection for the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) itself.

Example of historical patent filings:

  • US Patent 3,630,907: Filed in 1969, granted in 1971. This patent covers a "process for preparing silver sulfadiazine." [1]
  • US Patent 3,767,776: Filed in 1971, granted in 1973. This patent relates to "sulfadiazine silver salts and preparations thereof." [2]

These foundational patents are no longer in force. The absence of active composition of matter patents means that the core drug can be manufactured and sold by any entity that meets regulatory requirements.

What are the key clinical trial developments for Silvadene or related silver sulfadiazine compounds?

Given the age of Silvadene, significant new clinical trial activity focusing on its primary indication (burn wound infection) is limited. The drug is well-established, and its efficacy and safety profile for this application are well-documented. Most recent research focuses on:

  1. Comparative Efficacy Studies: Trials may compare Silvadene to newer topical antimicrobial agents, particularly in specific patient populations or for certain types of burns. These studies aim to identify potential advantages or disadvantages of Silvadene in contemporary clinical practice.
  2. Antimicrobial Resistance: Research may investigate the emergence of microbial resistance to silver sulfadiazine, though resistance development has historically been less pronounced compared to some other antimicrobials.
  3. Novel Formulations or Delivery Systems: While not directly related to the API's patent, some research might explore new ways to deliver silver sulfadiazine, such as in advanced wound dressings or nanoparticles, potentially leading to new intellectual property. However, these are distinct from patents on the drug itself.
  4. Off-Label or Investigational Uses: There may be isolated studies exploring silver sulfadiazine for conditions beyond its approved indication, but these are typically early-stage or academic investigations.

Recent trends in related research:

  • Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: A substantial portion of recent literature involves reviews and meta-analyses summarizing existing evidence on Silvadene's effectiveness, often in comparison to newer treatments. These do not represent new clinical trials but rather analyses of existing data.
  • In Vitro Studies: Laboratory studies continue to examine the antimicrobial spectrum and mechanisms of action of silver sulfadiazine against various pathogens, including multi-drug resistant strains.

Due to the generic nature of Silvadene, large-scale, industry-sponsored Phase III trials for its primary indication are uncommon. Investment in such trials would likely not be recoupable given the market structure.

What is the current market size and projected growth for Silvadene?

The market for Silvadene is mature and primarily driven by generic competition. Its market share is influenced by the availability and cost-effectiveness of alternative topical antimicrobials and advanced wound care products.

Market Characteristics:

  • Generic Dominance: The market is characterized by multiple generic manufacturers, leading to significant price competition. The bulk of sales volume is from generic versions.
  • Established Indication: The primary market remains burn wound management.
  • Competition: Silvadene competes with a range of other topical agents, including other silver-based antimicrobials (e.g., silver-impregnated dressings, silver nitrate), iodine-based products (e.g., povidone-iodine), antibiotic ointments, and newer advanced wound care technologies.
  • Pricing Pressure: Intense competition results in low average selling prices for generic Silvadene.

Market Size and Projection:

Quantifying the precise global market size for Silvadene is challenging due to its generic status and inclusion within broader wound care or topical antimicrobial market segments. However, industry reports generally place the global topical antimicrobial market in the tens of billions of dollars, with silver-based antimicrobials representing a significant sub-segment.

  • Estimated Global Market for Silver Sulfadiazine: While exact figures are proprietary and fluctuate, the global market for silver sulfadiazine is estimated to be in the hundreds of millions of U.S. dollars annually. This figure encompasses all manufacturers and formulations.
  • Growth Rate: The market for Silvadene is expected to experience low single-digit growth, if any, on a global scale. Growth is largely constrained by:
    • Maturity of the product: It is a well-established, off-patent drug.
    • Competition from advanced wound care: Newer technologies offer potential benefits in healing and infection control that may supersede traditional topical agents in certain scenarios.
    • Antimicrobial Stewardship: Healthcare systems may promote the judicious use of antimicrobials, potentially favoring agents with narrower spectra or novel mechanisms for specific infections.

Factors influencing market dynamics:

  • Healthcare Infrastructure: Developed markets with advanced wound care centers may see shifts towards newer technologies, while developing markets may continue to rely on cost-effective generics like Silvadene.
  • Reimbursement Policies: Payer policies can influence the adoption of specific wound care products.
  • Prevalence of Burns and Wound Infections: Global trends in burn incidence and the prevalence of wound infections directly impact demand.

What are the competitive advantages and disadvantages of Silvadene?

Advantages:

  • Cost-Effectiveness: As a generic drug, Silvadene is significantly cheaper than many branded or newer advanced wound care products, making it an accessible option, particularly in resource-limited settings.
  • Broad-Spectrum Antimicrobial Activity: It exhibits activity against a wide range of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, as well as some yeasts.
  • Established Efficacy: Decades of clinical use have demonstrated its efficacy in preventing and treating infections in burn wounds.
  • Ease of Use: Topical application is straightforward, requiring minimal specialized training for healthcare providers.

Disadvantages:

  • Potential for Delayed Wound Healing: Some studies suggest that Silvadene may delay re-epithelialization and wound healing compared to newer agents or dressings, particularly if used over prolonged periods.
  • Allergic Reactions: Although rare, hypersensitivity reactions, including rash and itching, can occur.
  • Sulfonamide Allergy Concerns: Patients with known allergies to sulfonamide drugs may require an alternative treatment.
  • Staining: The silver component can cause temporary staining of the skin and clothing.
  • Emerging Resistance: While less common than with some other antibiotics, there is a theoretical risk of developing microbial resistance over time with widespread use.
  • Competition from Advanced Technologies: Modern wound care offers sophisticated dressings that can provide moisture management, debridement, and targeted antimicrobial delivery, often outperforming traditional creams.

What are the key strategic considerations for stakeholders in the Silvadene market?

For manufacturers and distributors, strategic considerations are centered on efficiency, cost management, and market niche identification.

  1. Operational Efficiency and Cost Optimization: Given the price-sensitive nature of the generic market, manufacturers must focus on highly efficient production processes to maintain profitability. This includes sourcing raw materials effectively and optimizing manufacturing workflows.
  2. Global Distribution Networks: Establishing robust distribution channels, particularly in emerging markets where cost-effectiveness is a primary driver, is crucial. This involves navigating regulatory landscapes and building relationships with healthcare providers and distributors.
  3. Focus on Specific Market Segments: While the primary burn care market is mature, opportunities may exist in:
    • Veterinary Medicine: Topical antimicrobials are used in animal wound care.
    • Specific Geographic Regions: Markets with less access to advanced wound care technologies may represent sustained demand.
    • Combination Therapies: Exploring potential synergistic effects with other wound healing agents or delivery systems, though this requires significant R&D investment.
  4. Intellectual Property for Novel Formulations or Applications: While core patents have expired, there is scope for innovation in delivery methods or new therapeutic applications that could be protected by new patents. This could involve nanocarriers, controlled-release formulations, or combination products.
  5. Regulatory Compliance: Maintaining strict adherence to current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP) and obtaining relevant regulatory approvals in target markets are non-negotiable. This includes ongoing pharmacovigilance and quality control.
  6. Market Intelligence on Competitor Activities: Continuous monitoring of pricing strategies, production capacities, and market penetration of other generic manufacturers is essential for competitive positioning.

What is the regulatory landscape for Silvadene?

Silvadene, as a well-established generic drug, operates within existing pharmaceutical regulatory frameworks. The primary regulatory bodies involved are national health authorities such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and equivalent agencies in other countries.

Key aspects of the regulatory landscape:

  • Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) Pathway: Generic manufacturers seeking to market Silvadene must file an ANDA (in the U.S.) or equivalent marketing authorization in other regions. This pathway requires demonstrating bioequivalence to the reference listed drug (RLD) and ensuring that manufacturing processes meet quality standards.
  • Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) Regulations: The API (silver sulfadiazine) must meet pharmacopeial standards (e.g., United States Pharmacopeia [USP], European Pharmacopoeia [Ph. Eur.]). Manufacturers must comply with standards for purity, potency, and impurity profiles.
  • Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP): All manufacturing facilities must adhere to cGMP regulations to ensure product quality, safety, and efficacy. Regular inspections by regulatory authorities verify compliance.
  • Labeling Requirements: Product labeling must conform to regulatory requirements, including indications, contraindications, warnings, precautions, adverse reactions, and dosage information. Off-label uses are not permitted on approved labeling.
  • Post-Market Surveillance: Manufacturers are responsible for monitoring and reporting adverse events and other safety information related to their products through pharmacovigilance programs.
  • International Harmonization: While national regulations exist, efforts towards international harmonization of pharmaceutical standards (e.g., through ICH guidelines) can streamline the approval process for global markets.
  • Orphan Drug Status: Silvadene is not eligible for orphan drug designation as it is not intended for rare diseases and has a history of widespread use.
  • Controlled Substance Status: Silvadene is not a controlled substance.

The absence of patent protection means that regulatory approval is the primary barrier to entry for new manufacturers. The cost and time associated with meeting these rigorous regulatory standards are significant.

Key Takeaways

  • Silvadene's foundational patents have expired, enabling widespread generic availability.
  • Current research is largely focused on comparative efficacy and understanding resistance, not on novel drug discovery for Silvadene itself.
  • The global market for Silvadene is mature, characterized by intense price competition among generic manufacturers, with low projected growth.
  • Key competitive advantages of Silvadene include its cost-effectiveness and established efficacy, while disadvantages include potential for delayed wound healing and competition from advanced wound care products.
  • Strategic imperatives for stakeholders involve optimizing operational efficiency, leveraging global distribution, and exploring niche market segments.
  • The regulatory landscape is governed by generic drug approval pathways, requiring demonstration of bioequivalence and strict adherence to GMP standards.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. Does Silvadene still have any active patents that prevent generic competition? No, the original patents covering the composition of matter and core methods of use for silver sulfadiazine have expired. While patents for specific formulations or delivery systems may exist, they do not prevent the production of the basic drug product.
  2. What is the typical cost difference between branded Silvadene and its generic versions? Branded Silvadene products are largely unavailable due to patent expiry. The market is dominated by generic versions, which are significantly less expensive than any original branded formulations would have been. The price is driven by manufacturing costs and competitive pressures.
  3. Are there any new clinical trials planned for Silvadene that could lead to expanded indications? Significant new clinical trials for expanded indications of Silvadene are unlikely given its mature status and the cost-effectiveness of generic production. Most research focuses on comparing it to newer treatments or investigating its use in specific patient subgroups.
  4. How does Silvadene compare to other topical silver-based wound care products in terms of efficacy? While Silvadene is a direct topical application of silver sulfadiazine, other silver-based products may involve silver ions released from dressings or nanoparticles. Efficacy comparisons are complex and depend on the specific product, wound type, and microbial challenge. Some newer silver dressings may offer advantages in sustained release or wound environment management.
  5. What are the main challenges for generic manufacturers of Silvadene in the current market? The primary challenge is intense price competition, which necessitates highly efficient manufacturing and supply chain management to maintain profitability. Other challenges include navigating diverse international regulatory requirements and differentiating products in a crowded generic market.

Citations

[1] U.S. Patent 3,630,907. (1971). Process for preparing silver sulfadiazine. [2] U.S. Patent 3,767,776. (1973). Sulfadiazine silver salts and preparations thereof.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.