Last Updated: May 15, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR SILENOR


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for SILENOR

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT02353299 ↗ Assess the Effect of Zolpidem, Silenor & Placebo on Arousability, Ataxia/Balance & Cognition in Healthy Volunteers Completed Henry Ford Hospital Phase 4 2015-01-01 This is a Phase IV, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, four-arm crossover study. The study will assess the effects of a single dose of Silenor 6 mg compared with matching placebo and a single dose of zolpidem 10 mg compared to its matching placebo at the respective T-max in normal healthy adult male volunteers. The study will be conducted in approximately 52 male subjects
NCT02353299 ↗ Assess the Effect of Zolpidem, Silenor & Placebo on Arousability, Ataxia/Balance & Cognition in Healthy Volunteers Completed Currax Pharmaceuticals Phase 4 2015-01-01 This is a Phase IV, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, four-arm crossover study. The study will assess the effects of a single dose of Silenor 6 mg compared with matching placebo and a single dose of zolpidem 10 mg compared to its matching placebo at the respective T-max in normal healthy adult male volunteers. The study will be conducted in approximately 52 male subjects
NCT02353299 ↗ Assess the Effect of Zolpidem, Silenor & Placebo on Arousability, Ataxia/Balance & Cognition in Healthy Volunteers Completed Pernix Theraputics LLC Phase 4 2015-01-01 This is a Phase IV, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, four-arm crossover study. The study will assess the effects of a single dose of Silenor 6 mg compared with matching placebo and a single dose of zolpidem 10 mg compared to its matching placebo at the respective T-max in normal healthy adult male volunteers. The study will be conducted in approximately 52 male subjects
NCT03758079 ↗ Comparison of Gabapentin With Doxepin in the Management of Uremic Pruritus Completed University of Balamand Phase 4 2018-06-01 This is a single blind randomized trial to compare efficacy and side effects of Gabapentin with Doxepin. Hemodialysis patients with uremic pruritus at one dialysis center of Saint George Hospital University Medical Centre were included in this study. Patients were divided into 2 groups to receive either 10 mg Doxepin daily or Gabapentin at a dose of 100mg after each hemodialysis session (increased as tolerated) for 4 weeks, after which patients were treated reversley. Pruritus severity and its effect on quality of life will be assessed by using visual analog scale (VAS), 5-D pruritus scale and dermatology life quality index (DLQI). Include patients will have to fill these forms at baseline and at end of week1, week2 and week4
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for SILENOR

Condition Name

Condition Name for SILENOR
Intervention Trials
Healthy 1
Uremic Pruritus 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for SILENOR
Intervention Trials
Pruritus 1
Ataxia 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for SILENOR

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for SILENOR
Location Trials
Lebanon 1
United States 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for SILENOR
Location Trials
Michigan 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for SILENOR

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for SILENOR
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for SILENOR
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for SILENOR

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for SILENOR
Sponsor Trials
University of Balamand 1
Henry Ford Hospital 1
Currax Pharmaceuticals 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for SILENOR
Sponsor Trials
Other 2
Industry 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

SILENOR (Doxepin HCl, low-dose) — Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection

Last updated: April 26, 2026

What is SILENOR and what is its clinical position?

SILENOR is low-dose doxepin hydrochloride (oral) indicated for sleep maintenance insomnia. The product is differentiated by dose-dependent pharmacology (low-dose regimen primarily targets histamine H1–mediated wakefulness), which supports its clinical use profile in insomnia with sleep-maintenance goals.

Key clinical use profile

  • Target condition: Sleep maintenance insomnia
  • Therapeutic goal: Increase time asleep / reduce awakenings during the night
  • Dosing concept: Low-dose doxepin regimen rather than antidepressant-dose doxepin

Source anchors: FDA labeling for SILENOR describes the approved indication and clinical use. Clinical trial evidence referenced in the labeling supports efficacy in sleep maintenance endpoints. [1]


What do the latest clinical trial records show?

No new, late-stage (Phase 3) efficacy-defining trial data with a clearly attributable “SILENOR” label-expansion outcome is available from the provided record set. The clinically actionable picture remains anchored to the pivotal efficacy program already reflected in FDA labeling.

Current evidence basis (FDA label-backed)

  • The approved indication and dosing are supported by randomized clinical trials summarized in the FDA prescribing information for SILENOR. [1]
  • Trial endpoints in these studies focus on sleep maintenance outcomes relevant to insomnia, such as wake time after sleep onset (WASO) and sleep efficiency measures (as described in the label). [1]

Where is SILENOR in the competitive landscape for insomnia?

SILENOR competes in sleep maintenance and insomnia treatment more broadly against:

  • Non-benzodiazepine hypnotics (Z-drugs)
  • Melatonin receptor agonists
  • Orexin receptor antagonists
  • Benzodiazepines in select use cases
  • Other low-dose sedating agents for sleep continuity targets (varies by country)

The practical differentiation for SILENOR is the sleep-maintenance insomnia positioning supported by label-specific claims and clinical trial design reflected in FDA documentation. [1]


How large is the insomnia market that SILENOR addresses?

A precise, drug-specific market size for SILENOR is not present in the available record set, but the market framework is standard:

  • Insomnia drug spend is driven by the size of the diagnosed population, prescribing frequency, payer coverage, and duration-of-use patterns.
  • Sleep maintenance insomnia is a meaningful segment within insomnia treatment because many branded and generic products target sleep-onset or sleep maintenance differently.

Because there is no provided source set with SILENOR sales, prescriptions, or market share, projection must be grounded in labeled indications and broad insomnia-market dynamics rather than by-calibrated revenue curves.


What is the pricing and access context that matters for projections?

The projection inputs that typically govern low-dose doxepin trajectories are:

  • Generic erosion risk: SILENOR faces pricing pressure if doxepin formulations and/or equivalents are available in the relevant dosage and strength formats.
  • Formulary placement: Health plans often prefer cost-effective options with predictable safety and guideline-concordant use.
  • Switching behavior: Sleep maintenance patients sometimes switch within the insomnia class based on coverage changes, tolerability, and clinician preference.

FDA labeling does not provide pricing forecasts. [1] Therefore, any numerical revenue projection would require sales and pricing history not included in the provided record set.


How should R&D and investment teams think about near-term pipeline risk?

From a patent and lifecycle perspective, low-dose doxepin products tend to face:

  • Generic competition if formulation and exclusivity windows have expired
  • Next-gen improvements (dose refinement, combination therapy, or new delivery systems) if pursued by the originator or competitors

However, this requires specific patent and exclusivity timelines and pending regulatory filings for SILENOR, which are not available in the provided record set.


What is a defensible market projection without sales and patent expiry data?

A defensible projection is limited to qualitative direction and scenario framing tied to the label and competitive forces, not numeric revenue.

Base-case directional view

  • Stable clinical demand: Sleep maintenance insomnia remains a persistent condition segment.
  • Margin pressure: Low-dose doxepin products can experience price competition if equivalents exist.
  • Formulary dependence: Outcome likely tracks managed-care formularies and prior authorization rules rather than only clinical performance.

Upside levers

  • Stronger payer positioning for sleep maintenance indications in formularies
  • Evidence generation supporting tolerability and adherence (label-consistent patient segments)

Downside levers

  • Broad generic entry at the relevant strength(s)
  • Substitution toward newer hypnotics with strong formulary preference

Key clinical and regulatory anchor points for the SILENOR profile

FDA label evidence

  • SILENOR is an FDA-approved therapy for sleep maintenance insomnia with clinical trial support summarized in the prescribing information. [1]

Safety and use considerations (label-based)

  • The label includes safety information and warnings appropriate to doxepin class effects and insomnia pharmacotherapy. [1]

Key Takeaways

  1. SILENOR is low-dose doxepin for sleep maintenance insomnia, with efficacy and indication anchored in FDA-labeled clinical trials. [1]
  2. No new late-stage, SILENOR-specific expansion trial results are available in the provided record set; the practical evidence base remains label-driven. [1]
  3. Market outlook is primarily determined by formulary access and generic pricing pressure, not by new clinical efficacy signals in the current record set.
  4. Quantitative market size and revenue projections cannot be stated from the provided sources without sales, pricing, or market-share inputs.

FAQs

  1. What condition is SILENOR approved to treat?
    Sleep maintenance insomnia. [1]

  2. Is SILENOR a benzodiazepine or a Z-drug?
    No. It is low-dose doxepin (a tricyclic antidepressant at low doses used for insomnia). [1]

  3. What clinical endpoints support SILENOR’s approval?
    Sleep maintenance endpoints as summarized in the FDA prescribing information (including measures of wakefulness during the night). [1]

  4. What is SILENOR’s main competitive threat?
    Pricing and access pressure from alternative insomnia therapies and potential generic competition for doxepin formulations consistent with the strength/dose used for sleep maintenance.

  5. What determines near-term growth more than anything?
    Managed-care coverage, formulary status, and substitutability within insomnia pharmacotherapy classes.


References

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). SILENOR (doxepin hydrochloride) prescribing information / label. FDA. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.