CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR SILDENAFIL CITRATE

All Clinical Trials for SILDENAFIL CITRATE

Trial ID	Title	Status	Sponsor	Phase	Start Date	Summary
NCT00057759 ↗	Sildenafil in Treating Erectile Dysfunction in Patients With Prostate Cancer	Completed	National Cancer Institute (NCI)	N/A	2003-01-01	RATIONALE: Sildenafil may be effective in helping patients who have undergone treatment for prostate cancer to have an erection for sexual activity and may improve sexual satisfaction and quality of life. PURPOSE: Randomized clinical trial to study the effectiveness of sildenafil in treating erectile dysfunction in patients who have undergone radiation therapy and hormone therapy for prostate cancer in clinical trial RTOG-9910.
NCT00057759 ↗	Sildenafil in Treating Erectile Dysfunction in Patients With Prostate Cancer	Completed	Radiation Therapy Oncology Group	N/A	2003-01-01	RATIONALE: Sildenafil may be effective in helping patients who have undergone treatment for prostate cancer to have an erection for sexual activity and may improve sexual satisfaction and quality of life. PURPOSE: Randomized clinical trial to study the effectiveness of sildenafil in treating erectile dysfunction in patients who have undergone radiation therapy and hormone therapy for prostate cancer in clinical trial RTOG-9910.
NCT00080808 ↗	Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy With or Without Nerve Grafting Followed by Standard Therapy for Erectile Dysfunction in Treating Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer	Completed	National Cancer Institute (NCI)	Phase 2	2001-08-01	RATIONALE: Nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy with nerve grafting followed by standard therapies for erectile dysfunction may be effective in helping patients with prostate cancer improve sexual satisfaction and quality of life. It is not yet known whether erectile dysfunction therapy and nerve-sparing prostatectomy are more effective with or without nerve grafting. PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying nerve grafting and standard therapy to see how well they work compared to standard therapy alone in treating erectile dysfunction in patients undergoing nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.
NCT00080808 ↗	Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy With or Without Nerve Grafting Followed by Standard Therapy for Erectile Dysfunction in Treating Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer	Completed	M.D. Anderson Cancer Center	Phase 2	2001-08-01	RATIONALE: Nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy with nerve grafting followed by standard therapies for erectile dysfunction may be effective in helping patients with prostate cancer improve sexual satisfaction and quality of life. It is not yet known whether erectile dysfunction therapy and nerve-sparing prostatectomy are more effective with or without nerve grafting. PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying nerve grafting and standard therapy to see how well they work compared to standard therapy alone in treating erectile dysfunction in patients undergoing nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.
NCT00104637 ↗	Sildenafil for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease	Completed	Pfizer	Phase 2	2005-02-01	The purpose of this study is to determine if sildenafil improves the exercise capacity and lung function of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
NCT00104637 ↗	Sildenafil for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease	Completed	Kawut, Steven, MD	Phase 2	2005-02-01	The purpose of this study is to determine if sildenafil improves the exercise capacity and lung function of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Clinical Trial Conditions for SILDENAFIL CITRATE

Condition Name

Condition Name for SILDENAFIL CITRATE
Intervention	Trials
Erectile Dysfunction	20
Impotence	12
Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension	10
Pulmonary Hypertension	9

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for SILDENAFIL CITRATE
Intervention	Trials
Erectile Dysfunction	35
Hypertension	27
Hypertension, Pulmonary	16
Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension	14

Clinical Trial Locations for SILDENAFIL CITRATE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for SILDENAFIL CITRATE
Location	Trials
United States	208
United Kingdom	37
Egypt	24
Mexico	21
Spain	20

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for SILDENAFIL CITRATE
Location	Trials
Texas	15
California	14
New York	12
Massachusetts	11
Ohio	10

Clinical Trial Progress for SILDENAFIL CITRATE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for SILDENAFIL CITRATE
Clinical Trial Phase	Trials
PHASE3	2
PHASE2	1
PHASE1	2

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for SILDENAFIL CITRATE
Clinical Trial Phase	Trials
Completed	83
Unknown status	18
Recruiting	12

Clinical Trial Sponsors for SILDENAFIL CITRATE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for SILDENAFIL CITRATE
Sponsor	Trials
Pfizer	45
Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc.	32
Ain Shams University	8

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for SILDENAFIL CITRATE
Sponsor	Trials
Other	132
Industry	93
NIH	8

SILDENAFIL CITRATE Market Analysis and Financial Projection

Last updated: April 28, 2026

Sildenafil Citrate: Clinical Trial Update, Market Analysis, and Projections

What does the current clinical development landscape look like for sildenafil citrate?

Sildenafil citrate is an established PDE5 inhibitor with broad, mature clinical evidence in erectile dysfunction (ED), pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), and off-label vasculoprotective uses. As a result, “clinical trials update” for sildenafil is dominated by (1) incremental label-expansion efforts (often in specific geographies or patient subgroups), (2) new formulations and delivery systems, and (3) regimen optimization studies rather than primary efficacy discovery.

Core therapeutic areas with ongoing or recently reported clinical activity (typical trial categories observed in registries and literature for sildenafil-class drugs):

• ED and LUTS-associated male sexual dysfunction: studies often test sildenafil combinations with alpha-blockers or evaluate dosing strategies.
• PAH: studies focus on combination therapy sequencing and comparator-based endpoints (6-minute walk distance, functional class, time to clinical worsening).
• Formulation and pharmacokinetic (PK) trials: bioavailability, food-effect, and alternative salt/crystal or dispersion forms.
• Special populations: renal/hepatic impairment, diabetes comorbidity, post-prostate interventions.

What this means for decision-making

• For R&D planning, the relevant “delta” is typically in formulation/PK and population-specific claims, not in creating a new mechanism.
• For investment underwriting, trial risk is lower than for first-in-class PDE5 discoveries, but revenue upside depends on patent posture by jurisdiction, formulation defensibility, and persistence of branded share vs. generics.

---

How big is the sildenafil citrate market and where does it come from?

Sildenafil’s market is fundamentally the sum of:

• ED treatment (the largest volume pool globally by prescriptions),
• PAH treatment (smaller volume, but higher clinical specificity),
• Secondary uses (smaller revenue impact, often off-label and not the base driver of commercial forecasts).

Market structure

• Generics dominate volume in most regions where sildenafil patents expired years ago.
• Branded revenue persists where there are still active brand equity, channel lock-ins, and local marketing support.
• Pricing power is limited by generic competition; growth tends to track market access, reimbursement, and demographic demand rather than price.

Demand drivers

• Aging population increases ED prevalence.
• Cardiovascular comorbidities drive use of PDE5 inhibitors when medically appropriate.
• Ongoing guideline inclusion keeps sildenafil entrenched in ED algorithms in many markets.
• PAH treatment algorithms rely on PDE5 inhibitors as part of combination care, supporting continued demand.

Key commercial reality

• Sildenafil is a mature product with a large generic base, so growth is usually measured in unit expansion, market penetration, and limited value-add from formulations rather than wholesale price increases.

---

What does a defensible revenue projection for sildenafil look like under generic pressure?

A realistic projection framework for sildenafil must separate:

1. Total addressable market (TAM) growth from epidemiology and access, and
2. Net revenue share under price erosion and generic substitution.

Because sildenafil is widely genericized, projections for “market” and projections for “vendor revenue” can diverge sharply.

Base-case projection structure (market vs. share)

• Market growth: tied to prevalence and treatment uptake (slow-to-moderate annual growth in mature markets).
• Pricing trend: typically downward as additional generic entrants gain share, with occasional stabilizations in regulated markets.
• Share of branded vs. generics: depends on local brand strength and channel strategy.

Scenario guide used for underwriting

• Bull: slower price erosion due to fewer meaningful new entrants in key geographies and stronger local branding.
• Base: continued generics-led competition with modest unit growth.
• Bear: accelerated price competition or reimbursement tightening reduces revenue share faster than units grow.

---

What are the main sources of competitive differentiation for sildenafil today?

With mechanism innovation largely exhausted, differentiation comes from:

• Formulation: improved onset, reduced variability, new solid-state forms, or patient-friendly dosing.
• Combination strategies: sildenafil with complementary agents where clinically supported and commercially adopted.
• Distribution and access: contracting, reimbursement positioning, and country-specific market execution.
• Regulatory strategy: localized labeling and post-market commitments that support continued clinician confidence.

---

How should market players time investments and expectations for sildenafil-linked R&D?

Sildenafil-linked development is most rational when it fits one of these tracks:

• Patent-defense through formulation in specific jurisdictions (where incremental patents exist for process/formulation or crystals).
• Targeted clinical claims for subpopulations with clear endpoint relevance.
• Clinical pharmacology packages to support differentiated product positioning (e.g., faster Tmax or reduced food effect), which can matter in high-switching generic markets.

If the strategy is purely “new pivotal efficacy trials,” the economics are usually unfavorable for a mature molecule unless the target indication is novel or the regulatory pathway demands new evidence.

---

Key Takeaways

• Sildenafil citrate is a mature PDE5 inhibitor with a clinical footprint dominated by incremental trials (formulation, PK, population subgroup studies, and regimen optimization) rather than mechanism discovery.
• The market is volume-driven and generic-dominated in most regions, limiting pricing power and shifting the revenue equation to unit growth plus share retention.
• The most investable opportunities generally align with formulation defensibility, localized regulatory claims, and execution in reimbursement and channel access rather than large-scale mechanism-based clinical programs.

---

FAQs

1) Is sildenafil still actively studied in clinical trials?

Yes, clinical activity persists, largely in formulation/PK work, combination regimens, and subgroup studies rather than foundational mechanism trials.

2) What indication drives sildenafil demand most?

Erectile dysfunction is the largest demand pool by prescription volume in most markets.

3) How does generic competition affect sildenafil revenue projections?

It typically compresses prices and forces projections to rely on unit growth and maintained share rather than premium pricing.

4) Are PAH trials a growth lever for sildenafil?

PAH demand can support continued use, but it is smaller than ED and competes with a broader PDE5 and combination-treatment landscape.

5) Where can differentiation still matter commercially?

Improved formulation performance, patient experience, and local regulatory and reimbursement positioning can affect switching behavior in generic markets.

---

References

1. World Health Organization. (2022). WHO Model List of Essential Medicines (updated editions). World Health Organization.
2. European Medicines Agency. (n.d.). Sildenafil-containing medicinal products: EPARs and product information. European Medicines Agency.
3. US Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Drug approvals and product labeling for sildenafil (Viagra and generic equivalents). FDA.
4. DrugBank. (n.d.). Sildenafil. DrugBank.