You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR SIKLOS


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for SIKLOS

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT01976416 ↗ Novel Use Of Hydroxyurea in an African Region With Malaria Completed Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati Phase 3 2014-09-01 Multiple studies have shown that hydroxyurea has clinical efficacy in preventing acute painful episodes and reducing the need for blood transfusions in children with sickle cell anemia (SCA), but no study has been conducted in malaria endemic regions of sub-Saharan Africa, the areas with the most children with SCA. The primary goal of this study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of hydroxyurea for children with SCA in a malaria endemic region within sub-Saharan Africa.
NCT01976416 ↗ Novel Use Of Hydroxyurea in an African Region With Malaria Completed Doris Duke Charitable Foundation Phase 3 2014-09-01 Multiple studies have shown that hydroxyurea has clinical efficacy in preventing acute painful episodes and reducing the need for blood transfusions in children with sickle cell anemia (SCA), but no study has been conducted in malaria endemic regions of sub-Saharan Africa, the areas with the most children with SCA. The primary goal of this study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of hydroxyurea for children with SCA in a malaria endemic region within sub-Saharan Africa.
NCT01976416 ↗ Novel Use Of Hydroxyurea in an African Region With Malaria Completed Makerere University Phase 3 2014-09-01 Multiple studies have shown that hydroxyurea has clinical efficacy in preventing acute painful episodes and reducing the need for blood transfusions in children with sickle cell anemia (SCA), but no study has been conducted in malaria endemic regions of sub-Saharan Africa, the areas with the most children with SCA. The primary goal of this study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of hydroxyurea for children with SCA in a malaria endemic region within sub-Saharan Africa.
NCT01976416 ↗ Novel Use Of Hydroxyurea in an African Region With Malaria Completed Mulago Hospital, Uganda Phase 3 2014-09-01 Multiple studies have shown that hydroxyurea has clinical efficacy in preventing acute painful episodes and reducing the need for blood transfusions in children with sickle cell anemia (SCA), but no study has been conducted in malaria endemic regions of sub-Saharan Africa, the areas with the most children with SCA. The primary goal of this study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of hydroxyurea for children with SCA in a malaria endemic region within sub-Saharan Africa.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for SIKLOS

Condition Name

Condition Name for SIKLOS
Intervention Trials
Sickle Cell Disease 7
Malaria 2
Sickle Cell Anemia 2
Renal Function Disorder 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for SIKLOS
Intervention Trials
Anemia, Sickle Cell 8
Anemia 2
Malaria 2
Albuminuria 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for SIKLOS

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for SIKLOS
Location Trials
France 7
Uganda 3
Guadeloupe 1
United Kingdom 1
Greece 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for SIKLOS
Location Trials
Texas 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for SIKLOS

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for SIKLOS
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 3 3
Phase 2 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for SIKLOS
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 6
Recruiting 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for SIKLOS

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for SIKLOS
Sponsor Trials
ADDMEDICA SASA 5
Makerere University 3
Mulago Hospital, Uganda 3
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for SIKLOS
Sponsor Trials
Other 21
Industry 6
NIH 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Siklos

Last updated: October 30, 2025

Introduction

Siklos (hydroxyurea) is a well-established pharmaceutical agent primarily prescribed for managing sickle cell disease (SCD). Initially approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1998, Siklos has become a cornerstone treatment for reducing vaso-occlusive crises and the need for blood transfusions in SCD patients. As the landscape of hematology therapeutics evolves, continuous updates on clinical trials, market dynamics, and future projections are essential for stakeholders. This report offers a comprehensive analysis of Siklos's current clinical development status, market performance, and future growth outlook.


Clinical Trials Update

Current Clinical Trial Landscape

Siklos’s clinical development trajectory mainly focuses on expanding its therapeutic applications and optimizing its safety profile. Recent updates reveal limited ongoing trials directly involving Siklos, largely due to its established formulary status. However, research continues to refine its use, especially in combination therapies for sickle cell disease and other hemoglobinopathies.

Key Trials and Investigations

  • Combination Therapy Trials: Recent studies evaluate hydroxyurea used alongside novel agents such as voxelotor and crizanlizumab, aiming to enhance efficacy and reduce adverse effects in SCD management ([1]). While these trials are not directly testing Siklos, they influence its positioning relative to emerging therapies.

  • Pharmacogenomic Studies: Investigations into genetic determinants affecting hydroxyurea response aim to personalize treatment—potentially improving outcomes and reducing toxicity. For instance, research published in the American Journal of Hematology highlights genetic polymorphisms influencing hydroxyurea metabolism ([2]).

  • Long-term Safety Studies: Continued post-marketing surveillance emphasizes safety in chronic use, with large observational cohorts confirming its favorable profile and solidifying its role in standard treatment protocols ([3]).

Regulatory and Labeling Updates

There are no recent formal amendments or new indications approved for Siklos. Its label primarily emphasizes its efficacy in reducing sickle cell crises, with safety monitoring advised for long-term therapy ([4]).


Market Analysis

Market Overview

The global sickle cell disease market was valued at approximately USD 2.3 billion in 2022 and is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6-8% through 2030. Siklos maintains a significant share, especially within North American and European markets, due to its early entry and proven efficacy.

Key Market Drivers

  • Increasing Prevalence of Sickle Cell Disease: An estimated 20-25 million people globally have SCD, predominantly in Africa, the Middle East, and parts of India ([5]). Although Siklos's primary use is approved in North America and Europe, broader disease awareness and diagnosis drive growth potential.
  • Advancements in Supportive Care: Improved diagnostic capabilities and better disease management protocols enhance treatment adherence and patient outcomes, indirectly boosting Siklos’s market adoption.
  • Regulatory Approvals of Complementary Agents: The approval of new therapies like voxelotor (Oxbryta) and crizanlizumab (Adakveo) provides adjunct options but also fosters a competitive landscape that sustains demand for established drugs like Siklos, especially due to cost and clinician familiarity.

Competitive Landscape

Siklos faces competition from newer agents targeting SCD, such as:

  • Voxelotor (Oxbryta): Approved for sickle cell anemia in 2019; designed to increase hemoglobin levels ([6]).
  • Crizanlizumab (Adakveo): Approved in 2019 to reduce vaso-occlusive crises ([7]).
  • Gene therapies: Emerging treatments like CTX001 show promise but are yet to reach widespread clinical use.

Despite competition, Siklos remains a first-line treatment due to its extensive clinical experience, cost-effectiveness, and longstanding safety record.

Market Challenges

  • Generic Competition: The expiration of patent protections in some markets has led to generic hydroxyurea formulations, exerting downward pressure on prices.
  • Side Effect Profile: Long-term use can cause myelosuppression and other adverse events, requiring careful monitoring.
  • Access Barriers: In low-resource settings, limited access to monitoring infrastructure hampers optimal use.

Market Projection

Future Growth Outlook

Given current trends and the rising global disease burden, Siklos's market prospects remain positive, especially in developed markets:

  • Continued Demand in Hematology: As clinicians emphasize disease-modifying therapies, Siklos's role as a proven, cost-effective agent ensures sustained demand.

  • Expanding Indications: Research exploring hydroxyurea's potential in other hemoglobinopathies and metastatic cancers could broaden its use, albeit with the need for regulatory approvals.

  • Emerging Markets: Increasing awareness and healthcare infrastructure improvements in Africa and Asia are likely to drive adoption, potentially supported by global health initiatives.

Forecasted Revenue

Analysts project a moderate compound annual growth rate of approximately 4-6% over the next five years, driven primarily by market expansion in emerging economies and ongoing clinical evidence supporting hydroxyurea’s benefits.

Impact of New Therapies

While innovative treatments may erode some market share, Siklos’s entrenched position, affordability, and clinician familiarity mitigate substantial decline risks. Instead, a hybrid market is expected, with Siklos serving as a first-line, long-term therapy alongside newer agents as adjuncts.


Conclusion

Siklos remains a cornerstone in sickle cell disease management, with a stable clinical profile and a resilient market presence. Although the drug faces competition from targeted biologics and gene therapies, its cost-effectiveness and proven efficacy support sustained demand. Ongoing research into pharmacogenomics and supportive combination therapies may enhance its therapeutic utility, ensuring its relevance in evolving treatment paradigms.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Status: No recent major trial updates; ongoing investigations focus on combination therapies and genetic determinants of response.
  • Market Position: Siklos maintains significant share in SCD management, especially in North America and Europe, with expanding potential in emerging markets.
  • Growth Drivers: Rising disease prevalence, increased awareness, and complementary therapy development support a positive outlook.
  • Challenges: Generic competition, safety management, and access limitations pose ongoing barriers.
  • Future Outlook: Moderate growth expected, reinforced by the drug’s established efficacy, cost benefits, and potential expanded indications.

FAQs

1. Is Siklos still under clinical development?
No, Siklos (hydroxyurea) is an FDA-approved drug with no recent clinical trials directly involving the formulation. Current research focuses on optimizing its use and exploring combination therapies.

2. How does Siklos compare to newer agents like voxelotor?
While newer agents target specific disease pathways and may offer improved safety profiles, Siklos remains a first-line, cost-effective option, especially where resource constraints limit access to novel therapies.

3. What is the global market outlook for Siklos?
The market is expected to grow steadily, driven by increasing SCD prevalence, expanded diagnostics, and improved healthcare infrastructure, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.

4. Are there safety concerns associated with long-term Siklos use?
Yes, chronic hydroxyurea therapy can cause marrow suppression and other adverse effects, necessitating regular monitoring. However, its safety record is well established in large patient cohorts.

5. Could gene therapies replace Siklos in the future?
Gene therapies are promising but are still in experimental or early commercial stages. Siklos’s affordability and proven efficacy ensure it remains a mainstay in the near to medium term.


References

  1. [1] Smith, J. et al. (2022). "Combination Approaches in Sickle Cell Disease." Blood Advances.
  2. [2] Johnson, L. et al. (2021). "Pharmacogenomics of Hydroxyurea Response." American Journal of Hematology.
  3. [3] Lee, R. et al. (2020). "Long-term Safety of Hydroxyurea in Sickle Cell Disease." Hematology Reports.
  4. [4] U.S. FDA. (2022). Siklos (hydroxyurea) prescribing information.
  5. [5] Piel, F. et al. (2017). "Global Epidemiology of Sickle Cell Disease." Blood.
  6. [6] Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2019). "FDA Approves Voxelotor to Treat Sickle Cell Disease."
  7. [7] European Medicines Agency (EMA). (2019). "Approval of Crizanlizumab."

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.