Last Updated: August 10, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR SEVOFLURANE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for SEVOFLURANE

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
OTC NCT01691690 ↗ Analgesic Effect of IV Acetaminophen in Tonsillectomies Completed Nationwide Children's Hospital Phase 2 2012-10-01 Acetaminophen (paracetamol) is a first-line antipyretic and analgesic for mild and moderate pain for pediatric patients. Its common use (particularly in oral form) is underscored by its wide therapeutic window, safety profile, over the counter accessibility, lack of adverse systemic effects (as compared with NSAIDS and opioids) when given in appropriate doses. Although the exact anti-nociceptive mechanisms of acetaminophen continue to be elucidated, these mechanisms appear to be multi-factorial and include central inhibition of the cyclo-oxygenase (COX) enzyme leading to decreased production of prostaglandins from arachidonic acid, interference with serotonergic descending pain pathways, indirect activation of cannabinoid 1 (CB1) receptors and inhibition of nitric oxide pathways through N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) or substance P. Of the above mechanisms, the most commonly known is that of central inhibition of COX enzymes by which the decreased production of prostaglandins diminish the release of excitatory transmitters of substance P and glutamate which are both involved in nociceptive transmission (Anderson, 2008; Smith, 2011). To date, several studies have shown acetaminophen's opioid sparing effect in the pediatric population when given by the rectal or intravenous routes (Korpela et al, 1999; Dashti et al, 2009; Hong et al, 2010).
New Combination NCT03089905 ↗ A Study to Compare the Long-term Outcomes After Two Different Anaesthetics Recruiting Baylor College of Medicine Phase 3 2017-08-10 There is considerable evidence that most general anaesthetics modulate brain development in animal studies. The impact is greater with longer durations of exposure and in younger animals. There is great controversy over whether or not these animal data are relevant to human clinical scenarios. The changes seen in preclinical studies are greatest with GABA agonists and NMDA antagonists such as volatile anaesthetics (eg sevoflurane), propofol, midazolam, ketamine, and nitrous oxide. There is less evidence for an effect with opioid (such as remifentanil) or with alpha 2 agonists (such as dexmedetomidine). Some, but not all, human cohort studies show an association between exposure to anaesthesia in infancy or early childhood and later changes in cognitive tests, school performance or risk of developing neurodevelopmental disorders. The evidence is weak due to possible confounding. A recent well designed cohort study (the PANDA study) comparing young children that had hernia repair to their siblings found no evidence for a difference in a range of detailed neuropsychological tests. In that study most children were exposed to up to two hours of anaesthesia. The only trial (the GAS trial) has compared children having hernia repair under regional or general anesthesia and has found no evidence for a difference in neurodevelopment when tested at two years of age. The GAS and PANDA studies confirm the animal data that short exposure is unlikely to cause any neurodevelopmental impact. The impact of longer exposures is still unknown. In humans the strongest evidence for an association between surgery and poor neurodevelopmental outcome is in infants having major surgery. However, this is also the group where confounding is most likely. The aim of our study is to see if a new combination of anaesthetic drugs results in a better long-term developmental outcome than the current standard of care for children having anaesthesia expected to last 2 hours or longer. Children will be randomised to receive either a low dose sevoflurane/remifentanil/dexmedetomidine or standard dose sevoflurane anaesthetic. They will receive a neurodevelopmental assessment at 3 years of age to assess global cognitive function.
New Combination NCT03089905 ↗ A Study to Compare the Long-term Outcomes After Two Different Anaesthetics Recruiting Boston Children's Hospital Phase 3 2017-08-10 There is considerable evidence that most general anaesthetics modulate brain development in animal studies. The impact is greater with longer durations of exposure and in younger animals. There is great controversy over whether or not these animal data are relevant to human clinical scenarios. The changes seen in preclinical studies are greatest with GABA agonists and NMDA antagonists such as volatile anaesthetics (eg sevoflurane), propofol, midazolam, ketamine, and nitrous oxide. There is less evidence for an effect with opioid (such as remifentanil) or with alpha 2 agonists (such as dexmedetomidine). Some, but not all, human cohort studies show an association between exposure to anaesthesia in infancy or early childhood and later changes in cognitive tests, school performance or risk of developing neurodevelopmental disorders. The evidence is weak due to possible confounding. A recent well designed cohort study (the PANDA study) comparing young children that had hernia repair to their siblings found no evidence for a difference in a range of detailed neuropsychological tests. In that study most children were exposed to up to two hours of anaesthesia. The only trial (the GAS trial) has compared children having hernia repair under regional or general anesthesia and has found no evidence for a difference in neurodevelopment when tested at two years of age. The GAS and PANDA studies confirm the animal data that short exposure is unlikely to cause any neurodevelopmental impact. The impact of longer exposures is still unknown. In humans the strongest evidence for an association between surgery and poor neurodevelopmental outcome is in infants having major surgery. However, this is also the group where confounding is most likely. The aim of our study is to see if a new combination of anaesthetic drugs results in a better long-term developmental outcome than the current standard of care for children having anaesthesia expected to last 2 hours or longer. Children will be randomised to receive either a low dose sevoflurane/remifentanil/dexmedetomidine or standard dose sevoflurane anaesthetic. They will receive a neurodevelopmental assessment at 3 years of age to assess global cognitive function.
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for SEVOFLURANE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000259 ↗ Sevoflurane vs Nitrous Oxide Inhalation at Subanesthetic Concentrations - 11 Completed National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) N/A 1996-08-01 The purpose of this study is to conduct experiments to examine subjective and reinforcing effects of nitrous oxide. Mood altering and psychomotor effects will be tested on non-drug abusers and preference procedures will be used to assess reinforcing effects. Comparisons between nitrous oxide, opiates, and benzodiazepine antagonists will be made. To examine sevoflurane versus isoflurane inhalation at subanesthetic concentrations on mood, pain, and psychomotor performance.
NCT00000259 ↗ Sevoflurane vs Nitrous Oxide Inhalation at Subanesthetic Concentrations - 11 Completed University of Chicago N/A 1996-08-01 The purpose of this study is to conduct experiments to examine subjective and reinforcing effects of nitrous oxide. Mood altering and psychomotor effects will be tested on non-drug abusers and preference procedures will be used to assess reinforcing effects. Comparisons between nitrous oxide, opiates, and benzodiazepine antagonists will be made. To examine sevoflurane versus isoflurane inhalation at subanesthetic concentrations on mood, pain, and psychomotor performance.
NCT00000261 ↗ Effects of Alcohol History on Effects of Sevoflurane and Nitrous Oxide - 13 Completed National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) Phase 2 1997-11-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of alcohol history on the subjective and reinforcing effects of sevoflurane and nitrous oxide in healthy volunteers. All subjects underwent psychomotor testing during 4 sessions of placebo, drug/placebo, and choice of intervention.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for SEVOFLURANE

Condition Name

Condition Name for SEVOFLURANE
Intervention Trials
Anesthesia 88
Postoperative Pain 51
Emergence Agitation 30
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for SEVOFLURANE
Intervention Trials
Pain, Postoperative 101
Emergence Delirium 86
Delirium 45
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for SEVOFLURANE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for SEVOFLURANE
Location Trials
China 149
Egypt 134
United States 125
Korea, Republic of 82
Turkey 48
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for SEVOFLURANE
Location Trials
Texas 15
Ohio 15
Illinois 13
New York 11
Massachusetts 10
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for SEVOFLURANE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for SEVOFLURANE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 37
PHASE3 8
PHASE2 13
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for SEVOFLURANE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 502
RECRUITING 175
Unknown status 126
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for SEVOFLURANE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for SEVOFLURANE
Sponsor Trials
Ain Shams University 24
Yonsei University 23
Assiut University 22
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for SEVOFLURANE
Sponsor Trials
Other 1258
Industry 43
OTHER_GOV 8
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sevoflurane Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Sales Projections (2024-2035)

Last updated: July 27, 2026

Sevoflurane (inhalation anesthetic) is an established, globally marketed volatile anesthetic with no meaningful “clinical-trials-only” pipeline substitute; commercial dynamics are driven by (1) regulatory access and device availability for vaporizer-based delivery, (2) hospital capital budgets and anesthetic formulary decisions, and (3) payer procurement practices rather than by new phase 3 outcomes. The most decision-relevant near-term R&D focus is on manufacturing/quality improvement, device-compatible formulations and concentrates, and label/usage expansions rather than on new molecular entities.

No complete, source-citable clinical-trials dataset with timelines, study identifiers, and phase status can be produced from the information available in this chat alone. Market sizing and projections also require validated baseline revenue, geography splits, and end-use adoption rates from primary sources (company reports, audited datasets, or regulator-linked datasets). Under the constraints, a complete and accurate update cannot be generated.

Are there ongoing clinical trials for sevoflurane and what phase are they in?

A clinical trials update for sevoflurane should be grounded in study-level evidence such as NCT identifiers, sponsor, phase, primary endpoints, comparator arms, and enrollment/completion dates. This requires access to a trials registry dataset (eg, ClinicalTrials.gov) and extraction of all currently recruiting, active not recruiting, and recently completed studies for sevoflurane-containing products.

What would be included in a sevoflurane trials update

  • Study identifier (eg, NCT number) and registry status
  • Sponsor and participating sites
  • Age group (adult vs pediatric), surgical context (general anesthesia, outpatient surgery, pediatric inhalational induction)
  • Primary endpoints (anesthetic depth, hemodynamic stability, recovery profile, incidence of adverse events, emergence time)
  • Arms and comparators (other volatile agents, intravenous induction comparators, adjuvant regimens)
  • Manufacturing product form (sevoflurane concentration, container type) and vaporizer compatibility
  • Dates: first posted, recruitment status change, last update, estimated primary completion, results posting

Clinical-trials update limitation A phase-accurate, date-accurate sevoflurane clinical-trials table cannot be produced without a source-citable registry pull.

Which sevoflurane studies focus on pediatric induction and emergence outcomes?

Sevoflurane’s most common trial themes in historical datasets are pediatric inhalational induction, emergence time, airway reflexes, and hemodynamic effects. A current update requires registry extraction and endpoint mapping to confirm whether any trials are still recruiting or newly completed.

Which studies evaluate sevoflurane versus desflurane or isoflurane in specific surgeries?

Comparative volatile agent trials are common, but a current head-to-head status and results timeline must be verified from trial registry entries.


How big is the sevoflurane market and what revenue sources drive it?

A credible market analysis needs:

  • Global market size baseline (revenue or unit consumption)
  • Geography breakdown (US, EU5, Japan, China, rest of world)
  • Product form distribution (liquid sevoflurane sold per mL bottle, strength, package type)
  • Channel split (hospital, ambulatory surgery centers)
  • Contracting drivers (national procurement tenders, group purchasing organization rebates)

Under the constraints, this cannot be completed with source-citable numbers.

What procurement dynamics matter for sevoflurane adoption in hospitals?

Sevoflurane uptake depends on:

  • Formulary decisions among anesthesia departments
  • Availability and service status of compatible vaporizers
  • Conversion costs when switching volatile agents
  • Training and clinical protocols
  • Supply reliability and pricing in distributor networks

How do generics and authorized equivalents affect sevoflurane pricing?

Sevoflurane has a history of generic entry in multiple jurisdictions. Pricing erosion tends to reflect:

  • Number of approved suppliers
  • Contracting power of large hospital groups
  • Volatility in raw material and packaging costs
  • Supply disruptions that can temporarily restore margins

A projection model requires verified market share data by brand versus generic and container-level pricing baselines.


When will sevoflurane market growth accelerate or slow, and why?

Commercial growth for volatile anesthetics typically correlates with:

  • Procedure volumes (inpatient and outpatient)
  • Surgical mix shifts (shorter recovery outpatient trends)
  • Pediatric anesthesia volumes (driving repeat dosing volumes)
  • Competitive pricing versus other volatiles

Near-term drivers that typically move demand

  • Growth in ambulatory surgery and pediatric case mix
  • Hospital modernization and vaporizer maintenance cycles
  • Supply stability and distribution coverage
  • Regulatory approvals for local authorized generics

What would be required for a time-based acceleration forecast A quantified procedure-volume forecast plus sevoflurane market share by geography and the expected impact of pricing and substitution across agents.

This requires external datasets not available in the chat.


What are the key assumptions for sevoflurane sales projections (2024-2035)?

A defensible projection needs a model structure such as:

Top-down model inputs

  • Total surgical/anesthesia procedure volumes by geography
  • Average sevoflurane consumption per case (mL per hour of use with typical vaporizer settings and duration distribution)
  • Sevoflurane market penetration among volatile anesthetic choices
  • ASP trends driven by contracting and generic penetration

Bottom-up model inputs

  • Supplier capacity and supply constraints
  • Bottle/package demand and procurement cycle lengths
  • Price elasticity with substitution between sevoflurane and desflurane/isoflurane
  • Regulatory events (product approvals, label changes)

A complete model with quantified assumptions cannot be produced without source-citable baseline values.


Which companies sell sevoflurane and how does the competitive landscape affect pricing?

A market-competitive view should cover:

  • Originator brand holders (where applicable by jurisdiction)
  • Generic manufacturers with approved products
  • Distributor concentration and hospital group contracting behavior
  • Supply reliability and potential shortages by bottle size and concentration

A current competitive landscape requires verified product listing data by geography. That cannot be produced accurately from the information in this chat.


How do regulatory and labeling changes influence sevoflurane demand?

Sevoflurane demand can change with:

  • Label expansions supporting additional procedures, populations, or airway management contexts
  • Safety communications affecting administration protocols
  • Approval of additional strengths, packaging, or formulation stability changes
  • Product availability or recalls

A “clinical and regulatory update” needs FDA and EMA label/variation history and current postmarket announcements, which are not provided here.


What is the risk of sevoflurane substitution by other inhaled anesthetics or alternatives?

Substitution risks are driven by:

  • Relative cost per case versus desflurane, isoflurane, and other agents
  • Clinical protocol preferences and anesthesia department training
  • Environmental policies influencing volatile agent selection in some regions
  • Supply stability of competitor anesthetics

Quantifying substitution requires time-series market share by agent type and case-level preference data that is not available in the chat.


Key Takeaways

  • Sevoflurane is an established volatile anesthetic with commercial dynamics that depend more on hospital procurement, vaporizer compatibility, and supply reliability than on a late-stage R&D “clinical trial pipeline.”
  • A phase-accurate clinical trials update and a quantified 2024-2035 sales projection cannot be produced with source-citable specificity from the information available in this chat alone.
  • A decision-grade market forecast requires validated baseline revenue/volume, geography splits, and current trial registry extraction.

FAQs

  1. How can hospitals compare sevoflurane vs desflurane on emergence time and recovery profiles?
  2. Does sevoflurane use differ between pediatric and adult anesthesia protocols in real-world practice?
  3. What drives sevoflurane bottle procurement cycles and how do shortages affect pricing?
  4. How do environmental and policy constraints influence volatile anesthetic selection by hospital systems?
  5. What is the typical substitution pattern when switching from sevoflurane to isoflurane during cost-reduction tenders?

References (APA)

No sources were provided in the prompt, and no source-citable registry or market dataset is available within the chat.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.