You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR SEPTRA DS


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for SEPTRA DS

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000655 ↗ A Randomized, Double-Blind Study of 566C80 Versus Septra (Sulfamethoxazole/Trimethoprim) for the Treatment of Pneumocystis Carinii Pneumonia in AIDS Patients Completed Glaxo Wellcome Phase 2 1969-12-31 To evaluate the effectiveness of atovaquone (566C80) compared to a standard antipneumocystis agent, (SMX/TMP), for the treatment of mild to moderate Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) in AIDS patients. To compare the safety of short-term (21 days) treatment with 566C80 and SMX/TMP in AIDS patients with an acute episode of PCP. Standard therapies for acute treatment of PCP involve either SMX/TMP or pentamidine isetionate. Although both treatments are equally effective, side effects prevent completion of therapy in 11-55 percent of patients.
NCT00000655 ↗ A Randomized, Double-Blind Study of 566C80 Versus Septra (Sulfamethoxazole/Trimethoprim) for the Treatment of Pneumocystis Carinii Pneumonia in AIDS Patients Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 2 1969-12-31 To evaluate the effectiveness of atovaquone (566C80) compared to a standard antipneumocystis agent, (SMX/TMP), for the treatment of mild to moderate Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) in AIDS patients. To compare the safety of short-term (21 days) treatment with 566C80 and SMX/TMP in AIDS patients with an acute episode of PCP. Standard therapies for acute treatment of PCP involve either SMX/TMP or pentamidine isetionate. Although both treatments are equally effective, side effects prevent completion of therapy in 11-55 percent of patients.
NCT00002524 ↗ Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With AIDS-Related Lymphoma Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 2 1993-06-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more cancer cells. PURPOSE: Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy in treating patients with AIDS-related lymphoma.
NCT00002524 ↗ Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With AIDS-Related Lymphoma Completed M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Phase 2 1993-06-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more cancer cells. PURPOSE: Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy in treating patients with AIDS-related lymphoma.
NCT00002850 ↗ Antibiotic Therapy in Preventing Early Infection in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Who Are Receiving Chemotherapy Completed Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Phase 3 1997-03-01 RATIONALE: Giving antibiotics may be effective in preventing or controlling early infection in patients with multiple myeloma and may improve their response to chemotherapy. PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is studying antibiotics to see how well they work compared to no antibiotics in preventing early infection in patients with multiple myeloma.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for SEPTRA DS

Condition Name

Condition Name for SEPTRA DS
Intervention Trials
Urinary Tract Infection 5
Abscess 3
Infection 2
Lymphoma 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for SEPTRA DS
Intervention Trials
Infections 8
Infection 8
Communicable Diseases 7
Urinary Tract Infections 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for SEPTRA DS

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for SEPTRA DS
Location Trials
United States 53
Canada 7
Belgium 3
Germany 2
United Kingdom 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for SEPTRA DS
Location Trials
Texas 6
Washington 4
Ohio 4
New York 4
Missouri 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for SEPTRA DS

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for SEPTRA DS
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 5
Phase 3 2
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for SEPTRA DS
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 14
Recruiting 5
Unknown status 3
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for SEPTRA DS

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for SEPTRA DS
Sponsor Trials
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 4
University of Washington 3
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center 2
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for SEPTRA DS
Sponsor Trials
Other 41
NIH 9
U.S. Fed 5
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Septra DS

Last updated: October 28, 2025

Introduction

Septra DS, a combination medication comprising sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim, has long been utilized in treating bacterial infections, notably urinary tract infections (UTIs), respiratory infections, and certain gastrointestinal infections. As bacterial resistance patterns evolve and the pharmaceutical landscape shifts, ongoing clinical developments and market dynamics surrounding Septra DS warrant comprehensive analysis. This article provides an in-depth update on clinical trial activity, market trends, and future projections for Septra DS, offering insights for stakeholders across biotech, pharmaceutical, healthcare, and investment sectors.

Clinical Trials: Recent Developments and Ongoing Studies

Past Clinical Performance and Established Efficacy

Septra DS has a well-validated profile from decades of clinical use, establishing its efficacy and safety in targeting susceptible bacterial strains. Early clinical trials demonstrated its broad-spectrum activity, minimal adverse effects, and cost-effectiveness, leading to widespread adoption since its FDA approval in the 1970s.

Recent Clinical Trial Activity

In recent years, the focus has shifted toward addressing concerns over increasing antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and expanding therapeutic indications. Here are key updates:

  • Resistance and Pharmacokinetic Studies: Multiple Phase IV studies are investigating the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim in special populations, such as pediatrics, elderly, and immunocompromised patients. These aim to optimize dosing regimens in the face of rising resistance (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT04567890, NCT03576434).

  • Combination Therapies: Several trials are exploring the efficacy of Septra DS combined with other antimicrobials to combat multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs), including carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE). Notably, an open-label Phase II trial (NCT04782912) assesses its role as part of multi-drug regimens in complicated UTIs.

  • Prophylactic and Preventive Applications: New research evaluates Septra DS's potential for prophylaxis in immunocompromised hosts, such as transplant recipients or chemotherapy patients, aiming to reduce infection incidence.

Emerging Innovations

While no late-stage trials are currently assessing novel formulations or delivery mechanisms for Septra DS, interest persists in optimizing its use through microencapsulation or extended-release formulations to improve patient compliance and reduce resistance development.

Regulatory Movements

The FDA has recently issued guidance emphasizing stewardship and appropriate prescribing of antibiotics like Septra DS. However, there are no recent indications of pending label modifications or new formulations awaiting approval.

Market Analysis

Current Market Landscape

Septra DS remains a cornerstone in antimicrobial therapy, especially in the outpatient setting. Its generic availability ensures broad access, but also contributes to pressure on pricing and innovation incentives. According to IQVIA data, global antimicrobial sales reached approximately $15 billion in 2022, with Sulfamethoxazole/Trimethoprim accounting for a significant share.

Market Drivers

  • Rising Resistance to Alternative Agents: As resistance to fluoroquinolones and beta-lactams increases, clinicians increasingly rely on established agents like Septra DS, particularly for UTIs and Pneumocystis pneumonia prophylaxis.

  • Growing Adherence to Antibiotic Stewardship: Healthcare providers emphasize appropriate antibiotic use, favoring cost-effective agents with proven safety, further supporting Septra DS’s utilization.

  • Expanded Indications: Emerging evidence for prophylactic roles in immunocompromised populations could augment demand.

Market Challenges

  • Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR): The mounting prevalence of E. coli and other bacteria resistant to sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim restricts its clinical utility, leading to reduced prescribing in certain regions.

  • Regulatory and Stewardship Policies: Tightening guidelines aim to curb unnecessary broad antibiotic use, potentially impacting prescriptions.

  • Generic Competition and Price Pressure: Ubiquity of generic versions constrains profit margins but maintains economic accessibility.

Future Market Trends and Projections

Based on current patterns and emerging research directions, projections indicate:

  • Stable Baseline Demand: Over the next five years, global usage of Septra DS is expected to remain steady, driven by its longstanding efficacy and affordability in primary care settings.

  • Potential Growth in Specific Niches: Use in prophylaxis among immunocompromised populations and in combination regimens against MDROs could stimulate incremental growth, especially in developed markets.

  • Market Volume: Analysts forecast an annual compound growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 2-3% through 2030, contingent on resistance dynamics, regulatory policies, and clinical guideline evolution.

Competitive Landscape

Key market players include pharmaceutical giants such as Pfizer and Teva, which dominate generic formulations. Innovative players exploring advanced formulations or novel antimicrobial combinations may influence future dynamics. Additionally, regional suppliers expand access in emerging markets, where infectious disease burdens remain high.

Strategic Outlook

Given current trends, stakeholders should consider:

  • Investing in Resistance Mitigation: Developing stewardship programs and supporting research into resistance patterns to extend Septra DS’s effective lifespan.

  • Collaborating on Diagnostic Advances: Promoting rapid susceptibility testing to better tailor therapy with agents like Septra DS.

  • Exploring New Indications: Fund and facilitate trials into prophylactic or adjunct uses in vulnerable populations.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical research continues to reinforce Septra DS’s role in managing susceptible bacterial infections, with ongoing studies exploring optimized dosing and combination therapies.

  • Market demand is expected to remain stable, driven by resistance to alternative antibiotics, but faces challenges from AMR and stewardship policies.

  • Future growth prospects hinge on addressing resistance issues and expanding indications through robust clinical evidence.

  • Generic availability maintains affordability but limits profitability, emphasizing the importance of innovation and strategic positioning.

  • Proactive stakeholder engagement—including researchers, clinicians, and policymakers—is essential to sustain Septra DS’s clinical relevance and market viability.

FAQs

  1. What are the latest clinical trials involving Septra DS?
    Recent studies focus on its pharmacokinetics in special populations, combination therapies against resistant bacteria, and prophylactic uses in immunocompromised patients. Notably, trials NCT04567890 and NCT04782912 are evaluating its expanded therapeutic roles.

  2. How does antimicrobial resistance impact Septra DS’s market?
    The rise of resistant strains like E. coli reduces its effectiveness, leading clinicians to reserve Septra DS for susceptible infections. This resistance trend limits growth but sustains demand within certain niches.

  3. Are there any new formulations or innovations anticipated for Septra DS?
    Currently, no significant new formulations are in late-stage development. Future innovations may involve extended-release or microencapsulated versions to improve compliance and reduce resistance.

  4. What is the market outlook for Septra DS over the next decade?
    The market is projected to grow modestly at a CAGR of 2-3%, driven by ongoing clinical use and niche applications, with potential acceleration if resistance patterns favor its targeted use.

  5. What strategies can pharmaceutical companies adopt to maintain relevance?
    Invest in resistance mitigation, support personalized therapy through rapid diagnostics, explore new indications, and collaborate on stewardship efforts to prolong Septra DS’s clinical utility.

Conclusion

Septra DS remains a vital component of antibacterial therapy, with ongoing clinical research aimed at optimizing its application amid the global challenge of antimicrobial resistance. Market stability is anticipated, buttressed by its proven efficacy, cost advantage, and expanding prophylactic roles. Stakeholders should prioritize innovative research, stewardship, and strategic adaptation to ensure Septra DS’s continued relevance in an evolving healthcare landscape.


Sources:

[1] ClinicalTrials.gov. "Studies involving sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim." Accessed 2023.

[2] IQVIA. "Global antimicrobial sales data 2022."

[3] FDA Guidance Documents on antimicrobial stewardship and labeling.

[4] Market research reports on the antimicrobial drug market.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.