Last Updated: August 9, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR SECOBARBITAL SODIUM


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for SECOBARBITAL SODIUM

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT02017197 ↗ Therapeutic Equivalence Between Branded and Generic WARFArin Tablets in Brazil Completed Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo Phase 4 2014-08-01 The purpose of this study is to assess whether the switch from branded to generic warfarin or between different generic warfarin tablets may cause fluctuation in the results of coagulation tests (International Normalized Rate, acronym INR) in patients, thus predisposing them to unnecessary risks.
NCT02017197 ↗ Therapeutic Equivalence Between Branded and Generic WARFArin Tablets in Brazil Completed Federal University of São Paulo Phase 4 2014-08-01 The purpose of this study is to assess whether the switch from branded to generic warfarin or between different generic warfarin tablets may cause fluctuation in the results of coagulation tests (International Normalized Rate, acronym INR) in patients, thus predisposing them to unnecessary risks.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for SECOBARBITAL SODIUM

Condition Name

Condition Name for SECOBARBITAL SODIUM
Intervention Trials
Atrial Fibrillation 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for SECOBARBITAL SODIUM
Intervention Trials
Atrial Fibrillation 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for SECOBARBITAL SODIUM

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for SECOBARBITAL SODIUM
Location Trials
Brazil 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for SECOBARBITAL SODIUM

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for SECOBARBITAL SODIUM
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for SECOBARBITAL SODIUM
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for SECOBARBITAL SODIUM

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for SECOBARBITAL SODIUM
Sponsor Trials
Federal University of São Paulo 1
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for SECOBARBITAL SODIUM
Sponsor Trials
Other 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: July 29, 2026

Secobarbital Sodium Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Launch Projections: Ongoing Studies, Competitive Landscape, and Revenue Timing

Executive summary: Public clinical development for secobarbital sodium is limited to historical use and label maintenance rather than new, late-stage programs. Market activity is dominated by legacy supply, generic availability, and access to institutional channels, with revenue most sensitive to short-term shortages, controlled-substance scheduling enforcement, and payor/institutional formulary updates, not to new trial readouts. A credible forward projection requires relying on observed market structure (generic penetration and distribution patterns) rather than expecting an imminent phase-to-approval pathway.

No sufficiently specific, current, publicly verifiable clinical-trial dataset and FDA submission status for secobarbital sodium can be compiled here to produce an accurate “update” and timing-based projections without risking factual errors.

Is secobarbital sodium still in active clinical trials, and what are the latest results?

Featured snippet: There is no complete, current, publicly verifiable basis here to state an “active clinical trials update” with dates, phase, endpoints, and sponsors for secobarbital sodium.

What trial types would be expected for a barbiturate like secobarbital sodium?

If new studies exist, they would typically fall into one of these categories:

  • Bioequivalence (BE) for generic supplements or reformulations
  • Pharmacokinetic (PK) studies in special populations
  • Use-pattern studies (often observational) for seizure/status protocols or anesthesia-adjunct contexts
  • Risk management studies tied to controlled-substance handling and safety

What would a “latest results” update require to be actionable?

An update for clinical development normally needs:

  • Trial identifier (e.g., NCT number)
  • Sponsor and study phase
  • Population (age group, indication)
  • Primary endpoint and outcomes
  • Publication date and regulator-facing milestones

This structured dataset is not available in the information provided.

What patents protect secobarbital sodium, and what is the expiration timeline?

Featured snippet: A barbiturate active like secobarbital sodium is typically protected, if at all, by legacy composition and manufacturing patents, with later protection often shifting to process, formulation, and regulatory exclusivity edge-cases. A precise expiration timeline cannot be produced here.

How patent coverage usually shapes market outcomes for legacy barbiturates

  • Generic approvals generally proceed once main composition patents expire.
  • Residual patent thickets can survive in:
    • specific salt form crystallinity or polymorphs
    • encapsulation or controlled-release approaches
    • manufacturing process steps
    • method-of-use claims (less common for long-established indications)

What matters for launch risk in this segment?

Even with expired patents, market entry can be constrained by:

  • manufacturing capacity for controlled-substance supply
  • regulatory and compliance timelines for DEA-handling and state distribution
  • distribution contracts with institutional buyers
  • quality systems and inspection outcomes

How many generics compete with secobarbital sodium, and who dominates supply?

Featured snippet: Secobarbital sodium’s market competitiveness is usually high once generic manufacturing is established, with dominant suppliers depending on facility capacity and institutional contracting.

Competitive dynamics that typically control share

  • Institutional procurement tends to favor suppliers with:
    • consistent supply
    • validated sterility/quality systems
    • reliable lead times
  • Shortages shift share temporarily to any supplier that clears inspections and can scale
  • Controlled-substance compliance can be a practical barrier even when IP is not

What an accurate competitor mapping requires

A robust competitor table normally includes:

  • all marketed label holders
  • ANDA holders and FDA approval dates
  • strength and dosage form coverage
  • current availability status by channel

That dataset cannot be generated reliably from the information provided.

What is the Orange Book status of secobarbital sodium, and which listings drive exclusivity?

Featured snippet: An Orange Book status table requires exact FDA listing records (application number, patent numbers, exclusivity codes, and expiration dates). That cannot be produced accurately here.

What to look for in Orange Book for legacy injectables/controlled substances

  • Patent listing types:
    • drug substance
    • drug product
    • method of use
  • Exclusivity:
    • NCE, 505(b)(1), or other code-based exclusivity
  • Linkage to formulation strengths and dosage forms

Without an accessible listing dataset here, any table of “Orange Book status” would be speculative.

When does secobarbital sodium lose exclusivity, and when could generics launch?

Featured snippet: A timing-based “loss of exclusivity” analysis needs:

  • end dates of listed patents
  • end of any granted exclusivity
  • any applicable regulatory exclusivity extensions (if relevant) No such dateable dataset can be produced here.

Generic launch scenario mechanics for legacy products

A realistic launch forecast depends on:

  • patent and exclusivity end dates
  • ANDA readiness (CMC and labeling)
  • DEA scheduling compliance readiness
  • distribution and hospital formulary timelines

What patent litigation affects secobarbital sodium generic entry risk?

Featured snippet: No litigation record set can be cited here with dates, parties, claims, and outcomes.

How litigation would surface for this drug class

For barbiturates, litigation, if present, typically involves:

  • Paragraph IV filings targeting listed patents in the Orange Book
  • settlement agreements that can create “at-risk” launch delays
  • consent decrees tied to labeling or manufacturing

A credible legal status requires docket-level facts that are not present.

What formulations are protected for secobarbital sodium (and do salts or dosage forms change IP)?

Featured snippet: Salt form and dosage form can change patent scope, including:

  • particle/crystal properties
  • stability and shelf-life enhancements
  • container closure systems However, a specific “formulation patents” map cannot be produced here.

Key formulation levers that can create patent islands

  • different salt hydrates/solvates
  • concentration-specific compositions
  • stabilization systems (buffers, antioxidants)
  • pH windows affecting degradation and compatibility

How does secobarbital sodium compare with alternative therapies for the same indications?

Featured snippet: Market outcomes for secobarbital sodium are typically driven by substitution toward:

  • benzodiazepines and other sedative-hypnotics for many acute indications
  • newer protocols in hospitals where barbiturates are less preferred However, without defining the exact current indication set used by prescribers in the US and without verifying which label indications remain most relevant, a substitution-driven projection cannot be accurately quantified here.

How strong is the patent estate for secobarbital sodium versus competing sedatives?

Featured snippet: For legacy barbiturates, the “patent estate strength” usually declines quickly, and the key constraints shift from IP to manufacturing and supply stability.

What would be required for a strength scorecard

A strength scorecard needs:

  • number of active US patents by family
  • claim scope and remaining term by jurisdiction
  • enforcement posture and litigation history
  • probability-weighted infringement risk

Those inputs cannot be established here.

Secobarbital sodium market projection: what drives demand and what could change the outlook?

Featured snippet: Secobarbital sodium demand is most sensitive to:

  • controlled-substance handling and institutional supply contracts
  • substitution by therapeutic alternatives
  • acute care protocols and guideline adherence
  • episodic shortages and reimbursement/payer behavior

Demand drivers

  • Acute care and institutional use: small absolute volumes but high operational dependence
  • Protocol adherence: barbiturates can be used when specific criteria are met
  • Supply reliability: if supply disruptions occur, institutions may reorder from whichever vendor can fulfill
  • Regulatory and compliance: changes in controlled-substance enforcement can affect throughput

What can swing the market within 12 to 36 months

  • persistent shortages leading to higher utilization across compliant suppliers
  • new generic capacity coming online
  • substitution shifts due to guideline changes or payer policies
  • adverse inspections or supply interruptions from key manufacturers

Projection limits with the available input

A numeric projection requires:

  • current sales baseline (US and ex-US)
  • unit and value by channel (hospital vs retail, where applicable)
  • pricing and rebate assumptions
  • inventory and shortage normalization factors

No such data is available in the information provided.

Key takeaways

  • Clinical-trial “updates” for secobarbital sodium are not supportable here without a complete, current trial registry and sponsor/outcome dataset.
  • Market outlook is supply and access-led for legacy controlled-substance barbiturates, with the biggest swings coming from manufacturing reliability and channel contracts, not breakthrough trial results.
  • Patent/exclusivity and litigation timelines cannot be stated accurately without exact FDA Orange Book listing and docket records.

FAQs

1) Are there any ongoing Phase 2 or Phase 3 trials for secobarbital sodium?

No current, fully verifiable trial dataset is available here to confirm active Phase 2/3 programs.

2) Does secobarbital sodium have FDA exclusivity that delays generic entry?

A precise exclusivity statement requires Orange Book and exclusivity-code records that are not available here.

3) What are the biggest risks to supply for secobarbital sodium?

Typical risks include manufacturing capacity constraints, controlled-substance compliance, and inspection-related production disruptions.

4) Will biosimilars apply to secobarbital sodium?

No. Secobarbital sodium is a small-molecule barbiturate and is not a biologic.

5) How should investors model secobarbital sodium revenue?

Use scenario modeling tied to institutional procurement, reimbursement behavior, and supply reliability rather than expecting trial-driven demand growth.

References (APA)

No sources were provided or cited in the available information.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.