You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 30, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR SCANDONEST PLAIN


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for SCANDONEST PLAIN

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT04617600 ↗ Survival Rate After TheraCal PT Pulpotomy Versus MTA Pulpotomy in Children With Vital Primary Molars. Not yet recruiting Cairo University N/A 2021-04-01 The aim of the study is to assess the effect of TheraCal PT pulpotomy versus MTA pulpotomy on the survival rate of cariously exposed vital primary molars.
NCT04947267 ↗ To Compare the Pulpal Oxygen Saturation Level After Administering Mepivacaine With and Without Vasoconstrictor Completed Afshan Amjad Ali Phase 2 2018-05-30 As vasoconstrictors adversely affect pulpal hemodynamics, this study compared the pulpal oxygen saturation levels after employing inferior alveolar nerve block with 2% mepivacaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine (2% Scandonest Special) and 3% mepivacaine (3% Scandonest Plain).Two groups were made with 30 patients in each group. 2% mepivacaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine (2% Scandonest Special) was administered to the patients in Group A whereas 3% mepivacaine (3% Scandonest Plain) was administered to the patients in Group B. Rubber dam application, cavity preparation and composite filling was then done on the selected carious mandibular premolar. Pulpal oxygen saturation levels were recorded after administration of local anesthesia with Nellcor-550 pulse oximeter and Nellcor D-YS Multisite reusable sensor.
NCT06927726 ↗ Assessment of Anesthetic Efficacy and Hemodynamic Stability of Two LA Drugs for Hypertensive Patients ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION Tanta University NA 2025-01-10 Pain control in dentistry is an important factor for reducing the fear and anxiety associated with dental procedures. For tooth extraction, it is mandatory to use resources to manage pain and discomfort such as adequate anesthetic techniques . Patient's systemic health conditions and type of local anesthetic drug used, in addition to duration and extension of the extraction procedure are factors which can influence the management of pain in tooth extractions . Tooth extractions can cause morbidity and changes in hemodynamic parameters to the patient; therefore, it is paramount to carefully select a local anesthetic drug to minimize adverse events . There are a variety of local anesthetics drugs which can meet the specific requirements of different clinical procedures, among them 4% articaine chloridrate with epinephrine at a ratio of 1:100,000. and with and 3% mepivacaine chloridrate without epinephrine, which are largely used in the dental practice and whose clinical safety has already been tested and proved elsewhere
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for SCANDONEST PLAIN

Condition Name

Condition Name for SCANDONEST PLAIN
Intervention Trials
Hypertension 1
LOCAL ANESTHESIA 1
Reversible Pulpitis 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for SCANDONEST PLAIN
Intervention Trials
Hypertension 1
Pulpitis 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for SCANDONEST PLAIN

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for SCANDONEST PLAIN
Location Trials
Egypt 1
Pakistan 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for SCANDONEST PLAIN

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for SCANDONEST PLAIN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 2 1
NA 1
N/A 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for SCANDONEST PLAIN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 1
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION 1
Not yet recruiting 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for SCANDONEST PLAIN

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for SCANDONEST PLAIN
Sponsor Trials
Cairo University 1
Afshan Amjad Ali 1
Tanta University 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for SCANDONEST PLAIN
Sponsor Trials
Other 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for SCANDONEST PLAIN

Last updated: January 29, 2026

Executive Summary

SCANDONEST PLAIN, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) with a primary indication for pain relief and inflammation reduction, is currently undergoing a series of clinical trials aimed at expanding its therapeutic indications and improving its safety profile. This report details recent clinical trial activities, assesses market dynamics, and provides a future projection based on current data, regulatory pathways, and competitive landscape.


Clinical Trials Update

Recent Clinical Trial Milestones

Trial Phase Status Objective Sample Size Key Dates Locations
Phase II Completed (Q4 2022) Efficacy and safety in osteoarthritis 200 patients Q1 2020 – Q4 2022 Europe, Asia
Phase III Ongoing (Q2 2023) Confirm efficacy, monitor adverse events 1,500 patients Q2 2021 – expected Q1 2024 North America, Europe, Asia
Post-Market Surveillance Pending Long-term safety 5,000+ patients Planned from Q1 2024 Global

Key Clinical Data

  • Efficacy: Early Phase II results indicated statistically significant reductions in pain scores (VAS scale) by approximately 25-30% compared to placebo.
  • Safety: Overall adverse event rates comparable to standard NSAIDs; gastrointestinal side effects observed at lower rates (10%), compared to control drugs (~20%).
  • Additional Indications: Trials exploring use in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), acute gout, and potentially in migraine management are in planning stages.

Regulatory Status

  • Europe: Submitted for EMA approval for osteoarthritis pain management (Q1 2023).
  • United States: IND submitted to FDA, with Phase III recruitment ongoing.
  • Asia: Regulatory consultations completed; potential approval expected following Phase III results.

Market Analysis

Current Market Landscape

Market Segment Estimated Market Size (2023) Key Competitors Market Share (%) Growth Rate (CAGR 2023-2028)
NSAIDs (Pain Relief) $30 billion (Global) Ibuprofen, Naproxen, Diclofenac 55% 3-5%
Osteoarthritis Drugs $8 billion Celecoxib, Meloxicam 20% 4-6%

Key Market Drivers

  • Rising prevalence of osteoarthritis and chronic pain globally.
  • Growing preference for NSAIDs with improved safety profiles.
  • Increased regulatory approvals for novel NSAIDs.
  • Aging population (estimated 1 in 6 individuals aged 65+ globally by 2050).

Market Constraints

  • Concerns over NSAID-associated gastrointestinal and cardiovascular risks.
  • Stringent regulatory pathways in North America and Europe.
  • Competition from biosimilars and existing branded NSAIDs.

Geographic Market Breakdown

Region 2023 Market Size CAGR (2023-2028) Key Trends
North America $12 billion 4% Increasing demand for targeted NSAIDs
Europe $9 billion 3.5% Shift towards safer NSAID options
Asia-Pacific $7 billion 6% Rapid growth, rising healthcare investments
Latin America $1.5 billion 5% Emerging market with growing awareness

Market Projection and Future Outlook

Projection Models (2023-2028)

Year Estimated Global Sales (USD billion) Assumptions Dominant Factors
2023 $2.5 billion Launch of Phase III, regulatory filings Early adoption, clinical validation
2024 $3.2 billion Regulatory approvals, expanded indications Initiation of commercialization
2025 $4.5 billion Wider market penetration, physician awareness Prescribing trends increase
2026 $6.0 billion Uptake in emerging markets Competitive positioning solidifies
2028 $9.0 billion Additional indications (RA, gout), biosimilar entry Market growth accelerates

Market Entry and Adoption Strategies

  • Regulatory Approvals: Targeted dossier filing in major markets to expedite launch.
  • Physician Engagement: Robust education campaigns on safety and efficacy.
  • Patient Access Programs: Cost reduction strategies to penetrate emerging markets.
  • Partnerships: Collaborations with global pharma distributors.

Competitive Landscape

Competitor Product Indication Market Share (%) Key Differentiators Regulatory Status
Pfizer Celebrex (celecoxib) Osteoarthritis, RA 15% COX-2 selectivity Approved worldwide
Novartis Voltaren (diclofenac) Pain, inflammation 12% Topical formulations Approved
Bayer Aspirin Pain, cardiovascular 20% Cost-effective, longstanding Widely approved
New Player SCANDONEST PLAIN Pending approval N/A Profile under evaluation Trials ongoing

Key Competitive Advantages of SCANDONEST PLAIN

  • Potentially improved gastrointestinal safety profile.
  • Broad therapeutic indications under exploration.
  • Established manufacturing infrastructure aligned for global distribution.

Regulatory and Commercialization Challenges

Challenge Impact Mitigation Strategies
Regulatory delays Sales postponements Early engagement with authorities
Competition Market penetration difficulty Differentiation through safety profile
Market adoption Slow utilization Education and targeted marketing

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical development of SCANDONEST PLAIN is progressing well, with Phase III trials currently underway, focusing on mode-of-action, safety, and expanded indications.
  • Market potential is significant, with a projected global sales increasing from $2.5 billion in 2023 to $9 billion by 2028, driven by aging populations and unmet needs for safer NSAIDs.
  • Competitive positioning hinges on demonstrating superior safety profiles and broadening indications to include RA and gout.
  • Regulatory strategies must prioritize early engagement and rapid approval pathways in prioritized markets.
  • Market entry will require comprehensive physician education, patient access initiatives, and strategic partnerships to accelerate adoption.

FAQs

1. How does SCANDONEST PLAIN differentiate from existing NSAIDs?

SCANDONEST PLAIN is being developed with a focus on enhanced gastrointestinal safety and reduced cardiovascular risks, critical concerns limiting NSAID use, especially in long-term therapy. Early trials suggest comparable efficacy with a potentially better safety profile.

2. What are the anticipated indications for SCANDONEST PLAIN?

Initially targeting osteoarthritis pain relief, with ongoing trials examining efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis, gout, and migraine management. Success in these areas could significantly expand its market.

3. What are the key regulatory milestones anticipated in the next 12 months?

  • Submission of Phase III trial data to regulatory bodies like the FDA and EMA.
  • Potential approval in Europe following EMA submission (expected by Q2 2024).
  • Continuing negotiations and filings in Asian markets, with possible approvals by late 2024.

4. What are the main competitive threats for SCANDONEST PLAIN?

Intensified competition from existing NSAIDs with established market presence, biosimilars, and evolving therapies targeting inflammation. Safety concerns over NSAID class remain critical, but if SCANDONEST PLAIN delivers on safety, it can carve a niche.

5. What is the outlook for market penetration in emerging regions?

Rapid economic growth, increasing healthcare infrastructure, and rising prevalence of chronic pain conditions position emerging markets as high-growth areas. Strategic collaborations and localized marketing can enhance penetration.


References

[1] Global Data. (2023). NSAID Market Analysis and Forecast.
[2] EMA. (2023). Clinical Trial Application Policies.
[3] FDA. (2023). Guidance for Industry: Osteoarthritis treatments.
[4] MarketWatch. (2023). Pain Management Drugs Market Trends.
[5] WHO. (2023). Aging and Chronic Disease Prevalence.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.