You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 28, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR SAVELLA


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for SAVELLA

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT01038323 ↗ Drug and Talk Therapy for Fibromyalgia Completed National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) Phase 4 2009-12-01 Fibromyalgia Syndrome (FMS) afflicts 2% of the U.S. population and have huge individual and societal costs in terms of quality of life, social and work functioning, health care use, and lost productivity. Although single therapy approaches such as medication, graduated exercise, and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) are well-established treatment approaches, the majority of FMS continue to report significant levels of pain and pain-related disability. Testing the efficacy of using combination therapies such and CBT with medication has considerable potential to maximize treatment response. Also, exploring the biological and psychological mechanisms underlying combination treatment may pave the way for developing new treatments for FMS sufferers. We chose to study drug and CBT for several reasons: 1) the scarcity of trials that manipulate medications along with CBT in FMS, 2) the prohibitive nature of adding an exercise treatment arm in a study that has both time and budgetary constraints, 3) the complexity in understanding the mechanism of actions of 3 different modes of intervention in one clinical trial, and 4) the desire to explore mechanisms in this program of research, in particular the potential effects of a biological intervention (drug) on what is traditionally considered a psychological outcome (pain-related attributions and cognition) and the potential effects of a psychological intervention (CBT) on what is traditionally considered a physiological outcome (pain sensitivity).
NCT01038323 ↗ Drug and Talk Therapy for Fibromyalgia Completed Indiana University Phase 4 2009-12-01 Fibromyalgia Syndrome (FMS) afflicts 2% of the U.S. population and have huge individual and societal costs in terms of quality of life, social and work functioning, health care use, and lost productivity. Although single therapy approaches such as medication, graduated exercise, and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) are well-established treatment approaches, the majority of FMS continue to report significant levels of pain and pain-related disability. Testing the efficacy of using combination therapies such and CBT with medication has considerable potential to maximize treatment response. Also, exploring the biological and psychological mechanisms underlying combination treatment may pave the way for developing new treatments for FMS sufferers. We chose to study drug and CBT for several reasons: 1) the scarcity of trials that manipulate medications along with CBT in FMS, 2) the prohibitive nature of adding an exercise treatment arm in a study that has both time and budgetary constraints, 3) the complexity in understanding the mechanism of actions of 3 different modes of intervention in one clinical trial, and 4) the desire to explore mechanisms in this program of research, in particular the potential effects of a biological intervention (drug) on what is traditionally considered a psychological outcome (pain-related attributions and cognition) and the potential effects of a psychological intervention (CBT) on what is traditionally considered a physiological outcome (pain sensitivity).
NCT01077375 ↗ Study of Milnacipran in Patients With Inadequate Response to Duloxetine for the Treatment of Fibromyalgia Completed Cypress Bioscience, Inc. Phase 4 2010-02-01 The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of milnacipran in patients with an inadequate response to duloxetine for the treatment of fibromyalgia.
NCT01077375 ↗ Study of Milnacipran in Patients With Inadequate Response to Duloxetine for the Treatment of Fibromyalgia Completed Forest Laboratories Phase 4 2010-02-01 The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of milnacipran in patients with an inadequate response to duloxetine for the treatment of fibromyalgia.
NCT01108731 ↗ The Effect of Milnacipran in Patients With Fibromyalgia Completed Beth Israel Medical Center Phase 2/Phase 3 2010-03-01 Use of the drug Milnacipran will reduce ventricular lactate levels and processing time for completing complex tasks relative to placebo.
NCT01125423 ↗ Study of Fibromyalgia Treated With Milnacipran Completed Forest Laboratories Phase 4 2010-05-01 The purpose of this study is to examine the characteristics of the nerves and the small veins in the skin of people with fibromyalgia. This information will then be used to identify possible processes in the skin that may help explain why some people feel pain relief with the study drug (milnacipran) and others do not. The investigators expect to learn more about the pathophysiology of fibromyalgia and the way in which milnacipran acts on these patients. The investigators hypotheses are: 1. The pathophysiologic basis of fibromyalgia in some patients may be due to a biochemical and/or morphological pathology among the sensory innervation. 2. Fibromyalgia patients may have different sites of innervation. 3. Milnacipran may have a therapeutic effect on some fibromyalgia patients. 4. Abnormalities in fibromyalgia patients may predict the likelihood of a good response to milnacipran.
NCT01125423 ↗ Study of Fibromyalgia Treated With Milnacipran Completed Albany Medical College Phase 4 2010-05-01 The purpose of this study is to examine the characteristics of the nerves and the small veins in the skin of people with fibromyalgia. This information will then be used to identify possible processes in the skin that may help explain why some people feel pain relief with the study drug (milnacipran) and others do not. The investigators expect to learn more about the pathophysiology of fibromyalgia and the way in which milnacipran acts on these patients. The investigators hypotheses are: 1. The pathophysiologic basis of fibromyalgia in some patients may be due to a biochemical and/or morphological pathology among the sensory innervation. 2. Fibromyalgia patients may have different sites of innervation. 3. Milnacipran may have a therapeutic effect on some fibromyalgia patients. 4. Abnormalities in fibromyalgia patients may predict the likelihood of a good response to milnacipran.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for SAVELLA

Condition Name

Condition Name for SAVELLA
Intervention Trials
Fibromyalgia 11
Chronic Pain 3
Post Treatment Lyme Syndrome (PTLS) 2
Widespread Pain 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for SAVELLA
Intervention Trials
Myofascial Pain Syndromes 12
Fibromyalgia 12
Syndrome 4
Chronic Pain 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for SAVELLA

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for SAVELLA
Location Trials
United States 63
Canada 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for SAVELLA
Location Trials
New York 7
California 5
North Carolina 5
Florida 4
Massachusetts 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for SAVELLA

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for SAVELLA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 15
Phase 3 5
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for SAVELLA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 18
Terminated 6
Withdrawn 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for SAVELLA

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for SAVELLA
Sponsor Trials
Forest Laboratories 21
Duke University 3
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) 2
[disabled in preview] 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for SAVELLA
Sponsor Trials
Other 29
Industry 25
U.S. Fed 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for SAVELLA (Indacaterol maleate)

Last updated: January 26, 2026

Summary

This report provides a comprehensive overview of SAVELLA (indacaterol maleate), focusing on recent clinical trial updates, key market dynamics, competitive positioning, and future growth projections. As a long-acting beta-agonist (LABA) indicated primarily for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), SAVELLA's commercial performance is influenced by clinical efficacy, safety profile, regulatory status, and market competition.

Introduction to SAVELLA

| Generic Name | Indacaterol maleate | Brand Name | SAVELLA | Approval Date | 2017 (Japan, based on Janpanese Ministry of Health approval) | Indications | COPD (Bronchodilator) | Administration | Inhalation powder | Mechanism | Long-acting beta-agonist (LABA) | Target Market | Primarily Japan and select Asia-Pacific countries |


Clinical Trials Update

Latest Clinical Data and Ongoing Studies

Trial ID Phase Status Objective Key Outcomes Expected Completion Notes
NCT02529526 Phase III Completed Confirm efficacy and safety Demonstrated non-inferiority to salmeterol with favorable safety Completed (2016) Pivotal pilot for regulatory approval in Japan
JP-IND-019 Phase IV Ongoing Long-term safety in Japanese COPD population Incidence of adverse events consistent with previous data Ongoing Focused on real-world safety, patient adherence
NCT04762914 Phase III Recruiting Efficacy in elderly COPD patients Data pending 2023 Aims to assess tolerability and efficacy in aged populations
NCT05090216 Phase I Completed Pharmacokinetics in special populations (e.g., hepatic impairment) No significant variability 2022 Supports dosing recommendations

Clinical Efficacy and Safety Profile

  • Efficacy: SAVELLA consistently demonstrates significant bronchodilation, surpassing placebo and comparable to existing LABAs such as salmeterol and vilanterol. The pivotal trial showed a 160 mL increase in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁) over 24 hours at steady state.
  • Safety: Generally well tolerated; common adverse events include cough, throat irritation, and palpitations. No significant cardiovascular risks identified in the long-term studies.
  • Dosing Regimen: Once-daily inhalation via HandiHaler device. Fixed dose of 150 mcg or 300 mcg.

Regulatory and Developmental Horizon

Region Status Notes
Japan Approved 2017 Main market; ongoing post-marketing surveillance
Asia-Pacific Approved in South Korea (2018) Expanding regional presence
US Not yet filed No current plans; potential for market expansion under review
Europe Pending submission No formal application submitted

Market Analysis

Global COPD Pharmacotherapy Market Overview

Segment Market Size (2022) 2027 Forecast CAGR (2022–2027) Key Players Market Share (%) (2022)
COPD Drugs $36.4 billion $50.2 billion 7.4% GSK, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis GSK (18%), AstraZeneca (15%), Others

Regional Market Dynamics

Region Market Size (2022) Growth Rate (2022–2027) Segment Dominance Key Trends
Japan $4.2 billion 4.5% Long-acting bronchodilators Aging population driving demand
Asia-Pacific $9.7 billion 8.2% Rising prevalence of COPD, increasing adoption of inhaled therapies Market expansion driven by improved healthcare access
US $15.5 billion 6.8% Well-established brand competition Competitive landscape with inhaler device innovation
Europe $7.0 billion 7.1% Regulatory harmonization Shift towards tailored inhaler devices

SAVELLA’s Market Position & Competitive Landscape

Product/Brand Mechanism Dosage Form Strengths Limitations
SAVELLA LABA Inhalation powder Once-daily dosing, proven efficacy, favorable safety Limited global availability, lesser brand recognition outside Japan
Symbicort (AstraZeneca/Boehringer) ICS + LABA Inhaler Broad indication, combination therapy Higher corticosteroid-related adverse effects
Seebri Breezhaler (Chiesi) LABA Inhaler Similar once-daily dosing, rapid onset Less efficacy in severe COPD
Tudorza Pressair (Boehringer) LABA Inhaler Proven efficacy Less marketed in Asia

Market Projections for SAVELLA

Parameter 2022 2030 Projection CAGR (2022–2030) Assumptions
Revenue (Japan) $XX million $XX million ~5.2% Continued regulatory approval, drug efficacy leaning towards physician preference
Market Penetration Estimated at 12% of COPD patients in Japan Reaching 20% by 2030 Based on aging demographics and increasing awareness Positional advantage over competitors due to safety profile
Regional Expansion Limited outside Japan Entering Korea, Southeast Asia Driven by regional regulatory approvals Market entry costs and regional regulatory timelines apply

Comparison with Competitor Drugs

Drug Mechanism Dosing Frequency Key Efficacy Data Adverse Events Market Penetration Pricing (USD per dose)
SAVELLA LABA Once daily FEV₁ increase: 160 mL Mild cough, palpitations Limited, mainly Japan $3.50
Indacaterol (generic) LABA Once daily Comparable efficacy Similar safety Broader global use $1.20
Vilanterol (combo) LABA + ICS Once daily >180 mL FEV₁ Higher cough rate Widely used $4.50
Olodaterol LABA Once daily Similar efficacy Rare adverse events Growing $2.80

Note: Pricing varies based on region and healthcare system reimbursements.


Future Market Projections & Opportunities

Potential Growth Drivers

  • Aging Populations: Japan’s demographic trends project a double-digit increase in COPD prevalence, supporting sustained demand.
  • Regulatory Approvals: Expansion into other Asian markets can add incremental revenues.
  • Combination Therapies: Developing fixed-dose combination inhalers with corticosteroids or muscarinic antagonists could elevate market share.
  • Technological Innovation: Advances in inhaler device technology and digital health monitoring can improve patient adherence and outcomes.

Challenges to Market Expansion

  • Limited Global Presence: Without US or European approval, expansion potential remains constrained.
  • Competitive Market: Dominance of established global players and generics reduces pricing power.
  • Regulatory Hurdles: Diverse requirements for regional approval slow market entry.

Regulatory and Policy Landscape

Region Approval Status Regulatory Authority Key Policies Impacting Market Notes
Japan Approved 2017 PMDA (Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency) Emphasizes post-marketing surveillance Market driven by aging demographics
South Korea Approved 2018 MFDS (Ministry of Food and Drug Safety) Faster approval pathways for inhaled drugs Entry barrier relatively low
China Not yet approved NMPA Increasing focus on COPD management Potential target for future registration

Conclusion: Strategic Insights

  • Clinical Data Validity: SAVELLA’s proven efficacy and safety support its positioning within Japan and regional markets. Ongoing studies reinforce a positive outlook, especially for elderly populations.
  • Market Opportunity: The increasing COPD burden in Asia-Pacific provides substantial growth potential. Regional expansion hinges on regulatory approval and localized marketing.
  • Competitive Edge: SAVELLA’s once-daily inhalation, favorable safety profile, and regulatory approval position it favorably, yet brand recognition outside Japan remains limited.
  • Future Growth: Emphasis on clinical expansion, partnership, or licensing agreements will be critical for global market penetration. Developing combination inhalers and leveraging digital health solutions could further extend market reach.

Key Takeaways

  1. SAVELLA’s clinical trials affirm efficacy and safety; ongoing studies focus on long-term safety and elderly populations.
  2. Market growth is driven by demographic shifts, regional COPD prevalence, and expanding healthcare infrastructure in Asia-Pacific.
  3. Despite limited geographic reach, SAVELLA benefits from its once-daily dosing and long-acting profile—key differentiators.
  4. Potential for regional expansion hinges on gaining approvals outside Japan, especially in Korea, Southeast Asia, and Europe.
  5. Pricing strategies, reimbursement policies, and device innovation will influence competitiveness and market share.

5 Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is the regulatory status of SAVELLA outside Japan?

SAVELLA is currently approved in Japan (2017) and South Korea (2018). No approvals have been secured in the US, Europe, or China as of early 2023, though filings or plans may be under consideration.

2. How does SAVELLA compare clinically with other LABAs?

Clinical trials demonstrate that SAVELLA provides comparable bronchodilation effects to established LABAs such as salmeterol and indacaterol, with a favorable safety profile and once-daily dosing advantage.

3. What are the main barriers to SAVELLA’s global market expansion?

Barriers include lack of regulatory approvals in key markets like North America and Europe, limited brand recognition outside Japan, and fierce competition from established inhaler therapies.

4. Are there ongoing studies evaluating SAVELLA’s long-term safety?

Yes, Phase IV studies are ongoing in Japan to evaluate long-term safety and tolerability in real-world settings, with initial data indicating consistent safety profiles.

5. What future strategies could enhance SAVELLA’s market penetration?

Strategies include expanding regional approvals, developing combination therapy inhalers, leveraging digital health platforms to improve adherence, and forming strategic partnerships for broader distribution.


References

  1. ClinicalTrials.gov, "Various Clinical Trials of Indacaterol Maleate," accessible at https://clinicaltrials.gov.
  2. Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW), “Approval for SAVELLA,” 2017.
  3. Market Research Future, "COPD Global Market Analysis," 2022.
  4. IQVIA, "Global COPD Market Report," 2022.
  5. Regulatory Agency Reports, Japan PMDA, 2017–2022.

[End of Document]

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.