You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR SAPHRIS


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for SAPHRIS

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00281320 ↗ Study of Asenapine in Elderly Subjects With Psychosis (A7501021)(P05717) Completed Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Phase 3 2006-02-01 This study evaluates the safety and tolerability of Asenapine in elderly patients with psychosis.
NCT00833976 ↗ Omega-3 Fatty Acids (Lovaza) for Second Generation Antipsychotic-Associated Hypertriglyceridemia Completed GlaxoSmithKline Phase 4 2009-07-01 This is an open-label pilot study of omega-3 fatty acids (Lovaza) for hypertriglyceridemia in subjects who have been on an atypical (second-generation) antipsychotic medication. The investigators hypotheses are that patients who receive Lovaza will experience a significant decrease in triglycerides from baseline. Secondary hypotheses include: Patients will experience a significant decrease in total cholesterol, and Lovaza will be well tolerated.
NCT00833976 ↗ Omega-3 Fatty Acids (Lovaza) for Second Generation Antipsychotic-Associated Hypertriglyceridemia Completed Massachusetts General Hospital Phase 4 2009-07-01 This is an open-label pilot study of omega-3 fatty acids (Lovaza) for hypertriglyceridemia in subjects who have been on an atypical (second-generation) antipsychotic medication. The investigators hypotheses are that patients who receive Lovaza will experience a significant decrease in triglycerides from baseline. Secondary hypotheses include: Patients will experience a significant decrease in total cholesterol, and Lovaza will be well tolerated.
NCT00878462 ↗ An Acceptability Study of Unflavored Asenapine Versus Raspberry Flavored Asenapine in Stable Patients With a Psychotic Disorder (P07010)(COMPLETED) Completed Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Phase 2 2005-06-29 This trial was a randomized trial to determine a patient's acceptability of unflavored antipsychotic medication compared to raspberry flavored antipsychotic medication. Patients received 6 total doses of study drug (2 doses of each asenapine formulation) over 3 consecutive days: 2 different formulations each day, 1 in the morning and 1 in the evening. The formulations were: white unflavored, white raspberry flavored, and red raspberry flavored. Patients were given a questionnaire following each dose of study medication (one questionnaire twice per day for 3 days) to measure how acceptable each formulation was.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for SAPHRIS

Condition Name

Condition Name for SAPHRIS
Intervention Trials
Schizophrenia 4
Bipolar Disorder 3
Psychosis 2
Stuttering 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for SAPHRIS
Intervention Trials
Bipolar Disorder 4
Schizophrenia 4
Disease 3
Psychotic Disorders 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for SAPHRIS

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for SAPHRIS
Location Trials
United States 14
India 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for SAPHRIS
Location Trials
North Carolina 3
California 2
Georgia 2
Ohio 2
Florida 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for SAPHRIS

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for SAPHRIS
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 6
Phase 3 2
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for SAPHRIS
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 10
Suspended 1
Terminated 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for SAPHRIS

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for SAPHRIS
Sponsor Trials
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. 7
bioRASI, LLC 2
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for SAPHRIS
Sponsor Trials
Industry 16
Other 11
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Saphris: Clinical Trials, Market Landscape, and Future Projections

Last updated: February 19, 2026

Saphris (asenapine), an atypical antipsychotic developed by Merck & Co., is approved for the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar I disorder. Its efficacy and safety profile in specific patient populations, along with emerging clinical data and patent expiration timelines, shape its current market position and future revenue potential.

What is the Current Status of Saphris Clinical Trials?

As of late 2023, Saphris has undergone extensive clinical trial evaluation across its approved indications. Post-marketing studies and real-world evidence collection continue to refine understanding of its efficacy and safety in diverse patient groups.

Schizophrenia Trials

Saphris demonstrated efficacy in treating acute exacerbations of schizophrenia in pivotal Phase III trials. These trials established the drug's ability to reduce positive and negative symptoms of the disease. Key trials included:

  • Study 3001 (NCT00111037): A 6-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in adults with schizophrenia. It showed statistically significant improvements in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total scores compared to placebo. The mean change from baseline in PANSS total score was -9.0 for Saphris (20 mg/day) versus -3.8 for placebo (p < 0.001) [1].
  • Study 3003 (NCT00111063): Another 6-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in adults with schizophrenia. It also demonstrated statistically significant improvement in PANSS total scores with Saphris compared to placebo. The mean change from baseline in PANSS total score was -12.1 for Saphris (20 mg/day) versus -5.6 for placebo (p < 0.001) [1].

Longer-term studies have assessed the maintenance of efficacy and safety.

Bipolar I Disorder Trials

Saphris is indicated for the treatment of manic or mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder. Clinical trials supported its efficacy in acute treatment and continuation phases.

  • Study 201 (NCT00113185): A 3-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in adults with manic or mixed episodes. It showed statistically significant reductions in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) scores compared to placebo. The mean change from baseline in YMRS score was -11.4 for Saphris (12 mg twice daily) versus -7.3 for placebo (p < 0.001) [2].
  • Study 204 (NCT00113211): A 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in adults with bipolar I disorder and a history of manic or mixed episodes. It demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in YMRS scores and recurrence of manic or depressive episodes [2].

Specific Populations and Substudies

Research has also explored Saphris in specific patient subgroups, including those with comorbid conditions or specific demographic characteristics. Real-world data collection continues to assess long-term outcomes and adherence.

What is the Market Landscape for Saphris?

Saphris competes in the antipsychotic market, characterized by established generics, newer agents with distinct profiles, and evolving treatment guidelines. Its market position is influenced by its efficacy, safety profile, and the availability of alternative treatments.

Competitive Landscape

The atypical antipsychotic market is crowded. Key competitors to Saphris include:

  • Risperidone (Risperdal): A well-established, broad-spectrum antipsychotic with generic availability.
  • Olanzapine (Zyprexa): Another widely used atypical antipsychotic, also available generically, known for its efficacy but associated with significant metabolic side effects.
  • Quetiapine (Seroquel): Effective for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, with generic availability.
  • Aripiprazole (Abilify): A dopamine partial agonist, available generically, with a different side effect profile.
  • Ziprasidone (Geodon): Another atypical antipsychotic with a favorable metabolic profile.
  • Paliperidone (Invega): A long-acting injectable metabolite of risperidone, offering extended release.
  • Lurasidone (Latuda): Approved for schizophrenia and bipolar depression, with a good metabolic safety profile.
  • Brexpiprazole (Rexulti) & Cariprazine (Vraylar): Newer agents with nuanced receptor binding profiles offering additional treatment options.

Saphris's unique sublingual formulation offers an alternative for patients who have difficulty swallowing pills or require rapid absorption.

Market Share and Revenue

Precise current market share data for Saphris is proprietary and varies by region and reporting period. However, as a branded product facing generic competition for risperidone, olanzapine, and quetiapine, its market share has likely stabilized or declined from its peak.

Merck's disclosed revenues for Saphris have been impacted by generic entry. For example, in 2017, U.S. Saphris net sales were reported at $368 million [3]. Subsequent reporting may not specifically break out Saphris revenue due to its maturity. Global sales have been influenced by patent expirations in major markets.

Pricing and Reimbursement

Pricing for Saphris is set by Merck & Co., with variations across countries. As a branded medication facing generic alternatives, its pricing strategy aims to balance market penetration with profitability. Reimbursement policies from payers (e.g., insurers, government health programs) significantly influence patient access and physician prescribing patterns. The presence of lower-cost generics generally exerts downward pressure on branded drug prices.

Regulatory Status

Saphris is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for:

  • Schizophrenia in adults.
  • Manic or mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder in adults.

In Europe, it is marketed under the brand name Secudose (in some markets) and Sycrest, also approved for schizophrenia and bipolar mania. Regulatory approvals in other countries vary.

What are the Patent Expiration Timelines for Saphris?

The patent landscape for Saphris is critical for understanding its future market exclusivity and the timeline for generic competition. Patent expirations significantly impact revenue streams for branded pharmaceuticals.

Key Patents and Expirations

Saphris (asenapine) is protected by several patents. The primary compound patent and formulation patents have expired or are nearing expiration in key markets.

  • U.S. Patent Expiration: The key patents covering asenapine have expired. For instance, a significant patent, U.S. Patent No. 7,785,909, related to asenapine formulations, expired in 2022. Earlier patents covering the compound itself have also expired [4].
  • European Patent Expiration: Similar patent expiries have occurred or are occurring in European countries, allowing for generic market entry.
  • Exclusivity Periods: Regulatory exclusivities, separate from patents, may have provided additional market protection for a limited time post-launch. However, these also have defined end dates.

The expiration of these patents has opened the door for the introduction of generic versions of asenapine.

Generic Entry and Impact

Generic asenapine products have begun to enter the market in the United States and other major jurisdictions following patent expirations.

  • U.S. Generic Launch: Generic versions of asenapine are now available in the U.S. market. This has led to a significant decrease in the price of the active pharmaceutical ingredient and the final product, impacting Saphris's revenue.
  • Market Share Erosion: The introduction of generics typically leads to rapid erosion of market share for the branded product as healthcare providers and payers opt for the lower-cost alternatives.
  • Revenue Projections: Merck's revenue from Saphris has been negatively impacted by generic competition. Future revenue projections are therefore expected to reflect a substantial decline from peak sales.

What are the Future Projections for Saphris?

The future of Saphris is largely dictated by its status as a branded drug facing generic competition, alongside its established clinical utility.

Market Trajectory

The market trajectory for Saphris is expected to be one of continued decline in revenue due to generic penetration. While the drug retains its approved indications and a segment of prescribers may continue to utilize it for specific patient needs, the economic advantage of generics will drive market dynamics.

  • Shrinking Branded Market: The branded Saphris market is projected to continue shrinking as generic asenapine captures a larger share.
  • Niche Market Role: The branded product may maintain a niche role for patients who have historically responded well to it or for whom specific sublingual delivery is critical and insurance coverage remains favorable.
  • Generic Market Growth: The generic asenapine market is expected to grow as more manufacturers enter and competition drives down prices further.

Potential for New Indications or Formulations

Given its patent expiry and the competitive landscape, the development of new indications or novel formulations for Saphris by Merck is unlikely to be a significant strategic focus. The company's R&D efforts would typically shift to newer pipeline assets.

Impact of Real-World Evidence

Ongoing collection and analysis of real-world evidence (RWE) could support the continued use of asenapine by demonstrating its long-term effectiveness and safety in routine clinical practice. RWE might highlight specific patient profiles where asenapine offers particular benefits, thus supporting its place in treatment algorithms even amidst generic competition.

Financial Outlook

Merck's financial reporting will likely show diminishing contributions from Saphris. The company's overall performance will depend on its newer drug launches and established blockbuster products. For investors, the primary focus regarding Saphris shifts from growth potential to the residual value it may generate during its remaining branded market presence and the potential for generic manufacturers to capture this market.

Key metrics to monitor include:

  • Generic penetration rates: The speed and extent to which generic asenapine captures market share.
  • Pricing of generic asenapine: The competitive pricing landscape for generic alternatives.
  • Formulary placement: Changes in insurance formulary coverage for branded Saphris versus generic asenapine.

Key Takeaways

Saphris (asenapine) has established efficacy in schizophrenia and bipolar I disorder, supported by robust clinical trial data. Its market presence is now primarily defined by significant generic competition following the expiration of its key patents in major markets, particularly the U.S. The sublingual formulation remains a distinguishing feature. Merck & Co.'s revenue from Saphris is projected to continue declining as generic asenapine gains market share. Future market dynamics will be driven by generic pricing, prescriber and payer adoption of generics, and the potential for real-world evidence to support niche use of the branded product.

Frequently Asked Questions

  • What are the primary approved indications for Saphris? Saphris is approved for the treatment of schizophrenia in adults and for manic or mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder in adults.
  • When did the key patents for Saphris expire in the U.S.? Key patents covering asenapine, including formulation patents, began expiring around 2022, paving the way for generic entry.
  • Has generic asenapine been launched in the U.S. market? Yes, generic versions of asenapine are available in the U.S. market following patent expirations.
  • What is the main differentiator of Saphris compared to other atypical antipsychotics? Saphris's primary differentiator is its sublingual tablet formulation, designed for rapid absorption under the tongue.
  • What is the expected impact of generic competition on Saphris's future revenue? Generic competition is expected to lead to a significant decline in revenue for branded Saphris, as payers and prescribers shift towards lower-cost generic alternatives.

Citations

[1] Merck & Co. (2009). Saphris (asenapine) Prescribing Information. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2009/022123s000lbl.pdf

[2] Weisler, R. H., Culhane, J. E., & Karcher, K. (2010). Asenapine for the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar mania. Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy, 11(11), 1895-1907. https://doi.org/10.1517/14656566.2010.502228

[3] Merck & Co., Inc. (2018). Form 10-K Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/310601/000031060118000017/mrk-12312017x10k.htm

[4] United States Patent and Trademark Office. (n.d.). Patent search results for asenapine formulations. (Specific patent numbers and dates retrieved through USPTO database search, with U.S. Patent No. 7,785,909 identified as a relevant formulation patent that expired).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.