Last Updated: June 25, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR SALONPAS


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for SALONPAS

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT05106400 ↗ Clinical Adhesion Study Between ZTlido 1.8% and Three Over-the-counter External Analgesic Lidocaine-containing Patches Completed Scilex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Phase 1 2021-07-01 The study is designed to evaluate and compare the clinical adhesion performance of the ZTlido (Lidocaine Topical System) 1.8% of Scilex Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Reference) versus Salonpas (Lidocaine Patch 4%), Aspercreme (Lidocaine Patch 4%) and IcyHot (Lidocaine 4% + Menthol 1% Patch), on the Mid to upper back while being worn for 12 hours in healthy adult human subjects.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for SALONPAS

Condition Name

Condition Name for SALONPAS
Intervention Trials
Healthy 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for SALONPAS
Intervention Trials
Tissue Adhesions 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for SALONPAS

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for SALONPAS
Location Trials
United States 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for SALONPAS
Location Trials
Minnesota 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for SALONPAS

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for SALONPAS
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 1 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for SALONPAS
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for SALONPAS

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for SALONPAS
Sponsor Trials
Scilex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for SALONPAS
Sponsor Trials
Industry 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: May 3, 2026

SALONPAS: Clinical-Stage Update, Market Analysis, and Projection (By Product Line)

What is SALONPAS and how is it positioned clinically?

SALONPAS is a brand of over-the-counter (OTC) topical analgesics based on methyl salicylate and/or menthol formulations, used for temporary relief of minor aches and pains (typically muscle and joint discomfort). In practice, SALONPAS products operate as OTC monotherapy or combination analgesics rather than prescription disease-modifying therapies, so the clinical evidence base is dominated by supporting studies for symptom relief, not late-stage pivotal trials.

Regulatory/clinical implication for “clinical trials update”: OTC topical analgesics usually do not run the same Phase 3 lifecycle as prescription drug candidates. Trial activity (where published) tends to be pharmacodynamic, formulation, absorption, local tolerability, or comparative symptomatic efficacy work, often conducted post-launch for line extensions and manufacturing updates.

What does the available public clinical evidence pattern look like?

Public literature for OTC topical analgesics like SALONPAS generally falls into four buckets:

  1. Efficacy for short-term pain relief in minor musculoskeletal pain (symptom outcomes).
  2. Absorption and formulation performance (skin permeation, onset timing, local tolerability).
  3. Comparative studies versus other topical counterirritants (menthol/methyl salicylate blends, patches vs gels).
  4. Safety and tolerability in real-world or controlled settings (irritation, sensitization risk consistent with salicylates).

Because SALONPAS is a marketed OTC brand, the most decision-relevant “clinical trials update” for business is not Phase 1-to-3 progression. It is instead new study releases tied to specific SKUs (patch formats, adhesive systems, or strength changes) and evidence updates supporting FDA OTC monograph compliance.

How is the SALONPAS market segmented?

SALONPAS sales are driven by OTC demand for topical pain relief and are usually segmented in the market by form factor and active ingredient system:

  • Patch: typically fixed-dose adhesive systems delivering methyl salicylate and menthol.
  • Gel/cream/roll-on (where marketed under the SALONPAS umbrella): topical counterirritant delivery.
  • Strength tiers: variations in methyl salicylate and menthol content by geography and SKU.

From a competitive standpoint, SALONPAS competes in a broad OTC topical analgesic set that includes:

  • Menthol/counterirritant rubs and gels
  • Salicylate-containing topical products
  • Combination counterirritant systems
  • Patch-based rival brands

What is the competitive landscape for topical OTC analgesic patches?

The most direct market friction points for SALONPAS patches typically include:

  • Brand switchability: consumers compare based on perceived effectiveness, duration, comfort, and skin tolerability.
  • Retail execution: shelf placement, promotions, and multi-pack economics drive volume.
  • Form factor preference: patches capture consumers seeking hands-free application and less mess versus gels.

Clinical trial activity: how to interpret it for SALONPAS

For SALONPAS, a “clinical trials update” for stakeholders is best read as:

  • SKU-by-SKU evidence refresh (new patch adhesive system, strength adjustments, format change)
  • Localized tolerability and adhesion performance studies (skin irritation, patch wear time)
  • Comparative symptom-relief studies against other OTC topicals

A Phase 3-style progression framework does not map cleanly onto this product category.


Market Analysis: TAM, Drivers, and Unit Economics Levers

How does demand behave for SALONPAS-type OTC products?

Key demand drivers for topical OTC analgesics include:

  • Higher prevalence of minor aches and pains with aging demographics
  • Consumer migration from oral analgesics to localized topical solutions (perceived safety and reduced systemic exposure)
  • Store-level promotional intensity during peak seasonal pain and back-to-school or winter musculoskeletal discomfort cycles (varies by market)

What are the main channels that matter?

For SALONPAS, channel economics typically depend on:

  • Pharmacy and mass retail (high frequency purchase, promo-driven)
  • Online OTC (brand-led repeat purchase, subscription where enabled)
  • Regional export/Asian retail corridors for brand-native consumers, depending on distribution rights

Where does value capture come from?

For patch and topical analgesics, value capture usually reflects:

  • Price per effective wear session (consumer-perceived duration)
  • Skin comfort and patch adherence (reduced returns and negative feedback)
  • Promotion cadence (trade spend and retail markdowns)
  • Pack-size economics (multi-pack reduces churn)

Projection: Base, Upside, and Downside Scenarios (Brand-Led OTC)

What should business teams forecast for SALONPAS-like OTC brands?

Because SALONPAS is OTC, projections should be modeled as:

  • Unit growth driven by distribution expansion, retail share gains, and category growth
  • Value growth from mix shift to patch formats (if the patch mix improves), plus price realization net of promotions
  • Risk tied to regulatory labeling changes, competitive launches, and retailer promo intensity

Scenario framework for OTC brand projection (mechanics):

  • Base case: modest share retention plus category growth; stable promo environment
  • Upside: patch mix expansion, stronger online conversion, and improved retail execution
  • Downside: higher promo intensity from competitors, weaker online pricing power, and mix shift away from higher-margin formats

Key “Actionable” Takeaways for R&D and Licensing Teams

What does the SALONPAS opportunity imply for next moves?

  1. Evidence is format-specific: any claim and any SKU upgrade is tied to patch/gelt formulation performance and tolerability rather than disease endpoints.
  2. Moat is brand + compliance + execution: manufacturing consistency, adhesive performance, and consumer experience matter as much as clinical outcomes for OTC.
  3. Competitive differentiation is often operational: wear time, comfort, and reduced skin irritation drive repeat purchase.
  4. Licensing and partnerships should target distribution + SKU portfolio: the fastest path to growth in OTC topicals typically comes from expanding patch and format coverage in high-velocity channels.

Key Takeaways

  • SALONPAS operates as an OTC topical analgesic brand; the “clinical trials update” is mainly SKU-level efficacy/tolerability and formulation performance rather than Phase 3 progression.
  • Market growth is driven by aging demographics, consumer preference for localized relief, and retail and online execution.
  • Projections for SALONPAS-style OTC brands should model unit share, mix (patch vs gel), and net price after promotions.
  • Sustainable advantage is typically built on format performance (adhesion and skin comfort), compliance, and channel execution, not on new molecular entities.

FAQs

1) Does SALONPAS have Phase 1 to Phase 3 clinical trial data like a prescription drug?

No. SALONPAS is OTC; public clinical work typically focuses on topical efficacy, tolerability, and formulation performance for specific SKUs rather than late-stage disease-focused trials.

2) What endpoints matter most for SALONPAS-style OTC topical products?

Short-term pain relief and consumer-relevant performance outcomes such as local tolerability and product wear behavior (for patches), plus pharmacokinetic or permeation data when studied.

3) What drives SALONPAS patch sales more: price or perceived duration?

In practice, consumers prioritize perceived effectiveness and the time the patch stays comfortable and usable. Pricing matters via promotions, but repeat purchase is strongly tied to wear time and comfort.

4) Where is growth most likely: patches or gels?

Growth typically follows mix advantages where patches deliver better convenience and consumer satisfaction, assuming similar efficacy and competitive pricing. Exact direction depends on regional SKU mix and retailer execution.

5) What are the primary risks for forecasting SALONPAS-type OTC brands?

Promo-driven price compression, retailer planogram losses, shifts in consumer preference to competing OTC topicals, and any labeling or regulatory changes affecting salicylate/irritant claims.


References

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Nonprescription Drugs: Products for Pain Relief (OTC Monograph Framework). FDA website.
[2] PubMed. Methyl salicylate and menthol topical analgesic clinical studies (systematic search results for topical pain relief and patch/gels). National Library of Medicine.

(No additional sources are provided because no specific SALONPAS trial identifiers, dates, or SKU-level results were included in the request content.)

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.