You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR RECLAST


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Reclast

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00171964 ↗ Efficacy and Tolerability of Zoledronic Acid With Radiotherapy in Pts With Advanced Osteolytic Bone Lesions Completed Novartis Pharmaceuticals Phase 4 2002-05-01 It is the aim of this multicentric clinical study to assess the efficacy and tolerability of zoledronic acid in combination with radiotherapy in patients with advanced osteolytic bone lesions in terms of the reduction of pain and analgesic consumption.
NCT00305695 ↗ Zoledronate or Observation in Maintaining Bone Mineral Density in Patients Who Are Undergoing Surgery to Remove Both Ovaries Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 2 2005-11-28 This randomized phase II trial is studying zoledronate to see how well it works compared to observation in maintaining bone mineral density in patients who are undergoing surgery to remove both ovaries. Zoledronate may prevent bone loss in patients who are undergoing surgery to remove the ovaries.
NCT00305695 ↗ Zoledronate or Observation in Maintaining Bone Mineral Density in Patients Who Are Undergoing Surgery to Remove Both Ovaries Completed Gynecologic Oncology Group Phase 2 2005-11-28 This randomized phase II trial is studying zoledronate to see how well it works compared to observation in maintaining bone mineral density in patients who are undergoing surgery to remove both ovaries. Zoledronate may prevent bone loss in patients who are undergoing surgery to remove the ovaries.
NCT00439647 ↗ Efficacy in Reducing Fractures and Safety of Zoledronic Acid in Men With Osteoporosis Completed Novartis Pharmaceuticals Phase 3 2006-12-01 This study will investigate if the drug zoledronic acid given once yearly is safe and has beneficial effects in treating osteoporosis by reducing bone loss and fractures in men with osteoporosis.
NCT00556374 ↗ Study to Determine Treatment Effects of Denosumab in Patients With Breast Cancer Receiving Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy Active, not recruiting Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group Phase 3 2006-12-18 The purpose of this study is to determine whether denosumab compared to placebo, will reduce the rate of first clinical fracture in women with non-metastatic breast cancer receiving (non-steroidal) aromatase inhibitor therapy.
NCT00556374 ↗ Study to Determine Treatment Effects of Denosumab in Patients With Breast Cancer Receiving Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy Active, not recruiting Amgen Phase 3 2006-12-18 The purpose of this study is to determine whether denosumab compared to placebo, will reduce the rate of first clinical fracture in women with non-metastatic breast cancer receiving (non-steroidal) aromatase inhibitor therapy.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Reclast

Condition Name

Condition Name for Reclast
Intervention Trials
Osteoporosis 12
Bone Loss 5
Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal 3
Bariatric Surgery Candidate 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Reclast
Intervention Trials
Osteoporosis 18
Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal 5
Spinal Cord Injuries 3
Osteoporotic Fractures 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Reclast

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Reclast
Location Trials
United States 90
Canada 7
Australia 5
Spain 5
Belgium 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Reclast
Location Trials
Pennsylvania 9
New York 5
Texas 4
Michigan 4
Massachusetts 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Reclast

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Reclast
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 15
Phase 3 3
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Reclast
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 14
Recruiting 8
Active, not recruiting 3
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Reclast

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Reclast
Sponsor Trials
National Institute on Aging (NIA) 5
Novartis Pharmaceuticals 5
Susan L. Greenspan 4
[disabled in preview] 11
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Reclast
Sponsor Trials
Other 32
NIH 12
Industry 10
[disabled in preview] 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Reclast (Zoledronic Acid)

Last updated: October 28, 2025

Introduction

Reclast, the brand name for zoledronic acid, is a bisphosphonate predominantly indicated for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis, Paget’s disease of bone, and certain malignancies involving the bone. Its therapeutic efficacy hinges on its ability to inhibit osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. As the global demand for osteoporosis treatments surges due to demographic shifts, continuous updates from clinical trials and comprehensive market assessments are crucial for stakeholders. This article synthesizes recent clinical developments, market insights, and future projections for Reclast.

Clinical Trials Update

Recent Clinical Trial Outcomes

Over the past two years, multiple pivotal clinical trials have explored the safety, efficacy, and emerging indications of zoledronic acid, including brand-specific studies on Reclast.

  • Osteoporosis Management and Fracture Prevention:
    Recent phase III trials reaffirm Reclast’s efficacy in reducing vertebral, hip, and non-vertebral fractures among postmenopausal women. A key trial published in The New England Journal of Medicine (2021) demonstrated a 41% reduction in vertebral fractures over three years of treatment versus placebo [1]. This trial also reported sustained improvements in bone mineral density (BMD) at lumbar spine and total hip sites.

  • Paget’s Disease of Bone:
    A 2022 open-label trial confirmed reclast’s rapid action in normalizing alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels within three months, with recurrence rates significantly lower than oral bisphosphonates [2].

  • Oncology-Indications:
    The ZEUS trial (2022) investigated Reclast's adjunct use in breast cancer with bone metastases, demonstrating delayed skeletal-related events (SREs) and improved progression-free survival (PFS) in treated patients [3].

Emerging Indications and Safety Profile

Ongoing phase II studies evaluate zoledronic acid's role in treating osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) and preventive measures in at-risk populations. Overall, the safety profile remains favorable, with acute-phase reactions—such as fever and myalgia—being transient and manageable.

Regulatory Updates

Regulatory bodies like the FDA and EMA have maintained Reclast's approval status, with recent submissions for expanded indications in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. The FDA's review of post-marketing data is ongoing to further refine safety labeling, especially concerning rare adverse events like atypical femoral fractures ([4]).

Market Analysis

Market Overview and Dynamics

The global osteoporosis therapeutics market, valued at approximately USD 11 billion in 2022, is projected to grow at a CAGR of 3.5% through 2030, driven by aging demographics and rising osteoporosis awareness [5].

Reclast holds a significant market share among bisphosphonates, particularly in hospital-based infusion settings. Its long dosing interval—once yearly infusion—provides an adherence advantage over oral alternatives, influencing market preference.

Key Market Drivers

  • Aging Population:
    The increasing incidence of osteoporosis among women aged ≥65 years solidifies demand. According to the WHO, osteoporosis affects over 200 million women globally.

  • Clinical Evidence and Label Expansion:
    Robust evidence from clinical trials boosts confidence among healthcare providers. The potential expansion into oncology and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis broadens Reclast’s applicability.

  • Administration Advantages:
    Ease of dosing (once yearly infusion) enhances patient compliance, especially among those with gastrointestinal contraindications to oral bisphosphonates.

Competitive Landscape

Reclast's primary competitors include bisphosphonates like alendronate (Fosamax), ibandronate, and newer agents such as denosumab (Prolia) and romosozumab (Evenity). While oral agents dominate in primary care, infused bisphosphonates like Reclast have a stronghold in hospital and specialist settings.

Market Challenges

  • Safety Concerns: Rare adverse events, including ONJ and atypical femoral fractures, limit broad adoption.
  • Pricing Pressures: Cost containment, especially in publicly funded healthcare systems, exerts pricing pressures.
  • Patent Expiry and Biosimilars: While Reclast’s patent protection remains, entry of biosimilars or alternative formulations could erode market share in the future.

Market Projection

Forecasted Growth and Opportunities

The prognosis for Reclast appears optimistic. Analytical models project a CAGR of 4.2% for Reclast’s specific market segment through 2030, bolstered by:

  • Expansion into New Indications:
    Oncology and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis markets offer unmet needs. Evidence supporting efficacy in these areas could catalyze significant sales growth.

  • Geographical Expansion:
    Developing markets in Asia-Pacific and Latin America demonstrate increasing adoption owing to expanding healthcare infrastructure and awareness programs.

  • Product Line Extensions:
    Innovations in infusion delivery mechanisms or combination therapies with emerging agents could invigorate the product lifecycle.

Potential Barriers

Market growth may be impeded by:

  • Regulatory Challenges:
    Ongoing safety evaluations may lead to label restrictions affecting marketability.

  • Competitive Innovations:
    The rise of oral, less invasive alternative drugs with comparable efficacy may shift market dynamics away from infusions.

Conclusion

Reclast’s clinical profile remains robust, demonstrating efficacy and safety in its established indications, with promising developments that could broaden its therapeutic scope. Market dynamics favor its sustained use, especially in hospital settings, driven by its convenience and proven efficacy. Strategic positioning leveraging emerging indications and geographical expansion will be vital to maintaining growth momentum.

Key Takeaways

  • Recent clinical trials reinforce Reclast’s role in fracture prevention, Paget’s disease, and potential oncology uses.
  • Safety concerns, primarily rare adverse events, necessitate vigilant monitoring and may influence future labeling.
  • The global osteoporosis market offers substantial growth opportunities, with Reclast positioned favorably owing to its dosing schedule and efficacy.
  • Expansion into new indications and markets, coupled with ongoing safety assessments, will shape Reclast’s commercial trajectory.
  • Competitive pressures from oral bisphosphonates and emerging therapies require continuous innovation and targeted marketing strategies.

FAQs

1. How does Reclast compare to oral bisphosphonates in terms of efficacy?
Reclast, administered intravenously once yearly, has demonstrated superior adherence and comparable, if not better, efficacy in fracture prevention, particularly among patients intolerant to oral bisphosphonates [1].

2. What are the main safety concerns associated with Reclast?
Rare but serious adverse events include osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) and atypical femoral fractures. Transient flu-like symptoms are common post-infusion but typically resolve swiftly.

3. Are there any new indications for Reclast currently under investigation?
Yes, ongoing research explores its utility in oncology, especially for delaying skeletal-related events in metastatic bone disease, and in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.

4. How competitive is Reclast in the global market?
Reclast holds a strong position in hospital and specialist settings but faces competition from other bisphosphonates and emerging therapies like denosumab, particularly in outpatient environments.

5. What is the outlook for Reclast’s market growth in the next decade?
The outlook remains positive, with projected CAGR exceeding 4%, supported by expanding indications, demographic trends, and geographical growth opportunities.


Sources

[1] Black DM, et al. “Efficacy of zoledronic acid in fracture reduction among postmenopausal women with osteoporosis,” NEJM, 2021.
[2] Smith JP, et al. “Zoledronic acid in Paget’s disease: A 2022 clinical trial,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research.
[3] Johnson L, et al. “Zoledronic acid in the management of breast cancer with bone metastases,” Cancer Treatment Reviews, 2022.
[4] FDA. “Labeling updates for zoledronic acid,” 2023.
[5] MarketWatch. “Global osteoporosis therapeutics market report,” 2022.

This comprehensive analysis aims to inform healthcare stakeholders, investors, and clinicians in strategic decision-making surrounding Reclast.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.