Last Updated: May 11, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ROFLUMILAST


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ROFLUMILAST

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00062582 ↗ Effect of Roflumilast on Pulmonary Function and Respiratory Symptoms in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (BY217/M2-110) Completed AstraZeneca Phase 3 2003-06-01 The aim of the study is to compare the effect of roflumilast and placebo on the lung function in patients with COPD.
NCT00073177 ↗ Efficacy and Safety of Roflumilast in Patients With Asthma (BY217/M2-012) Completed AstraZeneca Phase 3 2003-11-01 The aim of the study is to compare the effects of oral roflumilast with placebo on lung function in patients with asthma.
NCT00076076 ↗ The FLASH Study: A Study of Roflumilast Versus Placebo in Patients With Asthma (BY217/M2-023) Completed AstraZeneca Phase 3 2003-12-01 The purpose of this study is to confirm the dose of roflumilast to be used for asthma management by comparing the effects of 250 mcg and 500 mcg oral roflumilast with placebo on pulmonary function and asthma symptoms.
NCT00076089 ↗ OPUS Study: Effect of Roflumilast on Exacerbation Rate in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (BY217/M2-111) Completed AstraZeneca Phase 3 2003-12-01 The purpose of this study is to determine whether roflumilast is effective in the treatment of exacerbations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
NCT00108823 ↗ The HERO-study: Effects of Roflumilast in Patients With COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) (BY217/M2-121) Completed AstraZeneca Phase 3 2004-10-01 The purpose of this trial is to study the effects of roflumilast on lung function parameters indicative of hyperinflation in patients with COPD.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ROFLUMILAST

Condition Name

Condition Name for ROFLUMILAST
Intervention Trials
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 15
COPD 13
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) 8
Asthma 7
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ROFLUMILAST
Intervention Trials
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive 35
Lung Diseases 32
Lung Diseases, Obstructive 30
Psoriasis 11
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ROFLUMILAST

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ROFLUMILAST
Location Trials
United States 455
Canada 55
China 27
Spain 12
United Kingdom 12
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ROFLUMILAST
Location Trials
California 23
Texas 23
Florida 21
Kentucky 16
Pennsylvania 15
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ROFLUMILAST

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ROFLUMILAST
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 3
PHASE3 3
PHASE2 8
[disabled in preview] 17
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ROFLUMILAST
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 59
Recruiting 26
Not yet recruiting 11
[disabled in preview] 12
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ROFLUMILAST

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ROFLUMILAST
Sponsor Trials
AstraZeneca 37
Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. 13
Takeda 11
[disabled in preview] 10
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ROFLUMILAST
Sponsor Trials
Industry 82
Other 73
NIH 5
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Roflumilast: Clinical-Stage Update, Market Analysis, and Multi-Year Projection

Last updated: April 25, 2026

What is roflumilast and what do current clinical developments target?

Roflumilast is an oral, once-daily phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) inhibitor used for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), specifically to reduce exacerbations in patients with severe COPD associated with chronic bronchitis and a history of exacerbations. Approved use in most major markets is for COPD maintenance therapy, not acute rescue. (US prescribing information: [1])

No reliable, decision-grade “late-stage pipeline update” data for roflumilast itself can be produced from the information available in this chat. To avoid mixing pipeline assumptions with approvals, the analysis below anchors on: (i) label scope and regulatory status, (ii) trial types historically associated with the program (COPD exacerbation reduction endpoints), and (iii) market dynamics driven by COPD prevalence, inhaled therapy adoption, and PDE4 competitive positioning.

What does the approved evidence base focus on?

Clinical evaluation for roflumilast has historically centered on COPD exacerbation reduction as the primary clinical endpoint, with secondary assessments across lung function (FEV1), symptom scores, and tolerability. The approved label ties treatment benefit to reducing COPD exacerbations in the target population (severe COPD with chronic bronchitis, history of exacerbations). (US prescribing information: [1])

Key label-relevant points for trial interpretation:

  • Indication scope: COPD maintenance therapy in severe disease with chronic bronchitis and exacerbation history. (US prescribing information: [1])
  • Mechanism: PDE4 inhibition with anti-inflammatory activity relevant to COPD pathophysiology. (US prescribing information: [1])
  • Safety profile considerations: label highlights adverse events and discontinuation risks that shape adherence and real-world usage. (US prescribing information: [1])

What is the current commercial landscape for roflumilast?

Roflumilast is marketed as Daliresp in the US (and equivalent branded/generic products in other jurisdictions). As a small-molecule PDE4 inhibitor, its market performance is tied less to blockbuster switching and more to:

  • clinician adoption in “frequent exacerbator” COPD phenotypes,
  • long-term persistence vs inhaler-based escalation,
  • payer formulary placement vs competing add-on classes.

Price and volume drivers typically include:

  • COPD treated population growth in absolute numbers (driven by epidemiology and aging),
  • “exacerbation phenotype” refinement (more narrow use case increases eligible patients),
  • generic entry dynamics in markets where IP has lapsed.

How big is the addressable COPD population segment for roflumilast?

Because roflumilast’s label is phenotype-defined, the addressable base is the portion of COPD patients with:

  • severe COPD, plus
  • chronic bronchitis, plus
  • history of exacerbations.

The practical market model therefore uses epidemiologic COPD prevalence multiplied by the fraction meeting exacerbation-prone, chronic bronchitis phenotypes. Without current, source-cited epidemiology split ratios in the provided materials, the analysis cannot convert prevalence into a defensible numeric TAM/SAM in this environment without fabricating inputs.

What can be stated with citation-backed certainty is the label requirement set that constrains demand. (US prescribing information: [1])

What is the competitive position vs PDE4 and inhaled add-ons?

Within COPD management, PDE4 inhibition is one route to reduce exacerbations alongside:

  • optimized inhaled bronchodilation (LABA/LAMA),
  • inhaled corticosteroid-containing regimens for appropriate phenotypes,
  • escalation strategies for frequent exacerbators.

Roflumilast’s differentiated value proposition is oral dosing and anti-inflammatory activity aimed at exacerbation reduction in chronic bronchitis phenotypes, not primary symptom relief. The label frames roflumilast as add-on maintenance to reduce exacerbations. (US prescribing information: [1])

Clinical trial update: what is actionable to monitor right now?

For business decision-making, roflumilast-specific trial monitoring should focus on:

  • post-approval clinical commitments, if any (often safety, adherence, and risk mitigation),
  • trials in new COPD subgroups (exacerbator phenotypes, chronic bronchitis),
  • head-to-head or add-on studies against inhaled escalation strategies,
  • real-world evidence studies on discontinuation and tolerability.

However, producing a “current clinical trials update” with named studies, registration IDs, enrollment status, and results timelines requires sourced data not present in the chat. Under strict constraints (no fabricated clinical trial specifics), the clinical update cannot be completed.

Market projection: what can be projected without inventing inputs?

A defensible roflumilast market projection requires:

  • base-year sales,
  • region mix,
  • price erosion / generic penetration rates,
  • volume growth tied to COPD epidemiology and prescribing behavior,
  • competitive substitution by other exacerbation-reduction strategies.

The necessary starting values and policy/market data are not provided in the chat. Under strict constraints, the projection cannot be quantified into revenue ($) or patient-treatment counts without fabricating.

What can be delivered without inventing numbers is a structured projection framework anchored to identifiable levers from the approved product profile:

  • Demand lever 1: eligible population growth (COPD prevalence and aging),
  • Demand lever 2: phenotype capture (proportion classified as chronic bronchitis with exacerbation history),
  • Demand lever 3: persistence (tolerability and adherence, reflected in label safety constraints),
  • Supply lever: pricing (generic vs branded mix by market and time).

Roflumilast’s label-defined population keeps growth partially capped by phenotype narrowing; the safety profile can also cap persistence and throughput into eligible lines of therapy. (US prescribing information: [1])

Roflumilast: label-driven product specs that shape clinical use and market uptake

Dimension Label / Product Constraint Implication for trials and market
Indication COPD maintenance in severe COPD with chronic bronchitis and history of exacerbations Limits patient pool to exacerbation-prone chronic bronchitis phenotype. (US prescribing information: [1])
Dosing concept Oral maintenance therapy (once daily in standard use) Facilitates adherence for some patients but depends on tolerability. (US prescribing information: [1])
Endpoint focus in evidence Exacerbation reduction Market uptake tracks clinician confidence in exacerbation benefit. (US prescribing information: [1])
Safety and tolerability PDE4 class adverse effects drive discontinuation risk Persistence and payer coverage are influenced by tolerability. (US prescribing information: [1])

Strategic takeaways for R&D and investment decisions

  1. Roflumilast demand is phenotype-driven: label eligibility requires severe COPD with chronic bronchitis and exacerbation history, which structurally limits addressable growth. (US prescribing information: [1])
  2. Exacerbations, not lung function, anchor value perception: trial design and outcomes should map to the exacerbation endpoint that supports label positioning. (US prescribing information: [1])
  3. Real-world adoption depends on persistence: tolerability and discontinuation risk are central to sustained utilization, which affects market share and revenue durability. (US prescribing information: [1])
  4. Market projections must model price erosion: as a small molecule with likely generic availability in multiple jurisdictions, revenue can diverge from volume trends; a correct model separates unit volume growth from net price decline.
  5. Clinical update monitoring should prioritize subgroup and add-on sequencing: the key question for future incremental value is whether roflumilast improves outcomes in specific exacerbator phenotypes when layered after inhaled optimization.

Key Takeaways

  • Roflumilast is a PDE4 inhibitor with an approval scope tied to severe COPD plus chronic bronchitis and exacerbation history. (US prescribing information: [1])
  • The clinical evidence base is centered on reducing COPD exacerbations, which is the endpoint that most directly informs prescribing and payer decisions. (US prescribing information: [1])
  • Market growth is structurally constrained by phenotype narrowing and moderated by tolerability-driven persistence. (US prescribing information: [1])
  • A quantified market projection and a named clinical trials update cannot be produced from the data available in this chat without risking fabricated figures.

FAQs

  1. What COPD patients are eligible for roflumilast under the US label?
    Patients with severe COPD associated with chronic bronchitis and a history of exacerbations. (US prescribing information: [1])

  2. What is roflumilast’s primary clinical benefit in COPD?
    Reduction in COPD exacerbations in the labeled phenotype. (US prescribing information: [1])

  3. Is roflumilast a rescue medicine for acute symptoms?
    No. The approved use is as maintenance therapy to reduce exacerbations, not for acute rescue. (US prescribing information: [1])

  4. What drives real-world continuation or discontinuation of roflumilast?
    PDE4-class adverse events and tolerability considerations highlighted in the label, which affect persistence. (US prescribing information: [1])

  5. What should investors/R&D teams watch for in future roflumilast clinical work?
    Exacerbation-reduction outcomes in exacerbator subgroups and evidence that supports sequencing with inhaled therapies. (US prescribing information: [1])


References

[1] Daliresp (roflumilast) Prescribing Information. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.