Last Updated: June 24, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR RIMEXOLONE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for RIMEXOLONE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00471419 ↗ Phase II Study of AL-2178 (FID 109980) in the Treatment of Dry Eye Completed Alcon Research Phase 3 2006-07-01 The purpose of this study is to see if Rimexolone (FID 109980) is a safe and effective treatment of dry eye.
NCT02608489 ↗ Clinical Effects and Safety of 3% Diquafosol After Cataract Surgery Completed Soonchunhyang University Hospital N/A 2014-01-01 The purpose of this study is determine whether 3% diquafosol and 0.1% sodium hyaluronate are effective and safe in the treatment of patients with dry eye after cataract surgery.
NCT02816905 ↗ Ocular-hypertensive Response to Topical Steroids in Children After Bilateral Strabismus Surgery Completed Cairo University Phase 4 2015-10-01 This study aims to compare the effects of topical (Rimexolone versus Dexamethasone) on the IOP in children under 13 years of age who underwent bilateral strabismus surgery, and to compare the effects of topical (Rimexolone versus Fluorometholone) on the IOP in the children under 13 years of age who underwent bilateral strabismus surgery.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for RIMEXOLONE

Condition Name

Condition Name for RIMEXOLONE
Intervention Trials
Dry Eye 1
Dry Eye Syndromes 1
Intraocular Pressure 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for RIMEXOLONE
Intervention Trials
Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca 2
Dry Eye Syndromes 2
Strabismus 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for RIMEXOLONE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for RIMEXOLONE
Location Trials
Egypt 1
United States 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for RIMEXOLONE
Location Trials
Ohio 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for RIMEXOLONE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for RIMEXOLONE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 3 1
N/A 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for RIMEXOLONE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for RIMEXOLONE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for RIMEXOLONE
Sponsor Trials
Cairo University 1
Alcon Research 1
Soonchunhyang University Hospital 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for RIMEXOLONE
Sponsor Trials
Other 2
Industry 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: May 4, 2026

Rimexolone: clinical trials update and market analysis with projections

What is rimexolone and where is it in development?

Rimexolone is a corticosteroid eye drug (glucocorticoid) developed for ocular inflammatory conditions. Clinical development in the US and Europe has focused on topical ophthalmic use, with attention on steroid efficacy and tolerability (notably intraocular pressure effects typical of class corticosteroids).

What clinical trials results exist, and what is their status now?

Public, citable clinical-trial status for rimexolone is limited in the public domain versus large pipeline assets. What is available indicates that rimexolone is not in late-stage, widely enrolling global Phase 3 programs with fully observable, ongoing trial activity in major registries at the current time window. As a result, the practical clinical view for decision-making is:

  • No clear, ongoing global Phase 3 “registration-enabling” program identifiable from public registries at the time of this analysis.
  • Development activity appears to be concentrated in earlier-stage or region-specific programs, with trial reporting fragmented across jurisdictions and older publications.
  • Most commercially relevant path depends on existing approvals and label expansion rather than a visible new Phase 3 wave.

What is known about pivotal evidence and comparative positioning?

Rimexolone belongs to the corticosteroid class used to control ocular inflammation. For commercial positioning, the key differentiators in the category are:

  • Efficacy in reducing ocular inflammation signs and symptoms
  • Safety profile relevant to steroid response, especially intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation risk
  • Formulation and dosing convenience (frequency, suspension vs solution, ocular tolerability)

Rimexolone is often evaluated against other ophthalmic corticosteroids (prednisolone derivatives, dexamethasone acetate/other steroids) on a risk-benefit basis. In practice, rimexolone competes less on mechanism (class effect) and more on clinical outcomes and tolerability signals seen in the trials that led to market access, plus any further label expansions.

What is the rimexolone commercial landscape by geography?

Rimexolone has historically been developed and marketed in select markets as an ophthalmic corticosteroid. The commercial landscape can be summarized as:

  • Mature, class-like market dynamics: corticosteroids are low-to-mid growth unless new label indications expand addressable demand.
  • High formulary and prescriber switching friction: ophthalmology prescribing patterns tend to favor established products and strong local clinical evidence.
  • Price competition after entry is common, especially for older steroid molecules once generics and authorized generics enter.

Given these forces, rimexolone’s commercial performance is more sensitive to:

  • Any new approved indications (post-operative inflammation is the most common demand driver)
  • Dosing regimen advantage and patient outcomes that shorten steroid courses
  • Tender and payer dynamics in key European and other regulated markets

Who are the main competitors and how does rimexolone compare?

Rimexolone competes in the ophthalmic steroid segment dominated by:

  • Prednisolone acetate and prednisolone phosphate
  • Dexamethasone acetate
  • Other steroid combinations (inflammation plus anti-infective in some lines, depending on label)
  • Non-steroid options in the broader anti-inflammatory space (less direct for all indications)

Competitive comparison framework:

  • Efficacy: the category typically converges; small differences in trial endpoints drive labeling and switching
  • Safety: IOP response and cataract risk matter for long courses and steroid-sensitive patients
  • Usage pattern: post-op and acute inflammation drive volume; maintenance regimens drive retention

What is the market sizing logic for rimexolone?

A rigorous market model for rimexolone has to be built from:

  1. Addressable ophthalmic steroid prescription volume (post-op inflammation, keratitis/uveitis subsets where steroids are used, and other label indications where rimexolone is approved)
  2. Share capture: rimexolone’s ability to gain and defend share versus branded and generic steroids
  3. Price erosion: class products face generic pressure after exclusivity lapses
  4. Lifecycle: growth is mainly label expansion and switching; absent new indications, growth is usually modest

Because publicly citable, molecule-specific market share and unit sales for rimexolone are not consistently available in a uniform dataset, the actionable projection approach is to anchor to:

  • Expected category growth (generally low single digits in mature segments)
  • Share stability or mild decline under generic pressure
  • Incremental growth only if label expansion or superior regimen adoption occurs

What market projection base case applies?

The practical projection for rimexolone under typical ophthalmic steroid lifecycle dynamics is:

  • Base case: rimexolone remains a mid-share or niche steroid product with low single-digit revenue growth driven by unit stability and inflation, offset partly by price erosion and competitive entry.
  • Downside case: steeper price erosion and share loss drive flat to mid-single-digit declines in revenue.
  • Upside case: any meaningful label expansion or strong adoption from prescriber outcomes drives mid-single-digit to high-single-digit growth from share gains, not from category expansion alone.

How does patent and exclusivity affect valuation and R&D timing?

Rimexolone value is typically most sensitive to:

  • Availability of patent protection covering formulation, dosing regimen, or crystalline form (if any)
  • Regulatory exclusivity such as data exclusivity and any supplementary protection in specific jurisdictions
  • Patent cliff risk that accelerates generic substitution

Because rimexolone is a known corticosteroid molecule with historical development and existing commercial use, the investment question is less “will the molecule be approved” and more “can the company defend share and price through lifecycle events.”

What signals matter for near-term clinical and commercial traction?

Near-term traction signals for rimexolone should be tracked via:

  • Regulatory updates: label expansions, updates to steroid response language, and any changes to recommended dosing frequency
  • Trial reporting: results that reduce uncertainty around IOP effects and efficacy endpoints that matter to ophthalmologists
  • Formulation strategy: any reformulation that changes dose schedule and improves tolerability

Key Takeaways

  • Rimexolone is an ophthalmic corticosteroid positioned around efficacy and steroid safety (especially IOP response).
  • Publicly observable clinical-trial activity for rimexolone is limited relative to large, global Phase 3 programs; the development view is dominated by historical evidence and regional programs rather than a clearly visible new registration-enabling late-stage pipeline.
  • Market growth is driven primarily by label scope and share capture, not by category expansion; mature ophthalmic steroid dynamics imply low growth with meaningful price erosion risk.
  • Near-term value depends on regulatory outcomes (label changes) and prescriber adoption, not new mechanism breakthroughs.

FAQs

  1. Is rimexolone in late-stage Phase 3 trials globally right now?
    The public clinical record does not show a clear, widely observable global Phase 3 registration-enabling program for rimexolone in the current time window.

  2. What is rimexolone’s competitive advantage versus other ophthalmic steroids?
    Competitive advantage is typically framed around trial outcomes for inflammation control and tolerability, especially IOP response, plus regimen and formulation attributes.

  3. How sensitive is rimexolone revenue to generic competition?
    High. Ophthalmic steroid molecules generally face price pressure as generics enter, making revenue and share defense central to valuation.

  4. What would be the biggest driver of upside for rimexolone?
    Label expansion and prescriber adoption tied to clinically meaningful outcomes, rather than broad category growth.

  5. What is the main risk for continued performance?
    Steroid class price erosion, share loss after exclusivity ends, and any adverse safety signals that influence switching decisions.

References

[1] ClinicalTrials.gov. Rimexolone (search results and trial records). (Accessed 2026-05-04).
[2] PubMed. Rimexolone ophthalmic clinical studies and trial publications. (Accessed 2026-05-04).
[3] European Medicines Agency (EMA). Public assessment history and product-related documents for ophthalmic corticosteroids and rimexolone-related entries where available. (Accessed 2026-05-04).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.