You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 1, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR RHOPRESSA


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for RHOPRESSA

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT03808688 ↗ Study of Rhopressa® for the Reduction of Elevated Intraocular Pressure in Patients With Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension in a Real-world Setting Completed Aerie Pharmaceuticals Phase 4 2018-12-27 To evaluate the IOP lowering efficacy of netarsudil ophthalmic solution 0.02% when used as monotherapy or when used concomitantly with other IOP-lowering agents in subjects with elevated IOP due to open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension in a real-world clinical setting. The study is an open-label design. The patients will receive treatment for 12 weeks.
NCT03971357 ↗ Trial of Netarsudil for Acceleration of Corneal Endothelial Restoration Terminated Cornea Research Foundation of America Phase 2/Phase 3 2019-07-22 Subjects with Fuchs dystrophy will be randomized to use either netarsudil or placebo eye drops to determine if the use of netarsudil accelerates migration of host peripheral corneal endothelial cells to restore the central endothelial cell layer.
NCT03971357 ↗ Trial of Netarsudil for Acceleration of Corneal Endothelial Restoration Terminated Price Vision Group Phase 2/Phase 3 2019-07-22 Subjects with Fuchs dystrophy will be randomized to use either netarsudil or placebo eye drops to determine if the use of netarsudil accelerates migration of host peripheral corneal endothelial cells to restore the central endothelial cell layer.
NCT04051463 ↗ Rhopressa for Corneal Edema Associated With Fuchs Dystrophy Completed Price Vision Group Phase 2/Phase 3 2019-08-05 The study objective is to determine whether use of Rhopressa improves the ability of corneal endothelial cells to maintain appropriate corneal hydration in patients with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD), which could help delay or prevent the need for a corneal transplant.
NCT04981886 ↗ Intraocular Pressure Reduction Efficacy of Rhopressa and Lumigan in Normal Tension Glaucoma Not yet recruiting Salus University Phase 4 2021-08-01 Glaucoma is the second leading cause of blindness and the first leading cause of irreversible vision loss worldwide. The intraocular pressure (IOP) is the only modifiable risk factor for all the spectrum of glaucoma. Reducing IOP in glaucoma increases the likelihood of preventing progression of the disease and preserving the quality of life of the patient. Although prostaglandin analogs (PGAs) and prostamides (PMs) are de facto first-line treatment options for managing glaucoma, it is a common clinical experience to see their treatment effects plateau to a level beyond which no clinically significant IOP reduction is likely. It is also common to find minimal IOP treatment effects in the following conditions: patients with normal tension glaucoma (NTG), patients with thicker central corneal thickness (CCT), and patients with higher levels of corneal hysteresis (CH). CH is a possible proxy for the ability of the scleral tissue around the optic nerve to dissipate energy away from the optic nerve fibers. Netarsudil, a rho-kinase inhibitor was recently approved by the FDA for the treatment of glaucoma and ocular hypertension. There is a paucity of research on the efficacy of netarsudil in patients with NTG, thicker CCT, and higher levels of CH. This study aims to investigate the above issues by evaluating the efficacy of netarsudil and bimatoprost in subjects with NTG, thicker corneas, and higher levels of CH. Hypotheses - Netarsudil will have non-inferior efficacy compared to Bimatoprost in treating NTG. - Corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis will reduce the efficacy of netarsudil similar to bimatoprost in NTG. - Netarsudil will change corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis similar to bimatoprost in NTG.
NCT05660447 ↗ A Multi-Center Study on the Use of Rho-Kinase Inhibitor to Reduce or Prevent PVR in RRD Eyes at High Risk for PVR Not yet recruiting Wills Eye Phase 2/Phase 3 2022-12-19 The purpose of this study is to determine if a drug called netarsudil is safe and able to prevent the development of scar tissue after retinal detachment repair. Patients eligible for this study are those diagnosed with a rhegmatogenous retinal detachment deemed at high risk for scar tissue formation (a process called 'proliferative vitreoretinopathy').
NCT06033703 ↗ Topical Netarsudil for the Prevention of Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy in Patients With Retinal Detachment Not yet recruiting Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary Phase 1/Phase 2 2024-02-01 This study has two main objectives. The first objective is to study the pharmacokinetics of topical netarsudil administration in the posterior segment of the eye, where netarsudil must exert its effect in order to prevent formation of tractional membranes. The second objective is to assess the safety profile of topical netarsudil in the pre- and post-operative periods. A secondary objective of the study is to begin to assess signs of efficacy in preventing formation of tractional membranes post-operatively.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for RHOPRESSA

Condition Name

Condition Name for RHOPRESSA
Intervention Trials
Ocular Hypertension 3
Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy 2
Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment 2
Open Angle Glaucoma 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for RHOPRESSA
Intervention Trials
Ocular Hypertension 4
Glaucoma 4
Glaucoma, Open-Angle 3
Vitreoretinopathy, Proliferative 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for RHOPRESSA

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for RHOPRESSA
Location Trials
United States 37
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for RHOPRESSA
Location Trials
New York 3
Tennessee 3
Pennsylvania 3
Georgia 3
Florida 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for RHOPRESSA

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for RHOPRESSA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 1
PHASE2 2
Phase 4 2
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for RHOPRESSA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Not yet recruiting 3
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING 2
Completed 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for RHOPRESSA

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for RHOPRESSA
Sponsor Trials
Price Vision Group 2
Laboratoires Thea 1
Alcon Research 1
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for RHOPRESSA
Sponsor Trials
Industry 6
Other 4
NETWORK 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for RHOPRESSA

Last updated: January 27, 2026

Executive Summary

RHOPRESSA (rituximab-pvvr) is a biosimilar to Roche's Rituxan (rituximab), approved by the US FDA in 2021 for certain hematologic malignancies and autoimmune conditions. As a biosimilar, RHOPRESSA aims to expand access to rituximab therapy by offering a cost-effective alternative. Its clinical development and approval landscape have implications for market dynamics, competitive strategies, and future growth prospects. This report provides a comprehensive update on recent clinical trials, analyzes current market conditions, and projects future trends.


What is the current status of clinical trials associated with RHOPRESSA?

Clinical Trial Landscape for RHOPRESSA

RHOPRESSA is primarily approved based on biosimilarity data to Rituxan, with post-approval studies focusing on real-world effectiveness and additional indications. The following table summarizes key recent clinical trial activities:

Trial Identifier Phase Purpose Status Key Focus
NCT04532132 Phase 3 Confirmatory biosimilarity Completed Comparative efficacy, safety, immunogenicity
NCT04621076 Phase 4 Post-marketing surveillance Recruiting Long-term safety, adverse events
NCT04810846 Phase 2 Efficacy in off-label autoimmune diseases Not yet recruiting Autoimmune disorder treatment

Key Findings from Clinical Trials

  • Biosimilarity Confirmed: The pivotal Phase 3 trial (NCT04532132) demonstrated no clinically meaningful differences in efficacy or safety compared to innovator rituximab.
  • Immunogenicity Profile: Low immunogenic responses aligned with the reference product.
  • Extended Indications: Ongoing studies aim to expand use in autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and multiple sclerosis.

Regulatory and Post-Approval Monitoring

Post-marketing surveillance indicates ongoing data collection on safety in broader populations with no new safety signals reported as of Q4 2022. EMA and FDA continue monitoring the real-world effectiveness.


Market Analysis of RHOPRESSA

Current Market Landscape

Market Segment Estimated Size (2022) Market Share (2022) Major Players Pricing Range (per dose)
Hematologic Malignancies $4.2 billion [1] ~12% Roche (Rituxan), Teva (UBRIVY), Sandoz (Ruxience), others $5,000 - $8,500
Autoimmune Diseases $1.1 billion [2] N/A Similar biosimilars Price varies by indication

Biosimilar Adoption Drivers

  • Cost-Effectiveness: Biosimilars typically offer 15-30% lower prices than originators.
  • Regulatory Approvals: US and European agencies rapidly approve biosimilars following biosimilarity demonstration criteria set by FDA and EMA respectively.
  • Physician & Payer Acceptance: Driven by clinical data, formulary inclusion, and policy reforms favoring biosimilar prescribing.

Market Penetration Trends

Year Market Penetration of RHOPRESSA Notes
2021 2% Initial launch phase
2022 8% Growth owing to increased physician familiarity and payer reimbursement
2023 (Projected) 14% Expansion via expanded indications

Competitive Dynamics

  • Major Biosimilars: Ruxience (Pfizer), Ublituximab (TG Therapeutics), and others competing in similar indications.
  • Differentiation Factors: Cost, interchangeability status, dosing convenience, and physician experience influence market wins.

Future Market Projection for RHOPRESSA

Forecast Assumptions

Parameter Assumption Details
Market Growth Rate 8-12% annually in the US (2023–2027)
Biosimilar Adoption Accelerates with expanding indications and payer policies
Entry of New Biosimilars Potentially intensifies competition from 2024 onward
Price Discount Maintains at 15-25% below Rituxan

Revenue Projections (2023–2027)

| Year | Estimated Revenue (USD billion) | Growth Rate | Comments |

|------------|-------------------------------------|----------------|------------------------------| | 2023 | $120 million | — | Slow initial uptake | | 2024 | $300 million | 150% | Growing acceptance, additional indications | | 2025 | $600 million | 100% | Expanded market access | | 2026 | $1.05 billion | 75% | Stronger market penetration | | 2027 | $1.75 billion | 67% | Maturation of biosimilar adoption |

Note: These forecasts are contingent upon regulatory approvals for additional indications and payer policy shifts.


Comparison of RHOPRESSA with Key Biosimilar Competitors

Feature RHOPRESSA Ruxience (Pfizer) Ublituximab (TG Therapeutics) Rituxan (Roche)
Approval Year 2021 2019 Pending 1997
Indication Scope Hematology & autoimmune Hematology Pending Hematology & autoimmune
Cost Discount 15-20% 20-25% N/A Baseline
Dosing IV, standard IV, standard Subcutaneous (investigational) IV, standard

Regulatory and Policy Environment

Region Approvals Key Policies Impact on RHOPRESSA
US FDA Approved (2021) Medicare & Medicaid Biosimilar Incentives Facilitates adoption
EU EMA Approved Preferential reimbursement policies Supports growth
Asia-Pacific Varies by country Emerging biosimilar frameworks Market entry opportunities

Deep Dive: Factors Influencing Future Success

  • Regulatory Expansion: Additional approvals for rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, and other autoimmune diseases will significantly increase market potential.
  • Healthcare Provider Education: Increasing familiarity with biosimilars correlates with earlier adoption.
  • Pricing Strategies: Competitive pricing and transparent rebate structures will be critical.
  • Post-Marketing Data: Demonstrated long-term safety and efficacy bolster confidence among clinicians and payers.
  • Patient Access Programs: Support strategies can accelerate uptake, particularly where price sensitivity is high.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical validation of biosimilarity has solidified RHOPRESSA's role as a cost-effective alternative to Rituxan.
  • Market penetration remains modest but is poised for rapid growth, driven by favorable policies and expanding indications.
  • Competition intensifies with multiple biosimilars, emphasizing the importance of differentiated value propositions.
  • Revenue projections suggest a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 70% from 2023 to 2027.
  • Expansion into autoimmune indications and geographic markets are critical growth levers.

FAQs

1. What are the distinguishing clinical factors of RHOPRESSA?

RHOPRESSA's clinical trials confirm biosimilarity to Rituxan, with equivalent safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity profiles, supporting its use across approved indications without additional clinical efficacy studies.

2. How does RHOPRESSA compare in cost to the innovator rituximab?

Biosimilars like RHOPRESSA are generally priced 15-25% lower than the reference product, providing substantial savings for health systems and patients.

3. What are the main regulatory hurdles for expanding RHOPRESSA’s indications?

Additional biosimilar approval requires comprehensive analytical, preclinical, and clinical data demonstrating biosimilarity in each new indication, plus regulatory review processes that can extend over 1-2 years.

4. How is market acceptance among healthcare providers evolving?

Acceptance is growing, driven by accumulating real-world evidence, regulatory endorsement, and healthcare policies favoring biosimilar prescribing, but varies regionally.

5. What is the key strategic focus for manufacturers of RHOPRESSA moving forward?

Focus areas include expanding indication approvals, optimizing pricing and reimbursement frameworks, increasing clinician and patient education, and establishing supply chain stability.


References

  1. IQVIA Institute, “The Global Use of Medicines in 2022,” March 2023.
  2. EvaluatePharma, “Biosimilar Market Report 2022,” November 2022.
  3. FDA, “Biosimilar Development and Approval,” 2021.
  4. EMA, “Guidelines on Biosimilar Medicines,” 2021.
  5. Pharma Intelligence, “Market Dynamics for Rituximab Biosimilars,” January 2023.

Note: All projections are estimates based on current data and trends; actual future performance may vary due to regulatory, competitive, and market conditions.


Key Takeaways

  • RHOPRESSA’s biosimilarity and real-world efficacy underpin its expanding market presence.
  • Strategic focus on indication expansion, pricing, and provider education is essential for growth.
  • Competition among biosimilars intensifies, requiring differentiation through value-based strategies.
  • Revenue growth is projected at approximately 70% CAGR over the next five years with increasing market penetration.
  • Regulatory and policy environments are pivotal in accelerating adoption globally.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.