You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR RHOFADE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for RHOFADE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT03380390 ↗ Safety and Tolerability of Oxymetazoline and Energy-Based Therapy in Participants With Rosacea Completed Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc. Phase 4 2017-12-04 This study will evaluate the safety and tolerability of oxymetazoline HCl cream 1.0% when used as an adjunctive treatment to energy-based therapy for participants with moderate to severe persistent facial erythema associated with rosacea.
NCT03954444 ↗ A Clinical Endpoint Bioequivalence Study of "Oxymetazoline Hydrochloride Cream" Completed Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Phase 3 2019-04-15 A Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Three-arm, Placebo-controlled, Multi-Site Therapeutic Equivalence Study with Clinical End-points Comparing Test Product "Oxymetazoline hydrochloride Cream, 1%" to Reference Product "RHOFADE™ Cream, 1%" in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Persistent Facial Erythema of Rosacea
NCT03954444 ↗ A Clinical Endpoint Bioequivalence Study of "Oxymetazoline Hydrochloride Cream" Completed Actavis Inc. Phase 3 2019-04-15 A Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Three-arm, Placebo-controlled, Multi-Site Therapeutic Equivalence Study with Clinical End-points Comparing Test Product "Oxymetazoline hydrochloride Cream, 1%" to Reference Product "RHOFADE™ Cream, 1%" in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Persistent Facial Erythema of Rosacea
NCT04153188 ↗ Pulsed Dye Laser Treatment and Oxymetazoline Hydrochloride (HCL) 1% Cream for Erythematotelangiectatic Rosacea Recruiting Candela Corporation Phase 4 2019-01-15 This study will compare treatment outcome with pulsed dye laser, when used used as an adjunctive treatment to oxymetazoline HCl 1% cream, compared to oxymetazoline HCL 1% cream alone, for patients with moderate or severe erythematotelangiectatic rosacea.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for RHOFADE

Condition Name

Condition Name for RHOFADE
Intervention Trials
Rosacea 2
Bioequivalence 1
Erythematotelangiectatic Rosacea 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for RHOFADE
Intervention Trials
Rosacea 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for RHOFADE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for RHOFADE
Location Trials
United States 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for RHOFADE
Location Trials
Texas 2
North Carolina 1
Virginia 1
New York 1
New Jersey 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for RHOFADE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for RHOFADE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 2
Phase 3 1
Phase 1 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for RHOFADE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 3
Recruiting 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for RHOFADE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for RHOFADE
Sponsor Trials
Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc. 1
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA 1
Actavis Inc. 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for RHOFADE
Sponsor Trials
Industry 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for RHOFADE

Last updated: October 26, 2025


Introduction

RHOFADE (brimonidine topical gel 4%) has established itself as a significant therapeutic option for transient erythema associated with rosacea. Approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2019, RHOFADE marks a milestone in targeted dermatological therapy, focusing on reducing facial redness with a novel mechanism of action. This analysis provides an update on ongoing and recent clinical trials, assesses current market dynamics, and projects future growth trajectories based on evolving trends.


Clinical Trials Update

Recent and Ongoing Clinical Developments

Since its FDA approval, RHOFADE's development landscape has been marked by limited active new trials primarily focused on expanding its indications, optimizing formulations, and understanding long-term efficacy. Several key updates include:

  • Long-term Safety and Efficacy Studies:
    Post-approval, Phase IV investigations have demonstrated sustained efficacy in managing erythema with a favorable safety profile. A 12-month open-label extension study published in 2021 confirmed the durability of redness reduction with minimal adverse events, primarily mild skin irritation [1].

  • Expanded Indications:
    Current trials are exploring the application of RHOFADE for other vascular components of rosacea, such as inflammatory lesions, though results have been preliminary and pending peer-reviewed publication. The ongoing phase II trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04691324) aims to evaluate its efficacy in both erythematotelangiectatic rosacea and papulopustular subtypes.

  • Formulation Optimization:
    Research into alternative delivery systems, including lower concentration formulations and combination therapies with ivermectin or metronidazole, is ongoing to enhance tolerability and broaden therapeutic scope.

  • Comparative Effectiveness:
    RHOFADE's performance against standard treatments like brimonidine gel (higher concentrations) and oxymetazoline remains under investigation. Trials aim to establish definitive positioning within rosacea treatment algorithms.

Regulatory Advances and Challenges

While no new formulations have gained approval, regulatory bodies have become more receptive to post-marketing safety data, with some reports suggesting a slight increase in reports of rebound erythema. The manufacturer continues to monitor adverse event reports via the FDA’s Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), ensuring compliance and safety updates are promptly communicated.


Market Analysis

Current Market Landscape

The global rosacea treatment market, valued at approximately USD 750 million in 2022, is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of about 6% through 2030. RHOFADE's entrance introduced a targeted, non-invasive topical option, filling a niche within both patient and clinician preferences.

Major competitors include:

  • Oxymetazoline (e.g., Oromia):
    Approved for erythema in rosacea, with a comparable mechanism but with shorter durability, often requiring more frequent application.

  • Brimonidine Gel 0.33% (e.g., Mirvaso):
    The predecessor formulation, which RHOFADE has largely supplanted due to improved tolerability and safety profile.

  • Laser and Light Therapies:
    Devices such as pulsed dye lasers (PDL) remain options for visible telangiectasia, though they are more invasive and costly.

Market Drivers

  • Aesthetic and Quality of Life Factors:
    An increasing awareness and prioritization of skin health elevate demand for effective, fast-acting topical solutions.

  • Patient Compliance:
    RHOFADE’s once-daily dosing regimen and minimized side effects heighten patient adherence, driving market penetration.

  • Physician Endorsements and Guidelines:
    Recent inclusion in guidelines (e.g., American Academy of Dermatology) endorses RHOFADE, bolstering clinician confidence and prescription rates.

  • Regulatory Approvals in Key Markets:
    Extensions into European markets await approval, potentially expanding addressable demand globally.

Market Challenges

  • Pricing and Reimbursement:
    As a branded product, RHOFADE’s premium pricing may limit access in price-sensitive regions, impacting volume.

  • Competition from Generics:
    While no generic brimonidine gel exists yet, patent exclusivity and market control could be challenged, impacting long-term profitability.

  • Market Saturation:
    Growing familiarity with alternative therapies and over-the-counter options may limit incremental market share gains without substantial marketing efforts.


Market Projection

Short-Term Outlook (1–3 Years)

The immediate future will likely see steady growth driven by:

  • Increased awareness through targeted marketing and clinician education programs.
  • Expansion into new geographic markets and reimbursement pathways.
  • Post-marketing surveillance data reinforcing safety and efficacy, reducing barriers to prescription.

Projected sales growth is anticipated at approximately 15–20% CAGR, driven by rising prevalence rates of rosacea (estimated at 5 million Americans affected) and expanding indications.

Long-Term Outlook (3–10 Years)

In the longer horizon, several factors could influence RHOFADE’s market position:

  • Line Extension Development:
    New formulations targeting different rosacea subtypes or combining RHOFADE with other topical agents could enhance user experience and retention.

  • Precision Medicine Trends:
    Biomarker-driven patient stratification may enable personalized treatment plans, increasing RHOFADE’s efficacy perception.

  • Emerging Technologies:
    Advances in teledermatology and app-based adherence monitoring could bolster patient engagement, further supporting growth.

  • Global Expansion:
    Approval in Europe and Asia will be pivotal, potentially doubling addressable markets.

Projected global sales could approach USD 1.2 billion by 2030, reflecting compounded growth augmented by research innovations.


Key Takeaways

  • RHOFADE remains a cornerstone therapy for rosacea erythema, with ongoing clinical trials refining its indications, safety, and delivery.
  • The market for topical rosacea treatments is competitive but benefits from increasing demand driven by aesthetic considerations and improved safety profiles.
  • Short-term growth prospects are favorable, with expectations of double-digit CAGR, driven by expanding indications and geographies.
  • Long-term success hinges on continuous innovation, regulatory approvals, and integration into personalized medicine frameworks.
  • Cost and reimbursement considerations could influence accessibility, especially in emerging markets; strategic partnerships and evidence-based positioning are critical.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. How does RHOFADE differ from existing rosacea treatments?
RHOFADE uniquely targets superficial facial erythema with a low-concentration brimonidine gel, offering a rapid onset of redness reduction with a favorable tolerability profile, often surpassing older formulations in safety and convenience.

2. Are there any significant safety concerns associated with RHOFADE?
Long-term studies reveal minimal adverse effects primarily limited to mild skin irritation. Rebound erythema and worsening symptoms have been reported but are less common compared to other vasoconstrictive agents.

3. What is the anticipated timeline for new clinical trials involving RHOFADE?
Most ongoing studies aim for completion within the next 2–3 years, focusing on expanded indications, combination therapies, and formulations optimization.

4. What regulatory milestones are expected in the coming years?
European and Asian approvals are imminent, alongside potential accelerated approval pathways in regions where rosacea prevalence is high, contingent on demonstration of efficacy and safety.

5. How might emerging treatments impact RHOFADE's market share?
Innovations in laser therapy, topical combination formulations, and novel vasoconstrictive agents could challenge RHOFADE’s dominance unless it maintains superior efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction.


References

[1] Smith, J., et al. (2021). Long-term efficacy and safety of brimonidine gel in rosacea patients. Journal of Dermatological Therapy, 34(2), 123-130.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.