Last Updated: May 10, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR RESTASIS MULTIDOSE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for RESTASIS MULTIDOSE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00348335 ↗ Efficacy of Topical Cyclosporin for Ocular Rosacea Completed Allergan Phase 4 2006-06-01 The purpose of this study is to determine whether Restasis (topical cyclosporin) is effective in the treatment of ocular rosacea
NCT00348335 ↗ Efficacy of Topical Cyclosporin for Ocular Rosacea Completed Ophthalmic Consultants of Long Island Phase 4 2006-06-01 The purpose of this study is to determine whether Restasis (topical cyclosporin) is effective in the treatment of ocular rosacea
NCT00349440 ↗ Efficacy of Cyclosporine for the Prevention and Treatment of Dry Eye Symptoms Following LASIK or Photorefractive Keratectomy Completed Innovative Medical Phase 4 2006-09-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of topical cyclosporine ophthalmic solution 0.05% (Restasis, Allergan) on the signs and symptoms of dry eye in patients undergoing LASIK or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for RESTASIS MULTIDOSE

Condition Name

Condition Name for RESTASIS MULTIDOSE
Intervention Trials
Dry Eye Syndromes 13
Dry Eye 11
Dry Eye Syndrome 5
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for RESTASIS MULTIDOSE
Intervention Trials
Dry Eye Syndromes 39
Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca 33
Eye Diseases 14
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for RESTASIS MULTIDOSE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for RESTASIS MULTIDOSE
Location Trials
United States 70
Korea, Republic of 7
Singapore 2
Thailand 2
Australia 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for RESTASIS MULTIDOSE
Location Trials
California 9
Massachusetts 6
North Carolina 5
New York 5
Texas 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for RESTASIS MULTIDOSE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for RESTASIS MULTIDOSE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 2
PHASE1 1
Phase 4 16
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for RESTASIS MULTIDOSE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 35
Terminated 4
Withdrawn 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for RESTASIS MULTIDOSE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for RESTASIS MULTIDOSE
Sponsor Trials
Allergan 13
Innovative Medical 6
Huons Co., Ltd. 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for RESTASIS MULTIDOSE
Sponsor Trials
Industry 43
Other 30
NIH 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

RESTASIS MULTIDOSE: Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection

Last updated: April 28, 2026

What is RESTASIS MULTIDOSE and how is it positioned clinically?

RESTASIS MULTIDOSE is an ophthalmic cyclosporine product in a multi-dose formulation indicated for inflammation of keratitis due to ocular graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and for dry eye disease associated with inflammation (commonly summarized in the US label as “dry eye associated with ocular inflammation”). The active ingredient is cyclosporine delivered as an ophthalmic emulsion.

Key implication for trials and market uptake: Unlike single-dose or highly constrained regimens, a multi-dose format targets practical adherence in chronic use settings where patients and prescribers weigh device convenience and dosing stability alongside efficacy.


What clinical trial readouts define the current development and lifecycle status?

No new, unambiguous Phase 3 “registration-level” clinical outcomes for RESTASIS MULTIDOSE were identified in publicly accessible sources that can be cleanly attributed to this specific product name (as distinct from the broader RESTASIS brand and cyclosporine ophthalmic franchise) within this response’s operating constraints.

Practical lifecycle interpretation

  • RESTASIS MULTIDOSE sits inside the cyclosporine ophthalmic established treatment pathway for inflammatory dry eye and ocular GVHD-related keratitis.
  • Commercial dynamics are therefore driven more by labeling scope, refill channel economics, and competitor competitive intensity than by brand-new Phase 3 evidence for this named multi-dose SKU.

How does the market look for RESTASIS MULTIDOSE’s category?

The relevant commercial frame is the anti-inflammatory dry eye and ocular surface inflammation segment, anchored by:

  • Cyclosporine ophthalmics (RESTASIS and RESTASIS MULTIDOSE class)
  • Lifitegrast (XIIDRA)
  • Steroid/anti-inflammatory rescue strategies (various)
  • Tear supplements and mechanical approaches (lubricants, devices, thermal systems)

Demand drivers

  • Chronicity: most patients remain on therapy for long periods.
  • Inflammation focus: cyclosporine and lifitegrast maintain differentiation versus purely lubricating therapies.
  • Access and adherence: multi-dose practicality supports refill consistency.

Competitive setup (direct commercial pressure)

  • XIIDRA (lifitegrast) competes on anti-inflammatory mechanism and long-term symptom management.
  • Multiple lubricants and device-adjunct strategies reduce prescription exclusivity, especially in milder disease.

What does pricing and channel structure imply for revenue durability?

For established ophthalmic brands, revenue is typically shaped by:

  1. Rebate and formulary placement across commercial plans and PBMs
  2. Contracting with large payers for chronic ophthalmic inflammation
  3. Dispensing footprint in retail and mail order through ophthalmic dispensing and specialty channels

RESTASIS cyclosporine products generally face a pricing ceiling from:

  • payer limits on chronic non-genericized products
  • comparison with competitively priced anti-inflammatory alternatives
  • substitution pressure from lubricants and “step edits”

In multi-dose form, the strongest commercial advantage is operational convenience (refill economics and dosing handling), which can support sustained access.


What market projection can be derived for RESTASIS MULTIDOSE (scenario-based)?

No product-specific revenue forecast for RESTASIS MULTIDOSE can be produced with integrity from the provided constraints because a clean separation of “MULTIDOSE” revenue versus other RESTASIS cyclosporine SKUs is not reliably published in accessible sources inside this response’s rules.

Category-level projection logic used for decision-making

The defensible projection approach for investors and R&D teams is to model cyclosporine ophthalmics as part of the inflammatory dry eye market:

  • Growth comes from persistent prevalence and treatment migration from lubricants to prescription anti-inflammatories.
  • Market ceiling depends on P&L hit from competitive entry (lifitegrast and potential future anti-inflammatory ophthalmics) and access shifts driven by PBM policy.

A usable projection can be stated only at the market-mechanism level, not as a numeric “RESTASIS MULTIDOSE-only” line item.


How do trial and label realities translate into commercial execution?

Even without new headline trials, commercial execution follows predictable levers in ophthalmology:

Prescriber behavior

  • After initial diagnosis, anti-inflammatory therapy is chosen based on:
    • inflammatory phenotype fit (dry eye with ocular surface inflammation)
    • tolerability and familiarity
    • adherence feasibility (device and dosing schedule)

Patient adherence

  • Cyclosporine regimens are often perceived as longer time-to-benefit therapies.
  • Multi-dose convenience can reduce friction in refills, which supports persistence.

Payer control

  • Chronic ophthalmic anti-inflammatories are frequently subjected to:
    • step edits (e.g., trial of lubricants first)
    • prior authorization in certain plans
    • quantity limits tied to dosing frequency

What are the primary risks to RESTASIS MULTIDOSE market growth?

  1. Competitive substitution to lifitegrast in plans that prefer one anti-inflammatory class over the other.
  2. Step-therapy constraints limiting early access and delaying anti-inflammatory initiation.
  3. Device and adherence disadvantages relative to newer formulations if competitors improve dosing comfort.
  4. Generic and lifecycle pressure risk if cyclosporine ophthalmic formulations face broader access changes (including authorized generics) that compress net price.
  5. Clinical differentiation limits once the class becomes interchangeable in payer policy.

What should investors and R&D leaders watch over the next 24 months?

Even when the clinical evidence base is largely established, near-term signals typically come from:

  • PBM contracting outcomes (net price trends are often the main driver of performance)
  • formulary access changes tied to prior authorization criteria
  • persistency and refill rate indicators (claims data proxies)
  • new product entries in inflammatory dry eye with differentiating onset profiles or dosing convenience

Key Takeaways

  • RESTASIS MULTIDOSE is a cyclosporine ophthalmic multi-dose product within the established inflammatory dry eye and ocular GVHD keratitis treatment landscape.
  • No clearly attributable, registration-level new clinical trial readouts for “RESTASIS MULTIDOSE” as a distinct product name are available in the sources that can be used within this response’s constraints.
  • Market performance is driven primarily by payer contracting, net pricing, formulary positioning, and persistence support via multi-dose convenience rather than by new Phase 3 differentiation.
  • A numeric “RESTASIS MULTIDOSE-only” market forecast cannot be produced reliably from public, product-specific data available under these constraints; category-level modeling supports a durable but competitive outlook contingent on formulary access and step-therapy structure.

FAQs

1) Is RESTASIS MULTIDOSE the same active ingredient as RESTASIS?

Yes. RESTASIS MULTIDOSE is a cyclosporine ophthalmic product, aligned to the cyclosporine ophthalmic franchise.

2) What drives uptake of cyclosporine ophthalmics in dry eye?

Inflammation-targeting efficacy plus the ability to fit into chronic, refill-based treatment workflows, supported by access via PBM and payer policy.

3) Does RESTASIS MULTIDOSE have new Phase 3 trial readouts?

No new, clearly attributable Phase 3 registration-level readouts for RESTASIS MULTIDOSE as a distinct named product were identified in the sources usable under the response constraints.

4) Who are the main competitive threats?

Lifitegrast (XIIDRA) and payer-favored alternatives in the anti-inflammatory and adjunct categories (plus step-therapy constraints that delay initiation).

5) What is the highest-impact lever for near-term performance?

Net pricing and formulary access (including prior authorization and quantity policy) that governs persistence and refill volume.


References

[1] FDA. (n.d.). Restasis (cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion) prescribing information. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
[2] FDA. (n.d.). Xiidra (lifitegrast ophthalmic solution) prescribing information. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
[3] American Academy of Ophthalmology. (n.d.). Dry eye disease clinical guidance and updates. American Academy of Ophthalmology.
[4] National Library of Medicine. (n.d.). ClinicalTrials.gov search results for cyclosporine ophthalmic. U.S. National Institutes of Health.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.