Last Updated: June 25, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR REGITINE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for REGITINE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT02966665 ↗ : Vascular Function in Health and Disease Recruiting Russell Richardson Phase 1 2008-09-01 Many control mechanisms exist which successfully match the supply of blood with the metabolic demand of various tissues under wide-ranging conditions. One primary regulator of vasomotion and thus perfusion to the muscle tissue is the host of chemical factors originating from the vascular endothelium and the muscle tissue, which collectively sets the level of vascular tone. With advancing age and in many disease states, deleterious adaptations in the production and sensitivity of these vasodilator and vasoconstrictor substances may be observed, leading to a reduction in skeletal muscle blood flow and compromised perfusion to the muscle tissue. Adequate perfusion is particularly important during exercise to meet the increased metabolic demand of the exercising tissue, and thus any condition that reduces tissue perfusion may limit the capacity for physical activity. As it is now well established that regular physical activity is a key component in maintaining cardiovascular health with advancing age, there is a clear need for further studies in populations where vascular dysfunction is compromised, with the goal of identifying the mechanisms responsible for the dysfunction and exploring whether these maladaptations may be remediable. Thus, to better understand the etiology of these vascular adaptations in health and disease, the current proposal is designed to study changes in vascular function with advancing age, and also examine peripheral vascular changes in patients suffering from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), Sepsis, Pulmonary Hypertension, and cardiovascular disease. While there are clearly a host of vasoactive substances which collectively act to govern vasoconstriction both at rest and during exercise, four specific pathways that may be implicated have been identified in these populations: Angiotensin-II (ANG-II), Endothelin-1 (ET-1), Nitric Oxide (NO), and oxidative stress.
NCT03079921 ↗ Adrenergic System in Islet Transplantation Active, not recruiting National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) Early Phase 1 2017-01-20 To determine the effect of sympathetic neural and hormonal (epinephrine) input on islet cell hormonal responses to insulin-induced hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetic recipients of intrahepatic islet transplantation. We hypothesize that α-adrenergic (neural) blockage will abolish insulin-mediated suppression of C-peptide, attenuating α-cell glucagon secretion during hypoglycemia, and that β-adrenergic (hormonal) blockage will have no effect. Glucose counterregulatory responses will be measured during hyperinsulinemic euglycemic-hypoglycemic clamps on three occasions with randomized, double-blind administration of the α-adrenergic blocker phentolamine, the β-adrenergic blocker propranolol, or placebo. The demonstration of neural rather than hormonal regulation of the transplanted islet cell response to hypoglycemia is critical for understanding the mechanism for protection from hypoglycemia afforded by intrahepatically transplanted.
NCT03079921 ↗ Adrenergic System in Islet Transplantation Active, not recruiting National Institutes of Health (NIH) Early Phase 1 2017-01-20 To determine the effect of sympathetic neural and hormonal (epinephrine) input on islet cell hormonal responses to insulin-induced hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetic recipients of intrahepatic islet transplantation. We hypothesize that α-adrenergic (neural) blockage will abolish insulin-mediated suppression of C-peptide, attenuating α-cell glucagon secretion during hypoglycemia, and that β-adrenergic (hormonal) blockage will have no effect. Glucose counterregulatory responses will be measured during hyperinsulinemic euglycemic-hypoglycemic clamps on three occasions with randomized, double-blind administration of the α-adrenergic blocker phentolamine, the β-adrenergic blocker propranolol, or placebo. The demonstration of neural rather than hormonal regulation of the transplanted islet cell response to hypoglycemia is critical for understanding the mechanism for protection from hypoglycemia afforded by intrahepatically transplanted.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for REGITINE

Condition Name

Condition Name for REGITINE
Intervention Trials
Hypoglycemia 1
Hypoglycemia Unawareness 1
Islet Cell Transplantation 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for REGITINE
Intervention Trials
Hypoglycemia 1
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive 1
Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for REGITINE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for REGITINE
Location Trials
United States 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for REGITINE
Location Trials
Pennsylvania 1
Utah 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for REGITINE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for REGITINE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 1 1
Early Phase 1 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for REGITINE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Recruiting 1
Active, not recruiting 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for REGITINE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for REGITINE
Sponsor Trials
National Institutes of Health (NIH) 1
University of Pennsylvania 1
Russell Richardson 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for REGITINE
Sponsor Trials
NIH 2
Other 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: May 25, 2026

Regitine (phentolamine) clinical trials update, market analysis, and market projection (2026-2036)

Executive summary: Regitine is phentolamine mesylate, an injectable alpha-adrenergic antagonist used for short-term management of hypertensive crises and perioperative-related vasodilation emergencies, including diagnostic and therapeutic indications in selected settings. Public clinical-trials and modern regulatory exclusivity data for Regitine are limited, and the product sits in a mature, largely off-patent small-molecule segment where competitive pressure is typically driven by generic injectable pricing, supply continuity, and hospital formulary adoption rather than new proprietary pipeline differentiation. Based on the mature category profile, the market is expected to remain largely stable in volume with low single-digit value growth in the US/EU through 2030, with global growth tied to emerging-market procurement and depot purchasing cycles rather than new label expansions.


What is Regitine (phentolamine mesylate) used for and where is it approved?

Direct answer: Regitine is an injectable phentolamine mesylate product indicated for alpha-adrenergic blockade in conditions where rapid reduction of adrenergic-mediated hypertension is required, and in perioperative management contexts associated with catecholamine effects. Approval status and specific indication wording vary by country, and injectable alpha-blockers are commonly available through both branded and generic manufacturers.

Key clinical use patterns

  • Hypertensive crisis related to catecholamine excess (including suspected pheochromocytoma-related events) in settings that need rapid IV control.
  • Diagnostic support in selected catecholamine-related protocols where alpha blockade is used as part of clinical assessment.
  • Perioperative cardiovascular management in defined anesthetic or hemodynamic instability contexts.

Global regulatory profile

  • In many jurisdictions, Regitine-branded supply is complemented by generics of phentolamine mesylate due to the long-established chemistry and manufacturing.

What clinical trials exist for phentolamine (Regitine) and what is the latest update?

Direct answer: Publicly tracked, phase-structured “new drug” registrational programs for phentolamine specifically under the Regitine brand are limited. The most visible clinical activity around phentolamine is often in investigator-led studies, older protocol evaluations, or use as part of comparative acute management strategies rather than new registrational end points.

Recent-trial “shape” in this space

  • Acute hemodynamic endpoints (BP reduction speed, reflex tachycardia incidence).
  • Comparative protocols versus other alpha-blockers or rescue vasodilator strategies.
  • Small cohort designs due to the narrow acute-use context.

Clinical development reality for Regitine

  • The drug is mature and genericized in many markets.
  • Clinical research attention tends to shift toward newer agents and devices.
  • Any new study impact on US label expansion would require clear, durable evidence tied to regulator-defined endpoints, which has been uncommon for mature alpha-blocker injectables.

How does phentolamine compare with other alpha-blockers for acute hypertensive crisis?

Direct answer: Phentolamine is a nonselective, short-acting alpha-adrenergic antagonist. Its positioning in acute settings typically depends on the need for rapid onset and controllability rather than target specificity.

Comparators in clinical practice

  • Other alpha-1 and alpha-2 blockers used in hypertensive emergencies.
  • Direct-acting vasodilators where alpha antagonism is not the primary mechanism.
  • Protocol-driven use alongside beta-blockade when clinically indicated (to manage reflex tachycardia).

Practical differentiation points

  • IV onset and titratability.
  • Adverse-event profile including orthostatic effects and reflex tachycardia.
  • Local availability and injectable stability/supply.

When does Regitine lose exclusivity and what patent barriers exist for generics?

Direct answer: The phentolamine mesylate active ingredient is not protected by active primary composition exclusivity in major markets under normal timelines. The market is largely governed by generic competition rather than brand exclusivity. Patent barriers, where present, are typically formulation, container-closure, stability, or process-specific and do not usually prevent standard generic injectable entry across all markets.

How generic entry usually happens

  • ANDA-style pathways in the US for already-approved small-molecule injectables.
  • Local equivalents internationally based on prior product authorization and bioequivalence frameworks.
  • Switching costs are mostly hospital contracting and inventory management.

What this means for pricing power

  • Brand pricing is typically constrained by generic parity.
  • Formulary tiering depends on total acquisition cost, reliability of supply, and substitution rules.

What is the Orange Book status of Regitine (phentolamine mesylate) and what does it imply for generic entry?

Direct answer: Regitine’s Orange Book footprint is generally consistent with older, off-patent small-molecule injectables where multiple applicants can compete. Practically, the Orange Book status typically does not create a sustained entry wall.

Implications for market dynamics

  • Competitive entry is often determined by:
    • manufacturing capacity for sterile injectables,
    • labeling parity,
    • contracted distribution,
    • and supply interruptions rather than IP.

How strong is the patent estate for phentolamine mesylate, and does it protect the brand?

Direct answer: For a mature generic-dominant injectable, patent strength usually does not translate into sustained exclusivity at the product level. Any residual IP tends to be narrow or not globally blocking.

Where IP can still matter

  • Manufacturer-specific manufacturing processes for sterility assurance.
  • Stability/potency claims for specific packaging formats.
  • Method-of-use for niche protocols only if supported by strong clinical evidence.

What patent litigation affects phentolamine mesylate or Regitine generics?

Direct answer: Public, high-salience modern Paragraph IV litigation specifically for Regitine/phentolamine is not typically a defining feature of the market. The category’s genericization suggests that any historic disputes did not establish a continuing litigation-driven delay pattern.

What to monitor

  • Supply-side disputes and consent decrees rather than classic patent-triggered generic delay.
  • Sterile injectable regulatory actions that can constrain availability.

What formulations are protected for Regitine and what dosage forms drive demand?

Direct answer: Demand is driven primarily by injectable sterile formulations with dosing tied to acute administration protocols. Market differentiation is usually minimal because the active ingredient is the same.

Dosage form demand drivers

  • Availability of IV administration formats suitable for emergency use.
  • Concentration strength consistency with hospital protocols.
  • Shelf-life and cold-chain needs (where applicable).

What generic entry risks exist for Regitine in the US and EU?

Direct answer: The dominant entry risk is supply and contract competition rather than IP blocking. Generic introduction is a recurring risk because cost pressure in hospital injectable procurement favors multiple-supplier resilience.

Where generic risk shows up

  • Tender cycles in Europe.
  • Group purchasing organizations in the US.
  • Increased substitution where therapeutic equivalents are accepted.

What is the competitive landscape for phentolamine mesylate injectables?

Direct answer: Competitive landscape is primarily generics versus branded history, with differentiation in:

  • price,
  • distribution coverage,
  • and supply reliability.

Key market mechanics

  • Hospitals rarely pay a premium for off-patent injectables unless it improves access or reduces stockout risk.
  • Pharmacy purchasing tends to favor suppliers with consistent production.

Clinical trial pipeline: is there any credible development that could expand Regitine’s label or market?

Direct answer: For phentolamine, label expansion would likely require new randomized evidence in modern endpoints for a defined patient subset and a clear regulator-ready benefit-risk profile. Public pipeline signals are limited.

What would change the market

  • A new acute-care protocol where phentolamine is the preferred alpha antagonist over alternatives based on stronger hemodynamic outcomes.
  • A controlled-release or improved stability formulation with demonstrable clinical usability advantages, which would still face generic equivalence pressures.

Market size and forecast for Regitine/phentolamine mesylate (2026-2036)

Direct answer: The market is expected to grow slowly in value and modestly in volume through 2030, driven by population needs for acute cardiovascular management and emerging-market purchasing. Pricing pressure from generics caps upside.

Forecast framework used

  • Mature injectable segment baseline demand.
  • Generic price compression assumptions.
  • Procurement growth in emerging markets.
  • Low likelihood of label-expanding breakthroughs specific to Regitine.

US/EU vs ROW outlook

  • US: Low single-digit growth in value is expected with flat-to-slightly-up volume, driven by formulary consolidation and tender dynamics.
  • EU5 (DE, FR, IT, ES, UK): Similar pattern with additional sensitivity to tender pricing and local manufacturing availability.
  • ROW: Higher unit growth potential due to procurement expansion and hospital capacity buildout, partially offset by reimbursement constraints and procurement price ceilings.

Projection (directional ranges, by value growth)

  • 2026-2030: Low single-digit value CAGR (0–4% range) globally.
  • 2030-2036: Continued slow value growth (0–3% range), largely tied to inflation pass-through and incremental procurement expansion.

Primary sensitivities

  • Sterile injectable manufacturing constraints that cause temporary shortages.
  • Contracting and tender outcomes.
  • Generic supplier consolidation impacting supply resilience.

Commercial outlook: what KPIs should investors and BD teams track for Regitine?

Direct answer: For off-patent injectables, execution KPIs beat pipeline KPIs.

KPIs

  • Hospital contract wins and formulary placement in acute-care centers.
  • ASP trend and distributor contract changes.
  • Supplier count in tenders (and switch rates).
  • Stockout frequency and distribution fill-rate.
  • Regulatory/quality events (sterility failures, recalls) affecting availability.

Key Takeaways

  • Regitine (phentolamine mesylate) is a mature injectable alpha-blocker with limited visible brand-specific registrational trial momentum.
  • The market is primarily driven by hospital acute-care protocols and procurement economics rather than IP-led defensibility.
  • Competitive pressure from generics constrains brand value growth; market upside is mainly volume expansion in ROW and stable US/EU tender absorption.
  • For 2026-2036, value growth is projected in the low single digits, with volatility tied to supply and contracting rather than exclusivity.

FAQs

  1. Is phentolamine mesylate injectable still widely used in hypertensive emergency protocols?
  2. Do shortages of sterile injectables typically impact phentolamine availability in the US or EU?
  3. What drives hospital formulary switching for off-patent injectable alpha-blockers?
  4. Are there any credible label-expansion strategies for phentolamine in acute cardiovascular care?
  5. How do tender pricing dynamics affect Regitine revenue versus generic phentolamine suppliers?

References (APA)

  1. FDA. Drugs@FDA database. (Accessed via public FDA platform).
  2. FDA. Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. (Accessed via public FDA platform).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.