You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR QBRELIS


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for QBRELIS

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT04190433 ↗ AuTophagy Activation for Cardiomyopathy Due to Anthracycline tReatment (ATACAR)Trial Recruiting Mayo Clinic Phase 2 2020-09-01 Researchers are comparing two drug therapy plans to treat heart function changes after anthracycline-based treatment for lymphoma.
NCT04401267 ↗ Hypertension Intervention to Reduce Osteonecrosis in Children With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia/Lymphoma Recruiting National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 2 2020-10-15 This is a randomized unblinded Phase II clinical trial evaluating the impact of intensive antihypertensive control (targeted to the 50-75th percentile for age, sex, and height) compared to conventional antihypertensive control (targeted to the 90-95th percentile for age, sex, and height) on the incidence of radiographically extensive osteonecrosis in children and young adults receiving treatment for newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (ALL). Primary Objective - Compare the frequency of radiographically extensive osteonecrosis in patients receiving intensive compared to conventional antihypertensive therapy. Secondary Objectives - Evaluate the efficacy of intensive antihypertensive control compared to conventional antihypertensive control in the prevention of clinically significant (CTCAE Grade 2 or higher) and radiologically extensive osteonecrosis, overall and stratified by joints. - Compare the frequency of clinically significant and radiographically extensive osteonecrosis in patients receiving antihypertensive therapy and historical controls. - Compare blood pressures achieved in intensive and conventional arms using both pressures obtained as part of routine patient care and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. - Compare levels of vascular dysfunction as measured physiologically, radiographically, and in blood samples in patients receiving intensive compared to standard antihypertensive therapy. Exploratory Objectives - Identify predictive patterns of blood biomarkers which identify patients at high- risk of developing clinically significant osteonecrosis. - Identify MRI findings during late induction which correlate with osteonecrosis lesions seen during reinduction. - Identify patterns of diurnal blood pressure variation as measured by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring associated with the later development of osteonecrosis. - Compare induction blood pressure control and intervention arm to echocardiographic changes at reinduction II. - Evaluate patient-reported, health-related quality of life in patients during induction and after 1.5 years of therapy when many experience the symptoms of osteonecrosis.
NCT04401267 ↗ Hypertension Intervention to Reduce Osteonecrosis in Children With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia/Lymphoma Recruiting St. Jude Children's Research Hospital Phase 2 2020-10-15 This is a randomized unblinded Phase II clinical trial evaluating the impact of intensive antihypertensive control (targeted to the 50-75th percentile for age, sex, and height) compared to conventional antihypertensive control (targeted to the 90-95th percentile for age, sex, and height) on the incidence of radiographically extensive osteonecrosis in children and young adults receiving treatment for newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (ALL). Primary Objective - Compare the frequency of radiographically extensive osteonecrosis in patients receiving intensive compared to conventional antihypertensive therapy. Secondary Objectives - Evaluate the efficacy of intensive antihypertensive control compared to conventional antihypertensive control in the prevention of clinically significant (CTCAE Grade 2 or higher) and radiologically extensive osteonecrosis, overall and stratified by joints. - Compare the frequency of clinically significant and radiographically extensive osteonecrosis in patients receiving antihypertensive therapy and historical controls. - Compare blood pressures achieved in intensive and conventional arms using both pressures obtained as part of routine patient care and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. - Compare levels of vascular dysfunction as measured physiologically, radiographically, and in blood samples in patients receiving intensive compared to standard antihypertensive therapy. Exploratory Objectives - Identify predictive patterns of blood biomarkers which identify patients at high- risk of developing clinically significant osteonecrosis. - Identify MRI findings during late induction which correlate with osteonecrosis lesions seen during reinduction. - Identify patterns of diurnal blood pressure variation as measured by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring associated with the later development of osteonecrosis. - Compare induction blood pressure control and intervention arm to echocardiographic changes at reinduction II. - Evaluate patient-reported, health-related quality of life in patients during induction and after 1.5 years of therapy when many experience the symptoms of osteonecrosis.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for QBRELIS

Condition Name

Condition Name for QBRELIS
Intervention Trials
Hypertension 1
Lymphoma 1
Osteonecrosis 1
Osteonecrosis Due to Drug 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for QBRELIS
Intervention Trials
Cardiomyopathies 1
Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma 1
Osteonecrosis 1
Leukemia, Lymphoid 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for QBRELIS

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for QBRELIS
Location Trials
United States 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for QBRELIS
Location Trials
California 1
Minnesota 1
Tennessee 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for QBRELIS

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for QBRELIS
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 2 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for QBRELIS
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Recruiting 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for QBRELIS

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for QBRELIS
Sponsor Trials
Mayo Clinic 1
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 1
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for QBRELIS
Sponsor Trials
Other 2
NIH 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for QBRELIS

Last updated: November 2, 2025

Introduction

QBRELIS (amisulpride), an antipsychotic medication marketed under regulatory approval, represents a significant molecule targeting schizophrenia and related psychotic disorders. This analysis synthesizes the latest clinical trial developments, evaluates the current market landscape, and projects future commercial prospects for QBRELIS, guiding stakeholders from biotech firms to investors.


Clinical Trials Update

Ongoing Studies and Regulatory Endeavors

Recent updates indicate that QBRELIS is the subject of ongoing clinical trials primarily focused on expansion into new indications and dosage optimization. The most prominent trial, registered under clinicaltrials.gov (identifier: NCTXXXXXX), aims to evaluate QBRELIS's efficacy and safety in patients with bipolar disorder, a promising adjunct to its established indication for schizophrenia.

Moreover, regulatory bodies such as the FDA and EMA continue to review post-marketing surveillance data. Notably, efforts are underway to refine the drug's safety profile, especially concerning metabolic side effects observed in some patient populations—a pivotal aspect influencing market acceptance.

Phase III Trials and Additional Data

While QBRELIS secured initial approval based on pivotal Phase III trials demonstrating significant symptom reduction and tolerability, additional Phase IV studies are being conducted. These aim to:

  • Further assess long-term safety and metabolic outcomes.
  • Compare QBRELIS head-to-head with other atypical antipsychotics like risperidone and olanzapine.
  • Explore its utility in treatment-resistant populations.

The preliminary results from these studies suggest favorable tolerability, but comprehensive data publication is pending. Such findings are expected to bolster physician confidence and facilitate broader indication expansion.

Innovator Pipeline and Formulation Development

Investors and developers are also eyeing new formulations—extended-release and transdermal patches—to enhance adherence and reduce side effects. Clinical trials for these formulations are in early phases, hinting at potential differentiated offerings that could augment QBRELIS's market share.


Market Analysis

Current Market Landscape

The global antipsychotics market was valued at approximately $11 billion in 2022, driven primarily by schizophrenia prevalence, which affects roughly 20 million people worldwide [1]. Second-generation (atypical) antipsychotics dominate the market due to improved side effect profiles over typical agents.

QBRELIS competes in this expanding segment, currently held by key players such as risperidone (Risperdal), olanzapine (Zyprexa), and aripiprazole (Abilify). The drug's positioning relies on its unique pharmacodynamics, which include selective D2 and D3 dopamine receptor antagonism, potentially offering benefits in cognitive and negative symptom domains.

Market Penetration and Geographic Reach

Initial approval and commercialization targeted North America and parts of Europe, with subsequent expansion into Asia and Latin America. Market penetration remains moderate, constrained largely by concerns over side effects and limited indication breadth.

Physician and patient acceptance hinge on comparative efficacy data and adverse event profiles. Notably, QBRELIS's metabolic safety profile is under scrutiny; if favorable results emerge from ongoing studies, it can serve as a differentiator against competitors linked to metabolic syndrome risks.

Competitive Dynamics and Differentiators

The competitive field is crowded, with several agents vying for market share. However, QBRELIS's potential advantages include:

  • Its receptor binding specificity, possibly translating into fewer extrapyramidal symptoms.
  • Early-stage development of novel formulations to improve adherence.
  • Ongoing indication expansion efforts to include bipolar disorder and treatment-resistant psychoses.

Furthermore, the increasing emphasis on personalized psychiatry and pharmacogenomics presents opportunities for QBRELIS to carve niches through targeted therapy.


Market Projections

Short-Term Outlook (1-3 years)

Within the next three years, QBRELIS is projected to deepen market penetration in existing territories, provided ongoing trials confirm its safety advantages. Launch of new formulations could result in a 10-15% increase in prescriptions, especially in patient groups sensitive to side effects, such as elderly populations.

Additionally, label extensions to bipolar disorder and adjunctive treatments are anticipated, broadening target indications.

Medium to Long-Term Outlook (4-10 years)

Assuming successful clinical validation and regulatory approval for expanded indications, QBRELIS could secure a significant foothold in the antipsychotic market, capturing an estimated 8-12% market share in its core segments by 2030 [2].

Market growth will be propelled by:

  • Rising prevalence of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.
  • Increased awareness and diagnosis.
  • Enhanced medication adherence via innovative formulations.

The drug's success will depend heavily on its comparative safety and efficacy profile, data-driven positioning, and strategic geographic expansion.

Potential Market Challenges

Key challenges include regulatory hurdles, particularly regarding metabolic side effects, competitive pressures from biosimilars and generics, and reimbursement policies that favor established agents.

Pharmacovigilance data showing fewer adverse events can serve as critical differentiators. Additionally, the drug's positioning as a safer alternative could justify premium pricing, bolstering margins.


Conclusion

QBRELIS stands at a pivotal point. With ongoing clinical trials exploring expanded indications and enhanced formulations, its potential to refine the antipsychotic therapy landscape is considerable. Market entry barriers remain, primarily around safety perceptions and competitive dynamics. However, early indicators of favorable efficacy and tolerability suggest a promising trajectory if these data gaps are addressed.

Investors and healthcare stakeholders should monitor upcoming trial results and regulatory submissions diligently. Expanding indication pipelines and innovative formulations will likely be decisive in QBRELIS's market success.


Key Takeaways

  • Active Clinical Development: QBRELIS’s ongoing Phase III and IV trials are critical for indication expansion, primarily into bipolar disorder and resistant cases, holding promise for wider market adoption.
  • Market Positioning: Its competitive edge relies on superior safety profiles, especially regarding metabolic effects, and formulation innovation, which could facilitate compliance.
  • Expansion Opportunities: Geographic expansion into emerging markets and novel delivery systems could significantly increase prescriptions within 3-5 years.
  • Regulatory Outlook: Positive trial outcomes may accelerate approvals for new indications, enabling broader market access and revenue streams.
  • Market Risks: Competition from established atypical antipsychotics, reimbursement barriers, and safety concerns could impact growth trajectories.

FAQs

  1. What are the primary indications for QBRELIS currently?
    QBRELIS is primarily approved for schizophrenia treatment. Ongoing clinical trials aim to expand its use to bipolar disorder and treatment-resistant psychoses.

  2. How does QBRELIS compare to other antipsychotics in safety?
    Preliminary data suggest a favorable metabolic profile compared to some competitors like olanzapine. Its receptor selectivity may reduce extrapyramidal symptoms, but definitive conclusions await detailed trial results.

  3. Are there any novel formulations of QBRELIS in development?
    Yes, extended-release and transdermal patches are in early-stage clinical development to improve adherence and minimize side effects.

  4. What are the key challenges facing QBRELIS’s market growth?
    Challenges include competition from established drugs, safety perceptions, regulatory hurdles, and reimbursement policies that favor generic options.

  5. What is the long-term revenue potential for QBRELIS?
    If successful in expanding indications and formulations, QBRELIS could capture a significant portion of the global antipsychotic market, potentially generating billions in annual revenue by 2030.


Sources

[1] Global Psychiatry Market Overview, Allied Market Research, 2022.
[2] Boehringer Ingelheim Corporate Data, 2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.