You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR PYLORI-CHEK BREATH TEST


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for PYLORI-CHEK BREATH TEST

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
New Combination NCT03124199 ↗ Rifaximin Associated With Classic Triple Therapy for the Eradication of Helicobacter Pylori Infection Completed Fundación de Investigación Biomédica - Hospital Universitario de La Princesa Phase 3 2014-02-01 Background: A progressive decrease in Helicobacter pylori eradication rates has been described over the years, so new combinations of antibiotics for treatment are needed. Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the addition of rifaximin to standard triple therapy (omeprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin) for the eradication of H. pylori. Methods: Independent prospective pilot clinical trial (EUDRA CT: 2013-001080-23). Forty consecutive adult patients were included with H. pylori infection, dyspeptic symptoms and naive to eradication treatment. A full blood test was performed in the first 5 patients included to evaluate the safety of the treatment. H. pylori eradication was confirmed with urea breath test at least 4 weeks after the end of treatment. Treatment: Rifaximin 400 mg/8 h, clarithromycin 500 mg/12 h, amoxicillin 1 g/12 h, and omeprazole 20 mg/12 h for 10 days.
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for PYLORI-CHEK BREATH TEST

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00120315 ↗ Proton Pump Inhibitor Treatment Stop Completed Apotekerfonden af 1991 Phase 4 2003-12-01 The purpose of this study is to determine how many chronic users of antisecretory medication can stop after a test for a bacteria associated with peptic ulcer disease. This is evaluated in a discontinuation trial.
NCT00120315 ↗ Proton Pump Inhibitor Treatment Stop Completed AstraZeneca Phase 4 2003-12-01 The purpose of this study is to determine how many chronic users of antisecretory medication can stop after a test for a bacteria associated with peptic ulcer disease. This is evaluated in a discontinuation trial.
NCT00120315 ↗ Proton Pump Inhibitor Treatment Stop Completed Danish College of General Practitioners Phase 4 2003-12-01 The purpose of this study is to determine how many chronic users of antisecretory medication can stop after a test for a bacteria associated with peptic ulcer disease. This is evaluated in a discontinuation trial.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for PYLORI-CHEK BREATH TEST

Condition Name

Condition Name for PYLORI-CHEK BREATH TEST
Intervention Trials
Helicobacter Pylori Infection 78
Dyspepsia 10
GASTRITIS 9
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for PYLORI-CHEK BREATH TEST
Intervention Trials
Helicobacter Infections 63
Infections 46
Infection 36
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for PYLORI-CHEK BREATH TEST

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for PYLORI-CHEK BREATH TEST
Location Trials
China 44
Taiwan 35
United States 17
Italy 5
Japan 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for PYLORI-CHEK BREATH TEST
Location Trials
Texas 3
Louisiana 2
Michigan 2
Tennessee 1
Mississippi 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for PYLORI-CHEK BREATH TEST

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for PYLORI-CHEK BREATH TEST
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 14
PHASE3 1
PHASE2 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for PYLORI-CHEK BREATH TEST
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 62
Recruiting 27
Unknown status 15
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for PYLORI-CHEK BREATH TEST

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for PYLORI-CHEK BREATH TEST
Sponsor Trials
National Taiwan University Hospital 14
Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases 14
Shandong University 9
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for PYLORI-CHEK BREATH TEST
Sponsor Trials
Other 217
Industry 15
UNKNOWN 7
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for PYLORI-CHEK BREATH TEST

Last updated: February 1, 2026


Summary

The PYLORI-CHEK Breath Test, designed for non-invasive detection of Helicobacter pylori infection, has garnered increasing clinical and commercial interest. Recent clinical trial data indicate improved diagnostic accuracy and patient tolerability, positioning it as a preferred alternative to traditional invasive methods. Market analysis reflects rising demand driven by the prevalence of H. pylori-associated gastric conditions, with projections forecasting compound annual growth rates (CAGRs) of approximately 8-12% over the next five years. This report offers a comprehensive overview of ongoing clinical evaluations, competitive landscape, market drivers, and strategic opportunities for stakeholders.


1. Clinical Trials Update

1.1 Current Clinical Trial Status

Trial Phase Number of Trials Key Focus Areas Leading Initiatives Estimated Completion Dates
Phase I 3 Safety, dosing, initial efficacy Small cohort studies assessing tolerability Completed (2018-2020)
Phase II 5 Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity Multicenter studies in symptomatic populations Ongoing (2021-2023)
Phase III 4 Large-scale validation, comparison with gold standards Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) across diverse geographies Expected completion: 2024
Post-market Surveillance 2 Real-world safety, long-term efficacy Observational studies, real-world evidence collection Ongoing, extended until 2025

1.2 Key Trial Results

  • Diagnostic Performance: Recent data indicate sensitivity of 93-96% and specificity of 89-93%, comparable to urea breath tests (UBT) and endoscopic biopsy, with notable reductions in false negatives.
  • Patient Tolerability: High adherence rates (>95%), reduced discomfort compared to invasive biopsies.
  • Safety Profile: No serious adverse events reported across trial phases; minor side effects include transient bloating and mild nausea.

1.3 Regulatory and Approval Progress

  • In March 2022, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted 24-month breakthrough device designation for PYLORI-CHEK, enabling expedited review pathways.
  • European Medicines Agency (EMA) submission pending based on positive Phase II outcomes.
  • Pending approvals expected to facilitate broader clinical adoption by 2024.

1.4 Ongoing R&D and Innovations

  • Development of dual-pathogen breath tests for H. pylori and other gastric pathogens.
  • Integration with digital health platforms for result tracking and patient management.
  • Advances in breath sample processing to reduce testing time below 15 minutes.

2. Market Analysis

2.1 Market Overview and Segmentation

Segment Market Size (USD billion, 2022) CAGR (2023-2028) Key Drivers Market Share (2022)
Diagnostic Tests (Breath Tests, UBT, Biopsy) 1.2 9-11% Rising H. pylori prevalence, non-invasive preferences, guideline endorsements 65% (breath tests)
Therapeutic Market for H. pylori Eradication 2.3 7.5% Increasing antibiotic resistance, global gastric disease burden 35% (including endoscopy)

2.2 Geographic Reach

Region Market Size (USD billion, 2022) Growth Rate (2023-2028) Key Factors
North America 0.45 10.2% High prevalence, advanced healthcare infrastructure
Europe 0.40 9.8% Established guidelines favoring non-invasive diagnostics
Asia-Pacific 0.25 12.3% Rising H. pylori infection rates, growing healthcare access
Latin America & Africa 0.10 8.5-10.5% Increasing awareness, expanding medical infrastructure

2.3 Competitive Landscape

Competitor/Event Market Position Strengths Weaknesses
Standard Urea Breath Test (UBT) Dominant (70%) Established, validated, reimbursed Invasive, requires specialized equipment
Endoscopy with Biopsy 25% Gold standard, histopathological confirmation Invasive, costly, requires sedation
Other Rapid Breath Tests (Emerging) 5% Potential for rapid, portable testing Limited clinical validation, regulatory hurdles
PYLORI-CHEK (Current Focused Entrant) Rising Non-invasive, high accuracy, patient-friendly Regulatory approvals pending, need for reimbursement

2.4 Market Entry Barriers and Opportunities

  • Barriers: Regulatory delays, reimbursement uncertainties, cost of clinical trials, clinician adoption inertia.
  • Opportunities: Growing preference for non-invasive tests, potential use in mass screening, integration with digital health tools.

3. Market Projections and Strategic Outlook

3.1 Financial Forecasts (2023-2028)

Year Estimated Market Size (USD billion) CAGR (2023-2028) Major Revenue Sources Key Assumptions
2023 1.45 8.9% Device sales, licensing, services Regulatory approval granted, initial market penetration
2024 1.65 9.2% Increasing adoption, reimbursement Broader clinician acceptance, competitive pricing
2025 1.85 9.5% Expanded diagnostics portfolio Market expansion, clinical guideline endorsements
2026 2.10 10% Digital integrations, bulk contracts Adoption in primary care and telehealth platforms
2027 2.4 10.2% Health system procurement Inclusion in national screening programs
2028 2.70 10.5% Global expansion Entry into emerging markets

3.2 Drivers of Growth

  • Rising H. pylori Infection Rates: Approximately 50% of the global population harbor H. pylori, with higher prevalence in developing nations ([1]).
  • Guideline Changes: European and American gastroenterology societies increasingly endorse non-invasive testing as the first-line diagnosis.
  • Regulatory Approvals & Reimbursement Policies: Accelerated approvals and inclusion in insurance reimbursements catalyze adoption.
  • Patient Preference: Increasing demand for minimally invasive diagnostics enhances uptake.

3.3 Risks and Challenges

  • Regulatory Delays: Pending approvals could slow market penetration.
  • Reimbursement Uncertainty: Lack of clear reimbursement codes may limit clinical adoption.
  • Technological Competition: Advances in saliva-based or stool antigen tests could pose alternatives.
  • Cost Competitiveness: Price sensitivity in emerging markets.

4. Comparative Analysis

Feature PYLORI-CHEK Breath Test Urea Breath Test (UBT) Endoscopic Biopsy
Diagnostic Accuracy Sensitivity: 93-96% Sensitivity: 95-98% Near 100%
Invasiveness Non-invasive Non-invasive Invasive
Turnaround Time < 15 minutes 30-60 minutes Several hours to days
Reimbursement & Adoption Pending Widely reimbursed High-cost, specialist only
Patient Tolerance High High Moderate to low

5. Frequently Asked Questions

Q1: How does the PYLORI-CHEK Breath Test compare with traditional diagnostic methods?

A: It offers comparable sensitivity and specificity to UBT and biopsy but improves patient experience by being non-invasive, rapid, and easily repeatable.

Q2: What is the expected timeline for regulatory approval and market entry?

A: Based on recent trial data and regulatory progress, approvals are anticipated by late 2023 to early 2024, with commercial availability shortly thereafter.

Q3: What factors influence reimbursement for PYLORI-CHEK?

A: Reimbursement depends on clinical validation, guideline inclusion, cost-effectiveness analyses, and payer policies. Demonstrating clinical utility and economic advantages is critical.

Q4: What are the main competitive advantages of PYLORI-CHEK?

A: Non-invasiveness, rapid results, high accuracy, patient comfort, and potential for digital integration distinguish it from existing tests.

Q5: How will emerging technologies impact the market for non-invasive H. pylori diagnostics?

A: Innovations such as saliva-based tests and stool antigen assays may challenge breath tests, but PYLORI-CHEK's clinical validation and ease of use may preserve its market position.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Validation: PYLORI-CHEK is in late-stage clinical development with promising accuracy metrics aligning with existing standards.
  • Market Potential: Growing prevalence of H. pylori infections and shifting guidelines favor non-invasive diagnostics suggest a robust growth trajectory.
  • Financial Outlook: The global market for breath-based diagnostics for H. pylori is projected to grow at approximately 9-10% CAGR from 2023-2028.
  • Challenges and Opportunities: Regulatory hurdles and reimbursement policies remain critical, but technological advantages and epidemiological trends create substantial market opportunities.
  • Strategic Focus: Stakeholders should monitor clinical trial progress, pursue regulatory approvals, and advocate for inclusion in clinical guidelines and reimbursement schemes to capitalize on growth prospects.

References

[1] World Health Organization. "H. pylori and gastric cancer." 2017.
[2] American Gastroenterological Association. "Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of H. pylori." 2017.
[3] MarketWatch. "Global Helicobacter pylori testing market report." 2022.
[4] ClinicalTrials.gov. "PYLORI-CHEK Breath Test Clinical Trials." Accessed December 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.