Last Updated: May 11, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR PROVENTIL


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for PROVENTIL

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00521222 ↗ Evaluating Long Acting Beta Agonists Used to Treat Asthma Among Those With Either Arg/Arg or Gly/Gly Genotypes Unknown status Columbia University N/A 2007-06-01 The investigators are conducting a study of asthma patients who use fluticasone with salmeterol (Advair) or any other combination of an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and a long acting beta agonist (LABA) to manage their asthma symptoms. Participants begin the study by continuing to use fluticasone with salmeterol or substituting fluticasone with salmeterol for their current ICS/LABA medication at their regular dose or the comparable dose(all study medications are provided) for a six-week period. Patients are then separated into 2 groups: one group is asked to use fluticasone (Flovent), the other to use fluticasone with salmeterol , twice daily over a 16-week period (patients will need to be seen monthly during this time). Neither study personnel nor patients will know which drug is being used. Patients are also asked to use a peak flow meter and record their daily results on a form, along with the number of puffs they use of their rescue inhaler each day. They also record any changes in asthma medications and information on any asthma episodes. The investigators hypothesize that there are certain patients with asthma who will do better when a long acting beta agonist is removed from their maintenance asthma medications.
NCT00550550 ↗ Efficacy and Safety of Grass Sublingual Tablet in Children and Adolescents (P05239 AM3)(COMPLETED) Completed ALK-Abelló A/S Phase 3 2007-11-01 The purpose of the study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of a grass sublingual tablet in children and adolescents with a history of grass-pollen induced rhinoconjunctivitis with or without asthma.
NCT00550550 ↗ Efficacy and Safety of Grass Sublingual Tablet in Children and Adolescents (P05239 AM3)(COMPLETED) Completed Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Phase 3 2007-11-01 The purpose of the study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of a grass sublingual tablet in children and adolescents with a history of grass-pollen induced rhinoconjunctivitis with or without asthma.
NCT00562159 ↗ Efficacy and Safety of Grass Sublingual Tablet in Adults (P05238 AM3)(COMPLETED) Completed ALK-Abelló A/S Phase 3 2007-11-01 This purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of a grass sublingual (under-the-tongue) tablet.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for PROVENTIL

Condition Name

Condition Name for PROVENTIL
Intervention Trials
Asthma 13
Bronchospasm 3
Conjunctivitis 2
Rhinitis 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for PROVENTIL
Intervention Trials
Asthma 13
Bronchial Spasm 3
Conjunctivitis 2
Rhinitis 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for PROVENTIL

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for PROVENTIL
Location Trials
United States 53
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for PROVENTIL
Location Trials
Oregon 7
Texas 6
California 5
Florida 4
Colorado 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for PROVENTIL

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for PROVENTIL
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 3
Phase 3 7
Phase 2 5
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for PROVENTIL
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 13
Terminated 4
Unknown status 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for PROVENTIL

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for PROVENTIL
Sponsor Trials
Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 6
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. 3
AstraZeneca 3
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for PROVENTIL
Sponsor Trials
Industry 15
Other 13
NIH 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

PROVENTIL Market Analysis and Financial Projection

Last updated: April 27, 2026

Proventil (albuterol sulfate): Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection

What is Proventil and what product lines define the market?

Proventil is the brand name for albuterol sulfate, a short-acting beta-2 agonist (SABA) used for relief of bronchospasm in conditions such as asthma and COPD. In market and clinical contexts, “Proventil” is primarily evaluated as an albuterol inhalation product, with demand driven by acute symptom relief, formulary access, and competitive supply of multisource SABA inhalers and nebulized solutions.

Core commercially relevant formats

  • Metered-dose inhaler (MDI): albuterol sulfate inhalation aerosol (CFC-free era products; formulation and device differ by NDA/manufacturer).
  • Nebulizer solution: albuterol sulfate inhalation solution for acute and chronic symptom management in patients using nebulizers.

Proventil’s competitive set is not a single molecule; it is a therapeutic class plus device-specific substitution:

  • Other albuterol brands and authorized generics (MDI and nebulized)
  • Alternative SABAs (where available through substitution policies)
  • Longer-acting controllers (for some patients, reducing SABA reliance)

What do the latest clinical trial signals indicate for albuterol (Proventil) specifically?

Albuterol is an established, off-patent product in most geographies. Clinical trial activity for albuterol is typically concentrated in:

  • Formulation/device optimization (particle size, spray pattern, plume characteristics, compatibility with spacers)
  • Comparative inhalation technique endpoints
  • Pediatric and acute-care usage studies
  • Real-world effectiveness and endpoints linked to emergency utilization, symptom scores, and rescue dosing

However, “Proventil” as a brand-specific intervention has limited stand-alone modern interventional trial volume because most development shifts to authorized generics, device generations, or class-level evidence rather than branded-albuterol trials.

For decision-making, the practical signal is that albuterol demand is sustained by:

  • Ongoing need for rapid rescue therapy
  • Broad accessibility and low perceived clinical differentiation among SABAs (driven by formulary, cost, and device usability)
  • Substitution and therapeutic switching that reduces the likelihood of branded-albuterol share gains through new clinical claims

Clinical implication for R&D and licensing: trials most often change device usability and administration workflow, not clinical efficacy in the way that new molecular entity development would.


What is the market structure for Proventil, and where does pricing pressure come from?

Market structure

  • SABA inhalers and nebulized albuterol are mature, with intense brand-to-generic and generic-to-generic competition.
  • Market share is influenced by:
    • Net price and contracting (PBM formularies)
    • NADAC/AMP dynamics (U.S. pricing frameworks)
    • Device preference (MDI vs nebulizer; spacer compatibility)
    • State and federal procurement for acute care and public health systems

Pricing and margin pressure drivers

  • Authorized generic entry and broad manufacturing redundancy
  • High substitutability between albuterol products
  • Low barriers to entry for approved generics (bioequivalence-based pathway)
  • Lower tolerance for premium pricing versus controllers due to payer cost containment

What is the forecast logic for Proventil demand and revenue?

Forecasts for mature SABAs typically track:

  • Asthma and COPD prevalence and exacerbation rates (volume driver)
  • Rescue inhaler utilization intensity (behavioral and guideline adherence driver)
  • Formulary placement stability (access driver)
  • Substitution rates against competing albuterol products and class comparators
  • Migration from nebulizers to MDIs where care models and devices support it

Key demand assumptions (directional)

  • Volume: grows modestly in line with treated populations; peaks during higher exacerbation seasons in acute markets.
  • Net revenue: tends to be flatter due to generic price competition and PBM contracting, with periodic step-downs after major supply and pricing resets.
  • Share: brand share is capped by authorized generic options unless brand-specific contracting restores differentiation via supply reliability, patient support, or device performance perception.

How does Proventil compare against substitutes that can erode share?

Controller-led substitution

  • For patients on effective inhaled corticosteroid or ICS/LABA regimens, SABA rescue use can decline, reducing annual albuterol inhaler counts per treated patient.
  • This does not eliminate rescue demand, but it can dampen growth.

Device substitution

  • Where inhalation therapy programs favor MDI with spacer, nebulized albuterol demand can soften.
  • Where acute care and specific patient needs favor nebulization (e.g., very young children, severe exacerbation settings), nebulized demand holds more steadily.

Therapeutic-class substitution

  • Other SABAs (where present) compete on access and cost.
  • In practice, most payer decisions in a given formulary tier route toward the lowest net cost product with acceptable device and coverage.

Market projection: baseline scenario through the forecast horizon

Below is a decision-useful scenario projection framework for Proventil brand revenue rather than a claim of single-point certainty. The intent is to support investment and licensing timing, not to overfit an imprecise model.

Projection framework (U.S.-centric, brand-level)

Variable Base assumption Upside scenario Downside scenario
Treated population Stable to low growth Higher treated prevalence due to detection programs Reduced incidence due to adherence improvements in controller use
Exacerbation intensity Seasonal normal Higher ED presentations; poorer control in cohorts Better control reduces rescue frequency
Net price Flat to slight decline Contract renewal with improved net PBM repricing and deeper generic discounts
Share vs authorized generics Stable to slight erosion Device differentiation + supply advantage in contracts Aggressive substitution to lower net cost SKU
Mix (MDI vs nebulizer) Gradual shift toward MDI Nebulized resilience in certain settings Faster migration to MDI with spacer

Directionally expected outcome

  • Volume: modest growth or flat.
  • Revenue: modest growth or flat-to-down, dominated by price and mix.
  • Share: constrained by authorized generic availability and therapeutic substitutability.

What does this mean for clinical development strategy tied to Proventil?

For albuterol brands in mature markets, the credible development value proposition generally concentrates on:

  • New device or formulation improvements that can defend usability and reduce administration errors
  • Indication expansion only when supported by meaningful clinical endpoints and competitive differentiation (rare for established SABAs)
  • Formulary and access execution (contracting, supply reliability, patient support)

The competitive landscape is such that brand-level differentiation by clinical trials alone is difficult unless the program generates endpoints payers and formularies accept as policy-relevant (e.g., reduced rescue events, reduced ED visits). Most albuterol programs historically do not reach that threshold compared with controllers.


Key watch items for near-term market performance

  • PBM contract renewals and formulary tier moves for SABA inhalers and nebulized solutions.
  • Supply stability and manufacturing continuity for specific SKUs and device types (in mature categories, disruptions can temporarily improve net share).
  • Seasonal utilization (winter respiratory infection patterns).
  • Policy-driven substitution (preferred product lists; state Medicaid managed care rules).
  • Therapy guideline adherence shifting SABA intensity per patient.

Key Takeaways

  • Proventil (albuterol sulfate) is a mature SABA category with high substitution and persistent pricing pressure from authorized generics.
  • Clinical trial activity is mainly device/formulation and administration workflow oriented, with limited brand-specific innovation leverage.
  • Market demand is supported by rescue therapy needs, but revenue growth is typically capped by net price declines and PBM contracting dynamics.
  • Forecasts should be built on exacerbation and rescue intensity plus net price and mix, not on molecule-driven step-changes.

FAQs

  1. Is Proventil still a growth product?
    It is typically a stable-to-slow growth product category where volume is supported by treated populations and exacerbations, while revenue depends on net pricing and formulary placement.

  2. What limits Proventil brand revenue versus controllers?
    SABAs face strong generic substitution and lower payer willingness to pay premiums when controllers reduce rescue need.

  3. Does nebulized albuterol face structural decline?
    In many settings, demand trends toward MDIs with spacer when feasible, but nebulized demand persists in acute care and specific patient groups.

  4. What type of evidence can move formulary decisions for Proventil?
    Evidence tied to administration effectiveness and health-system endpoints that change rescue frequency, ED utilization, or adherence to inhalation technique.

  5. What are the biggest near-term performance risks?
    PBM contract repricing, deeper authorized generic discounts, and supply disruptions at the SKU/device level.


References

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Proventil (albuterol sulfate) prescribing information and related product labeling documents. FDA accessdata database.
[2] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA-approved drug products database and labeling history for albuterol sulfate inhalation aerosol and albuterol sulfate inhalation solution. FDA.
[3] Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA). Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention. Latest report.
[4] Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD). Global Strategy for Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatment of COPD. Latest report.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.