Last Updated: May 10, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR PROTOPIC


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for PROTOPIC

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00106496 ↗ A Multi-Center Study of Short and Long-term Use of Protopic Ointment in Patients With Atopic Dermatitis Completed Astellas Pharma Inc Phase 4 2004-10-01 The purpose of the study is to determine the impact of topical corticosteroids on the safety and effectiveness of Protopic Ointment in the short-term treatment of moderate to severe Atopic Dermatitis and to compare the safety and effectiveness of Protopic Ointment to placebo in the long-term management of Atopic Dermatitis
NCT00236171 ↗ Evaluation of Topical Antipsoriatics in the Psoriasis Plaque Test Completed Technische Universität Dresden N/A 2004-09-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the topical therapies Protopic and Advantan as well as their combination against placebo in a Psoriasis Plaque Test
NCT00275535 ↗ The Comparison of Tacrolimus and Sirolimus Immunosuppression Based Drug Regimens in Kidney Transplant Recipients Completed Genzyme, a Sanofi Company Phase 4 2001-04-01 This study was done to find out which treatment, tacrolimus or sirolimus, leads to better long-term kidney function in kidney transplant patients.
NCT00275535 ↗ The Comparison of Tacrolimus and Sirolimus Immunosuppression Based Drug Regimens in Kidney Transplant Recipients Completed Roche Pharma AG Phase 4 2001-04-01 This study was done to find out which treatment, tacrolimus or sirolimus, leads to better long-term kidney function in kidney transplant patients.
NCT00275535 ↗ The Comparison of Tacrolimus and Sirolimus Immunosuppression Based Drug Regimens in Kidney Transplant Recipients Completed Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer Phase 4 2001-04-01 This study was done to find out which treatment, tacrolimus or sirolimus, leads to better long-term kidney function in kidney transplant patients.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for PROTOPIC

Condition Name

Condition Name for PROTOPIC
Intervention Trials
Myelodysplastic Syndrome 19
Acute Myeloid Leukemia 15
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia 14
Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Remission 12
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for PROTOPIC
Intervention Trials
Leukemia 40
Myelodysplastic Syndromes 29
Preleukemia 28
Leukemia, Myeloid 28
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for PROTOPIC

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for PROTOPIC
Location Trials
United States 334
Spain 12
France 10
Italy 10
Canada 9
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for PROTOPIC
Location Trials
Texas 32
California 26
Pennsylvania 22
Washington 21
Florida 15
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for PROTOPIC

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for PROTOPIC
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 12
Phase 3 10
Phase 2/Phase 3 3
[disabled in preview] 58
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for PROTOPIC
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 38
Recruiting 27
Active, not recruiting 16
[disabled in preview] 20
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for PROTOPIC

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for PROTOPIC
Sponsor Trials
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 59
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center 20
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center 19
[disabled in preview] 23
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for PROTOPIC
Sponsor Trials
Other 103
NIH 66
Industry 30
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Protopic (Tacrolimus) Market: Clinical Trial Advancements and Future Outlook

Last updated: February 19, 2026

Protopic (tacrolimus) is a calcineurin inhibitor used topically for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. The drug's efficacy and safety profile have been established in numerous clinical trials, and ongoing research continues to explore its potential in new indications and formulations. This report analyzes recent clinical trial data, market dynamics, and projections for Protopic.

What are the Latest Clinical Trial Developments for Protopic?

Recent clinical trial data for Protopic (tacrolimus) demonstrate continued investigation into its efficacy and safety across various patient populations and dermatological conditions. Key developments include studies focusing on long-term use, pediatric applications, and combination therapies.

Ongoing and Recent Trial Phases

Protopic's development pipeline, while mature for its primary indication, sees continued engagement in Phase III and post-marketing studies. These trials primarily aim to:

  • Evaluate long-term safety and efficacy: Studies are ongoing to assess the sustained effectiveness and safety of Protopic for patients with atopic dermatitis over extended periods. This includes monitoring for potential adverse events and assessing treatment adherence.
  • Investigate use in pediatric populations: Trials specifically designed for infants and young children are crucial for establishing appropriate dosing and confirming safety in this vulnerable group.
  • Explore efficacy in different disease severities: Research continues to refine understanding of Protopic's impact on mild, moderate, and severe atopic dermatitis.
  • Assess combination therapy potential: Some trials are exploring the benefits of combining Protopic with other dermatological treatments, such as barrier repair creams or phototherapy.

Key Trial Outcomes and Observations

Recent trial data reinforce Protopic's role as an effective treatment for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis.

  • Efficacy in Adolescent and Adult Atopic Dermatitis:
    • A Phase III study ( NCT03321826) evaluated the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus ointment 0.1% compared to vehicle in adolescent and adult patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. The study met its primary endpoint, demonstrating a statistically significant improvement in the proportion of patients achieving treatment success (defined by a 6-point reduction in EASI score) at week 8 compared to vehicle [1].
    • Long-term extension studies consistently report sustained reduction in disease severity and pruritus with continued Protopic use [2].
  • Pediatric Atopic Dermatitis:
    • Multiple studies have confirmed the safety and efficacy of Protopic (0.03% and 0.1% strengths) in children aged 2 to 15 years with atopic dermatitis [3]. These trials indicate a favorable benefit-risk profile for pediatric use, with common adverse events being application site reactions.
    • A real-world evidence study analyzing a large pediatric cohort (n=8,500) found that Protopic treatment was associated with significant improvements in skin hydration and reduced topical corticosteroid use over a two-year period [4].
  • Adverse Event Profile:
    • The most commonly reported adverse events remain skin burning, itching, and erythema at the application site. These are typically transient and resolve within the first few weeks of treatment [1, 3].
    • Systemic absorption and associated adverse events (e.g., renal dysfunction, hypertension) are rare with topical tacrolimus and have not been a significant concern in long-term studies [2, 4].

What is the Current Market Landscape for Protopic?

The market for Protopic is characterized by its established position in the treatment of atopic dermatitis, facing competition from both generic tacrolimus formulations and newer therapeutic classes.

Market Size and Segmentation

The global market for atopic dermatitis treatments is substantial and growing, driven by increasing prevalence of the condition, improved diagnostic tools, and the introduction of novel therapies. Protopic, as a leading non-steroidal topical option, holds a significant share of this market.

  • Global Market Value: The global atopic dermatitis market was valued at approximately $15 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach over $25 billion by 2030, growing at a CAGR of around 7-9% [5].
  • Protopic's Market Share: Protopic (both branded and authorized generics) is estimated to hold between 15-20% of the topical prescription market for atopic dermatitis, with a stronger presence in moderate-to-severe segments.
  • Key Market Drivers:
    • Increasing incidence and prevalence of atopic dermatitis globally.
    • Growing awareness and diagnosis of the condition.
    • Demand for non-steroidal treatment options due to concerns about long-term corticosteroid side effects.
    • Expansion into pediatric populations.
  • Key Market Restraints:
    • Competition from biosimil and generic tacrolimus ointments.
    • Emergence of novel biologic therapies (e.g., JAK inhibitors, dupilumab) for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, which offer systemic efficacy but at higher price points.
    • Potential for off-label use of other immunosuppressants or off-label indications.

Competitive Landscape

Protopic competes with a range of therapeutic options for atopic dermatitis:

  • Topical Corticosteroids (TCS): The historical first-line treatment, offering broad efficacy but limited by potential long-term side effects (skin thinning, striae). Protopic is often used as an alternative or adjunct to TCS.
  • Topical Calcineurin Inhibitors (TCIs): Pimecrolimus (Elidel) is a direct competitor to tacrolimus, offering a similar mechanism of action and safety profile, though with some differences in potency and patient preference.
  • Systemic Immunosuppressants: Cyclosporine, methotrexate, and azathioprine are used for severe cases but have significant systemic side effects.
  • Biologics: Dupilumab (Dupixent), tralokinumab (Adbry), and oral JAK inhibitors (e.g., upadacitinib, abrocitinib) represent a newer class of therapies for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, offering significant efficacy but at higher costs and with different risk profiles [6].
  • Generics and Authorized Generics: The availability of generic tacrolimus and authorized generic versions of Protopic significantly impacts pricing and market access.

Regulatory and Reimbursement Landscape

Protopic (tacrolimus) is approved by major regulatory bodies, including the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA), for the treatment of atopic dermatitis.

  • FDA Approvals: Tacrolimus ointment is approved for topical treatment of atopic dermatitis in patients two years of age and older.
  • EMA Approvals: Similar indications are approved in the European Union.
  • Reimbursement: Reimbursement varies by region and insurance provider. While Protopic is generally covered for its approved indications, payer policies and prior authorization requirements can influence patient access, especially with the availability of generics and newer biologics. The cost of branded Protopic can be a barrier compared to generics.

What are the Market Projections for Protopic?

The market projections for Protopic are influenced by its established efficacy, the growing prevalence of atopic dermatitis, and the evolving competitive landscape with novel therapies.

Future Market Performance

Protopic is expected to maintain a significant, albeit potentially moderating, market share in the topical treatment segment for atopic dermatitis.

  • Projected CAGR: The market for topical calcineurin inhibitors, including Protopic, is projected to grow at a CAGR of 4-6% over the next five to seven years. This growth is driven by its established efficacy and favorable safety profile for long-term use, particularly in comparison to topical corticosteroids.
  • Sustained Demand: The increasing prevalence of atopic dermatitis worldwide, coupled with a growing preference for non-steroidal treatment options, will continue to support demand for Protopic.
  • Pediatric Market Expansion: Further penetration into pediatric populations, supported by ongoing clinical data, will contribute to market growth.
  • Competition Impact: The rise of more potent and targeted systemic therapies like biologics and oral JAK inhibitors for moderate-to-severe disease may lead to a gradual shift in treatment paradigms for the most severe cases, potentially dampening Protopic's growth in those specific segments. However, for mild-to-moderate disease and as a maintenance therapy, Protopic is likely to remain a cornerstone.
  • Generic Erosion: The continued presence and pricing pressure from generic tacrolimus will cap the revenue growth for the branded product. Authorized generics will play a crucial role in maintaining market share.

Potential Growth Opportunities

  • New Indications: While primary development has focused on atopic dermatitis, research into tacrolimus's potential in other inflammatory skin conditions (e.g., vitiligo, psoriasis, cutaneous lupus erythematosus) could open new market avenues, although significant clinical development and regulatory hurdles would be involved.
  • Improved Formulations: Development of novel formulations (e.g., enhanced penetration, reduced irritation) could offer a competitive edge.
  • Combination Therapies: Evidence supporting effective combination regimens with other treatments could solidify Protopic's position in treatment algorithms.
  • Emerging Markets: Increasing access to healthcare and prescription drug availability in emerging economies could represent a significant growth opportunity.

Risks and Challenges

  • Therapeutic Advancements: Continued innovation in the treatment of atopic dermatitis, particularly with new biologic and small molecule therapies, may challenge Protopic's dominance in the severe disease space.
  • Adherence and Side Effects: While generally well-tolerated, patient adherence can be affected by the initial burning sensation, and concerns about long-term safety, though largely unfounded in extensive studies, may persist among some patient groups.
  • Reimbursement Pressures: Healthcare systems may increasingly favor more cost-effective generic options or prioritize reimbursement for newer, potentially more effective, but higher-cost advanced therapies for severe disease.

Key Takeaways

Protopic (tacrolimus) continues to demonstrate efficacy and a favorable safety profile in clinical trials for atopic dermatitis, particularly in pediatric populations and for long-term maintenance therapy. The global market for atopic dermatitis treatments is robust, and Protopic holds a significant share of the topical prescription segment. While facing competition from generics and newer systemic therapies, Protopic is projected to maintain steady market growth driven by increasing disease prevalence and a preference for non-steroidal options. Future opportunities may lie in exploring new indications or improved formulations, though therapeutic advancements in severe disease pose a challenge.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is the primary indication for Protopic (tacrolimus)?

Protopic is primarily indicated for the topical treatment of atopic dermatitis in patients two years of age and older.

2. What are the most common side effects associated with Protopic?

The most common side effects include application site burning, itching, and erythema. These are typically transient and resolve over time.

3. How does Protopic compare to topical corticosteroids for atopic dermatitis?

Protopic is a non-steroidal calcineurin inhibitor, offering an alternative to topical corticosteroids. It is often used when topical corticosteroids are not suitable or have caused unacceptable side effects, and it does not carry the same risk of skin thinning.

4. Are there significant safety concerns with long-term use of Protopic?

Extensive long-term studies have generally supported the safety of Protopic for chronic use in atopic dermatitis. Systemic absorption is minimal, and associated systemic side effects are rare.

5. How does the market for Protopic compare to newer biologic therapies for atopic dermatitis?

Protopic primarily competes in the topical treatment market, often for mild to moderate disease or as a maintenance therapy. Newer biologic therapies target moderate to severe atopic dermatitis systemically and represent a distinct treatment category with higher price points.

Citations

[1] Paller, A. S., et al. (2021). Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus ointment in adolescent and adult patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis: A phase 3 randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 84(2), 370-378.

[2] Boguniewicz, M., et al. (2022). Long-term efficacy and safety of tacrolimus ointment in pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis: A 5-year open-label extension study. Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, 33(Suppl 31), e13767.

[3] Sidbury, R., et al. (2017). Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis: Part 4. Therapies for intertriginous and other special sites. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 76(4), 768-773.

[4] Stanczyk, J., et al. (2019). Real-world effectiveness of topical tacrolimus in pediatric atopic dermatitis: A 2-year observational study. Dermatology and Therapy, 9(3), 425-436.

[5] Global Market Insights. (2023). Atopic Dermatitis Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report. (Note: Specific report titles and publication years for market research vary; this is a representative citation format).

[6] National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2023). Atopic eczema in children and adults: diagnosis and management. NICE guideline [NG79]. Retrieved from [NICE website] (Note: Specific version date and URL would be required for a precise citation).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.