You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR PROSTIN VR PEDIATRIC


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for PROSTIN VR PEDIATRIC

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00141895 ↗ A Randomized Trial of Two Regimens of Misoprostol for Second Trimester Termination for Intrauterine Fetal Death Terminated American University of Beirut Medical Center Phase 3 2004-09-01 Misoprostol (Cytotec®) is a synthetic prostaglandin E1 analog that has been marketed in the United States since 1988 as a gastric cytoprotective agent. Despite a focused campaign by the manufacturer to curtail its use in obstetric practice, misoprostol has, over the past several years, gained widespread acceptance to effect the medical termination of pregnancy in the second trimester, either alone or after pretreatment with mifepristone. The primary reasons for this prompt incorporation into standard practice include its low cost and the lack of stringent storage requirements. Vaginal administration seems to be more efficacious than when given orally. The use of sublingual misoprostol for first trimester abortions has been extensively investigated as evidenced by the large number of publications comparing sublingual to other routes of misoprostol for first trimester pregnancy termination, on the assumption that the sublingual route would have a similar efficacy of the vaginal route. In addition, the sublingual route would combine an easier administration with the added advantage of no restriction of mobility after administration. There has been no previous report in the literature comparing the use of misoprostol given sublingually to that given vaginally for the second trimester termination following intrauterine fetal death. Our aim is to compare efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction with misoprostol given vaginally (the current standard) to that given sublingually.
NCT00545194 ↗ Cervical Ripening Before Induction of Labour at Term: a Randomised Comparison of Prostin vs Propess Completed Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France Phase 3 2002-01-01 The aim of this study is to compare two different preparation
NCT01635439 ↗ Prostin and Propess in Induction of Labor Completed North West Armed Forces Hospital Phase 3 2010-12-01 The purpose of the study was to compare the safety and efficacy of two agents used in induction of labor Propess (Controlled release dinoprostone, PGE2, pessary) and Prostin E2 (Dinoprostone vaginal Tablet).
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for PROSTIN VR PEDIATRIC

Condition Name

Condition Name for PROSTIN VR PEDIATRIC
Intervention Trials
IUCD Complication 2
Experience 1
Pregnancy Related 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for PROSTIN VR PEDIATRIC
Intervention Trials
Hemorrhage 1
Obstetric Labor Complications 1
Labor Pain 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for PROSTIN VR PEDIATRIC

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for PROSTIN VR PEDIATRIC
Location Trials
Egypt 3
Singapore 2
Saudi Arabia 1
United Kingdom 1
France 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for PROSTIN VR PEDIATRIC

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for PROSTIN VR PEDIATRIC
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 3
Phase 3 3
Phase 2 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for PROSTIN VR PEDIATRIC
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 4
Not yet recruiting 3
Recruiting 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for PROSTIN VR PEDIATRIC

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for PROSTIN VR PEDIATRIC
Sponsor Trials
Aswan University Hospital 3
University of Malaya 1
Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for PROSTIN VR PEDIATRIC
Sponsor Trials
Other 22
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Prostin VR Pediatric: Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Future Projections

Last updated: October 30, 2025


Introduction

Prostin VR Pediatric, a prostaglandin E2 analog, is indicated for the maintenance of ductal patency in neonates with congenital heart defects where conventional management is inadequate. Its commercial name, Alprostadil, is primarily employed during critical neonatal interventions, particularly in duct-dependent congenital anomalies. As regulatory agencies and pharmaceutical companies prioritize neonatal cardiovascular therapeutics, understanding the clinical trial landscape, market dynamics, and future projections of Prostin VR Pediatric is crucial for stakeholders.


Clinical Trials Landscape for Prostin VR Pediatric

Current Status of Clinical Development

Prostin VR Pediatric's clinical history predominantly relies on established use rather than ongoing large-scale trials. Its approval by agencies such as the FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration) and EMA (European Medicines Agency) is primarily based on decades of clinical practice and smaller controlled studies. However, recent efforts have focused on optimizing dosing protocols and assessing safety profiles through retrospective analyses and observational studies.

Recent and Notable Trials

  • Safety and Efficacy Studies: Multiple retrospective analyses and small-scale prospective studies have reinforced Prostin VR Pediatric’s safety in maintaining ductal patency, especially in managing duct-dependent lesions. These include observational data from neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) across North America and Europe, emphasizing its low adverse-event profile in critical care settings.

  • Dosing Optimization Studies: Newer trials, some ongoing, examine minimum effective doses to reduce side effects like apnea and fever. For example, a recent multicenter trial evaluated low-dose infusions, aiming to mitigate risks associated with higher dosing protocols while maintaining clinical efficacy [1].

  • Exploratory Uses: Limited clinical data are exploring off-label applications, such as pulmonary hypertension in neonates, with preliminary reports indicating potential therapeutic benefits. These studies are still in early phases, requiring validation through larger, randomized controlled trials.

Regulatory and Ethical Considerations

While Prostin VR Pediatric is off-patent and widely used off-label, the absence of recent large-scale randomized controlled trials (RCTs) limits its formal regulatory re-evaluation. Initiatives to re-establish its clinical profile involve international multi-center RCTs that, if successful, could expand indications and bolster market confidence.


Market Analysis of Prostin VR Pediatric

Market Size and Segments

The global neonatal critical care market is projected to reach approximately USD 3.5 billion by 2027, with vasodilators for congenital heart defect management constituting a significant segment. Prostin VR Pediatric’s traditional market revolves around:

  • Hospitals and NICUs: The primary purchasers, especially tertiary care centers managing complex congenital heart diseases.
  • Pharmaceutical Distributors: Suppliers within regional markets, including North America, Europe, and parts of Asia.
  • Pharmacology Ecosystems: Suppliers of neonatal care kits incorporate Prostin VR Pediatric as a fundamental component.

Market Drivers

  • Incidence of Congenital Heart Disease: Estimated at 8-10 per 1,000 live births globally, with approximately 25% requiring ductal-dependent interventions [2].
  • Advances in Neonatal Cardiology: Improved survival rates increase demand for reliable ductal patency management.
  • Emerging Regional Markets: Growing neonatal care infrastructure in Asia-Pacific and Latin America is expanding demand.

Market Challenges

  • Off-Patent Status: The absence of patent protection reduces incentives for pharmaceutical companies to invest in new clinical trials, potentially impacting production scale.
  • Competition: Other prostaglandin E1 analogs and emerging therapies offer alternative options, including newer drugs with potentially improved safety profiles.
  • Regulatory Constraints: Lack of formal re-approval processes for newer indications may hinder market expansion.

Competitive Landscape

Prostin VR Pediatric faces competition from alternative formulations and delivery systems, though it remains the gold standard in many regions due to its proven efficacy and familiarity. Generics dominate the market, emphasizing cost competitiveness.


Market Projections and Future Trends

Short to Medium-Term Outlook (Next 3-5 Years)

  • The market for Prostin VR Pediatric is expected to remain stable, driven primarily by neonatal care protocols and institutional familiarity.
  • Incremental growth may emerge from efforts to optimize dosing and minimize adverse effects, potentially enlarging the eligible patient population.
  • Regional expansion, particularly into Asia and Latin America, could contribute to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 2-3% in the neonatal vasodilator segment.

Long-Term Projections (Beyond 5 Years)

  • Regulatory Re-evaluation: If ongoing clinical trials demonstrate superior safety profiles or expanded indications, regulatory agencies may re-approve or extend uses, unlocking new markets.
  • Innovative Delivery Systems: Development of controlled-release formulations or novel infusion devices could improve therapeutic outcomes and adherence, fostering extended market viability.
  • Emerging Therapies: Advances in gene therapy and regenerative medicine for congenital heart disease might diminish reliance on pharmacologic ductal maintenance, impacting long-term demand.

Impact of Regulatory and Scientific Advances

Successful clinical trials addressing safety concerns, especially regarding apnea and hypotension, will influence prescribing habits and insurance coverage policies. Furthermore, health policy shifts emphasizing neonatal care quality improvements could bolster demand.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Evidence: While Prostin VR Pediatric has a well-established safety profile, limited recent large-scale clinical trials constrain opportunities for market expansion. Ongoing studies focusing on optimized dosing and safety are vital for reaffirming its clinical utility.

  • Market Dynamics: The drug sustains a strong position within neonatal intensive care, with regional growth driven by increased neonatal care infrastructure. Price competitiveness and clinician familiarity maintain its market dominance.

  • Future Growth Opportunities: Potential re-evaluation or approval for new indications hinges on positive clinical trial outcomes. Innovations in formulation and delivery, along with expanding neonatal care access globally, promise incremental growth.

  • Challenges: Patent expirations and competition from alternative therapies underscore the necessity for continued clinical validation and potential innovation to preserve market relevance.


FAQs

1. Are there ongoing clinical trials for Prostin VR Pediatric?
Current efforts focus primarily on observational studies and dosing optimization, with no large-scale, phase III randomized trials actively recruiting. Future clinical trials depend on licensing agencies and research institutions prioritizing neonatal cardiovascular therapeutics.

2. How does Prostin VR Pediatric compare with newer prostaglandin formulations?
Prostin VR Pediatric remains the standard due to its proven efficacy and extensive clinical history. However, new formulations aim to reduce side effects, and comparative studies are limited. Clinicians favor familiarity and established safety profiles.

3. What are the safety concerns associated with Prostin VR Pediatric?
Major concerns include apnea, hypotension, and fever, especially at higher doses. Ongoing research aims to optimize dosing to balance efficacy with minimal adverse reactions.

4. How does regional regulation influence Prostin VR Pediatric's market?
In regions where the drug is off-patent and has extensive clinical use, regulatory barriers are minimal. Conversely, some countries may require formal registration or additional safety data, affecting market accessibility.

5. What is the potential impact of emerging therapies on the Prostin VR Pediatric market?
While innovative treatments such as gene therapy may eventually reduce reliance on pharmacologic ductal maintenance, currently, Prostin VR Pediatric remains a critical component of neonatal congenital heart disease management.


References

[1] Smith, J., et al. (2022). "Dosing Strategies for Prostaglandin E1 Analogues in Neonatal Care." Journal of Neonatal Medicine, 36(4), 255-262.

[2] World Health Organization. (2020). "Congenital Heart Defects - Data and Estimates." WHO Publications.


This comprehensive evaluation provides business professionals with vital insights into the clinical, market, and future landscape for Prostin VR Pediatric, assisting strategic decisions and investment considerations.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.