You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR PROPULSID


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for PROPULSID

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00372970 ↗ Placebo Controlled Trial of Botulinum Toxin for Gastroparesis Completed American College of Gastroenterology N/A 2003-07-01 It is hypothesized that in some patients with gastroparesis increased pyloric tone may be a contributing feature. Botox relaxes the pylorus so that food can empty the stomach more rapidly. Lesser quality studies have shown that this treatment works in about 40% of patients, and relieves symptoms for up to 3 months. This study compares this treatment to placebo (saline) injection. After a 1 month period patients may elect to receive open label botox who have not received relief from their first injection. Patients symptoms and gastric emptying are followed for 1 year.
NCT00372970 ↗ Placebo Controlled Trial of Botulinum Toxin for Gastroparesis Completed Temple University N/A 2003-07-01 It is hypothesized that in some patients with gastroparesis increased pyloric tone may be a contributing feature. Botox relaxes the pylorus so that food can empty the stomach more rapidly. Lesser quality studies have shown that this treatment works in about 40% of patients, and relieves symptoms for up to 3 months. This study compares this treatment to placebo (saline) injection. After a 1 month period patients may elect to receive open label botox who have not received relief from their first injection. Patients symptoms and gastric emptying are followed for 1 year.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for PROPULSID

Condition Name

Condition Name for PROPULSID
Intervention Trials
Gastroparesis 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for PROPULSID
Intervention Trials
Gastroparesis 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for PROPULSID

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for PROPULSID
Location Trials
United States 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for PROPULSID
Location Trials
Pennsylvania 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for PROPULSID

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for PROPULSID
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
N/A 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for PROPULSID
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for PROPULSID

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for PROPULSID
Sponsor Trials
American College of Gastroenterology 1
Temple University 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for PROPULSID
Sponsor Trials
Other 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

PROPULSID Market Analysis and Financial Projection

Last updated: February 11, 2026

Clinical Trials, Market Analysis, and Projection for Propulsid (Cisapride)


What is the current status of clinical trials for Propulsid?

Propulsid (cisapride) was once marketed as a prokinetic agent for gastrointestinal motility disorders. Its marketing was discontinued in many markets due to safety concerns related to cardiac arrhythmias. Historically, clinical trials focus on evaluating efficacy and safety in specific populations, including those with gastroparesis and other motility disorders.

Recent clinical trial activities are limited. The last known significant trials, conducted by Johnson & Johnson in the late 1990s and early 2000s, aimed to evaluate its use in pediatric populations. Subsequent regulatory actions led to withdrawal from the market in 2000 in the U.S. and several other countries.

Currently, no active Phase III trials are registered or ongoing globally. Small-scale or investigator-initiated studies may exist, but these are not publicly registered or funded by major pharmaceutical companies. The clinical trial landscape indicates that Propulsid's development and testing have halted due to safety concerns and market withdrawal.


What are the legal and regulatory statuses of Propulsid?

  • United States: Market withdrawal in 2000 following FDA warnings on cardiac risks.

  • European Union: Similar withdrawal; the drug is no longer authorized.

  • Other regions: Limited or no regulatory approval; some jurisdictions restrict imports or possession.

  • Legal liabilities: Ongoing litigation connected to adverse effects, influencing companies' willingness to reintroduce or develop Propulsid.

Despite its halted market presence, patent rights related to cisapride have expired, and no active patent protections are likely to hinder repurposing efforts.


Market analysis for Propulsid

Despite its market withdrawal, the potential for reintroduction hinges on the development of safer analogs or reformulations.

  • Market Size (Pre-2000): The global market for gastrointestinal prokinetics was valued at approximately USD 0.5–1 billion, with Propulsid accounting for up to 20% of prescriptions at peak usage.

  • Current Market Opportunity: Minimal for cisapride due to safety issues. However, other drugs targeted at gastroparesis, such as metoclopramide and erythromycin, remain in use, indicating ongoing market demand.

  • Competing Drugs: Dopamine antagonists, newer prokinetics (e.g., prucalopride), and emerging therapies like gastric electrical stimulation. The market favors agents with improved safety profiles.

  • Regulatory hurdles: Reintroduction would require extensive safety data to mitigate known risks; high development and approval costs are barriers.

  • Potential for Repurposing: Modifications to cisapride's core structure or formulation could reduce cardiac risks, opening renewed market prospects.


Market projection and future outlook

  • No current commercial activity: Under the current regulatory climate, Propulsid remains inactive and unlikely to re-enter the market without significant reformulation.

  • Reformulation prospects: Pharmaceutical R&D focused on cardiac safety has increased interest in developing safer analogs. If a reformulated, safer version of cisapride emerges, potential market size could reach USD 200–500 million within 5 years, assuming successful regulatory approval and market adoption.

  • R&D investment: No significant R&D initiatives are publicly announced. Smaller biotech firms or academia may explore structural modifications to restore safety.

  • Regulatory pathway: Likely to require full safety and efficacy data, including large-scale phase III trials, at an estimated cost of USD 100–200 million.

  • Market risk: High, due to safety concerns and competition from other prokinetics with better safety profiles. Also, the shifting landscape toward non-pharmacological interventions poses additional hurdles.


Key challenges and considerations

  • Safety profile: Cardiac arrhythmias associated with cisapride remain a substantial barrier.
  • Patent landscape: Patent protections have expired, reducing exclusivity benefits.
  • Regulatory approval: Reintroduction demands rigorous testing and approval from agencies like the FDA.
  • Competition: Other drugs with similar indications have gained market share with improved safety.
  • Innovation: Success depends on chemical modifications and clinical validation of safety.

Key Takeaways

  • Propulsid is effectively withdrawn from the market; no active clinical development exists.
  • Potential for reintegration exists if safer formulations are developed, but substantial R&D and regulatory hurdles remain.
  • The market is moving toward newer, safer therapies for gastrointestinal motility disorders, limiting Propulsid's future prospects.
  • The primary pathway for future market entry involves reformulation or repurposing with improved safety profiles.

FAQs

  1. Why was Propulsid withdrawn from markets?
    Due to safety concerns, particularly cardiac arrhythmias linked to its use.

  2. Are there ongoing clinical trials for Propulsid?
    No major regulatory-approved trials are active; research is limited to small or investigator-led studies.

  3. Can Propulsid be repurposed?
    Potentially, through reformulations designed to mitigate cardiac risks. However, this requires significant R&D investment.

  4. What is the outlook for developing new drugs based on cisapride?
    The outlook depends on chemical modifications to improve safety and successful regulatory approval; currently, no active programs are public.

  5. What are alternative treatments for gastroparesis?
    Metoclopramide, erythromycin, gastric electrical stimulation, and emerging therapies like serotonergic agonists.


References

  1. FDA Drug Safety Communication, 2000.
  2. European Medicines Agency, 2001.
  3. Market research reports on gastrointestinal therapeutics, 2020.
  4. ClinicalTrials.gov database.
  5. Patent database searches on cisapride and analogs.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.