Last Updated: August 9, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR PROCAINAMIDE HYDROCHLORIDE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for PROCAINAMIDE HYDROCHLORIDE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000464 ↗ Cardiac Arrest in Seattle: Conventional Versus Amiodarone Drug Evaluation (CASCADE) Completed National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 3 1987-04-01 To compare the efficacy of amiodarone to conventional anti-arrhythmic therapy in individuals who had survived one episode of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
NCT00000464 ↗ Cardiac Arrest in Seattle: Conventional Versus Amiodarone Drug Evaluation (CASCADE) Completed University of Washington Phase 3 1987-04-01 To compare the efficacy of amiodarone to conventional anti-arrhythmic therapy in individuals who had survived one episode of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
NCT00000518 ↗ Electrophysiologic Study Versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring (ESVEM) Completed National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 3 1985-07-01 To determine whether electrophysiologic study (EPS) or Holter monitoring (HM) was the better method for selecting effective long-term antiarrhythmic drug therapy in patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, or an episode of aborted sudden death.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for PROCAINAMIDE HYDROCHLORIDE

Condition Name

Condition Name for PROCAINAMIDE HYDROCHLORIDE
Intervention Trials
Atrial Fibrillation 5
Arrhythmia 3
Heart Diseases 3
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for PROCAINAMIDE HYDROCHLORIDE
Intervention Trials
Arrhythmias, Cardiac 5
Atrial Fibrillation 5
Tachycardia 4
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for PROCAINAMIDE HYDROCHLORIDE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for PROCAINAMIDE HYDROCHLORIDE
Location Trials
Canada 7
Spain 5
United States 3
Turkey 1
Germany 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for PROCAINAMIDE HYDROCHLORIDE
Location Trials
Pennsylvania 1
New York 1
Tennessee 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for PROCAINAMIDE HYDROCHLORIDE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for PROCAINAMIDE HYDROCHLORIDE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 5
Phase 3 4
Phase 2 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for PROCAINAMIDE HYDROCHLORIDE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 7
Withdrawn 4
Terminated 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for PROCAINAMIDE HYDROCHLORIDE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for PROCAINAMIDE HYDROCHLORIDE
Sponsor Trials
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) 4
University of Pittsburgh 2
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for PROCAINAMIDE HYDROCHLORIDE
Sponsor Trials
Other 21
NIH 4
Industry 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: July 28, 2026

Procainamide Hydrochloride: Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Revenue-Projection Outlook

What clinical trials are ongoing or completed for procainamide hydrochloride?

Answer: Procainamide hydrochloride is a legacy class III/IA antiarrhythmic with limited modern interventional trial activity; most recent “activity” is expected to be protocol-driven, observational, or formulation/pharmacokinetic work rather than new outcome-efficacy programs.

What trial types typically exist for procainamide today

  • Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability (often in special populations such as renal impairment)
  • Formulation and manufacturing (stability, dissolution, rate-controlled substitutes)
  • Retrospective effectiveness/safety studies (electrophysiology practice patterns, arrhythmia subtype outcomes)
  • Regulatory-support studies (e.g., bridging for generic changes)

Where clinical-trial updates usually concentrate

  • ClinicalTrials.gov entries, with many trials labeled as “completed” and lacking large, randomized endpoint datasets
  • Smaller single-center electrophysiology studies rather than global Phase 2/3 programs
  • Hospital drug-safety registries capturing arrhythmia adverse events and dosing adjustments

Key endpoints that still show up

  • Ventricular arrhythmia suppression (often AF/atrial arrhythmia subsets are not the dominant focus)
  • QRS/QT interval changes and proarrhythmia signals
  • Renal-dose adjustment tolerability
  • Lab monitoring proxies (serum levels, electrolytes)

What is the market size and current commercial demand for procainamide hydrochloride?

Answer: Demand is niche and concentrated in hospital and emergency medicine settings, with usage tied to specific arrhythmia management protocols and formulary status rather than broad outpatient chronic therapy.

Pricing and revenue structure for older injectables

Procainamide hydrochloride is typically sold:

  • As sterile injectable for inpatient or acute-care use
  • Under multiple generic product labels
  • With revenue determined mainly by:
    • Hospital contract pricing
    • Formulary inclusion
    • Availability and supply continuity
    • Competitive tender outcomes

Demand drivers

  • Acute arrhythmia protocols that still list procainamide
  • Treatment algorithms for ventricular tachyarrhythmias where class III options are used selectively
  • Short-cycle inventory replenishment by wholesalers and hospitals

Demand headwinds

  • Preference shifts toward newer antiarrhythmics (class III agents and catheter-based strategies)
  • Safety and monitoring burdens historically associated with older class I/III therapies
  • Competitive pressure from alternative injectable antiarrhythmics with stronger guideline prominence

How does procainamide hydrochloride compete versus other antiarrhythmics in market share terms?

Answer: Procainamide competes primarily on availability, formulary contracting, and clinician familiarity, not on novel clinical differentiation.

Competitive set

  • Newer class III agents (and other antiarrhythmics with broader guideline adoption)
  • Less monitoring-intensive or more guideline-preferred acute options
  • Non-pharmacologic alternatives in electrophysiology workflows

What determines formulary retention

  • Stock reliability and short supply risk
  • Demonstrated dosing practicality in acute settings
  • Clinician experience and institutional protocol inertia

When does procainamide hydrochloride lose exclusivity, and does patent protection still matter?

Answer: Procainamide hydrochloride has effectively long since passed meaningful composition-of-matter exclusivity in most markets; current access is dominated by generic supply and formulation/manufacturing IP rather than brand-level exclusivity.

How exclusivity typically plays out for older generics

  • No active RLD exclusivity that blocks generics in a modern way
  • Remaining IP usually sits in:
    • Device or administration-specific packaging claims (rare)
    • Manufacturing process or purification steps (varies by supplier)
    • Specific dosage form stability and formulation (if newer product versions were patented)
    • Method-of-use claims (but these rarely constrain generic compounding for legacy products unless tightly drafted)

What Orange Book status applies to procainamide hydrochloride and which products list there?

Answer: Procainamide hydrochloride appears as a generic injectable legacy product with multiple entries; Orange Book status is typically populated by generic applicants and short listing periods reflecting product-specific patents or none beyond legacy process claims.

What to look for on the Orange Book (practical checklist)

  • Active patent numbers tied to the specific NDC
  • Expiration dates by dosage form (solution strength and container type)
  • Whether listed patents are drug substance, drug product, or method-of-use

What patent estate protects procainamide hydrochloride formulations and manufacturing processes?

Answer: Any enforceable protection is more likely to be product- or process-specific rather than core compound composition-of-matter.

Patent categories that still create entry friction

  • Sterile formulation claims (stability, excipient system, container interactions)
  • Process claims (crystallization, impurity limits, purification)
  • Method-of-use (dose regimens, monitoring schedules) if claimed narrowly enough to matter

Litigation risk profile

For a legacy generic, litigation risk generally clusters around:

  • Challenge-to-listed patents
  • Product substitutions that differ in formulation, concentration, or container closure system

Are there Paragraph IV filings or generic entry risks for procainamide hydrochloride?

Answer: Generic entry risk is structurally lower because procainamide is already generic; the real risk is not “first generic” entry but incremental contract wins and continuity of supply tied to manufacturing site reliability.

What “generic entry” means in this segment

  • New supplier launches
  • Replacement of an incumbent supplier due to procurement or supply interruption
  • Switching among equivalent NDCs under group purchasing rules

What is the FDA regulatory status of procainamide hydrochloride, and which pathways dominate?

Answer: Procainamide hydrochloride is regulated under Abbreviated New Drug Application structures for existing generic equivalents, with the key regulatory work focused on bioequivalence, sterility, and chemistry-manufacturing controls.

Typical regulatory artifacts

  • ANDA bioequivalence package (or biowaiver logic where supported)
  • Sterility assurance data for injectable use
  • Stability data under labeled storage conditions
  • Container closure system qualification

How does procainamide hydrochloride dosing and safety profile affect adoption and projected usage?

Answer: Adoption tracks clinician comfort, dosing protocols, and risk management for adverse effects and monitoring burden.

Key real-world constraints

  • Need for electrolyte and ECG monitoring in many protocols
  • Renal impairment dosing considerations
  • Drug-drug interactions that influence inpatient prescribing

What that means for market projection

Projected demand grows slowly and tracks:

  • Hospital acuity volume
  • Antiarrhythmia formulary cycles
  • Inventory availability and tender outcomes
  • Share shifts among competing injectables rather than overall class expansion

Revenue projection: Base case, downside, and upside scenarios

Answer: Near-term revenue for procainamide hydrochloride is expected to be stable to declining in aggregate value, driven by price compression and share migration to alternative antiarrhythmics, with upside limited to formulary reinstatement or supply-driven contract wins.

Base-case assumptions

  • Continued generic competition with periodic tender-based share reallocation
  • Mild volume stability (no broad expansion beyond hospital use)
  • Ongoing price erosion versus prior years typical of mature generics

Downside scenario

  • Further formulary substitution toward alternatives with stronger institutional preference
  • Supply disruptions that reduce hospital fill rates (even if demand exists)
  • Additional substitution pressure through group purchasing and contracting

Upside scenario

  • Hospital protocol updates that re-include procainamide for specific ventricular arrhythmia pathways
  • Supplier capacity expansions that increase reliability and improve contract award likelihood
  • Reduction in competitive pricing pressure for particular NDC strengths or container presentations

Projection framing

Because the drug is mature and generically supplied, value is best forecasted as:

  • NDC-level share times
  • Contracted net pricing times
  • Inpatient acute-use volume

A robust revenue model requires NDC-level pricing and procurement volumes, which are not specified here.

What are the most likely near-term clinical and regulatory developments affecting procainamide?

Answer: The highest probability developments are product-line updates (strengths, container systems), sterility/CMC changes, and incremental observational safety analyses rather than new late-stage efficacy trials.

Most probable actions

  • ANDA supplements for process or container changes
  • Ongoing pharmacovigilance and label updates driven by postmarketing reports
  • Updated hospital protocols influenced by guideline committee revisions and electrophysiology practice

Key Takeaways

  • Procainamide hydrochloride is a legacy injectable antiarrhythmic with market demand concentrated in hospital acute-care settings.
  • Clinical “updates” in modern years tend to be pharmacokinetic, formulation/CMC, or observational safety work rather than large randomized efficacy programs.
  • Exclusivity has long lapsed; present-day competition is mainly generic supply, NDC-level contracting, and formulation/manufacturing IP, not brand-level patent blocks.
  • Revenue projection is primarily driven by tender outcomes, price erosion, and formulary share shifts among competing antiarrhythmics.

FAQs

  1. Does procainamide hydrochloride have any active Orange Book patents that can delay generic competition?
  2. What role does procainamide play in ventricular arrhythmia protocols versus newer antiarrhythmics?
  3. Are there any recent pharmacokinetic studies of procainamide in renal impairment or pediatrics?
  4. Which manufacturing and sterility CMC factors most affect injectable procainamide supply reliability?
  5. How do hospital formulary tender cycles typically change procainamide hydrochloride market share?

References

  1. ClinicalTrials.gov. (n.d.). Procainamide hydrochloride studies. https://clinicaltrials.gov/
  2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Drugs@FDA: Procainamide hydrochloride. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.