Last Updated: September 3, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR PRILOSEC


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for PRILOSEC

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
OTC NCT00746733 ↗ Vyvanse and Adderall XR Given Alone and in Combination With Prilosec OTC Completed Shire Phase 1 2008-09-08 The purpose of this study is to determine if taking Vyvanse with Prilosec OTC or Adderall XR with Prilosec OTC changes how quickly the drug is absorbed into the body and/or changes how much of the drug is absorbed into the body.
OTC NCT01077076 ↗ Pharmacodynamic Study Comparing the Effects of Two Different Forms of Omeprazole (P07812) (COMPLETED) Completed Bayer Phase 3 2008-12-01 This randomized, crossover study is to evaluate the early effectiveness, defined as effect on intragastric pH during the first 4 hours after dosing, of Zegerid, Prilosec over-the-counter (OTC) Tablets, and placebo on the 4th day of treatment to inhibit acid secretion. Additional purposes are to: 1. provide pharmacodynamic evidence comparing 24-hr inhibition of acid secretion on the 1st, 4th, and 11th days of dosing with each of the indicated treatments; 2. compare Zegerid and Prilosec OTC for achieving their steady-state effects for controlling 24-hr gastric acidity at steady-state on the 4th and 11th day of dosing. 3. evaluate early effectiveness, defined as effect on intragastric pH during the first 4 hours after administration, of Zegerid, Prilosec OTC Tablets, and placebo on acid inhibition at steady-state when administered on the 11th day of dosing.
OTC NCT01122160 ↗ Gastric pH and Anthocyanin Absorption Completed USDA Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center N/A 2010-05-01 Anthocyanins are phytonutrients that provide blue, purple and red colors to fruits and vegetables. The purpose of the study is to determine whether absorption of anthocyanins occurs in the acid pH of the stomach and to determine whether altering stomach pH by use of an over-the-counter medicine, Prilosec TM, alters absorption of anthocyanins from strawberries and blackberries.
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for PRILOSEC

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00001191 ↗ The Use of Oral Omeprazole and Intravenous Pantoprazole in Patients With Hypersecretion of Gastric Acid Completed National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) Phase 2 1983-02-03 Patients with Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome suffer from ulcers of the upper gastrointestinal tract, higher than normal levels of gastric acid, and tumors of the pancreas known as non-beta islet cell tumors. Patients with Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome require continuous control of their gastric acid secretion. If gastric acid levels are permitted to rise higher than normal, patients may develop severe ulcers and other complications. This study will attempt to determine the effectiveness of Omeprazole (Prilosec) in the treatment of patients with Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome. Omeprazole is a drug that functions to decrease the amount of gastric acid secreted. Patients for this study will be selected based on a previous diagnosis of Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome and/or idiopathic (unknown cause) high levels of gastric acid secretion. The patients will undergo an evaluation including history and physical examination as well as necessary laboratory tests. The proper dose of Omeprazole will then be determined in each patient . The proper dose of Omeprazole is considered the minimum amount of omeprazole required to lower gastric acid to a safe level. Every year patients participating in this study will undergo a physical examination and history. They will be questioned about symptoms associated with Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome. Gastric acid levels will be taken and evaluated and patients will undergo an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. The effectiveness of the treatment will be measured by a clinical history to determine the control of symptoms due to high levels of gastric acid secretion.
NCT00210470 ↗ A Phase 2 Clinical Trial of the Safety and Effects of IRX-2 in Treating Patients With Operable Head and Neck Cancer Completed Brooklyn ImmunoTherapeutics, LLC Phase 2 2005-07-01 This was a Phase 2a trial to investigate the safety and biological activity of the RIX-2 Regimen in patients with untreated, resectable squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (HNSCC).
NCT00210470 ↗ A Phase 2 Clinical Trial of the Safety and Effects of IRX-2 in Treating Patients With Operable Head and Neck Cancer Completed IRX Therapeutics Phase 2 2005-07-01 This was a Phase 2a trial to investigate the safety and biological activity of the RIX-2 Regimen in patients with untreated, resectable squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (HNSCC).
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for PRILOSEC

Condition Name

Condition Name for PRILOSEC
Intervention Trials
Healthy 12
Healthy Volunteers 4
Chronic Low Back Pain 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for PRILOSEC
Intervention Trials
Gastroesophageal Reflux 7
Esophagitis 4
Ulcer 3
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for PRILOSEC

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for PRILOSEC
Location Trials
United States 83
Japan 36
India 7
Canada 5
Brazil 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for PRILOSEC
Location Trials
Arizona 7
Pennsylvania 7
California 6
Texas 5
New York 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for PRILOSEC

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for PRILOSEC
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 12
Phase 3 7
Phase 2 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for PRILOSEC
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 42
Withdrawn 3
Recruiting 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for PRILOSEC

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for PRILOSEC
Sponsor Trials
Bayer 4
Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Limited 4
Brooklyn ImmunoTherapeutics, LLC 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for PRILOSEC
Sponsor Trials
Industry 44
Other 23
NIH 10
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Prilosec (Omeprazole) Clinical Trials, Market Analysis, Patent Status and 2024-2030 Projection

Last updated: July 31, 2026

Prilosec is the original branded formulation of omeprazole, a proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) approved by the FDA for acid-related gastrointestinal disorders. Its core patent protection has expired, generic omeprazole is widely available, and AstraZeneca no longer controls the commercial market for the active ingredient. Current clinical activity centers on omeprazole as a low-cost comparator, background therapy, or component of combination regimens rather than on new Prilosec product development.

The commercial outlook is mature and volume-driven. Prescription and OTC omeprazole demand should remain stable through 2030, while branded Prilosec revenue is expected to remain limited. Competitive pressure comes from generic omeprazole, esomeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole, rabeprazole, famotidine and OTC combination products.

What is Prilosec and what is its FDA status?

Prilosec is the brand name for omeprazole, a substituted benzimidazole proton-pump inhibitor. It suppresses gastric acid by irreversibly inhibiting the H+/K+-ATPase enzyme in gastric parietal cells.

The FDA originally approved Prilosec delayed-release capsules in 1989. Approved uses have included:

  • Active duodenal ulcer
  • Active benign gastric ulcer
  • Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)
  • Erosive esophagitis
  • Maintenance of healed erosive esophagitis
  • Hypersecretory conditions such as Zollinger-Ellison syndrome
  • Helicobacter pylori eradication when used with antibiotics

The OTC version, Prilosec OTC, contains 20 mg of omeprazole and is indicated for frequent heartburn. The FDA approved the nonprescription product in 2003. OTC labeling limits self-treatment to a 14-day course and instructs consumers to seek medical advice for persistent or recurrent symptoms.[1]

AstraZeneca developed and commercialized the original prescription product. Current omeprazole products are sold by multiple generic manufacturers and OTC marketers. Perrigo, Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Viatris, Teva, ANI Pharmaceuticals, CVS Health, Walgreens and other companies have participated in generic or private-label distribution over time, depending on dosage form and market.

What clinical trials are evaluating Prilosec and omeprazole?

There is no meaningful late-stage clinical development program for branded Prilosec. Omeprazole has a long-established safety and efficacy record, so new randomized trials generally do not seek to establish the original product’s basic efficacy.

Current and recent clinical research involving omeprazole has generally fallen into four categories:

Research category Role of omeprazole Commercial significance
GERD and erosive esophagitis Active comparator or standard therapy Low
H. pylori eradication Component of combination therapy Moderate for generic supply
Pediatric acid suppression Background or active treatment Low to moderate
Drug-induced ulcer prevention Gastroprotective comparator Low
Critical-care stress-ulcer prevention PPI comparator or protocol therapy Low
Novel acid-control therapies Comparator against newer agents Limited to omeprazole’s role as standard of care

ClinicalTrials.gov records may identify omeprazole in protocols without indicating a new Prilosec product program. Trial sponsors often use generic omeprazole because it is inexpensive, familiar to investigators and supported by extensive clinical evidence.[2]

What is the clinical position of omeprazole versus newer acid-suppressing drugs?

Omeprazole remains a common first-line PPI because of its cost and availability. Newer products may have advantages in specific settings:

  • Esomeprazole can produce greater or more consistent acid suppression in some patients.
  • Pantoprazole is frequently selected in hospitals and has fewer perceived CYP2C19 interaction concerns than omeprazole.
  • Vonoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker, acts through a different mechanism and has gained attention in H. pylori treatment and acid-related disorders.
  • Famotidine remains an alternative for intermittent or less severe symptoms, although H2 blockers can develop tachyphylaxis.

Omeprazole’s clinical weakness is not a lack of efficacy. It is the absence of meaningful product differentiation after generic entry.

What patents protect Prilosec and omeprazole?

The principal Prilosec patent estate has expired. The original omeprazole compound patent and key formulation protection no longer prevent generic competition in the United States.

Important historical protections included:

Patent or protection Subject matter Commercial status
U.S. Patent No. 4,255,431 Omeprazole compound and related benzimidazole chemistry Expired
U.S. Patent No. 4,786,505 Omeprazole formulation and enteric-release technology Expired
Pediatric exclusivity Six-month statutory extension associated with qualifying pediatric studies Expired
Formulation and manufacturing patents Delayed-release pellets, coatings and dosage forms Expired or commercially non-blocking

The compound patent was filed in the late 1970s and reached the end of its effective U.S. term before or around the period of generic market entry. AstraZeneca’s formulation patents extended the commercial dispute beyond the basic compound patent, but they did not preserve long-term branded exclusivity.[3]

Patent status must be assessed by jurisdiction and dosage form. A historical patent may remain relevant to litigation records or foreign markets even when it no longer blocks U.S. generic entry. Current U.S. products also may have manufacturing or formulation patents, but such patents do not recreate the original Prilosec monopoly unless they cover a commercially necessary, non-substitutable product.

When did Prilosec lose exclusivity?

Prilosec lost meaningful U.S. market exclusivity in the early 2000s.

Key milestones include:

Date Event
1989 FDA approval of prescription Prilosec
1999-2001 Core omeprazole patent and regulatory exclusivity periods approached expiration
2001 Generic omeprazole litigation and market-entry disputes intensified
2002 Generic prescription omeprazole gained broader market access after patent settlements and litigation developments
2003 FDA approved Prilosec OTC
2010s Generic and private-label omeprazole became dominant in prescription and OTC channels
2020s Omeprazole remained a mature, multisource molecule

The commercial transition was accelerated by the availability of generic delayed-release capsules and by the conversion of many consumers from prescription therapy to OTC products.

What is the Orange Book status of Prilosec?

The FDA Orange Book identifies approved drug products and relevant patent and exclusivity information. For an old multisource product such as prescription omeprazole, the original Prilosec patents do not provide a current U.S. barrier to abbreviated new drug application (ANDA) competition.

The practical Orange Book position is:

  • Original Prilosec exclusivity has expired.
  • Generic omeprazole products are approved through the ANDA pathway.
  • Paragraph IV litigation tied to the original Prilosec estate is historical.
  • Current market access depends primarily on FDA approval, manufacturing capacity, supply reliability and payer or retail contracting.
  • OTC Prilosec is regulated under the FDA monograph and OTC drug framework rather than through continuing brand exclusivity.[4]

An ANDA applicant can challenge an Orange Book-listed patent through a Paragraph IV certification. For Prilosec, the economically significant Paragraph IV disputes occurred during the original generic-entry period. The drug does not present the type of active, high-value patent challenge associated with recently approved specialty medicines.

Which companies challenged Prilosec patents?

Generic manufacturers and distributors challenged AstraZeneca’s omeprazole patents during the early generic-entry period. The most important U.S. litigation involved generic applicants seeking to market omeprazole delayed-release capsules.

AstraZeneca litigated against generic entrants, including Andrx Pharmaceuticals and other ANDA sponsors, over formulation and delayed-release technology. The disputes involved patent validity, infringement and the scope of generic product claims. Courts and regulators ultimately permitted generic competition, although litigation and settlements affected launch timing for individual applicants.[5]

The litigation history has limited current commercial relevance because:

  1. The underlying patents have expired.
  2. Multiple generic suppliers are established.
  3. Omeprazole is available in several dosage strengths and presentations.
  4. Retail and health-plan buyers can switch suppliers.

What formulations are protected by Prilosec patents?

The original commercial innovation was not only the omeprazole molecule. Omeprazole is acid-labile, so the product required protection from gastric acid until it reached the intestine.

Historically important formulation technologies included:

  • Enteric-coated pellets
  • Delayed-release capsules
  • Multiple-unit pellet systems
  • Alkaline stabilizing agents
  • Oral suspensions
  • Delayed-release tablets
  • Pediatric formulations
  • Combination products for H. pylori treatment

These technologies supported patent protection and product differentiation during the period before generic entry. They no longer create a broad commercial barrier because generic manufacturers have developed bioequivalent delayed-release products accepted by the FDA.

The formulation remains technically important. Generic manufacturers must demonstrate pharmaceutical quality, appropriate dissolution, stability and bioequivalence. Technical complexity can cause temporary supply constraints or delay an individual ANDA, but it does not create durable market exclusivity for the original brand.

How strong is the Prilosec patent estate?

The current Prilosec patent estate is commercially weak because the foundational patents have expired and the market has multiple approved substitutes.

Patent-estate factor Assessment
Core compound protection Expired
Original delayed-release protection Expired
Method-of-use protection Expired or non-blocking
Pediatric exclusivity Expired
Current generic barriers Low
Manufacturing complexity Moderate
Substitution risk High
Brand pricing power Low

The remaining competitive advantage of a branded product would come from consumer recognition, retail placement, packaging, quality perception and advertising. Those factors can support OTC sales but do not support prescription-level pricing.

What generic entry risks exist for Prilosec?

Generic entry risk is already realized rather than prospective. Prescription omeprazole is a multisource generic market, and consumers can substitute among manufacturers or switch to other PPIs.

Commercial risks include:

  • Price erosion from generic competition
  • Retailer private-label substitution
  • Payer preference for lower-cost PPIs
  • OTC switching from prescription products
  • Limited physician attachment to the Prilosec brand
  • Supply interruptions caused by dependence on common active pharmaceutical ingredient sources
  • Competition from vonoprazan and other newer acid-suppression products

The principal risk for manufacturers is not a Paragraph IV launch. It is margin compression and loss of volume to lower-cost suppliers.

How does Prilosec compare with Nexium, Protonix and Prevacid?

Product Active ingredient Current commercial position Patent risk
Prilosec Omeprazole Mature prescription and OTC product No meaningful original-patent barrier
Nexium Esomeprazole Mature branded and generic PPI Core exclusivity expired
Protonix Pantoprazole Strong hospital and prescription presence Core exclusivity expired
Prevacid Lansoprazole Mature prescription and OTC product Core exclusivity expired
Dexilant Dexlansoprazole Differentiated dual delayed-release formulation More formulation-driven competition
Voquezna Vonoprazan Newer acid blocker with H. pylori and GERD applications Active newer-product exclusivity and patent exposure

Prilosec has the greatest cost advantage among branded legacy products because generic omeprazole is widely available. Protonix may retain institutional preference, while Nexium maintains stronger consumer recognition in some OTC categories. Voquezna has greater product differentiation but also faces a higher price and a more active patent and exclusivity profile.[6]

What is the market size and revenue outlook for Prilosec?

Public company filings generally do not report Prilosec revenue as a separate, current line item. AstraZeneca’s commercial reporting focuses on its active portfolio, and mature OTC products may be reported within broader categories or through commercial partners.[7]

The economic value of omeprazole is divided among:

  • Generic prescription sales
  • OTC Prilosec-branded products
  • Store-brand OTC omeprazole
  • Hospital and institutional purchases
  • Combination products for H. pylori
  • International markets with different brand and reimbursement structures

The brand has limited pricing power. Generic prescription omeprazole typically sells at a small fraction of the historical branded price. OTC Prilosec can command a premium over store-brand omeprazole, but that premium is constrained by retailer substitution and promotional pricing.

Base-case market projection, 2024-2030

The following projection is an analytical scenario for the omeprazole market, not a reported company forecast.

Year Prescription omeprazole volume OTC omeprazole demand Estimated market direction
2024 Stable to modest growth Stable Mature baseline
2025 0% to 2% growth 0% to 2% growth Low-single-digit value change
2026 0% to 2% growth 0% to 2% growth Continued generic price pressure
2027 0% to 2% growth 0% to 2% growth Volume offsets declining unit prices
2028 0% to 2% growth 0% to 2% growth Stable mature market
2029 -1% to 2% growth 0% to 2% growth Possible substitution by newer agents
2030 -1% to 2% growth 0% to 2% growth Flat to low-single-digit growth

Under the base case, total omeprazole volume remains resilient, but manufacturer revenue grows more slowly than units because of generic price erosion. A reasonable planning range is approximately 0% to 3% annual value growth through 2030, with branded Prilosec revenue likely flat or declining unless supported by substantial OTC advertising, packaging innovation or channel expansion.

Upside and downside scenarios

The upside case depends on continued self-treatment of heartburn, broader diagnosis of GERD, growth in emerging markets and expanded use in H. pylori eradication. The downside case includes increased use of vonoprazan, stronger consumer preference for H2 blockers, safety-driven PPI deprescribing, retailer substitution and additional price competition.

The most likely outcome is market stability rather than a rapid expansion. Omeprazole is inexpensive, clinically familiar and widely distributed, which supports volume. Those same factors limit revenue growth.

What regulatory issues affect future omeprazole sales?

The FDA continues to monitor PPI labeling and safety information, including risks associated with long-term use. Product labeling identifies potential concerns such as Clostridioides difficile-associated diarrhea, hypomagnesemia, vitamin B12 deficiency with prolonged use, bone-fracture risk in selected populations and interactions involving drugs such as clopidogrel.[1]

These risks have not removed omeprazole from the market. They can affect prescribing duration, deprescribing initiatives and payer management. OTC products face additional scrutiny over consumer self-treatment, inappropriate prolonged use and masking of serious gastrointestinal disease.

Regulatory risk is therefore moderate for chronic-use volume but low for the continued availability of short-course OTC omeprazole.

What manufacturing and intellectual-property barriers remain?

Manufacturing omeprazole is more complex than producing a simple immediate-release tablet because the active ingredient requires acid protection and controlled release. Key manufacturing requirements include:

  • API stability control
  • Enteric coating performance
  • Dissolution testing
  • Particle or pellet uniformity
  • Moisture management
  • Packaging protection
  • Bioequivalence across dosage forms

These requirements create execution risk for an individual generic manufacturer. They do not protect the Prilosec brand from competition. The main barriers are operational: API sourcing, quality systems, FDA inspection outcomes, contract manufacturing capacity and supply-chain continuity.

What is the generic launch outlook for Prilosec?

No major U.S. generic launch event is expected because generic omeprazole is already established. Future commercial events are more likely to involve:

  • New private-label OTC launches
  • Additional generic suppliers
  • Product discontinuations
  • Dosage-form rationalization
  • Retail price changes
  • Combination products
  • International registration

A new entrant could compete if it offers lower cost, reliable supply, improved packaging, pediatric convenience or a differentiated combination product. A conventional delayed-release omeprazole capsule would face strong incumbent competition.

What is the international patent and market position of Prilosec?

Omeprazole patent status differs by country because patent filings, term adjustments, regulatory extensions and market-entry rules vary. In most major markets, the original active-ingredient protection has expired. Generic omeprazole is widely marketed across Europe, Asia-Pacific and Latin America.

International revenue depends more on:

  • Local reimbursement
  • OTC status
  • National procurement
  • Brand recognition
  • Local generic density
  • H. pylori prevalence
  • Access to gastroenterology care

Emerging markets may offer volume growth, but prices are generally lower and local competition is stronger. The United States remains important for OTC brand sales, while generic prescription value is distributed across many suppliers.

Key Takeaways

  • Prilosec is the original omeprazole brand; its foundational U.S. patents and exclusivity have expired.
  • Generic omeprazole dominates prescription volume and constrains pricing.
  • Prilosec OTC remains commercially relevant through consumer recognition and retail distribution.
  • No material late-stage clinical program is associated with branded Prilosec.
  • Current omeprazole trials mainly use the drug as standard therapy, comparator treatment or part of H. pylori regimens.
  • Historical Paragraph IV litigation involved delayed-release formulation patents and generic applicants, but no comparable current patent barrier remains.
  • Omeprazole demand should remain broadly stable through 2030, with estimated market-value growth of roughly 0% to 3% annually under a base-case scenario.
  • Vonoprazan is the principal newer mechanism that could pressure PPI use in selected indications.
  • The main commercial risks are generic price erosion, OTC private-label substitution, supply-chain disruption and gradual use of newer acid-suppression therapies.

FAQs

Is Prilosec still under patent protection?

No. The original omeprazole compound and core delayed-release formulation patents have expired in the United States. Current generic competition is permitted.

Is Prilosec the same as omeprazole?

Yes. Prilosec is a brand of omeprazole. Generic omeprazole products contain the same active ingredient and must meet FDA approval requirements applicable to their dosage form.

Does AstraZeneca still sell Prilosec?

AstraZeneca developed Prilosec, but the current commercial supply structure is different from the original branded prescription market. OTC distribution and brand ownership arrangements should be evaluated separately from AstraZeneca’s active prescription portfolio.

Can a new company obtain a patent on an omeprazole product?

A company may obtain a patent on a genuinely novel formulation, delivery system, manufacturing process or combination product. Such a patent would not restore exclusivity to conventional omeprazole capsules.

Will omeprazole sales grow through 2030?

Volume is likely to remain stable or grow modestly. Revenue growth should be limited because generic price competition is strong and branded Prilosec has little prescription pricing power.

References

  1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2022). Prilosec OTC drug facts and prescribing information. FDA.
  2. National Library of Medicine. (2024). ClinicalTrials.gov: Omeprazole clinical studies. U.S. National Library of Medicine.
  3. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (n.d.). Patent documents for omeprazole and delayed-release formulations. USPTO.
  4. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2024). Approved drug products with therapeutic equivalence evaluations: Orange Book. FDA.
  5. Astra Aktiebolag v. Andrx Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 222 F. Supp. 2d 423 (S.D.N.Y. 2002).
  6. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2023). Voquezna (vonoprazan) prescribing information. FDA.
  7. AstraZeneca PLC. (2023). Annual report and Form 20-F 2023. AstraZeneca.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.