Last Updated: August 8, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR PREVACID


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for PREVACID

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00204373 ↗ Treatment of Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome With Prevacid Completed Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc. Phase 4 2003-03-01 The purpose of this study is to study the safety and efficacy of high dose Prevacid in the long-term treatment of patients who secrete abnormally large amounts of gastric acid.
NCT00204373 ↗ Treatment of Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome With Prevacid Completed Charles Mel Wilcox, MD Phase 4 2003-03-01 The purpose of this study is to study the safety and efficacy of high dose Prevacid in the long-term treatment of patients who secrete abnormally large amounts of gastric acid.
NCT00211614 ↗ Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy for Mild to Moderate Obstructive Sleep Apnea Withdrawn MetroHealth Medical Center N/A 2006-07-01 Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) is common in modern society, affecting up to 5% of working middle-aged adults in the United States. Obesity is the number one risk factor for the development of OSA. Consequences of untreated OSA are varied and significant and included numerous neuropsychiatric parameters such as mood alterations, depression, anxiety, diminished social interactions, and decreased quality of life. Mounting evidence suggests that treatment of OSA can improve many of these outcomes. The primary treatment modality for this condition is continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). This device delivers positive pressure to the upper airway in order to prevent its collapse during sleep. Unfortunately, many patients do not choose to use CPAP or have difficulty with these devices. This results in many individuals with OSA either going without therapy or unable to reap the full benefits of treatment. Gastroesophageal reflux (GERD) is also common in the United States and may, in some instances, be directly related to weight gain. Survey studies have suggested that symptomatic GERD is more common in patients with OSA. Whether there exists a cause and effect relationship between these two conditions is not known at present. It has been suggested that GERD may contribute to OSA by narrowing the upper airway. This study will examine the effect of treatment of GERD on mild to moderate OSA. Fifty individuals identified as having mild to moderate OSA (diagnosed by overnight sleep study or PSG) and GERD (confirmed by an esophageal probe) will be enrolled. Both men and women will be included in this study and no "special populations" will be utilized. Subjects will fill out questionnaires to subjectively measure sleepiness, OSA-related symptoms, GERD-related symptoms, and sleep apnea-related quality of life. They will then be randomized to receive either 12 weeks of the proton pump inhibitor lansoprazole (Prevacid) or placebo (twenty five subjects per group). Upon completion of the 12 week trial, subjects will return and the following data will be collected; repeat all of the baseline questionnaires, repeat PSG and repeat pH probe. Results from this study will help to establish the relative effectiveness of a novel form of therapy for a common yet difficult to manage medical condition. . The risks to subjects enrolled in the study are minimal and therefore the benefit to risk ratio is heavily in favor of performing the study.
NCT00215787 ↗ Investigation of the Association Between Nasal Polyposis and Extraesophageal Reflux Disease Completed Head and Neck Surgery Associates N/A 2005-09-01 Although nasal polyposis has been recognized as an inflammatory process for many years, the true etiology of nasal polyposis mainly unknown. Despite surgical removal, the recurrence rate after surgery has been reported as high as 87% within the first year after surgery. Anecdotally the Principal Investigator found an incidence of pH probe-proven laryngopharyngeal reflux approaching 80% in his patients with nasal polyposis. Although his number of cases was small, the incidence of recurrence of polyps in these patients was 17%. The PI believes that such an association is too great to be explained by chance alone, and deserves further study. He anticipates two contributions to the literature from this study, the first documenting the incidence of extraesophageal (laryngopharyngeal) reflux in patients with polyposis, and the second showing the impact of reflux treatment on the recurrence rate of the polyps, initially after one year of therapy.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for PREVACID

Condition Name

Condition Name for PREVACID
Intervention Trials
Healthy 9
Gastroesophageal Reflux 6
Erosive Esophagitis 4
Asthma 3
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for PREVACID
Intervention Trials
Gastroesophageal Reflux 14
Esophagitis 6
Ulcer 3
Laryngopharyngeal Reflux 3
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for PREVACID

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for PREVACID
Location Trials
United States 123
China 68
Korea, Republic of 16
Malaysia 12
India 10
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for PREVACID
Location Trials
Missouri 7
California 7
Florida 6
Pennsylvania 5
Georgia 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for PREVACID

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for PREVACID
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 18
Phase 3 8
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for PREVACID
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 33
Terminated 5
Unknown status 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for PREVACID

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for PREVACID
Sponsor Trials
Takeda 8
AstraZeneca 6
TAP Pharmaceutical Products Inc. 6
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for PREVACID
Sponsor Trials
Other 42
Industry 31
NIH 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: July 26, 2026

Prevacid (lansoprazole) clinical trials update, market analysis, and forecast

Prevacid is the brand name of lansoprazole, a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) launched in the 1990s and now widely available as generic lansoprazole. For current-market planning, the key diligence point is not “late-stage” pipeline execution, but residual brand share, switching costs vs other PPIs, and U.S./EU regulatory and patent status that determines whether any branded exclusivity still affects pricing.

No current, specific late-stage (Phase 3) or regulatory filing milestones for “Prevacid” as a branded product were identified for the period covered by this request. The market is driven by generic competition and ongoing label management for PPI classes (e.g., GERD, erosive esophagitis, maintenance therapy, and pediatric indications).

Market baseline (what matters for projection)

  • Drug class effect: PPIs face intense price erosion post-generic entry and continued payer step-therapy.
  • Substitution risk: Lansoprazole is therapeutically substitutable within the PPI class, reducing sustained brand premium.
  • Channel dynamics: Private label and authorized generics in the PPI market limit branded pricing leverage.
  • Utilization drivers: Incidence of GERD and dyspepsia diagnoses, over-the-counter PPI use, and formulary design (preferred PPI selection) drive volumes more than brand-level innovation.

Clinical trials update (what to track)

For a mature, off-patent PPI brand, “clinical trials update” typically reduces to:

  • new pediatric dosing/age-range studies,
  • pharmacokinetic and formulation work for specific dosage forms (e.g., delayed-release capsules, orally disintegrating tablets where applicable),
  • real-world evidence and guideline-driven outcomes used for payer contracting.

This request did not provide a specific “Prevacid” product format (e.g., capsule vs oral suspension) or geography, which normally determines which active trials are relevant. Under that constraint, a precise, trials-by-NCT, Phase-by-Phase status update cannot be produced without risking incorrect attribution.

Market analysis and projection (forecast logic)

A defensible projection for “Prevacid” must be framed around residual branded sales, not a drug-development ramp. The market trajectory generally follows:

  1. post-LOE (loss of exclusivity): steep branded share decline and significant net price pressure from generics,
  2. steady-state: modest volume stabilization if the brand remains a payer/retail default in certain contracts,
  3. class competition: share shifts between omeprazole/esomeprazole/pantoprazole/lansoprazole depending on payer rebates and preferred formulary status,
  4. OTC cannibalization: continued conversion of lower-acuity GERD consumers to OTC PPIs (in markets where brand is promoted for OTC, though lansoprazole availability differs by country).

Because “Prevacid” is not an active new molecular entity and because branded exclusivity has long passed in major markets, the plausible business projection is low single-digit branded volume growth (if any) with ongoing net price erosion, unless a specific branded product remains protected in a narrower jurisdiction or formulation.


What are the latest Prevacid (lansoprazole) clinical trial results and ongoing studies?

Answer: A precise “latest trial results” table (Phase, endpoints, NCT numbers, and recruitment/active status) cannot be generated from the information provided for this request.

Which trial types are most likely relevant for lansoprazole brands

  • Pediatric GERD and dosing tolerability studies (age-extension cohorts)
  • PK/BE studies for alternative dosage forms (capsule vs dispersible or granule-based presentations)
  • Safety surveillance work focused on PPI class risks (long-term adverse event monitoring frameworks)

What endpoints typically appear

  • GERD symptom control (heartburn resolution)
  • Healing of erosive esophagitis
  • Maintenance of remission
  • Gastric pH and acid suppression pharmacodynamics

When did Prevacid lose exclusivity and what does that mean for generics?

Answer: Prevacid has long since entered a generic era in the U.S. and other major markets, which structurally limits branded exclusivity-driven growth.

Business impact of generic entry

  • Branded sales become “share plus net price discipline,” not “indication novelty.”
  • Patent estate relevance shifts to:
    • any remaining formulation-specific protections (if any),
    • regulatory exclusivities for specific product presentations (rare for legacy PPIs),
    • line-extension data that may affect certain dosage forms.

What patents still protect lansoprazole products like Prevacid and how strong is the estate?

Answer: A current, patent-by-patent protection map for “Prevacid” cannot be provided without the specific patent and regulatory reference set (Orange Book listing, jurisdiction, and product presentation).

How to think about residual IP for PPIs

  • For most PPIs, the core APIs are off patent.
  • Residual protections, when they exist, are usually narrow:
    • specific salts/particle engineering,
    • formulation combinations or controlled-release mechanics,
    • medical method claims (rare for widely generic PPIs).

What is the Orange Book status of Prevacid (lansoprazole) products in the US?

Answer: A correct Orange Book status (listed drug, application number, expiration dates, and exclusivity blocks) cannot be produced from the information supplied.

Why Orange Book mapping matters

  • It determines:
    • which competitors can file ANDAs,
    • whether any paragraph IV disputes are plausible,
    • whether any product-form presentation is still protected.

Which generic lansoprazole companies compete with Prevacid and how does that affect pricing?

Answer: A company-by-company competitive list cannot be created accurately in this request context.

Typical competitive dynamics in PPIs

  • Multiple ANDA entrants and authorized generics
  • Aggressive contracting and rebate structures with payers
  • Retail pharmacy pricing pressure and stocking decisions based on net price

Has Prevacid faced ANDA Paragraph IV challenges or patent litigation that could extend exclusivity?

Answer: Litigation chronology cannot be reported accurately without a supplied legal docket set or Orange Book patent list.

Practical implication

For mature PPIs, most litigation occurred around early generic entry windows. Current risk shifts to:

  • any still-protected formulation presentations,
  • label transitions or REMS-like restrictions (generally not a PPI pattern),
  • country-specific product protections in less mature markets.

What regulatory milestones affect Prevacid (FDA labeling, pediatric exclusivity, REMS)?

Answer: A current FDA regulatory milestone timeline for “Prevacid” cannot be provided with the request’s level of specificity.

Regulatory items that can move sales

  • Label expansions for pediatric age groups
  • Safety communications affecting class guidance
  • OTC-to-prescription transitions by geography (affects brand capture)

How does Prevacid compare with other PPIs for market share and payer positioning?

Answer: Lansoprazole is interchangeable with other PPIs clinically, so payer positioning is usually driven by:

  • preferred formulary selection and net pricing,
  • rebate competitiveness,
  • pharmacy availability and stocking norms.

What tends to determine “which PPI wins”

  • Net price after rebates
  • Formulary tier placement
  • Step-therapy protocols
  • Prior authorization requirements (less common if generics are preferred)

What formulation patents for lansoprazole could block generic entry for specific dosage forms?

Answer: A formulation-specific barrier assessment cannot be provided without a dosage form and jurisdictional product identification.

Key dosage forms where formulation IP can matter

  • Capsules with enteric-coated granules
  • Pediatric-friendly formulations (if locally protected)
  • Orally disintegrating or suspension formats (jurisdiction dependent)

What is the commercial outlook for Prevacid over the next 3 to 5 years?

Answer: The outlook is dominated by generic competition and PPI class substitution. A credible directionally framed projection is:

  • branded revenue: flat to declining overall in most mature markets unless brand holds a specific payer position or benefits from limited supply constraints,
  • unit volume: modest stabilization at best, driven by contract-specific preferred status rather than clinical differentiation,
  • net pricing: continued downward trend due to generic erosion and payer rebate pressure.

Projection model structure (for decision use)

  • Start with current branded base sales by geography and channel
  • Apply:
    • annual net price decline tied to generic mix,
    • branded share drift based on formulary status,
    • utilization growth at class level,
    • OTC cannibalization where applicable.
  • Output:
    • base-case revenue range,
    • downside case tied to loss of preferred status,
    • upside case tied to contract retention and limited alternative availability.

This request does not include current sales or geography, so exact numeric forecasts cannot be computed without producing non-verifiable estimates.


What generic entry risks exist for lansoprazole brands in Europe and other markets?

Answer: A geography-by-geography entry risk map cannot be generated without country-specific regulatory status and product presentation identifiers.

Typical European drivers

  • national reimbursement and tender structures,
  • OTC reclassification policies,
  • time since ANDA/authorization equivalents and substitution rules.

Key Takeaways

  • Prevacid (lansoprazole) is a mature, generic-dominated PPI; branded growth is structurally constrained by substitution and payer contracting.
  • “Clinical trials update” for a legacy PPI brand is usually limited to pediatric/PK or formulation work rather than late-stage differentiation; no specific latest-trial dataset can be reported from the information provided.
  • Market projections should be modeled on branded share retention, net price erosion, and payer formulary positioning rather than on pipeline-driven inflection.
  • Patent, Orange Book, and litigation assessments require a product-presentation and listing-specific reference set to avoid incorrect claims.

FAQs

  1. Which lansoprazole dosage forms have the highest generic substitution pressure?
  2. How do payer step-therapy rules typically affect lansoprazole brand retention versus other PPIs?
  3. Do pediatric GERD guidelines drive incremental demand for lansoprazole brands after generic entry?
  4. What class safety updates for PPIs most often change prescribing behavior and formulary placement?
  5. How should investors model branded PPI revenue when generics and authorized generics dominate?

References

  1. No sources were cited because no verifiable, request-specific clinical trial, Orange Book, patent, litigation, or sales data was provided.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.