You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 29, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR PREPIDIL


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for PREPIDIL

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00140114 ↗ Sublingual Versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Labor Induction at Term Completed American University of Beirut Medical Center Phase 3 2004-01-01 Misoprostol (Cytotec®) is a synthetic prostaglandin E1 analog that has been marketed in the United States since 1988 as a gastric cytoprotective agent. In contradistinction to prostaglandin E2 preparations (dinoprostone, Prepidil, Cervidil), misoprostol is inexpensive and available in scored tablets that can be broken and inserted vaginally. Despite a focused campaign by the manufacturer to curtail its use in obstetric practice, misoprostol has, over the past several years, gained widespread acceptance as both a labor induction and a cervical ripening agent. Such off-label indication has been endorsed by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and other medical bodies. Recently, FDA approved a new label for the use of cytotec during pregnancy which removed pregnancy as a contraindication for its use. Vaginal administration seems to be more efficacious than when given orally, although there is the worry of uterine tachysystole and hyperstimulation with vaginal doses > 50-µg. The use of sublingual misoprostol for cervical ripening at term was recently investigated in two studies that compared it to the oral route, on the assumption that the sublingual route would have the higher efficacy of the vaginal route by avoiding the first pass effects of the gastrointestinal and hepatic systems, while having lower hyperstimulation rates by avoiding the direct effects on the cervix. In addition, the sublingual route would combine an easier administration with the added advantage of no restriction of mobility after administration. There has been no previous report in the literature comparing the use of misoprostol given sublingually to that given vaginally for the induction of labor at term. Our aim is to compare efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction with misoprostol given vaginally (the current standard) to that given sublingually.
NCT00504465 ↗ Combined Agent Randomized Trial of Induction of Labor Completed Weill Medical College of Cornell University N/A 2002-05-01 To compare sequential dinoprostone and oxytocin for induction of labor at term with intact membranes and an unripe cervix to two simultaneous regimens. Our aim was to confirm findings from smaller trials and add to data on fetal safety.
NCT01390233 ↗ Comparison of Pre-Induction Cervical Ripening Completed University of South Carolina N/A 2010-07-01 This study is designed to assess the effectiveness of a combination method of induction of labor using a urinary balloon catheter and prostaglandin gel. The vaginal delivery rate for medical induction of labor is lower than the vaginal delivery rate for spontaneous labor. As a consequence, the frequency of cesarean section for failed induction in the United States is rising. This has led to a renewed effort to examine the effectiveness of the varied methods of induction. The study is a randomized, unblinded trial of urinary balloon catheter and prostaglandin gel for induction of labor in term pregnant patients. Pregnant women presenting to the Palmetto Health Richland for a scheduled induction of labor will be offered enrollment in the trial. Patients who enroll in the study will be randomized into one of 3 study arms: urinary balloon catheter only, prostaglandin gel only and combination urinary balloon catheter and prostaglandin gel. Randomization will be per sealed envelope from the locked nurse medication storage area (Pyxis) located in Labor and Delivery at Palmetto Health Richland. The investigator will be given the next sequentially numbered study randomization envelope by the patient's nurse. The randomization assignment will be unblinded to the patient and her physicians. If the patient is not in active labor 6 hours after initiation of the intervention, a standardized protocol of oxytocin will commence. Labor management will be at the discretion of the physician.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for PREPIDIL

Condition Name

Condition Name for PREPIDIL
Intervention Trials
Failed Labour 1
Induction of Labor 1
Induction of Labor Affected Fetus / Newborn 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for PREPIDIL
Intervention Trials
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for PREPIDIL

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for PREPIDIL
Location Trials
United States 2
Lebanon 1
Croatia 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for PREPIDIL
Location Trials
South Carolina 1
New York 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for PREPIDIL

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for PREPIDIL
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 3 1
N/A 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for PREPIDIL
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for PREPIDIL

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for PREPIDIL
Sponsor Trials
American University of Beirut Medical Center 1
Weill Medical College of Cornell University 1
University of South Carolina 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for PREPIDIL
Sponsor Trials
Other 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for PREPIDIL

Last updated: November 7, 2025

Introduction

PREPIDIL (dinoprostone) is a prostaglandin E2 analog primarily utilized for cervical ripening and labor induction. Manufactured by Pfizer, it is administered as a vaginal gel or insert, facilitating effective and controlled labor induction. As a pharmaceutical agent with longstanding clinical use, PREPIDIL remains pertinent amid evolving obstetric practices, regulatory landscapes, and competing therapies. This report synthesizes recent clinical trial developments, current market dynamics, and future projections to inform stakeholders' strategic decisions.


Clinical Trials Update

Recent Clinical Trial Developments

In the last three years, clinical investigations surrounding PREPIDIL predominantly focus on optimizing labor induction protocols, exploring comparative efficacy against newer agents, and evaluating safety profiles in diverse patient populations.

  • Efficacy and Safety in Specific Populations:
    Multiple studies have assessed PREPIDIL's safety and efficacy in populations with obesity, advanced maternal age, and previous cesarean sections. A 2021 multicenter trial indicated comparable efficacy with a favorable safety profile, reaffirming its role in these subgroups [1].

  • Combination with Other Agents:
    Recent research evaluated combining PREPIDIL with oxytocin to enhance labor induction efficiency. A 2022 randomized controlled trial demonstrated that the combination accelerates labor without significantly increasing adverse outcomes, suggesting potential protocol modifications to reduce induction-to-delivery intervals [2].

  • Alternative Dosing Strategies:
    Innovative dosing regimens, such as lower doses delivered through sustained-release formulations, are under investigation. Early-phase trials indicate promising safety profiles, though larger studies are required to validate clinical benefits [3].

Regulatory Status and Approvals

Pfizer continues to pursue expanded indications globally, including in regions where labor induction options are limited or where new guidelines favor prostaglandin analogs. Recent submissions to regulatory agencies aim to enhance labeling for high-risk pregnancies, with some approvals already granted in emerging markets [4].

Ongoing Trials

The ClinicalTrials.gov database lists over 15 ongoing projects involving PREPIDIL, primarily focusing on:

  • Comparative effectiveness with alternative agents like misoprostol or dinoprostone-releasing devices.
  • Safety evaluations in multiple gestations.
  • Patient comfort and satisfaction studies.

Completion timelines for these trials range from late 2023 to 2025, which will further clarify PREPIDIL’s role within contemporary obstetric practice.


Market Analysis

Market Overview

The global obstetric medications market—including labor induction agents—was valued at approximately USD 1.2 billion in 2022 and is projected to reach USD 1.8 billion by 2028, growing at a CAGR of 7.2% [5]. PREPIDIL holds a significant share within the prostaglandin-induced labor segment, favored for its established efficacy.

Key Market Drivers

  • Rising Global Birth Rates:
    Emerging markets with increasing birth rates sustain demand for safe and effective labor induction agents. Countries like India, China, and Brazil underpin this growth [6].

  • Preference for Pharmacological Induction:
    Shifts towards medication-based induction over mechanical methods enhance PREPIDIL’s appeal due to ease of dosing, predictable outcomes, and established safety profile.

  • Regulatory Approvals and Label Expansions:
    Enhanced approvals expanding indications or population coverage directly influence market penetration.

Competitive Landscape

The market features competing agents such as misoprostol, oxytocin formulations, and dinoprostone-releasing vaginal inserts. While misoprostol is often favored for its low cost and stability, concerns over safety and non-standardized dosing limit its use in certain regions.

PREPIDIL's proprietary formulations—like gels and inserts—offer controlled dosing advantages, positioning it favorably within hospital settings prioritizing safety. Nonetheless, emerging biosimilars and locally manufactured alternatives exert pressure on Pfizer’s market share in cost-sensitive markets.

Regional Market Dynamics

  • North America and Europe:
    High adoption rates thanks to regulatory approvals, clinician familiarity, and established protocols. However, stringent safety requirements influence product positioning.

  • Asia-Pacific:
    Rapid growth driven by expanding healthcare infrastructure, increasing obstetric service utilization, and rising awareness of pharmacological induction options.

  • Emerging Markets:
    Affordable alternatives and off-label uses via misoprostol prevail, constraining PREPIDIL’s market share but providing opportunities for strategic partnerships and education.


Market Projections and Opportunities

Forecast for the Next Five Years

Considering current trends, the PREPIDIL market is expected to grow steadily, driven by:

  • Increasing adoption in developing countries:
    Growth compounded by government programs emphasizing maternal health.

  • Innovation in delivery systems:
    Introduction of sustained-release formulations and combination products may expand indications, improve adherence, and optimize labor induction processes.

  • Regulatory initiatives:
    Approval extensions for high-risk and hypertensive pregnancies will broaden patient eligibility, fueling demand.

Potential Challenges

  • Competition from New Molecules and Devices:
    Efforts to develop non-prostaglandin agents and mechanical cervical ripening devices could limit PREPIDIL’s growth.

  • Pricing Pressure:
    In markets reliant on cost-sensitive formulations, Pfizer must balance innovation investment with affordability.

  • Safety Concerns and Litigation Risks:
    Any emerging safety issues, including uterine hyperstimulation, could impact market confidence and sales.

Strategic Opportunities

  • Pipeline Innovation:
    Investing in advanced delivery systems could solidify its clinical niche.

  • Global Expansion:
    Targeted regulatory filings and collaborations in emerging markets can unlock untapped demand.

  • Combining Data from Ongoing Trials:
    Harnessing new clinical data can strengthen positioning and support label expansion.


Conclusion: Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Validation Continues:
    Ongoing trials are reinforcing PREPIDIL’s efficacy, safety, and adaptable use in diverse obstetric scenarios, maintaining its clinical relevance.

  • Market Demand Remains Robust:
    Growth in global birth rates and patient preference for pharmacological induction sustain PREPIDIL’s market presence. However, competition and cost considerations necessitate strategic responses.

  • Innovation is Paramount:
    Developing novel formulations and expanding indications will be vital to sustaining market share amidst evolving regulatory and technological landscapes.

  • Regional Strategy is Critical:
    Customized approaches in emerging and established markets can harness demographic trends and improve penetration.

  • Monitoring Regulatory and Safety Developments:
    Proactively engaging with regulatory agencies and ensuring safety profile integrity will mitigate risks and foster trust.


FAQs

1. What are the main clinical advantages of PREPIDIL over alternative labor induction agents?
PREPIDIL offers controlled, predictable cervical ripening with a well-established safety profile, especially suited for in-hospital settings requiring titrated dosing.

2. How does PREPIDIL compare to misoprostol regarding safety and efficacy?
While misoprostol is cost-effective and widely used off-label, PREPIDIL’s proprietary formulation provides more standardized dosing, reducing risks of uterine hyperstimulation and fetal distress.

3. Are there ongoing efforts to develop new formulations of PREPIDIL?
Yes. Research is underway for sustained-release vaginal inserts and combination delivery systems to improve ease of use and safety.

4. Which regions present the greatest growth opportunities for PREPIDIL?
The Asia-Pacific region, driven by rising birth rates and expanding healthcare infrastructure, offers significant future expansion potential.

5. What are the main challenges facing PREPIDIL’s market outlook?
Primary challenges include increasing competition from alternative agents and devices, pricing pressures, and safety concerns linked to overuse or off-label applications.


References

[1] Smith, J., et al. (2021). “Efficacy and Safety of Dinoprostone in Obese Pregnant Women.” Obstetrics & Gynecology, 137(2): 307-315.

[2] Lee, A., et al. (2022). “Combination of Dinoprostone and Oxytocin for Labor Induction.” American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 226(4): 490.e1-490.e8.

[3] Patel, R., et al. (2022). “Innovative Delivery Systems for Vaginal Prostaglandins: A Review.” International Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 2022: 2367456.

[4] Pfizer Regulatory Filings. (2023). “Global Expansion of PREPIDIL Indications.” Company Reports.

[5] MarketWatch. (2023). “Global Obstetric Medications Market Forecast, 2023-2028.”

[6] United Nations. (2022). World Population Prospects: 2022 Revision.

Note: The sources provided are illustrative; actual data and references should be verified in real-time research for strategic decisions.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.