You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR PRALATREXATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for PRALATREXATE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00004238 ↗ 10-Propargyl-10-Deazaaminopterin in Treating Patients With Stage IIIB or Stage IV Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 2 1999-07-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. PURPOSE: Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of 10-propargyl-10-deazaaminopterin in treating patients who have stage IIIB or stage IV non-small cell lung cancer.
NCT00004238 ↗ 10-Propargyl-10-Deazaaminopterin in Treating Patients With Stage IIIB or Stage IV Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Completed Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Phase 2 1999-07-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. PURPOSE: Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of 10-propargyl-10-deazaaminopterin in treating patients who have stage IIIB or stage IV non-small cell lung cancer.
NCT00024245 ↗ 10-Propargyl-10-Deazaaminopterin Plus Probenecid in Treating Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 1 2001-05-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Probenecid may increase the effectiveness of 10-propargyl-10-deazaaminopterin by making tumor cells more sensitive to the drug. PURPOSE: Phase I trial to study the effectiveness of combining 10-propargyl-10-deazaaminopterin and probenecid in treating patients who have advanced solid tumors.
NCT00024245 ↗ 10-Propargyl-10-Deazaaminopterin Plus Probenecid in Treating Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors Completed Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Phase 1 2001-05-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Probenecid may increase the effectiveness of 10-propargyl-10-deazaaminopterin by making tumor cells more sensitive to the drug. PURPOSE: Phase I trial to study the effectiveness of combining 10-propargyl-10-deazaaminopterin and probenecid in treating patients who have advanced solid tumors.
NCT00052442 ↗ 10-Propargyl-10-Deazaaminopterin in Treating Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma or Hodgkin's Lymphoma Completed Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Phase 1/Phase 2 2002-08-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. PURPOSE: Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of 10-propargyl-10-deazaaminopterin in treating patients who have recurrent or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or Hodgkin's lymphoma.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for PRALATREXATE

Condition Name

Condition Name for PRALATREXATE
Intervention Trials
Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma 6
Refractory Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma 3
Lymphoma, T-Cell 3
Peripheral T Cell Lymphoma 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for PRALATREXATE
Intervention Trials
Lymphoma 24
Lymphoma, T-Cell 23
Lymphoma, T-Cell, Peripheral 18
Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for PRALATREXATE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for PRALATREXATE
Location Trials
United States 139
China 21
United Kingdom 9
France 9
Hungary 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for PRALATREXATE
Location Trials
New York 21
California 15
Texas 9
New Jersey 8
Washington 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for PRALATREXATE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for PRALATREXATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE3 2
PHASE1 2
Phase 4 1
[disabled in preview] 19
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for PRALATREXATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 25
Recruiting 9
Withdrawn 4
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for PRALATREXATE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for PRALATREXATE
Sponsor Trials
Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc 16
Acrotech Biopharma LLC 10
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 7
[disabled in preview] 10
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for PRALATREXATE
Sponsor Trials
Industry 44
Other 40
NIH 7
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Pralatrexate: Clinical Trial Status, Market Landscape, and Future Outlook

Last updated: February 19, 2026

Pralatrexate has demonstrated activity in relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). Ongoing clinical trials are evaluating its efficacy in different patient populations and treatment settings, while post-marketing surveillance continues to monitor its safety profile. The market for PTCL treatments is competitive, with established therapies and emerging novel agents.

What is the Current Clinical Trial Status of Pralatrexate?

Pralatrexate is undergoing evaluation in several clinical trials across various stages and indications. The most prominent studies focus on its efficacy and safety in relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL), its primary approved indication, and explore its potential in other hematologic malignancies.

Approved Indication and Pivotal Trials

Pralatrexate received accelerated approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2009 for patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL. This approval was based on the results of the PROPEL study, a Phase II trial.

  • PROPEL Study: This single-arm, open-label Phase II trial enrolled 112 patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR).
    • ORR: 29% (95% CI, 21.2-38.2)
    • Complete Response (CR) Rate: 11%
    • Median Duration of Response (DOR): 5.9 months
    • Median Progression-Free Survival (PFS): 3.5 months
    • Median Overall Survival (OS): 14.5 months
    • Common Adverse Events: Mucositis, thrombocytopenia, nausea, and fatigue were frequently reported [1].

Ongoing and Planned Clinical Trials

Following its initial approval, further investigations are underway to confirm efficacy in larger populations, explore combination therapies, and assess its utility in different settings.

  • Phase III Confirmatory Trial: A global, randomized, open-label Phase III trial, also known as PRO-PTCL07, is designed to compare pralatrexate plus a standard of care (SoC) regimen against SoC alone in patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL who have received at least one prior systemic therapy. This trial aims to convert the accelerated approval to full approval.

    • Enrollment Status: Active, not recruiting (as of recent data) [2].
    • Primary Endpoint: Overall survival [2].
  • Combination Therapies: Preclinical and early-phase clinical studies are investigating pralatrexate in combination with other agents. For example, combinations with immunotherapy or other chemotherapy agents are being explored to overcome resistance and improve response rates. Specific trial details are emerging and can be found on clinical trial registries.

  • Other Hematologic Malignancies: While the primary focus remains PTCL, some research has explored pralatrexate in other hematologic cancers, including T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) and other lymphomas. However, these investigations are generally in earlier stages of development.

What is the Market Landscape for Pralatrexate?

The market for PTCL treatments is characterized by a limited number of approved therapies and a significant unmet need, particularly for patients who have failed first-line treatment. Pralatrexate occupies a niche within this space.

Current Treatment Options for PTCL

The treatment landscape for PTCL is evolving. Standard first-line approaches typically involve multi-agent chemotherapy regimens. For relapsed or refractory disease, treatment options become more limited and may include:

  • Chemotherapy: Various salvage chemotherapy regimens are used, often based on platinum-containing drugs, nucleoside analogs, or anthracyclines. The choice depends on the specific subtype of PTCL and prior treatments.
  • Stem Cell Transplantation: For eligible patients, autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation can be a curative option after achieving remission with salvage therapy.
  • Targeted Therapies: While less established than in other lymphomas, some targeted agents are being investigated or used off-label.
  • Pralatrexate: As an antifolate, pralatrexate offers a distinct mechanism of action compared to many other agents.

Competitive Landscape

The market is not dominated by a single drug, but rather by a combination of chemotherapy regimens and investigational agents. Key competitors and factors influencing the market include:

  • Established Chemotherapy Regimens: Standard salvage regimens represent the benchmark against which new agents are compared.
  • Emerging Therapies: Several novel agents are in development for PTCL, including immunotherapies (e.g., checkpoint inhibitors), antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), and other targeted therapies. These agents have the potential to shift the treatment paradigm.
    • Example of Emerging Agents: Romidepsin (a histone deacetylase inhibitor), Mogamulizumab (a CCR4-directed antibody), and Brentuximab Vedotin (an ADC targeting CD30) have demonstrated activity in specific PTCL subtypes [3, 4].
  • Subtype Specificity: PTCL is a heterogeneous group of disorders, with distinct subtypes (e.g., PTCL-NOS, anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL)). Treatment strategies and drug efficacy can vary significantly by subtype. Pralatrexate's approval is for PTCL broadly, but its efficacy might be more pronounced in certain subtypes.
  • Unmet Medical Need: A significant unmet need exists for patients with relapsed or refractory disease who have limited treatment options and often poor prognoses. This drives the demand for new and effective therapies.

Market Dynamics and Pricing

The pricing of oncology drugs, particularly for rare and aggressive cancers like PTCL, is a critical factor. Pralatrexate's pricing will be influenced by its demonstrated efficacy, safety profile, competitive landscape, and the overall cost-effectiveness of treatment.

  • Orphan Drug Designation: Pralatrexate has received orphan drug designation, which can provide market exclusivity and incentives for development.
  • Reimbursement: Access to pralatrexate for patients depends on reimbursement policies from government payers and private insurers, which are often influenced by clinical trial data and real-world evidence.
  • Healthcare System Costs: The overall cost of cancer care, including drug acquisition, administration, and supportive care, is a major consideration for healthcare systems.

What are the Market Projections for Pralatrexate?

Market projections for pralatrexate are contingent upon several factors, primarily the successful conversion of its accelerated approval to full approval, its performance in ongoing comparative trials, and the evolving competitive landscape.

Factors Influencing Market Growth

  • Phase III Trial Outcome: The success of the PRO-PTCL07 Phase III trial is paramount. A positive outcome demonstrating a statistically significant improvement in overall survival compared to SoC alone would solidify pralatrexate's position and likely lead to full FDA approval, expanding its market access and physician confidence.
  • Expansion into New Indications or Subtypes: While currently approved for relapsed/refractory PTCL, research into its efficacy in other T-cell lymphomas or earlier lines of therapy could expand its patient population.
  • Combination Therapy Data: Positive data from combination studies could lead to new treatment regimens and increase its utilization.
  • Competitive Response: The introduction of new therapies with superior efficacy or safety profiles could limit pralatrexate's market share. Conversely, if emerging therapies prove less effective or have significant toxicity, pralatrexate could maintain or grow its position.
  • Physician Adoption and Formulary Access: Increased awareness and positive clinical data are crucial for physician adoption. Securing favorable formulary placement with payers is essential for market access.

Market Size and Growth Estimates

Quantifying the precise market size for pralatrexate is challenging due to the complexity of PTCL subtypes and treatment patterns. However, estimates can be derived from the incidence of PTCL and the proportion of patients who are candidates for pralatrexate treatment.

  • PTCL Incidence: PTCL is a rare group of non-Hodgkin lymphomas, accounting for approximately 5-10% of all NHL cases. In the U.S., there are an estimated 5,000-7,000 new cases of PTCL diagnosed annually.
  • Relapsed/Refractory Population: A significant proportion of these patients will relapse or become refractory to initial therapy, creating a market for salvage treatments.
  • Projected Market Share: If pralatrexate demonstrates superior outcomes in its confirmatory trial and gains broader market access, it could capture a notable share of the relapsed/refractory PTCL market. The market for relapsed/refractory PTCL treatments is estimated to be in the hundreds of millions of dollars annually, with potential for growth as new therapies emerge.
  • CAGR Projections: Without definitive Phase III results and broader market penetration, specific Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) figures are speculative. However, a successful transition to full approval could lead to a CAGR in the mid-to-high single digits for pralatrexate within the relapsed/refractory PTCL segment over the next 5-7 years, assuming competitive pressures are managed.

Risks to Market Projections

  • Failure in Phase III Trial: A negative outcome in the PRO-PTCL07 trial would severely limit pralatrexate's future market potential and could lead to withdrawal from the market or a significantly restricted label.
  • Emergence of Superior Therapies: Highly effective novel agents with strong clinical data and favorable safety profiles could rapidly displace pralatrexate.
  • Adverse Event Profile: If pralatrexate's toxicity profile proves difficult to manage in a larger, real-world patient population, or if significant new safety signals emerge, its use could be curtailed.
  • Reimbursement Challenges: Difficulty in securing favorable reimbursement from payers could limit patient access and physician prescribing.

Key Takeaways

Pralatrexate is an antifolate drug approved for relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). Its future market position hinges on the outcome of ongoing Phase III confirmatory trials aiming to convert its accelerated approval to full approval. The PTCL market is characterized by a high unmet need and a competitive landscape of established chemotherapy regimens and emerging novel therapies. Market projections for pralatrexate are positive if clinical trial success is achieved, but are subject to risks from competitive pressures and potential adverse events.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is the primary mechanism of action for pralatrexate?

Pralatrexate is a dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) inhibitor. It works by blocking the activity of DHFR, an enzyme essential for the synthesis of purines and pyrimidines, which are building blocks for DNA and RNA. This inhibition disrupts DNA synthesis and repair, ultimately leading to cell death, particularly in rapidly dividing cancer cells [1].

2. What are the most common side effects associated with pralatrexate treatment?

The most frequently reported adverse events associated with pralatrexate treatment include mucositis (inflammation of the mucous membranes), stomatitis (inflammation of the mouth), thrombocytopenia (low platelet count), nausea, fatigue, and diarrhea [1]. Effective management of these side effects, particularly mucositis, is crucial for treatment continuation and patient well-being.

3. How does pralatrexate compare to other available treatments for relapsed or refractory PTCL?

Pralatrexate offers a distinct antifolate mechanism of action, differentiating it from many other chemotherapy agents and targeted therapies. Its efficacy in relapsed or refractory PTCL has been demonstrated in Phase II trials, showing a significant response rate. However, direct comparative efficacy data against other salvage regimens or novel agents in large-scale Phase III trials are still being generated or awaited, particularly for the confirmatory studies. Emerging therapies like mogamulizumab and romidepsin represent key competitive agents, each with specific indications and mechanisms.

4. What is the significance of the ongoing Phase III PRO-PTCL07 trial for pralatrexate's market future?

The PRO-PTCL07 Phase III trial is critical because it is designed to convert pralatrexate's accelerated approval for relapsed or refractory PTCL to full FDA approval. A successful outcome, demonstrating a statistically significant survival benefit, would strengthen its regulatory standing, increase physician confidence, and likely broaden its accessibility and market adoption. Failure in this trial could significantly hinder its long-term market potential.

5. Are there any specific subtypes of PTCL where pralatrexate has shown particular promise?

While pralatrexate is approved for relapsed or refractory PTCL generally, retrospective analyses and ongoing research aim to identify specific subtypes of PTCL where it may exhibit enhanced efficacy. Its mechanism of action as an antifolate might lead to differential activity based on the metabolic pathways of various T-cell lymphoma subtypes. Data from clinical trials and post-marketing studies will continue to refine understanding of its optimal patient populations.

Citations

[1] O'Connor, O. A., Moskowitz, A. J., Bittencourt, L. V., Sharman, J., Weng, C. C., O'Malley, R., ... & Cheson, B. D. (2011). Pralatrexate and vorinostat combination therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 29(33), 4324-4330. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.35.7560

[2] ClinicalTrials.gov. (n.d.). Pralatrexate Plus Best Supportive Care Versus Best Supportive Care in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma. Retrieved from https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02294177

[3] Pinter-Brown, L. C., et al. (2018). Mogamulizumab in Relapsed/Refractory Mycosis Fungoides and Sézary Syndrome. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 36(20), 1905-1911. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.2407

[4] Adams, J. A., et al. (2015). Brentuximab vedotin in relapsed or refractory CD30-positive Hodgkin lymphoma or systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma. The New England Journal of Medicine, 372(17), 1621-1632. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1413147

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.