Last Updated: June 25, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR PORTALAC


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for PORTALAC

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT01842113 ↗ Quality of Life and Nutritional Improvements in Cirrhotic Patients Terminated Tampa General Hospital Phase 4 2013-04-01 The purpose of this study is to determine whether taking Rifaximin (Xifaxan) in conjunction with the use of nutritional concepts is effective in improving morbidity and quality of life in cirrhotic patients suffering from hepatic encephalopathy (HE).
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for PORTALAC

Condition Name

Condition Name for PORTALAC
Intervention Trials
Hepatic Encephalopathy 1
Liver Cirrhosis 1
Portal Hypertension 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for PORTALAC
Intervention Trials
Liver Cirrhosis 1
Hypertension, Portal 1
Hepatic Encephalopathy 1
Brain Diseases 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for PORTALAC

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for PORTALAC
Location Trials
United States 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for PORTALAC
Location Trials
Florida 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for PORTALAC

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for PORTALAC
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for PORTALAC
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Terminated 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for PORTALAC

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for PORTALAC
Sponsor Trials
Tampa General Hospital 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for PORTALAC
Sponsor Trials
Other 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Portalac (lactulose) clinical trials update, market analysis and sales projection

Last updated: May 16, 2026

What is Portalac (lactulose) and what clinical-trials signals matter?

Portalac is a brand of lactulose, an osmotic laxative used for constipation and for hepatic encephalopathy (HE) (and related hyperammonemia indications in markets where approved). Clinical-trials activity for lactulose is dominated by older pivotal-era studies and ongoing work focused on:

  • Comparative efficacy vs other laxatives in constipation.
  • HE endpoints tied to ammonia control, cognition or neuropsychiatric testing, and hospitalization or recurrence.
  • Product-formulation and patient-experience studies rather than novel mechanisms.

High-signal lens for “clinical trials update” for an established, off-patent small molecule like lactulose is whether trials are expanding into:

  • New patient segments (e.g., elderly constipation, opioid-induced constipation where labeled).
  • New combinations (lactulose with probiotics or other agents, if any).
  • Updated endpoints aligned to modern HE and constipation trial design.

Which trials are ongoing or recently published for lactulose/Portalac?

No sufficient, source-anchored trial registry or publication set is available in the provided context to enumerate specific Portalac-lactulose trials with:

  • NCT numbers,
  • publication citations,
  • enrollment status,
  • primary endpoints,
  • top-line results, and
  • geographic recruiting scope.

Without a verified list of trials and results, a complete and accurate “clinical trials update” cannot be produced under a hard-data patent-analysis standard.

How strong is Portalac’s patent estate and what does it imply for clinical and market risk?

Portalac is lactulose, a mature genericized active. Market access is typically governed less by active ingredient exclusivity and more by:

  • Brand-specific formulation/manufacturing patents (where they exist in particular jurisdictions),
  • Label-protected indications (rare for lactulose in most regimes given time),
  • Orange Book listing status for specific dosage forms (if applicable in the US for a given ANDA/NDA product),
  • Litigation history for specific branded products.

No jurisdiction-specific patent-and-Orange-Book mapping for “Portalac” is available in the provided context, so an exact exclusivity or litigation-driven market-risk assessment cannot be made.

What is the current market size for lactulose and how is Portalac positioned?

A defensible market analysis requires at minimum:

  • Geographies (US, EU5, UK, Japan, LatAm, MEA, APAC),
  • Data source (IQVIA, GlobalData, company reports, government trade),
  • Segmentation (constipation vs HE; hospital vs retail),
  • Brand vs generic share,
  • Supply and pricing dynamics.

No validated market dataset is available in the provided context. As a result, any numeric market sizing or brand-specific share estimate would not meet the required accuracy threshold.

What competitive landscape exists for Portalac vs other lactulose brands and generics?

For lactulose, competition is usually characterized by:

  • Many equivalent generics for constipation.
  • Different brand presence by region.
  • Substitution driven by pricing and formulary decisions.
  • For HE, clinicians often favor established dosing regimens, but generic substitution commonly occurs in payer systems.

A precise competitive map requires verified product lists by country and data on substitutions, tenders, and reimbursement status for Portalac versus local brands. That information is not present.

When does lactulose lose exclusivity in key markets, and what drives generic entry timing?

Exclusivity for lactulose-based brands tends to be exhausted or governed by legacy brand-specific filings. For a timing answer, the analysis must include:

  • regulatory pathway (NDA vs ANDA),
  • Orange Book “listed drug” and patent expiry dates,
  • pediatric exclusivity or 30-month stay events from ANDA paragraph IV challenges (if any),
  • regulatory exclusivities tied to specific dosage strengths or formulations.

No Orange Book listing or patent expiry record for Portalac is available in the provided context, so a timing timeline cannot be produced.

What is the FDA and EMA regulatory status for Portalac?

A regulatory status section must cite, for the relevant jurisdictions:

  • FDA label status (NDA/ANDA reference product and listed strengths),
  • Orange Book listing for Portalac dosage forms,
  • EMA product authorization status and SmPC details,
  • any current shortages, recalls, or enforcement actions.

The provided context contains none of these verified records, so regulatory status cannot be stated accurately.

How do constipation and hepatic encephalopathy indications affect revenue projection?

Revenue projection for lactulose brands depends on:

  • Net price evolution (generic erosion in constipation retail markets vs stable hospital usage in some HE settings),
  • Patient persistence and adherence patterns (constipation) vs inpatient management patterns (HE),
  • Formulary coverage and payer policies,
  • Competition from alternative HE therapies (where approved locally) and other constipation agents (PEG, senna, other osmotics).

A numeric projection requires baseline revenue, growth rates, and channel mix by geography and indication. None is available.

What sales projection can be made for Portalac over the next 3–5 years?

No source-backed baseline (current sales, regional revenue mix, unit volumes, ASP/NDP, pricing trajectory) exists in the provided context. Without that, any 3–5 year projection would be speculative and not compliant with a hard-data analytic standard.

Key takeaways

  • Portalac is a brand of lactulose, an established small molecule with market access largely shaped by generic substitution rather than active-ingredient innovation.
  • A credible clinical trials update requires a verified trial registry and publication set tied to lactulose/Portalac, including outcomes and enrollment status.
  • A credible market analysis and sales projection requires validated market sizing data, competitive shares, and product-level pricing inputs.
  • Those data inputs are not available in the provided context, so a complete and accurate clinical, regulatory, and financial projection cannot be produced.

FAQs

  1. Is Portalac still prescribed for hepatic encephalopathy in major markets?
  2. Do lactulose formulations have meaningful differentiation vs PEG or other osmotics for constipation?
  3. What drives tender and formulary adoption of lactulose brands versus generics?
  4. Are there active patents on lactulose brands like Portalac in the US or EU?
  5. How do FDA labeling and EMA SmPC changes typically affect lactulose utilization?

References

No sources were provided in the prompt.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.