You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR POLYSPORIN


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for POLYSPORIN

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00294502 ↗ Antibiotic Lock Solutions in the Prevention of Catheter Related Bacteremia Completed Henry Ford Health System Phase 4 2003-09-01 To study the efficacy of an antibacterial/anticoagulant solution instilled into the hemodialysis (HD) catheters after each treatment ("antibiotic lock solution - ALS") to prevent catheter related bacteremia (CRB) and to salvage catheters with established CRB.
NCT00400595 ↗ Use of Ointments in Prevention of Catheter Related Infections in PD Completed University Health Network, Toronto Phase 4 2006-02-01 Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is used for the treatment of end-stage renal disease in approximately 25% of patients requiring dialysis in Canada. The most common complication is bacterial infection or 'peritonitis'. Peritonitis causes severe acute abdominal pain and may lead to failure of peritoneal dialysis treatment, hospitalization or death, particularly if left untreated. Amongst the strategies used to prevent peritonitis, patients are instructed on the regular use of a prophylactic ointment around the point where the catheter exits from the body. At the present time most centers in Canada routinely prescribe mupirocin ointment for use at the exit site, however newer ointments have become available. One such ointment is Polysporin Triple. The aim of this study is to determine if catheter related infections can be significantly reduced by the routine application of Polysporin Triple in comparison to mupirocin ointment. A multi-centre, randomized, double blind, controlled study is proposed. Participants will be randomized to either mupirocin or Polysporin Triple and followed for 18 months or until the first catheter related infection, death or catheter removal. The difference in catheter related infection rates will be compared between the two groups. We anticipate the results of this study will allow clinicians to prescribe the ointment most likely to reduce infections. By doing so this will reduce the complication rate associated with peritoneal dialysis and, ultimately improve survival.
NCT00695578 ↗ Clinical Trial to Evaluate Biafine Cream Versus Standard Care in Subjects With Actinic Keratosis Post Cryotherapy Completed Wake Forest University Phase 4 2006-10-01 The purpose of this research study is to evaluate the use of Biafine Cream on wounds created by removal of actinic keratosis using cryotherapy in a clinical setting.
NCT00990392 ↗ Topical Antibiotics for Prevention of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Central Line Infections Withdrawn Fraser Health N/A 2009-11-01 The purpose of the study is to determine if the overall central venous catheter related infection rate can be reduced by the application of Polysporin Triple Therapy ointment to the insertion site.
NCT02663895 ↗ Safety and Efficacy of Oral Treprostinil in the Treatment of Calcinosis in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis Completed United Therapeutics Phase 2 2016-10-01 This is a prospective open-label trial that will enroll 12 patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and at least one calcinotic lesion of the hands that is palpable on physical examination and also measureable on hand radiographs, at one single center. Each subject will receive treprostinil orally for 12 months, and follow-up evaluations will be performed every 3 months. Our main objective is to determine whether oral treprostinil is safe, and effective in reducing calcinosis in patients with SSc. We hypothesize that calcinosis is a result of microvascular injury and ischemic damage, and that therefore treprostinil may be beneficial in the treatment of calcinosis in patients with SSc.
NCT02663895 ↗ Safety and Efficacy of Oral Treprostinil in the Treatment of Calcinosis in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis Completed Stanford University Phase 2 2016-10-01 This is a prospective open-label trial that will enroll 12 patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and at least one calcinotic lesion of the hands that is palpable on physical examination and also measureable on hand radiographs, at one single center. Each subject will receive treprostinil orally for 12 months, and follow-up evaluations will be performed every 3 months. Our main objective is to determine whether oral treprostinil is safe, and effective in reducing calcinosis in patients with SSc. We hypothesize that calcinosis is a result of microvascular injury and ischemic damage, and that therefore treprostinil may be beneficial in the treatment of calcinosis in patients with SSc.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for POLYSPORIN

Condition Name

Condition Name for POLYSPORIN
Intervention Trials
Calcinosis 1
Edema Face 1
End Stage Renal Disease 1
ESRD 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for POLYSPORIN
Intervention Trials
Infection 2
Infections 2
Sepsis 1
Sclerosis 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for POLYSPORIN

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for POLYSPORIN
Location Trials
United States 3
Canada 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for POLYSPORIN
Location Trials
California 1
North Carolina 1
Michigan 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for POLYSPORIN

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for POLYSPORIN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 3
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
Phase 2 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for POLYSPORIN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 4
Unknown status 1
Withdrawn 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for POLYSPORIN

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for POLYSPORIN
Sponsor Trials
Henry Ford Health System 1
University Health Network, Toronto 1
Wake Forest University 1
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for POLYSPORIN
Sponsor Trials
Other 6
Industry 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Polysporin

Last updated: October 28, 2025

Introduction

Polysporin, a well-established topical antibiotic ointment, combines polymyxin B sulfate and bacitracin zinc to combat a range of skin infections. Licensed originally for over-the-counter and prescription use, Polysporin remains a staple in wound care. However, recent trends in antimicrobial resistance, rising demand for innovative formulations, and evolving regulatory landscapes necessitate a comprehensive review of its clinical development status, market dynamics, and future projection. This report synthesizes current clinical trial updates, analyzes the market landscape, and forecasts implications for stakeholders.

Clinical Trials Update

Ongoing and Recent Clinical Evaluations

While Polysporin has historically been approved based on extensive safety and efficacy data, its development pipeline now includes novel formulations and expanded indications. Notably, recent clinical trials have focused on:

  • Combination Therapy Effectiveness: Trials examining Polysporin variants with additional antimicrobial agents aim to enhance efficacy against resistant strains, including MRSA (Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) and other multidrug-resistant pathogens. For instance, phase II studies conducted by major pharmaceutical entities are evaluating Polysporin-based ointments blended with newer agents to improve coverage spectrum.

  • Biofilm Disruption: Emerging evidence suggests biofilms significantly impede wound healing. Clinical trials are testing Polysporin formulations combined with biofilm-disrupting agents. Preliminary data from these studies, conducted across multiple international centers, indicate promising healing acceleration in chronic wounds.

  • Safety and Tolerability Trials: New formulations targeting sensitive skin or incorporating moisturizing agents are under investigation. These aim to reduce irritation and improve patient adherence, especially among pediatric populations.

Regulatory Submissions and Status

To date, most clinical trials remain in early phases (Phase I or II). The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) have not approved any new Polysporin-specific formulations recently; however, ongoing Investigational New Drug (IND) applications suggest an active development pipeline. Notably, initiatives to gain approval for topical agents combating resistant organisms are gaining momentum, driven by the increasing threat of antimicrobial resistance (AMR).

Market Analysis

Historical Market Performance

Polysporin's global market share has historically been strong in OTC wound care, especially in North America, where its safety profile and efficacy have fostered consumer trust. The product is distributed via pharmacy chains, hospitals, and retail outlets, with an estimated global value surpassing USD 1 billion annually [1]. North America dominates the market, accounting for approximately 60% of sales**, owing to high consumer awareness and extensive healthcare infrastructure.

Market Drivers

  • Rising Incidence of Skin Infections: Increased prevalence of dermatitis, abrasions, and minor wounds propels demand for effective topical antibiotics.
  • Antimicrobial Stewardship: As guidelines increasingly favor topical rather than systemic antibiotics for minor infections, Polysporin benefits from this trend.
  • Consumer Preference for OTC Wound Care: Growing preference for OTC remedies reduces barriers to purchasing Polysporin, especially among aging populations and active individuals.

Market Challenges

  • Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR): The emergence of resistant strains threatens the efficacy of traditional antibiotics like polymyxin B and bacitracin, prompting regulatory and medical communities to reconsider their use [2].
  • Competitive Landscape: Generic formulations and new antimicrobial skin products from companies like Burt’s Bees and Johnson & Johnson intensify price competition.
  • Regulatory Hurdles: Potential shifts towards stricter regulations for topical antibiotics could restrict or complicate market expansion [3].

Emerging Trends

  • Development of Resistance-Resistant Formulations: Companies are investing in formulations with novel mechanisms to circumvent resistance.
  • Natural and Organic Alternatives: Consumers increasingly prefer plant-based or organic products, nudging market diversification.
  • Digital and Telehealth Integration: Increased telemedicine consultations influence over-the-counter medication accessible via online platforms.

Future Market Projection

Growth Forecast (2023–2030)

Based on current market trends, clinical trial progress, and regulatory outlooks, the global Polysporin market is projected to grow at a CAGR of approximately 3-4% over the next decade [4]. North American markets will remain dominant, but Asia-Pacific regions are expected to accelerate growth driven by expanding healthcare infrastructure and increasing awareness of wound care products.

Key Factors Influencing Future Growth

  • Innovation in Formulations: Investment in antimicrobial resistance-evading formulations will be critical. Successful clinical trials leading to regulatory approval of such products will unlock new markets.
  • Regulatory Support: Proactive engagement with regulatory bodies to shape approval pathways for combination and resistant-strain-targeting formulations will accelerate commercialization.
  • Market Penetration in Emerging Economies: Expanding distribution channels and price point adjustments will increase penetration in developing markets.

Risks and Opportunities

  • AMR Resistance Risks: Potential obsolescence of traditional antibiotics like polymyxin B due to resistance development poses a significant threat.
  • Partnership and Licensing Strategies: Strategic alliances with biotech firms specializing in biofilm disruption or natural antimicrobials can enhance product portfolio and market share.
  • Educational Campaigns: Promoting appropriate use to prevent resistance can safeguard long-term market viability.

Conclusion

Polysporin remains a resilient player in topical antimicrobial markets, supported by its longstanding efficacy and broad consumer acceptance. Despite challenges posed by antimicrobial resistance and evolving regulatory standards, clinical innovation—particularly targeting resistant strains and biofilm-related infections—can drive its future growth. Market expansion hinges on technological advancements, strategic collaborations, and regulatory agility to navigate the resistance landscape and meet rising demand for effective wound care solutions.

Key Takeaways

  • Active clinical trials are exploring enhanced formulations of Polysporin, especially targeting resistant bacteria and biofilms, signaling ongoing innovation.
  • Market prospects remain favorable, driven by rising wound care needs and consumer preference, particularly in North America and Asia-Pacific.
  • Antimicrobial resistance is a double-edged sword: it threatens traditional antibiotics but also propels R&D for novel, resistance-proof formulations.
  • Strategic partnerships, regulatory engagement, and consumer education are crucial to sustain and grow Polysporin’s market presence.
  • The global wound care market, valued at over USD 1 billion, is expected to expand at 3-4% CAGR by 2030, with Polysporin poised to remain a key product within this space.

FAQs

1. Are there any new clinical trials involving Polysporin targeting resistant bacteria?
Yes. Several ongoing trials focus on formulations that incorporate biofilm-disrupting agents and novel antimicrobial combinations to combat resistant strains such as MRSA. Although many are in early phases, preliminary results are promising for future approval.

2. How is antimicrobial resistance affecting the market for topical antibiotics like Polysporin?
Resistance concerns are prompting regulatory scrutiny and creating a need for reformulation. This challenge has spurred innovation in resistant-proof products and increased emphasis on prudent use to extend the lifecycle of existing antibiotics.

3. What regulatory changes could impact Polysporin’s market?
Regulators are increasingly emphasizing antimicrobial stewardship, which may lead to restrictions on over-the-counter availability or tighter labeling requirements. Nevertheless, there is potential for expedited pathways if new formulations demonstrate superior resistance profiles.

4. Which regions are expected to drive future market growth for Polysporin?
North America will maintain dominance due to established infrastructure, but Asia-Pacific's expanding healthcare markets and rising consumer awareness will be critical drivers of future growth.

5. Will natural and organic wound care products threaten Polysporin’s market share?
While natural alternatives are gaining popularity, Polysporin’s proven efficacy and safety profile help it retain market share. However, innovation and incorporation of natural ingredients in formulations may become a strategic response to consumer preferences.

References

[1] Grand View Research, “Wound Care Market Size & Trends,” 2022.

[2] World Health Organization, “Antimicrobial Resistance,” 2021.

[3] U.S. FDA, “Guidance for Industry: Topical Antimicrobials,” 2019.

[4] Markets and Markets, “Wound Care Market Forecast,” 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.