Last Updated: May 12, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL 3350; POTASSIUM CHLORIDE; SODIUM BICARBONATE; SODIUM CHLORIDE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL 3350; POTASSIUM CHLORIDE; SODIUM BICARBONATE; SODIUM CHLORIDE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT01170754 ↗ Miralax (PEG 3350) vs. Golytely as Bowel Preparation for Screening Colonoscopy Completed Temple University Phase 4 2010-04-01 A major limitation to the widespread acceptance of colonoscopy as a procedure to screen for colorectal cancer is the laxative preparation. Phosphate-based preps (e.g. Fleets Phosphosoda) are now used on a limited basis because of their known association with renal injury. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) mixed with a balanced electrolyte solution (e.g. Golytely) has been used for over two decades for colon cleansing. The mixture is not very palatable due to the electrolyte additives which include sodium sulfate. To overcome the limitation of existing preps, gastroenterologists and colorectal surgeons worldwide have been using PEG powder alone (same quantity as found in Golytely prep) not mixed with electrolytes (Glycolax or Miralax) and dissolving this into 64 ounces of Gatorade. Conservatively, we estimate that 25% of colonoscopies in the US are being done with this prep. Anecdotally there have been reports (case series) that it is far more palatable and the prep is equally efficacious. The active ingredient, PEG, is not changed and therefore this is not surprising. The issue at present is that there has never been a blinded study to confirm these claims. This study will compare the efficacy of the two preps. There is no funding. The investigators will charge insurance companies for the prep - this is our current practice. The procedures will be done on healthy individuals referred for colon cancer screening and the exam will be billed to their insurance. There will be no patient honorarium. The investigators will check electrolytes to be sure patients do not develop hypokalemia with the Gatorade prep.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL 3350; POTASSIUM CHLORIDE; SODIUM BICARBONATE; SODIUM CHLORIDE

Condition Name

Condition Name for POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL 3350; POTASSIUM CHLORIDE; SODIUM BICARBONATE; SODIUM CHLORIDE
Intervention Trials
Colon Cancer 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL 3350; POTASSIUM CHLORIDE; SODIUM BICARBONATE; SODIUM CHLORIDE
Intervention Trials
Colonic Neoplasms 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL 3350; POTASSIUM CHLORIDE; SODIUM BICARBONATE; SODIUM CHLORIDE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL 3350; POTASSIUM CHLORIDE; SODIUM BICARBONATE; SODIUM CHLORIDE
Location Trials
United States 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL 3350; POTASSIUM CHLORIDE; SODIUM BICARBONATE; SODIUM CHLORIDE
Location Trials
Pennsylvania 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL 3350; POTASSIUM CHLORIDE; SODIUM BICARBONATE; SODIUM CHLORIDE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL 3350; POTASSIUM CHLORIDE; SODIUM BICARBONATE; SODIUM CHLORIDE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL 3350; POTASSIUM CHLORIDE; SODIUM BICARBONATE; SODIUM CHLORIDE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL 3350; POTASSIUM CHLORIDE; SODIUM BICARBONATE; SODIUM CHLORIDE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL 3350; POTASSIUM CHLORIDE; SODIUM BICARBONATE; SODIUM CHLORIDE
Sponsor Trials
Temple University 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL 3350; POTASSIUM CHLORIDE; SODIUM BICARBONATE; SODIUM CHLORIDE
Sponsor Trials
Other 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Polyethylene Glycol 3350 + Potassium Chloride + Sodium Bicarbonate + Sodium Chloride (PEG 3350 + KCl + NaHCO3 + NaCl): Clinical Trial Update and Market Outlook

Last updated: May 6, 2026

What is this drug and how is it used commercially?

The combination of polyethylene glycol 3350 (PEG 3350) with potassium chloride (KCl), sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3), and sodium chloride (NaCl) is marketed in the U.S. and other markets as an oral bowel cleansing agent for colonoscopy preparation. It is a fixed-dose electrolyte-containing PEG regimen intended to maintain hydration and electrolytes during bowel evacuation.

Commercially, this product class is represented by prescription bowel prep brands (and their authorized generics) that use the PEG 3350 backbone plus electrolyte salts to reduce dehydration and electrolyte imbalance risk compared with older PEG-only regimens. (Class context: bowel preparation products and clinical endpoints are consistent across PEG plus electrolyte combinations.)

What is the clinical trial update (current evidence and activity)?

No single public-facing clinical development program is captured for this exact multi-salt fixed combination in a way that supports a comprehensive “ongoing trials by phase, status, and readouts” table across registries in this response. The most reliable, decision-grade market view for this regimen is therefore built from (1) established labeling usage, (2) typical endpoints used in bowel prep trials, and (3) observable market behavior (continued sales, switching patterns, and competitor penetration).

Clinical endpoints used for PEG-based bowel preps

For business and R&D benchmarking, trials for bowel cleansing agents typically measure:

  • Adequacy of bowel cleansing using validated endoscopic scoring systems (often Boston Bowel Preparation Scale or similar)
  • Overall colon cleansing success rates (typically defined by a threshold score)
  • Rate of repeat dosing or rescue medication
  • Safety and tolerability, with emphasis on electrolyte changes and adverse events such as nausea, abdominal discomfort, vomiting, and dehydration signals

Practical implication for this product class

PEG 3350 + electrolytes has a long-established clinical evidence base and stable prescribing patterns. New clinical development for fixed-dose combinations generally centers on:

  • non-inferiority / equivalence to reference bowel preps,
  • tolerability (lower symptom burden),
  • operational execution (split dosing logistics, reduced pill burden where applicable),
  • and special populations (renal impairment, older adults, comorbidity subgroups).

What does the market look like, and how does this product fit?

Market role

Within bowel preparation, PEG-based solutions are core share drivers because they balance efficacy (high-quality cleansing rates) with manageable safety for the majority of patients. Electrolyte inclusion is a key differentiator against PEG regimens without KCl/NaHCO3/NaCl.

Demand drivers

  • Colorectal cancer screening pipeline: screening volumes and rescreening cycles sustain demand for bowel preps.
  • Colonoscopy utilization: diagnostic and surveillance colonoscopies create baseline consumption.
  • GI guideline adherence: bowel cleansing quality is a quality metric linked to adenoma detection and procedure success; inadequate prep drives repeat procedures and physician enforcement.

Competitive landscape (high-level)

The competitive set for this regimen typically includes:

  • other PEG + electrolytes products (including lower-volume or different electrolyte compositions),
  • sodium picosulfate/magnesium oxide products,
  • sulfate-based regimens (where available),
  • and split-dose-ready formulations that improve adherence.

PEG + electrolytes retains broad prescriber acceptance because it supports high cleansing adequacy while using a well-understood safety profile. Switching is driven more by payer coverage, price, and patient tolerability than by breakthrough clinical differentiation.

What is the market projection and sizing logic for the next 5 years?

A defensible 5-year projection requires numeric market size, CAGR inputs, and segmentation from a specific dataset or report. This response cannot provide a complete, accurate quantified forecast without those cited numerical sources.

What can be projected with decision usefulness, using only established market mechanics and the fixed-drug profile:

1) Growth outlook: steady-to-moderate, volume-led

  • Base-case growth is expected to track colonoscopy volumes and screening rescheduling effects in mature markets.
  • Share gains are most likely where payers favor PEG + electrolyte regimens due to predictable safety and cost stability, especially as generics expand.

2) Share pressure: genericization and payer formularies

  • Where authorized generics or multiple brands compete at lower price points, brand-level unit growth can flatten even as category demand rises.
  • Bowel prep categories are unusually exposed to formulary tiering because they are procedure-linked consumables with frequent pharmacy fill events.

3) Uptake levers: adherence and split dosing execution

Projected adoption tends to improve with:

  • dosing schedules that fit outpatient workflows,
  • reduced time burden,
  • patient-friendly instructions and packaging,
  • and payer support that reduces out-of-pocket cost.

What should an investor or R&D lead focus on for this regimen?

Because the regimen is mature, the actionable diligence items are not “does it work” but “where does it win”:

Competitive differentiation workstreams

  • Adherence engineering: improving split-dose compliance via instruction clarity and patient education materials.
  • Tolerability reduction: minimizing nausea and discomfort through patient preparation kits and dosing guidance (not necessarily reformulation).
  • Protocol optimization: aligning with colonoscopy center workflows to reduce late starts and missed split doses.
  • Special population positioning: renal impairment safety messaging is critical because electrolytes and fluid shifts affect risk perception.

Evidence strategy for future life-cycle activity

If new clinical studies are planned, the highest decision value comes from:

  • non-inferiority bowel cleansing outcomes versus the current standard comparator,
  • symptom burden endpoints (patient-reported measures),
  • and safety monitoring focused on electrolyte perturbations and dehydration signals.

Key Takeaways

  • PEG 3350 + KCl + NaHCO3 + NaCl is a mature, core bowel-cleansing regimen for colonoscopy preparation, where clinical differentiation hinges on dosing execution and tolerability more than on breakthrough efficacy.
  • The clinical evidence base is established; this response does not support a quantified “ongoing trials” update with phase- and site-level detail without a registry-linked dataset.
  • Market outlook is best framed as volume-led with payer- and generic-driven share pressure; growth is likely steady-to-moderate rather than step-change.
  • For R&D and investment, the highest ROI levers are adherence, tolerability messaging, and protocol integration rather than fundamental mechanism redesign.

FAQs

  1. Is this regimen designed for colonoscopy bowel cleansing rather than chronic GI conditions?
    Yes. The fixed PEG plus electrolytes combination is used for colonoscopy preparation.

  2. What determines success in trials for this drug class?
    Primary endpoints are bowel cleansing adequacy and safety, with colonoscopic scoring systems and adverse event monitoring.

  3. How do generics affect the brand economics?
    They typically compress pricing and shift demand to the lowest net-cost formulary option, even when category demand stays stable.

  4. What patient factors most influence bowel prep outcomes?
    Adherence to split dosing, hydration status, baseline GI motility, and tolerability of large-volume oral regimens.

  5. What would create a material market shift for this product category?
    New formulations or delivery platforms that materially improve adherence, reduce symptom burden, or offer meaningful operational advantages for endoscopy centers.


References

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Drug Safety and Availability/Approved Drug Labeling database (search for PEG 3350 + potassium chloride + sodium bicarbonate + sodium chloride bowel preparation products and labeling endpoints). FDA.
[2] U.S. National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov (search terms: “polyethylene glycol 3350 potassium chloride sodium bicarbonate sodium chloride” and “bowel preparation”). ClinicalTrials.gov.
[3] Gastroenterology society guidance on bowel preparation quality and colonoscopy preparation outcomes (guideline documents on adequacy scoring and bowel-cleansing endpoints). Gastroenterology societies.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.