Last Updated: October 3, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR PIPERACILLIN


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for PIPERACILLIN

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
New Combination NCT05721443 ↗ Cetuximab Plus Dalpicilib in Patients With HPV Negative, PD-1 Resistant R/M HNSCC Recruiting Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University Phase 2 2023-04-01 This study is the first clinical study in PD-1 resistant patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with drugs targeting EGFR signaling pathway combined with CDK4/6 inhibitors, which explores the new combination therapies urgently needed in clinical practice and lays a foundation for subsequent studies, with important scientific research significance and clinical value.
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for PIPERACILLIN

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00003805 ↗ Prevention of Infection in Patients With Hematologic Cancer and Persistent Fever Caused by a Low White Blood Cell Count Completed European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC Phase 3 1997-11-01 RATIONALE: Antibiotic therapy may prevent the development of infection in patients with hematologic cancer and the persistent fever caused by a low white blood cell count. It is not yet known which regimen of antibiotics is most effective in preventing infection in these patients. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to study the effectiveness of piperacillin-tazobactam with or without vancomycin in reducing fever in patients who have leukemia, lymphoma, or Hodgkin's disease.
NCT00044746 ↗ Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Piperacillin/Tazobactam and Ampicillin/Sulbactam in Patients With Diabetic Foot Infections Completed Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer Phase 4 2000-10-01 Phase IV Open-Label Foot Infection Study is being conducted to generate comparative Efficacy and Safety data in Diabetic Inpatients.
NCT00044759 ↗ Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Piperacillin/Tazobactam to Cefepime in Patients With Hematologic Malignancy or Lymphoma Completed Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer Phase 3 1969-12-31 To compare the safety and efficacy of piperacillin/tazobactam (4 g/500 mg) administered intravenously every 6 hours to cefepime (2 g) administered intravenously every 8 hours for the empiric treatment of neutropenic fever in patients with a hematologic malignancy or lymphoma.
NCT00130754 ↗ Thymoglobuline in Non-myeloablative Allogeneic Stem-cell Transplantation Completed Hadassah Medical Organization Phase 3 2005-02-01 Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is the treatment of choice for a growing number of malignant and non-malignant indications. Until recently, myeloablative in conjunction with immunosuppressive conditioning was considered mandatory for the elimination of malignant hematopoietic cells and to prevent graft rejection. The aim of allogeneic non-myeloablative stem cell transplantation (NST) is to induce host-to-graft tolerance with fast and durable engraftment of donor stem cells, by means of conditioning, which is well-tolerated by patients. The rationale behind the NST strategy is to induce optimal graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effects for the elimination of all malignant cells by alloreactive immunocompetent cells from a matched donor as an alternative to standard high-dose myeloablative chemo radiotherapy. The NST protocol is therefore mainly based on immunosuppression and thus contains fludarabine, low dose busulfan and anti-T-lymphocyte globulin (ATG). Thymoglobuline is a polyclonal rabbit antiserum specific for human T cells used in organ transplantation for induction of tolerance and rejection prevention and treatment. It was also used in stem-cell transplantation (SCT) for the same purposes (e.g. for generation of tolerance and rejection preclusion) as well as a treatment for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Data from myeloablative protocols suggest that ATG before SCT significantly reduces the risk for grade III-IV acute GVHD. This does not translate to a reduction in transplant-related mortality (TRM) because of the increased risk for infections and thus survival is unchanged. Extensive chronic GVHD was also significantly shown to be reduced in patients receiving ATG in the myeloablative setting. However, the role of ATG in the NST protocol was never evaluated in a prospective randomized trial. In view of the preliminary data suggesting of an additive effect of ATG in these circumstances we, the investigators at Hadassah Medical Organization, evaluate the effect of ATG in NST by a prospective randomized trial.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for PIPERACILLIN

Condition Name

Condition Name for PIPERACILLIN
Intervention Trials
Sepsis 6
Septic Shock 5
Pneumonia 5
Infection 4
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for PIPERACILLIN
Intervention Trials
Infections 28
Infection 25
Communicable Diseases 19
Pneumonia 11
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for PIPERACILLIN

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for PIPERACILLIN
Location Trials
United States 122
China 28
Italy 16
Canada 15
Germany 15
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for PIPERACILLIN
Location Trials
Texas 8
Florida 8
California 7
Missouri 6
Ohio 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for PIPERACILLIN

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for PIPERACILLIN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 6
PHASE3 1
PHASE1 1
[disabled in preview] 32
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for PIPERACILLIN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 48
Unknown status 14
Not yet recruiting 13
[disabled in preview] 13
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for PIPERACILLIN

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for PIPERACILLIN
Sponsor Trials
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. 9
Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer 9
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center 5
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for PIPERACILLIN
Sponsor Trials
Other 182
Industry 47
UNKNOWN 3
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Piperacillin Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Revenue Projections (2026-2036)

Last updated: July 25, 2026

What is the current clinical development status of piperacillin?

Answer: Piperacillin is an established, off-patent intravenous beta-lactam antibiotic whose clinical activity is dominated by label updates (adult and pediatric dosing), resistance-management studies, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic optimization, and combination regimens with beta-lactamase inhibitors. No major late-stage “new drug” pivotal phase program is driving exclusivity-based growth.

Which studies are still being run and why?

Piperacillin programs typically focus on:

  • Population PK/PD refinement by age band (adult, elderly, pediatrics), renal impairment, and critical illness
  • Dosing strategies for severe infections (hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia, intra-abdominal infection, complicated UTI)
  • Stewardship and de-escalation pathways
  • Comparative effectiveness studies versus other broad-spectrum regimens in real-world cohorts

Trial types that affect near-term product share

  • Multicenter, pragmatic comparative studies using piperacillin-tazobactam as the comparator backbone
  • Therapeutic drug monitoring and dosing optimization studies for underdosing/overdosing risk in augmented renal clearance or renal failure
  • Carbapenem-sparing protocols in antimicrobial stewardship programs

How big is the global market for piperacillin and piperacillin-tazobactam?

Answer: The clinically relevant market is primarily the combination piperacillin-tazobactam administered for broad-spectrum hospital infections. Demand is driven by hospital admissions, length of stay, and antimicrobial stewardship directives, with procurement sensitivity to pricing and supply.

Market sizing structure used for projections

Because piperacillin is commonly sold as piperacillin-tazobactam, commercial forecasts usually model:

  • Hospital inpatient antibiotics budgets (US, EU5, UK, Japan, China, LATAM, India)
  • Acute infection incidence proxies (HCAI, cIAI, cUTI, pneumonia burden)
  • Share of use versus carbapenems and cefepime-based regimens
  • Generic penetration and tender pricing dynamics

Key demand drivers

  • High use in empiric treatment pathways in emergency and inpatient settings
  • Stewardship programs that favor “reserve” classes (carbapenems) can support penicillin/beta-lactamase inhibitor usage
  • Antibiotic rotation and local antibiograms influence regimen selection

Key headwinds

  • Extensive generic competition compresses margins
  • Drug shortages or manufacturing disruptions can create short spikes in spend but not durable price elevation
  • Resistance patterns reduce appropriateness in some cohorts, shifting utilization away from beta-lactam monotherapy where local guidance changes

What is the revenue outlook for piperacillin through 2030?

Answer: Revenue is expected to grow at or near global market volume growth rates, with pricing declining faster than volumes due to entrenched generic penetration. Real growth is most likely to come from unit volume expansion in hospital settings, not from price premiums.

Projection framework (directional)

Revenue change is modeled as:

  • Volume growth: global hospital care demand plus guideline persistence in empiric regimens
  • Price erosion: ongoing generic tendering and competitive entry
  • Mix: shifts between piperacillin-tazobactam versus alternatives based on antimicrobial resistance and stewardship protocols
  • Localization: different procurement cycles across regions

Regional tendencies that typically matter

  • US/EU: mature market with aggressive tendering, low pricing power, volume growth tied to hospitalization dynamics and formulary positioning
  • Japan: stable institutional prescribing, but pricing compression from competition
  • China/India: larger volume base and faster demand growth potential, offset by intense competition and regulatory/import dynamics
  • LATAM/ME&Africa: procurement variability and supply constraints can affect continuity of supply and short-term utilization

When does piperacillin lose exclusivity, and is there any remaining patent moat?

Answer: Piperacillin is off-patent. Any “exclusivity” discussion is functionally about formulation, manufacturing processes, or specific fixed-dose combinations where newer patents may exist, but it does not change the core outcome: generic and biosimilar-like substitution dynamics do not apply in the classic antibiotic way because this is not a biologic and there is no ongoing brand exclusivity comparable to novel drugs.

What patent estates typically still exist for piperacillin products?

Even off-patent actives, there can be:

  • Process patents for API or sterile drug product manufacturing
  • Formulation patents for specific concentrations, packaging, or stability profiles
  • Combination-specific patents tied to dosing regimens or device delivery systems
  • Method-of-use patents are less common for established empiric regimens due to prior art

What patents protect piperacillin and piperacillin-tazobactam in major markets?

Answer: A complete “how many patents” count cannot be produced here because this requires authoritative Orange Book/EP register/JP register pulls by specific listed products, strength, and dosage form. Broadly, protection is fragmented and mostly process or formulation-oriented, with multiple assignees across geographies.

Practical implication for commercialization

  • IP barriers tend to be narrow and product-specific (sterile fill-finish, stability, formulation)
  • Litigation risk is lower than for newer biologics/oncology, but generic entry can be blocked by narrower formulation/process claims

What is the Orange Book status of piperacillin products in the US?

Answer: The US landscape is dominated by ANDA-listed generic entries for piperacillin-tazobactam and related piperacillin-containing fixed-dose products. Orange Book “listed drug” status for piperacillin products is mostly mature and contains numerous generics rather than a single active brand exclusivity driver.

How to interpret Orange Book in this category

  • Look for Orange Book “listed drug” identifiers and patent expiration for each strength and dosage form
  • Settlement/consent decree patterns can matter more than primary patents because procurement tends to follow lowest landed cost

Which generic entry risks exist for piperacillin?

Answer: Primary risks are not exclusivity-limited timing. They are:

  • Short-lived formulation/process patent blocks (if any remain for specific presentations)
  • ANDA approval sequencing and labeling design-around
  • Supply chain execution that determines actual market capture after approval

What would typically delay launches

  • Patent litigation stay triggers tied to specific listed patents
  • Manufacturing validation and sterile compliance
  • Packaging stability and label acceptability

What clinical trial readouts matter most for clinicians and formulary committees?

Answer: In piperacillin’s category, trials that influence adoption usually address dosing adequacy and safety in target populations rather than showing major superiority over other broad-spectrum agents.

High-impact study endpoints used in this space

  • Treatment failure and microbiologic eradication in complicated infections
  • Safety: nephrotoxicity signals and diarrhea/C. difficile risk management
  • PK/PD targets linked to time above MIC
  • Subgroup analyses in renal impairment and critically ill patients

How does piperacillin compare with carbapenems, cefepime, and ceftazidime in practice?

Answer: Piperacillin-tazobactam is often used as a carbapenem-sparing regimen when resistance patterns allow. Clinicians weigh:

  • Local susceptibility of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
  • Risk of ESBL-producing organisms
  • Patient severity and predicted pathogen mix
  • Safety and stewardship goals

Commercial positioning consequence

  • If stewardship pushes away from carbapenems, piperacillin-tazobactam tends to gain utilization
  • If local resistance or outbreak conditions shift guidance, utilization can fall and price pressure can accelerate due to tender rebalancing

What market projections are realistic for piperacillin through 2035?

Answer: Base-case growth is volume-driven with continued price compression. The category is structurally unfavorable for large revenue expansion unless there is a meaningful change in standard-of-care that expands use beyond current empiric regimens.

Projection ranges (directional, category-level)

  • Scenario 1 (base): modest global volume growth offset by price erosion
  • Scenario 2 (upside): increased hospital utilization or stewardship-driven preference versus carbapenems
  • Scenario 3 (downside): higher resistance rates reduce appropriate use and shift utilization to alternative agents

What competitive landscape shapes piperacillin pricing and share?

Answer: Competitive dynamics are dominated by generic manufacturers competing on tenders and supply reliability. Brand-level differentiation is limited.

Competition levers that affect market share

  • Contract pricing and reimbursement coding positions
  • Product availability and lead times during shortages
  • Stability, packaging format, and contracting terms

What regulatory milestones could shift piperacillin adoption?

Answer: Label updates, dosing guidance revisions, and safety communications can change prescribing behavior. However, these typically affect clinical practice rather than restarting exclusivity.

Regulatory events that usually matter

  • Expanded dosing in pediatrics or renal impairment
  • Safety labeling updates affecting formulary restrictions
  • Revisions tied to guideline consensus and stewardship protocols

What formulation or delivery patents could affect launch timing?

Answer: For antibiotics like piperacillin, formulation and process patents can create localized launch barriers for specific:

  • Concentration and fill-volume presentations
  • Stability and shelf-life improvements
  • Compatibility in IV admixture pathways
  • Packaging systems that reduce degradation

Why this matters commercially

If patent blocks exist for certain strengths, generics may launch selectively, fragmenting procurement supply and influencing tender outcomes.

Key Takeaways

  • Piperacillin demand is anchored to hospital inpatient empiric regimens, with the economically relevant product market centered on piperacillin-tazobactam.
  • Clinical “updates” are mostly dosing optimization, PK/PD, and stewardship-focused comparative work rather than late-stage brand-changing efficacy trials.
  • Revenue growth through 2030-2035 is expected to be volume-led with continued pricing pressure from generic competition.
  • IP-driven exclusivity timelines are not the primary driver in this category; market outcomes are dominated by procurement tenders, supply reliability, and local resistance-guided prescribing.

FAQs

  1. Do trials with piperacillin-tazobactam in pneumonia change formulary placement in 2026-2027?
  2. How do augmented renal clearance dosing studies affect piperacillin-tazobactam prescribing for ICU patients?
  3. What manufacturing or stability issues most often disrupt supply of piperacillin products in hospitals?
  4. What stewardship protocols most influence the shift between piperacillin-tazobactam and carbapenems by region?
  5. Which bottlenecks delay ANDA approvals for sterile injectable antibiotics like piperacillin-tazobactam?

References

  1. FDA. Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. (Accessed 2026).
  2. FDA. Drug Shortages database. (Accessed 2026).
  3. IDSA. Guidelines for the management of infections treated with beta-lactams and beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations. (Latest versions accessed 2026).
  4. WHO. Global antimicrobial resistance surveillance and stewardship guidance. (Accessed 2026).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.