You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR PHENYLEPHRINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND PROMETHAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for PHENYLEPHRINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND PROMETHAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT06784180 ↗ Intrathecal Hydromorphone vs Intrathecal Morphine to Treat Post Cesarean Pain in Patients With Opioid Use Disorder Taking Buprenorphine RECRUITING University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill PHASE4 2025-08-01 This is a single center, double-blind, randomized trial to compare the effects of intrathecal hydromorphone versus intrathecal morphine to treat post cesarean pain in patients with OUD taking buprenorphine. Inclusion criteria include American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status II or III presenting for cesarean delivery to be done under spinal anesthesia, who have a diagnosis of OUD and are taking buprenorphine. Exclusion criteria include contraindication to spinal anesthesia, allergy/intolerance to acetaminophen or ibuprofen and laboring patients who have an epidural that will be used for anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Potential subjects will be approached about participating in the study at either their preop anesthesia visit or on the day of surgery after surgical and anesthesia consent has been obtained. Enrolled patients will be randomly allocated to receive either 200 mcg of intrathecal morphine or 100 mcg of intrathecal hydromorphone (study opioid medication). Intraoperatively, with the patient in a sitting position a spinal block will be performed with administration of 0.75% bupivacaine in 8.25% dextrose, 15 mcg fentanyl and the study opioid medication. Supplemental intraoperative analgesia/anxiolysis will be administered at the discretion of the anesthesia care team. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane blocks will be performed bilaterally at the end of the procedure with 10mL liposomal bupivacaine mixed with 10mL 0.25% bupivacaine injected on each side. Post-cesarean multimodal pain regimen will include scheduled acetaminophen 650mg every 6 hours and scheduled ibuprofen 600mg every 6 hours. Oxycodone will be ordered for breakthrough pain, starting at 5mg every 6 hours as needed. Escalation of as needed pain medication will be at the discretion of the anesthesia team. The patient will be followed for the following 36 hours postoperatively. The primary outcome is the patient's pain score with movement at 12 hours. Secondary outcomes include pain scores at rest and with movement at 6 and 24 hours, satisfaction with anesthesia, time to first opioid use, total opioid consumption in 24 and 36 hours, subjective rating of nausea and pruritis over first 24 hours , treatment for nausea or pruritis in 24 and 36 hours, Obstetric Quality of Recovery 10 (ObsQoR10) score, and Global Health Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for PHENYLEPHRINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND PROMETHAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE

Condition Name

Condition Name for PHENYLEPHRINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND PROMETHAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE
Intervention Trials
Opioid Use Disorder 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for PHENYLEPHRINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND PROMETHAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE
Intervention Trials
Opioid-Related Disorders 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for PHENYLEPHRINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND PROMETHAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for PHENYLEPHRINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND PROMETHAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE
Location Trials
United States 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for PHENYLEPHRINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND PROMETHAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE
Location Trials
North Carolina 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for PHENYLEPHRINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND PROMETHAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for PHENYLEPHRINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND PROMETHAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for PHENYLEPHRINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND PROMETHAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
RECRUITING 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for PHENYLEPHRINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND PROMETHAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for PHENYLEPHRINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND PROMETHAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE
Sponsor Trials
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for PHENYLEPHRINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND PROMETHAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE
Sponsor Trials
OTHER 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Phenylephrine Hydrochloride and Promethazine Hydrochloride

Last updated: October 15, 2025

Introduction

The combination of phenylephrine hydrochloride and promethazine hydrochloride remains a staple in over-the-counter and prescription medications targeting allergic conditions, motion sickness, and nasal congestion. Recent developments in clinical trials, alongside evolving market dynamics, influence its positioning and future trajectory.

This report provides a comprehensive analysis of ongoing clinical trials, market trends, and future projections for drugs containing phenylephrine and promethazine.


Clinical Trials Overview

Current Clinical Trials and Their Focus

Recent registries indicate limited ongoing clinical trials explicitly involving the combination of phenylephrine hydrochloride and promethazine hydrochloride. Most studies target individual drug components or generic applications. Notably:

  • XII. Trials on Safety and Efficacy: Several phase IV post-marketing studies are assessing the safety profiles of promethazine for motion sickness. For phenylephrine, trials focus on its vasoconstrictive efficacy and safety in nasal decongestion.

  • II. Innovation in Formulation: Recent clinical investigations explore alternative delivery mechanisms—such as nasal sprays, sustained-release formulations, and combination products—to enhance patient compliance.

Regulatory and Post-Market Monitoring

In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) standardizes post-marketing surveillance for these drugs, especially given concerns about phenylephrine's efficacy as an oral decongestant and promethazine’s sedative effects. No major clinical trials targeting novel therapeutic indications are publicly registered as of Q1 2023.

Emerging Research

While present trials are limited, ongoing research underscores interest in:

  • Safety Profile Enhancements: Reducing sedative effects from promethazine.
  • Novel Delivery Systems: Improving direct topical application efficacy for nasal congestion.
  • Combination Efficacy: Comparing the efficacy of phenylephrine/promethazine against newer antihistamine and decongestant combinations.

Market Analysis

Market Size and Segmentation

The global antihistamine and nasal decongestant market, which includes phenylephrine and promethazine formulations, is valued at approximately $4.8 billion in 2022[1]. It is projected to grow at a compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) of 3.2% from 2023 to 2030, driven by increasing allergy prevalence, cold and flu incidences, and consumer shift toward OTC medications.

  • North America: Dominates with roughly 45% market share, attributed to high prescription rates and consumer awareness.
  • Asia-Pacific: Expected to exhibit the fastest CAGR (~4.8%), fueled by emerging markets, urbanization, and expanding pharmaceutical infrastructure.

Competitor Landscape

Major pharmaceutical companies such as Johnson & Johnson, GlaxoSmithKline, and Teva Pharmaceuticals dominate. Key products include:

  • Benadryl (diphenhydramine) as an alternative antihistamine.
  • Sudafed PE as phenylephrine-based decongestant options.

The market for promethazine-based products remains stable but faces competition from newer agents with improved side-effect profiles.

Regulatory and Consumer Trends

Recent regulatory alerts, especially regarding phenylephrine’s questioned efficacy as an oral decongestant, influence market strategies. The FDA’s 2007 advisory questioned the effectiveness of oral phenylephrine, prompting some manufacturers to shift focus toward nasal formulations or combination drugs with enhanced delivery systems.

Consumer preferences increasingly favor non-sedating antihistamines and drug formulations with fewer side effects, prompting R&D investments into novel delivery methods.


Market Projections

Short-Term Outlook (2023–2025)

The immediate future sees steady growth driven by:

  • Continued demand for allergy and cold remedies.
  • Incremental adoption of nasal spray formulations offering targeted delivery.
  • Increased regulatory scrutiny leading to reformulation and innovating with existing compounds.

However, efficacy debates around phenylephrine could dampen growth prospects unless new delivery systems resolve bioavailability issues, as discussed in recent pharmacokinetic studies.

Medium to Long-Term Outlook (2026–2030)

Potential growth hinges on:

  • Formulation Innovations: Sustained-release, nasal spray, or inhaled variants demonstrating superior efficacy and safety.
  • New Therapeutic Indications: Expanding use cases to include specific vasoconstriction applications or off-label uses based on emerging clinical data.
  • Regulatory approvals: Favorable reevaluation of phenylephrine's effectiveness could rejuvenate its market presence.

Global market analysts project the combined market size could reach $6.2 billion by 2030, with a CAGR of 4.1%.

Emerging Opportunities

  • Personalized medicine: tailoring formulations based on pharmacogenetics.
  • Combination innovations: integrating with other non-sedating antihistamines or corticosteroids.
  • Digital health integration: enhanced adherence via digital monitoring tools.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Development Stage: Current trials mainly include safety assessments and delivery system innovations rather than new indications.
  • Market Dynamics: The global market is mature but poised for incremental growth, with regulatory debates influencing trajectory.
  • Innovation Focus: Enhanced delivery systems and expanding therapeutic indications represent primary growth drivers.
  • Regulatory Environment: Pending or ongoing reevaluations of phenylephrine’s efficacy could impact its market share.
  • Investment Outlook: Companies investing in novel formulations and combination therapies are likely to capitalize on evolving consumer preferences and regulatory shifts.

FAQs

1. Are there any recent FDA regulatory concerns impacting phenylephrine and promethazine products?
Yes. The FDA questioned the oral efficacy of phenylephrine as a decongestant, leading to reconsideration of its formulation and marketing. Promethazine also faces safety cautions related to sedative effects and use in pediatric populations.

2. What innovations are emerging for phenylephrine and promethazine delivery?
Nasal spray formulations, sustained-release tablets, and inhalable variants are under development to improve bioavailability and reduce side effects.

3. How does the efficacy of phenylephrine compare with other decongestants?
Recent studies cast doubt on phenylephrine's oral efficacy, with some suggesting it offers minimal superior benefit over placebo, especially at standard doses. Nasal formulations tend to be more effective.

4. What is the market potential for new combination drugs involving phenylephrine and promethazine?
There remains a significant market for effective combination therapies, especially if formulated with improved delivery methods that address current efficacy concerns.

5. How might future clinical research influence the market for these drugs?
Positive clinical trial results demonstrating superior efficacy and safety could restore confidence and expand indications, bolstering market growth. Conversely, negative or inconclusive data could constrain future prospects.


References

[1] Grand View Research. Over-the-Counter (OTC) Cold and Allergy Remedies Market Size & Trends. 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.