Last Updated: November 8, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR PHENERGAN

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for PHENERGAN

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00147680 ↗ Uterine Papillary Serous Cancer (UPSC) Trial Completed Queensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer Phase 2 2004-09-01 This study will be an open, non-randomised, clinical phase 2 trial, which will involve 30 women diagnosed with uterine papillary serous cancer. The researchers will investigate the effect of four cycles of paclitaxel/carboplatin, followed by whole pelvic external beam radiotherapy to a standard pelvis field (50.4 Gy) with or without a para-aortic boost with respect to the safety and efficacy of treatment, and patterns of recurrence.
NCT00426491 ↗ Misoprostol for Non-Viable Pregnancies Completed Madigan Army Medical Center Phase 3 1999-03-01 The purpose of this study is to examine the effectiveness of Misoprostol (Cytotec; GD Searle and Co., Chicago, IL) for the management of non-viable first trimester pregnancies. Specifically, Misoprostol (15-S-15-methyl PGE1) will be compared to a placebo with expectant management in who have documented non-viable gestations. We will examine the following outcome variables: time to resolution, number of patients requiring dilation and curettage, change in hematocrit, cost to the institution, patient satisfaction, and reported side effects.
NCT00541671 ↗ Prevention of Narcotic-Induced Nausea Terminated Christiana Care Health Services N/A 2007-02-01 We are doing this study to find out if extra medicine is needed to avoid the chance of nausea sometimes linked to narcotic pain medicine (for example, morphine, dilaudid, fentanyl). Some doctors always give medicine to prevent the possible side effect of nausea, while others do not. We are looking to see if this extra medicine is helpful in preventing nausea. The goal is to screen all patients with pain and enroll enough subjects to reach our goal of 164 evaluable study participants.
NCT00895531 ↗ Combination of Peripheral Nerve Block and DepoDur in Total Knee Joint Replacement Terminated EKR Therapeutics, Inc Phase 4 2009-12-01 The investigators hypothesize that patients who receive a femoral catheter with low dose epidural Depodur will experience comparable or superior pain relief than those who receive both femoral and sciatic catheters. In addition, the investigators hypothesize that the one catheter will be less time consuming to place and facilitate early ambulation of the patient.
NCT00895531 ↗ Combination of Peripheral Nerve Block and DepoDur in Total Knee Joint Replacement Terminated University of Louisville Phase 4 2009-12-01 The investigators hypothesize that patients who receive a femoral catheter with low dose epidural Depodur will experience comparable or superior pain relief than those who receive both femoral and sciatic catheters. In addition, the investigators hypothesize that the one catheter will be less time consuming to place and facilitate early ambulation of the patient.
NCT01118884 ↗ Effects of Oral Midazolam in Comparison Promethazine With Nitrous Oxide for Uncooperative Children Unknown status Shahid Beheshti University Phase 3 2009-06-01 The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of sedation using orally administered midazolam and promethazine with nitrous oxide/oxygen in uncooperative children receiving dental treatments.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for PHENERGAN

Condition Name

Condition Name for PHENERGAN
Intervention Trials
Diabetic Gastroparesis 1
Pregnancy Related 1
Gastroparesis 1
Pruritus 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for PHENERGAN
Intervention Trials
Nausea 5
Vomiting 4
Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting 4
Gastroparesis 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for PHENERGAN

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for PHENERGAN
Location Trials
United States 12
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1
Australia 1
Egypt 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for PHENERGAN
Location Trials
Florida 1
Colorado 1
Indiana 1
California 1
Pennsylvania 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for PHENERGAN

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for PHENERGAN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 5
Phase 3 2
Phase 2 4
[disabled in preview] 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for PHENERGAN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 7
Recruiting 3
Terminated 3
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for PHENERGAN

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for PHENERGAN
Sponsor Trials
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center 1
University of Florida 1
EKR Therapeutics, Inc 1
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for PHENERGAN
Sponsor Trials
Other 21
Industry 3
U.S. Fed 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: July 28, 2026

Phenergan (promethazine) clinical trials update, market analysis and launch exclusivity projection

Phenergan is a brand of promethazine, a first-generation antihistamine used for allergic symptoms and off-label antiemetic and sedative indications. Commercially, Phenergan sits in a mature, low-price generic environment across key geographies, with limited scope for new regulatory exclusivity. Clinical-trial activity is sporadic and typically academic or small, because promethazine is off-patent in most major markets and is widely available as generics.

What clinical trials have been conducted for Phenergan (promethazine) and what’s the latest status?

Featured snippet answer: Current clinical-trial activity for promethazine is mostly small, investigator-led studies or comparative studies where promethazine is an established comparator, not an investigational new drug with brand-level development.

Which indications show the most ongoing or recent promethazine trial activity?

Promethazine trial activity most commonly clusters around:

  • Postoperative or acute nausea and vomiting (antiemetic comparator roles)
  • Motion sickness and migraine-associated nausea
  • Sedation or premedication protocols in specific settings
  • Allergic rhinitis or urticaria symptom control (often as an antihistamine comparator)
  • Breakthrough pain or emergency department antiemetic regimens (comparative arms)

How to interpret trial “updates” for an established drug like promethazine

Because Phenergan/promethazine is widely generic, “updates” often mean:

  • Registry entries with limited enrollment sizes
  • Trial completion without major regulatory endpoints
  • Trials evaluating real-world protocols rather than novel formulations or new chemical entities

How many Phenergan-specific trials exist versus generic promethazine trials?

Most registry searches capture “promethazine” rather than “Phenergan.” In practice, branded and generic promethazine are pharmacologically equivalent for standard endpoints, so trial counts under the brand name typically understate total evidence. For a market analysis, the practical feedstock is promethazine trial activity rather than brand-specific studies.

What is the current FDA regulatory status of Phenergan (promethazine) and what does Orange Book show?

Featured snippet answer: Phenergan (promethazine) is marketed under an FDA-approved New Drug Application for which active ingredient coverage is largely expired, with many generic approvals. Orange Book listings for promethazine antiallergy/antiemetic products generally reflect limited remaining patent-protected claims.

Is Phenergan listed in the Orange Book?

Orange Book coverage depends on the specific dosage form and strength (e.g., oral tablets/syrup, injectable solutions, suppositories). For established antihistamine brands, Orange Book listings typically show the original NDA plus many abbreviated approvals for generics and labeled versions. Patent listings, where present, tend to be minimal or already expired.

Which product strengths and dosage forms materially affect regulatory and patent position?

For market and launch risk, the relevant buckets are:

  • Oral immediate-release formulations (tablets, syrup)
  • Injectable (IM/IV labeling varies by product)
  • Rectal suppositories (where marketed)

What patents protect promethazine/Phenergan and how strong is the remaining patent estate?

Featured snippet answer: Patent protection for promethazine as an active ingredient is largely exhausted in major markets, with any remaining IP focused on narrow formulation, packaging, method-of-use, or process claims for specific dosage forms.

What patent types still matter for an old antihistamine brand?

For an off-patent molecule, remaining IP tends to be claim-sliced into:

  • Method-of-use patents tied to specific dosing regimens for nausea and vomiting
  • Formulation patents for controlled release or stability-focused composition tweaks
  • Manufacturing process patents for sterile production, if applicable
  • Labeling-related exclusivity, if any, tied to specific indications (rare for a widely generic molecule)

How to map the estate to actual competitive barriers

  • If no active formulation or method-of-use patents remain, generics can launch without Paragraph IV leverage.
  • If narrow patents exist for specific dosage forms, the competitive risk concentrates on those forms and label indications.

When does Phenergan lose exclusivity and what are the likely generic entry risks?

Featured snippet answer: Phenergan has effectively lost regulatory exclusivity in most jurisdictions. Competitive pressure is dominated by generic pricing and supply, not by exclusivity expiration.

Paragraph IV exposure: expected baseline for mature promethazine

For off-patent antihistamines, there is typically no meaningful Paragraph IV campaign tied to the original molecule. Generic manufacturers generally enter through:

  • FDA ANDA approvals against already genericized reference listed drug labeling
  • Shared reliance on older bridging studies and published pharmacology for established indications
  • New line extensions (different strengths/dosage forms) rather than “challenger” IP fights

Biosimilar risk

Not applicable. Promethazine is a small molecule.

How does Phenergan compare with other promethazine antiemetic and antihistamine products in the market?

Featured snippet answer: Competitive substitutes include other first-generation antihistamines (e.g., diphenhydramine) and dedicated antiemetics used in nausea and vomiting pathways (e.g., metoclopramide, ondansetron, prochlorperazine), depending on clinical setting.

Indication-driven substitution patterns

  • Emergency department nausea protocols often favor newer antiemetics for efficacy and tolerability, with promethazine as a lower-cost alternative in some pathways.
  • Allergy symptom control often shifts to second-generation antihistamines due to side-effect profile, keeping promethazine demand more niche.

Pricing and tender dynamics

In most markets, promethazine competes primarily on:

  • Wholesale acquisition cost and tender pricing
  • Supply continuity for injectable products
  • Formulary status and hospital purchasing contracts

What is the Phenergan market size, revenue exposure, and growth outlook?

Featured snippet answer: The promethazine market is mature and price-sensitive; growth is driven by volume stability, intermittent supply demand, and hospital formulary churn rather than brand-level premium.

Market revenue drivers

  • Short-cycle purchasing: hospital and wholesale orders respond to acute care protocols
  • Generic substitution: brand premium is limited
  • Dosage form mix: injectable versus oral mix can shift by procurement and clinical practice

Downside and upside levers

Downside:

  • Continued generic pricing pressure
  • Formulary preference shift toward non-sedating antihistamines and modern antiemetics
  • Safety-related label scrutiny for sedation and adverse CNS effects

Upside:

  • Renewed use in specific antiemetic protocols
  • Supply constraints in certain generics can temporarily lift market pricing
  • Geographic tender cycles favoring older, low-cost options

Forecast style for an off-patent antihistamine

A reasonable projection framework for promethazine looks like:

  • Flat-to-low single-digit CAGR driven by population and acute care utilization
  • Price erosion dominating nominal growth
  • Any brand-relevant growth is typically captured by share gains in tenders, not by IP-backed premium

What clinical outcomes matter most for promethazine’s continued use and what safety signals influence adoption?

Featured snippet answer: Key clinical decision drivers are efficacy for nausea control, sedative burden, and risk of adverse effects such as respiratory depression and anticholinergic CNS effects depending on route and population.

Safety considerations that affect formulary adoption

  • Sedation and cognitive impairment risk
  • Anticholinergic effects (e.g., dry mouth, urinary retention risk)
  • Injection-associated safety considerations and administration technique
  • Pediatric safety: promethazine has historically had strong warnings in children, which reduces eligible populations and shapes dosing protocols

Evidence pattern

For established agents, the evidence base often emphasizes:

  • Comparative clinical effectiveness in nausea pathways
  • Safety profile in specific subgroups
  • Practical outcomes like time-to-symptom relief in emergency or perioperative settings

What manufacturing and supply constraints affect Phenergan/promethazine availability?

Featured snippet answer: Availability risks for generics tend to come from sterile manufacturing capacity, cold chain or stability requirements, and quality system performance rather than from active pharmaceutical ingredient supply alone.

Dosage forms most exposed to supply volatility

  • Injectable presentations are more exposed due to sterile manufacturing oversight and batch release bottlenecks.
  • Oral syrups may be exposed to excipient supply constraints and stability shelf-life limits.

Market impact from shortages

Shortages usually produce short-duration:

  • Price spikes
  • Switching to alternative generics or therapeutic substitutes
  • Accelerated use of alternative antiemetics

How does Phenergan compete against modern antiemetics and antihistamines?

Featured snippet answer: Modern antiemetics and second-generation antihistamines reduce promethazine’s share in many settings, but promethazine remains a cost-controlled option where formularies allow sedating agents or where alternative coverage is limited.

Comparative positioning by clinical setting

  • Postoperative nausea: often dominated by 5-HT3 antagonists, neurokinin-1 antagonists, and multimodal pathways; promethazine competes on cost and protocol familiarity.
  • ED nausea: ondansetron/prochlorperazine/metoclopramide can displace promethazine based on local guidelines and contraindications.
  • Allergic rhinitis/urticaria: second-generation antihistamines reduce promethazine’s routine use; promethazine persists where sedation is acceptable or where cost constraints dominate.

Key Takeaways

  • Phenergan is promethazine, an off-patent small molecule with limited brand-level exclusivity and no material biosimilar pathway.
  • Clinical-trial updates for promethazine are typically small, comparative, or investigator-led; they rarely re-shape regulatory status.
  • Market dynamics are dominated by generic pricing, formulary decisions, and supply continuity, not by expiration-driven generic entry fights.
  • Any remaining IP, if present, is narrow and likely dosage-form or method-of-use specific; however, the baseline expectation is extensive generic availability.

FAQs

What are the most common uses of Phenergan (promethazine) in clinical practice?

Promethazine is used for allergic symptoms and has long-standing use as an antiemetic and sedative in many protocols, with specific labeling and age restrictions varying by jurisdiction.

Is Phenergan used for postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV)?

It can be used as an antiemetic option within multimodal regimens, but modern antiemetics often drive first-line selection depending on institutional guideline.

What is the difference between Phenergan brand promethazine and generic promethazine products?

They share the same active ingredient, route, and labeled dosing but may differ in excipients, formulation stability, and manufacturing quality controls.

Are there any ongoing promethazine clinical trials targeting pediatric indications?

Pediatric development is constrained by historical safety warnings and typical regulatory caution; trials are more common in adult or protocol-restricted contexts.

What happens to promethazine supply and pricing during generic shortages?

Shortages generally cause temporary price increases and formulary switching to alternative antiemetics or alternative strengths/dosage forms until supply stabilizes.

References

  1. FDA Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations (accessed via FDA database).
  2. ClinicalTrials.gov (search results for promethazine).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.