Last Updated: August 25, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR PEXIDARTINIB HYDROCHLORIDE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for PEXIDARTINIB HYDROCHLORIDE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT01349036 ↗ A Phase 2 Study of PLX3397 in Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma Terminated Plexxikon Phase 2 2011-12-03 The objective of this study is to evaluate the response of subjects with recurrent glioblastoma to continuous therapy of PLX3397.
NCT01349036 ↗ A Phase 2 Study of PLX3397 in Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma Terminated Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. Phase 2 2011-12-03 The objective of this study is to evaluate the response of subjects with recurrent glioblastoma to continuous therapy of PLX3397.
NCT01525602 ↗ Safety Study of PLX3397 and Paclitaxel in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors Completed Plexxikon Phase 1 2012-05-01 This was a 3-part study designed to explore the safety and tolerability of escalating doses of PLX3397 with weekly paclitaxel to establish a recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D), to confirm RP2D in participants with advanced non-resectable solid tumors, and to determine the efficacy of PLX3397 600 mg twice daily (BID) administered in combination with weekly paclitaxel in participants with advanced, metastatic or non-resectable, platinum-resistant or -refractory epithelial ovarian cancer, primary peritoneal cancer, or fallopian tube cancer.
NCT01525602 ↗ Safety Study of PLX3397 and Paclitaxel in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors Completed Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. Phase 1 2012-05-01 This was a 3-part study designed to explore the safety and tolerability of escalating doses of PLX3397 with weekly paclitaxel to establish a recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D), to confirm RP2D in participants with advanced non-resectable solid tumors, and to determine the efficacy of PLX3397 600 mg twice daily (BID) administered in combination with weekly paclitaxel in participants with advanced, metastatic or non-resectable, platinum-resistant or -refractory epithelial ovarian cancer, primary peritoneal cancer, or fallopian tube cancer.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for PEXIDARTINIB HYDROCHLORIDE

Condition Name

Condition Name for PEXIDARTINIB HYDROCHLORIDE
Intervention Trials
Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor 4
Melanoma 2
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) 2
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for PEXIDARTINIB HYDROCHLORIDE
Intervention Trials
Giant Cell Tumors 4
Giant Cell Tumor of Tendon Sheath 4
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors 3
Neoplasms 3
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for PEXIDARTINIB HYDROCHLORIDE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for PEXIDARTINIB HYDROCHLORIDE
Location Trials
United States 68
Korea, Republic of 6
Australia 5
Taiwan 4
Italy 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for PEXIDARTINIB HYDROCHLORIDE
Location Trials
New York 8
Massachusetts 7
California 7
Texas 6
Michigan 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for PEXIDARTINIB HYDROCHLORIDE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for PEXIDARTINIB HYDROCHLORIDE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 3 2
Phase 2 2
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for PEXIDARTINIB HYDROCHLORIDE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 11
Terminated 2
Active, not recruiting 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for PEXIDARTINIB HYDROCHLORIDE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for PEXIDARTINIB HYDROCHLORIDE
Sponsor Trials
Plexxikon 13
Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. 11
Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. 4
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for PEXIDARTINIB HYDROCHLORIDE
Sponsor Trials
Industry 35
Other 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Last updated: July 30, 2026

xidartinib Hydrochloride clinical trials update, market analysis, and projection (2026)
Executive summary: Pexidartinib hydrochloride (Videssa, Daiichi Sankyo) is an established targeted therapy for tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) requiring systemic treatment. The clinical development program is led by Daiichi Sankyo and is centered on TGCT, with current market dynamics shaped by continued uptake after approval and the durability of response in a disease with limited treatment alternatives. Patent and regulatory exclusivity timelines constrain near-term generic entry risk in most major markets, which supports sustained pricing and revenue stability through the exclusivity window. Longer-dated upside depends on label expansion (tumor subsets and earlier lines) and evidence generation for combination regimens or additional dosing forms.

What clinical trials are ongoing for pexidartinib hydrochloride in TGCT in 2025–2026?

Core answer: Publicly disclosed trial activity around pexidartinib in TGCT focuses on (1) durability of response and long-term safety in previously treated patients, (2) additional cohorts that refine benefit-risk in subpopulations, and (3) exploration of combination strategies to improve depth and duration of response.

Key trial themes seen across pexidartinib studies

  • Long-term follow-up for overall survival, progression-free survival, duration of response, and late safety signals (notably hepatic safety monitoring).
  • Subgroup refinement by disease form and prior exposure, since TGCT includes localized versus diffuse disease with different baseline risk.
  • Combination/sequence research to evaluate improved efficacy while managing toxicity and maintaining tolerability.
  • Real-world evidence alignment via registries or observational follow-ups in some markets to capture time to treatment discontinuation and resource use.

Clinical endpoints that drive future label value

  • Durable objective response (RECIST where applicable) and duration of response.
  • Progression-free survival as the principal sponsor-facing endpoint for comparability in future comparative studies.
  • Safety durability framed by treatment discontinuation rates, frequency and management of liver enzyme elevations, and QT-related monitoring.

What phase are the most relevant pexidartinib hydrochloride studies in?

Core answer: The program is anchored by completed pivotal/registrational work and ongoing follow-up plus supportive cohorts. Ongoing phases are typically late-stage (follow-up, extension, or additional cohorts) rather than discovery-stage, reflecting an already-approved product with a mature safety and efficacy profile.

Typical late-stage or follow-up structures

  • Extension studies for patients who completed earlier trials.
  • Additional cohorts to test specific clinical question refinements (population, regimen, or administration details).
  • Biomarker substudies to support stratification and future development decisions.

What are the latest efficacy and safety signals for pexidartinib in tenosynovial giant cell tumor?

Core answer: The clinical profile supports meaningful tumor response in advanced TGCT with systemic need, with hepatic safety risk as the dominant management issue requiring structured monitoring. Uptake in practice has been shaped by risk mitigation protocols.

Efficacy characteristics

  • Response rates and duration of response are the key drivers behind treatment adoption in diffuse TGCT where surgery may be morbid or incomplete.
  • Clinical value is strongest where patients have limited alternatives and need disease control that is sustained.

Safety characteristics

  • Hepatotoxicity risk is the key class effect for CSF1R inhibitors. Real-world use depends on:
    • baseline liver function evaluation
    • scheduled monitoring during treatment
    • dose interruption and discontinuation rules tied to transaminases and bilirubin thresholds
  • Other tolerability issues in practice include edema-related effects, cytopenias, GI events, and fatigue, managed through dose holds, supportive care, and monitoring.

What this means for clinical trial readouts

  • Trials emphasize maintaining efficacy without increasing clinically meaningful hepatic events.
  • Endpoints increasingly incorporate treatment interruptions and time on therapy rather than efficacy alone.

How big is the TGCT market, and where does pexidartinib fit?

Core answer: TGCT is rare but high-impact within orthopedics/oncology due to chronic symptoms, morbidity, and recurring disease burden in diffuse TGCT. Pexidartinib competes primarily in advanced, systemic-requiring TGCT where surgery alone is insufficient.

Market segmentation relevant to revenue capture

  • Localized TGCT: typically treated with surgery; systemic therapy use is more selective.
  • Diffuse TGCT: higher unmet need for systemic control; greater fit for CSF1R inhibition.
  • Prior therapy strata: patients with recurrence after surgery or unresectable disease are the most responsive target populations.

Competitive set and practical alternatives

  • CSF1R inhibitors define the competition set for advanced TGCT.
  • Other systemic options may be used off-label in some settings, but adoption depends on evidence strength and tolerability.

What is the current commercial status of pexidartinib hydrochloride in major markets?

Core answer: Pexidartinib has established regulatory approval in key jurisdictions for advanced TGCT requiring systemic treatment and has moved from launch-phase ramp to a steady commercial footprint, with revenue performance driven by patient identification, physician comfort with liver monitoring, and availability of specialty oncology/orthopedic networks.

Pricing and reimbursement dynamics that typically matter

  • Specialty pharmacy and REMS-like monitoring programs influence patient access.
  • Hospital and oncology center protocols influence time to initiation and discontinuation patterns.
  • Payer criteria may require confirmation of systemic need, prior interventions, and liver function documentation.

What market projection scenarios are most likely for pexidartinib through 2030?

Core answer: Market outcomes are most sensitive to (1) sustained share versus other CSF1R inhibitors, (2) label expansion or new evidence that broadens treatment eligibility, and (3) exclusivity duration that delays generic pressure.

Scenario framework (directional)

  • Base case: Steady uptake in diffuse TGCT with stable safety monitoring compliance, modest growth from increasing awareness and physician onboarding.
  • Upside case: Additional evidence supports expanded eligibility (earlier lines, broader systemic-requiring criteria, or combination strategies), increasing addressable patient numbers and therapy duration.
  • Downside case: Faster-than-expected competitive displacement or reduced treatment duration due to tolerability constraints, leading to share erosion.

Revenue drivers used in projection models

  • Diagnosed TGCT incidence and referral capture into systemic-therapy pathways.
  • Proportion of patients meeting trial-like systemic criteria (diffuse, unresectable, recurrent).
  • Treatment duration distribution (time on therapy median).
  • Net price after rebates and patient assistance.
  • Share within systemic TGCT options.

What patents protect pexidartinib hydrochloride and how do they affect generic entry risk?

Core answer: Generic entry in the US is constrained by the Orange Book patent estate and associated regulatory exclusivities tied to the approved product. While specific patent-by-patent expiration dates are best confirmed directly in the FDA Orange Book for the latest listings, the practical effect is that FDA-approved generic launch is delayed until key composition, formulation, or method patents expire and any paragraph IV challenges resolve.

Patent estate effects on launch timing

  • Composition-of-matter patents generally set the outer boundary for generic approvals.
  • Formulation or crystal/polymorph patents can restrict manufacturing and alternative forms.
  • Method-of-use patents can delay some label carve-outs.
  • Manufacturing-process patents can impede generic production.

What is the Orange Book status of pexidartinib hydrochloride?

Core answer: Pexidartinib is listed in the FDA’s Orange Book with patents covering the approved drug product, which typically includes at least one composition-related protection and may include additional patents for formulation and/or use. This listing is what governs paragraph IV certification and generic eligibility for launch.

How Orange Book listings change generic timing in practice

  • Patent expiration triggers the earliest potential entry for ANDAs without design-around.
  • Expiration of exclusivity blocks “skinny labeling” pathways in many practical cases.
  • Settlement agreements can shift launch windows even after patent expiration, depending on terms.

Has there been any paragraph IV litigation for generic versions of pexidartinib?

Core answer: The principal generic-entry risk mechanism in the US is paragraph IV filings against Orange Book-listed patents. Any such filing would be reflected in dockets tied to the relevant patents and could lead to 30-month stays, injunction settlements, or eventual court outcomes that determine actual launch dates.

Practical implication for investors and licensors

  • Even without a completed court decision, the existence of a paragraph IV challenge can change competitive expectations and the probability-weighted entry curve in revenue models.

How strong is the patent estate for pexidartinib hydrochloride?

Core answer: The strength of a targeted kinase inhibitor patent estate typically depends on (1) the number of Orange Book-listed patents, (2) whether multiple independent claims map to the product, and (3) whether formulation or method patents extend protection beyond composition expiration.

Elements that make estates stronger in litigation

  • Multiple independently infringed patents tied to the marketed formulation.
  • Patent claims that cover drug substance and the finished dosage form.
  • A record of consistent court outcomes or prosecution history supportive of claim construction.

What generic entry risks exist for pexidartinib in the US and EU?

Core answer: US risk centers on Orange Book patent status, patent expiration, and any paragraph IV challenges. EU risk is governed by different legal mechanisms (national patent enforcement and supplementary protection certificates, plus generic marketing authorization routes).

Risk translation into timeline uncertainty

  • If a late-expiring patent remains in force, generic ANDAs can be prevented from timely launch even if earlier patents expire.
  • Settlement terms can delay market entry after patent expiration.

Clinical development vs. market timing: what updates would most move the needle?

Core answer: The most market-moving updates are those that change patient eligibility, treatment duration, or sequencing relative to surgery and local therapies.

High-impact clinical updates

  • Evidence for earlier-line use where appropriate.
  • Demonstration of combination benefit with acceptable hepatic safety.
  • Data that shows longer treatment continuation or improved durability that increases average treated duration.

Key Takeaways

  • Pexidartinib hydrochloride remains a core systemic option for advanced TGCT requiring systemic treatment, with adoption tied to durable response and structured hepatic risk management.
  • Near-term market risk from generic entry is constrained by FDA Orange Book patent listings and associated exclusivities, which typically delay ANDA launch absent patent expiry or successful paragraph IV outcomes.
  • Revenue projections through 2030 depend mainly on (1) referral and diagnosis capture into systemic pathways, (2) treatment duration and discontinuation drivers, and (3) competitive share within CSF1R-inhibitor options.
  • The biggest upside catalysts are label expansion and combination evidence that increases addressable patient volume or extends average time on therapy.

FAQs

  1. What dosing and liver monitoring requirements define real-world tolerability for pexidartinib?
  2. How does pexidartinib compare with other CSF1R inhibitors for diffuse tenosynovial giant cell tumor response durability?
  3. What endpoints most influence future label expansion for pexidartinib in TGCT?
  4. How do Orange Book patent expirations translate into earliest possible generic launch dates for pexidartinib in the US?
  5. What patient-selection criteria maximize benefit-risk for systemic therapy in TGCT where surgery is incomplete?

References

  1. FDA. FDA Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. (Product listing for pexidartinib, accessed 2026-07-30).
  2. EMA. European public assessment reports and EPAR documents for pexidartinib (Videssa). (Accessed 2026-07-30).
  3. Daiichi Sankyo. Corporate and clinical pipeline materials on pexidartinib in tenosynovial giant cell tumor. (Accessed 2026-07-30).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.