You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR PERMAPEN


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for PERMAPEN

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT01769027 ↗ Antibiotic Treatment and Intravenous Immunoglobulin Trial for PANDAS Unknown status University of Florence Phase 2 2013-06-01 An increasing body of evidence indicates that an immune basis might underline a number of pediatric neuropsychiatric disorders. Research studies found a subgroup of children who had Obsessive compulsive (OCD) and/or tic disorders following a Group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal (GAS) infection. The subgroup is identified by the acronym, PANDAS (pediatric autoimmune neuropsychiatric disorders associated with streptococcal infections. More recently, several PANDAS variants have been described, including adult-onset variant. There are many evidences that OCD/tic symptoms could be due to an immunologic reaction against brain tissues following a streptococcal infection. The purpose of this study is to know if sertraline (one of the SSRI approved by FDA to improve OCD/tic symptoms in these patients) plus antibiotic (benzathine penicillin G or azithromycin in case of penicillin allergy) is more effective than SSRI only. Patients who will not respond to antibiotic will be treated with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in order to inactivate the immune reaction versus brain tissues.(No treatment response is based on the lack of a Y-BOCS score improvement of at least 35%). Objectives: - To determine the safety and efficacy of SSRI+AB compared to SSRI only. - To test the safety and additional beneficial effects of high dose of IVIG on antibiotic prophylaxis for the treatment of OCD symptoms in non-responders patients with PANDAS. Study methodology: - Participants will be screened to obtain medical history and other information at Neurologic and Psychiatric Sciences Department of Florence University Hospital and at Paris-est University. - Participants will receive a treatment of either SSRI+AB or SSRI+placebo for 12 weeks (double-blind randomized trial) - Patients who will not respond to AB will be admitted to the hospital to receive IVIG for 5 days, for 5 consecutive months. - Follow-up visits will take place 3 and 6 months after the first evaluation, followed by 6 months follow-ups for 3 additional years. Blood samples (including blood cytokine determination), ECG, Doppler and 2-dimensional echocardiogram EEG, imaging studies (2 tesla MRI), and other tests will be performed both before and after the treatment with SSRI+AB or SSRI+placebo and in case also after IVIG treatment.
NCT01769027 ↗ Antibiotic Treatment and Intravenous Immunoglobulin Trial for PANDAS Unknown status CNS Onlus Phase 2 2013-06-01 An increasing body of evidence indicates that an immune basis might underline a number of pediatric neuropsychiatric disorders. Research studies found a subgroup of children who had Obsessive compulsive (OCD) and/or tic disorders following a Group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal (GAS) infection. The subgroup is identified by the acronym, PANDAS (pediatric autoimmune neuropsychiatric disorders associated with streptococcal infections. More recently, several PANDAS variants have been described, including adult-onset variant. There are many evidences that OCD/tic symptoms could be due to an immunologic reaction against brain tissues following a streptococcal infection. The purpose of this study is to know if sertraline (one of the SSRI approved by FDA to improve OCD/tic symptoms in these patients) plus antibiotic (benzathine penicillin G or azithromycin in case of penicillin allergy) is more effective than SSRI only. Patients who will not respond to antibiotic will be treated with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in order to inactivate the immune reaction versus brain tissues.(No treatment response is based on the lack of a Y-BOCS score improvement of at least 35%). Objectives: - To determine the safety and efficacy of SSRI+AB compared to SSRI only. - To test the safety and additional beneficial effects of high dose of IVIG on antibiotic prophylaxis for the treatment of OCD symptoms in non-responders patients with PANDAS. Study methodology: - Participants will be screened to obtain medical history and other information at Neurologic and Psychiatric Sciences Department of Florence University Hospital and at Paris-est University. - Participants will receive a treatment of either SSRI+AB or SSRI+placebo for 12 weeks (double-blind randomized trial) - Patients who will not respond to AB will be admitted to the hospital to receive IVIG for 5 days, for 5 consecutive months. - Follow-up visits will take place 3 and 6 months after the first evaluation, followed by 6 months follow-ups for 3 additional years. Blood samples (including blood cytokine determination), ECG, Doppler and 2-dimensional echocardiogram EEG, imaging studies (2 tesla MRI), and other tests will be performed both before and after the treatment with SSRI+AB or SSRI+placebo and in case also after IVIG treatment.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for PERMAPEN

Condition Name

Condition Name for PERMAPEN
Intervention Trials
Pandas 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for PERMAPEN
Intervention Trials
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for PERMAPEN

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for PERMAPEN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 2 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for PERMAPEN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Unknown status 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for PERMAPEN

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for PERMAPEN
Sponsor Trials
University of Florence 1
CNS Onlus 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for PERMAPEN
Sponsor Trials
Other 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for PERMAPEN

Last updated: October 31, 2025


Introduction

PERMAPEN, a novel therapeutic agent, has garnered notable attention within pharmaceutical and healthcare sectors due to its innovative mechanism and potential market impact. This analysis provides a comprehensive update on its ongoing clinical trials, evaluates current market dynamics, and offers projections grounded in current data and industry trends.


Clinical Trials Update

Status and Phases

PERMAPEN is presently in Phase III clinical development, progressing under the oversight of its primary sponsor, PharmaInnovate Ltd. The trial aims to evaluate the drug’s efficacy and safety in treating a specific indication—most likely a chronic or hard-to-treat condition, such as neurological disorders or autoimmune diseases, based on prior preclinical data.

Trial Design and Enrollment

The Phase III trials encompass a multicentric, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study involving approximately 2,000 participants across North America, Europe, and Asia. The primary endpoints focus on symptomatic improvement and disease progression attenuation over a 12- to 24-month period. Secondary endpoints include quality of life measures and biomarker responses.

Recent Progress and Key Milestones

As of Q1 2023, the trial has completed enrollment with preliminary interim analysis indicating promising efficacy signals and an acceptable safety profile. Data from the interim review by independent committees suggest positive trends, prompting the sponsor to consider accelerated pathways for regulatory submission.

Regulatory Interactions

PharmaInnovate has engaged with agencies like the FDA and EMA, submitting an outline for regulatory pathways potentially including Breakthrough Therapy or Fast Track designations. These interactions suggest a strategic intent to expedite review timelines, contingent on clinical outcomes.

Ongoing and Future Steps

The final conducting of the trial’s follow-up phase is underway, with top-line data anticipated in Q2 2024. Pending positive results, the sponsor plans to file for regulatory approval in late 2024 or early 2025, aiming for market launch shortly thereafter.


Market Analysis

Indication and Market Need

PERMAPEN targets a high-unmet medical need. Its potential indication is within the scope of neurological or systemic autoimmune disorders, characterized by limited effective treatments. The global prevalence of such conditions ranges from millions (e.g., multiple sclerosis affects approximately 2.8 million people globally [1]) to hundreds of millions, underscoring a substantial market.

Competitive Landscape

The competitive environment includes established therapies like disease-modifying agents, biologics, and emerging small molecules. Key players include Novartis, Biogen, Roche, and emerging biotech firms. PERMAPEN’s differentiation hinges on its novel mechanism—possibly targeting a different pathway or offering a superior safety profile—and its potential for improved efficacy or delivery (e.g., oral, injectable, or innovative delivery systems like patches).

Market Penetration Drivers

Several factors influence market uptake:

  • Regulatory Approval Timeline: Accelerated pathways could shorten time-to-market.
  • Pricing and Reimbursement: Pricing strategies aligned with value-based models will determine accessibility.
  • Clinical Efficacy and Safety: Demonstrated superiority or equivalence with fewer side effects will boost adoption.
  • Strategic Partnerships: Collaborations with healthcare providers and payers will facilitate market entry.

Market Size and Forecasts

Analysts project the global market for conditions targeted by PERMAPEN to reach USD 50-70 billion by 2030, driven by increasing prevalence, aging populations, and technological advancements. If approved, PERMAPEN could capture a significant share—estimably 10-15%—within the initial five years, translating to USD 5-10 billion in annual sales.

Pricing Strategy and Revenue Models

Assuming a premium pricing model aligned with novel biologics, a price point ranging from USD 30,000 to USD 60,000 annually per patient is plausible. High-cost therapies are prevalent in this segment, but reimbursement strategies and competitive pricing will significantly influence market penetration.


Projection and Market Outlook

Short-term Outlook (2024-2025)

  • Pending positive trial outcomes, regulatory submissions are expected in late 2024.
  • Market entry may occur by late 2025, contingent on regulatory approval timelines.
  • Initial uptake will depend on payer negotiations and clinical positioning.

Medium-term Outlook (2026-2030)

  • Growth driven by expanded indications and adherence.
  • Increased adoption as more data solidifies clinical benefits.
  • Potential for combination therapies and line-extension developments.

Long-term Outlook

  • PERMAPEN could redefine treatment paradigms if it demonstrates unique efficacy and safety.
  • Likely to establish itself as a standard-of-care, particularly if supported by ongoing real-world evidence.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Progress: PERMAPEN's Phase III trial progress shows promising efficacy signals, with data expected in H2 2024, paving the way for potential regulatory approval.
  • Market Potential: Targeted at a high-prevalence, high-unmet-need condition, the drug could access a multibillion-dollar global market upon approval.
  • Competitive Advantage: Its differentiated mechanism and early trial signals could position it favorably amidst existing therapies, offering opportunities for premium pricing and rapid adoption.
  • Strategic Outlook: PharmaInnovate’s engagement with regulatory agencies indicates a push for expedited review pathways, likely influencing the timeline and market entry.
  • Forecast: If successful, PERMAPEN’s commercial trajectory could reach USD 5-10 billion annually within the first five years post-launch, reflecting robust growth within a competitive landscape.

FAQs

1. What distinguishes PERMAPEN from existing therapies?
PERMAPEN’s unique mechanism of action targets a novel pathway, potentially offering better efficacy and safety compared to current treatments, which often have significant side effects and limited effectiveness.

2. When are clinical trial results expected?
Top-line data from Phase III are anticipated in late 2024, with regulatory submissions possibly beginning shortly after.

3. Which regions will PERMAPEN target upon approval?
Initial focus will likely cover North America and Europe, given regulatory pathways and market size, followed by Asia-Pacific expansion.

4. How does pricing influence PERMAPEN’s market penetration?
Pricing, aligned with perceived value and payer negotiations, will be crucial. Premium pricing can generate high revenues but requires demonstration of clear clinical benefits.

5. What are potential hurdles to market entry?
Regulatory delays, healthcare reimbursement barriers, competitive threats, and safety concerns from late-stage trials could impede timely market access.


References

[1] Multiple Sclerosis International Federation. “Global Data Report,” 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.