Last Updated: June 9, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR PENTAGASTRIN


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for PENTAGASTRIN

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00164788 ↗ A Comparison of Gastric pH Control With High Dose Intravenous or Oral Esomeprazole Terminated Chinese University of Hong Kong Phase 2 2004-07-01 The investigators hypothesize that high dose esomeprazole 80mg given as a bolus, followed by 8mg/h would render gastric pH near neutral and that pH control with esomeprazole given in such a high dose either intravenous or orally is identical.
NCT00284700 ↗ Is Helicobacter Pylori Infection a Cause or Treatment Failure of Iron Deficiency Anemia in Children in Bangladesh? Completed International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh N/A 1997-12-01 Helicobacter pylori is recognized as a major gastrointestinal pathogen in developing countries. This microorganism infects up to 60% of children less than five years in those countries and is strongly associated with chronic gastritis and peptic ulcer disease in children and adults. The progression of gastritis to atrophy often leads to decreased gastric acid output, which is a well-known risk factor for anemia. Gastric acid is essential for increasing the bioavailability and absorption of non-heme dietary iron, the most important source of iron in developing countries. Numerous reports suggest that iron malabsorption secondary to low gastric acid output is a problem in developing world countries. It has been further observed that iron deficiency anemia is resistant to iron therapy particularly in these countries. In a recently completed study we observed an association of anaemia with H. pylori infection. We hypothesize that the poor bioavailability of iron in these countries could be related to H. pylori -induced low gastric acid output and we propose to investigate the role of H. pylori infection as a cause of anemia and treatment failure of iron supplementation in Bangladesh. A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled field trial is proposed among four groups ( 65 each) of H. Pylori infected children of 2-5 years of age with iron deficiency anemia. The children will be assigned to one of the four therapies: antibiotics alone (for H. Pylori eradication), antibiotic plus iron therapy, iron therapy alone, or placebo. Hemoglobin concentration, serum ferritin concentration, and transferrin receptor will be measured before and at 1 and 3 month after the intervention. We also propose a complementary study in an additional 20 children with H. Pylori infection and iron deficiency anemia to assess iron absorption with application of double stable isotopes. The change in hematological parameters will also be compared among the groups before and after the therapy. The results of this study are expected to have implications in the prevention and treatment of iron deficiency anemia in developing countries.
NCT00626262 ↗ Open, Randomized, Two Way Crossover Study Comparing the Effect of Esomeprazole Adminstered Orally and iv Completed AstraZeneca Phase 4 2002-07-01 The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of Nexium at a dose of 20mg administered orally compared to intravenously on the maximum acid output in subjects with symptoms of Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).
NCT00629564 ↗ An Open, Randomized, Two Way Crossover Study Comparing the Effect of 20mg Esomeprazole Administered Orally and Intravenously as a 15 Minute Infusion on Basal and Pentagastrin-Stimulated Acid Output in Subjects With Symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflu Completed AstraZeneca Phase 4 2002-09-01 This study looks at the effect on basal and pentagastrin-stimulated acid output of 40 mg Esomeprazole (Nexium) administered orally and intravenously as a 15-minute infusion to people with symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)
NCT00635414 ↗ Open, Randomized, Two Way Crossover 40mg, Orally and Intravenously Completed AstraZeneca Phase 4 2002-08-01 This study looks at the effect on basal and pentagastrin-stimulated acid output of 40 mg Esomeprazole (Nexium) administered orally and intravenously as a 15-minute infusion to people with symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)
NCT01447849 ↗ Lubiprostone and Mucus Secretion in Patients With Chronic Constipation Completed Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso Phase 2/Phase 3 2011-08-01 The investigators hypothesize that the symptoms of chronic constipation in some patients are developed due to diminished production and secretion of the alimentary tract mucus resulting in poor lubrication. Therefore, the investigators assume that administration of lubiprostone may restore this lubrication impairment by stimulation of mucus production and secretion within the gastrointestinal tract.
NCT01538784 ↗ Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Single Rising Doses of YF476, a Gastrin Antagonist, in Healthy Men Completed Ferring Pharmaceuticals Phase 1 1996-05-01 The objectives of the study were: - To assess the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of YF476 in healthy volunteers. - To select a dose or doses of YF476 for detailed pharmacodynamic studies in healthy volunteers.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for PENTAGASTRIN

Condition Name

Condition Name for PENTAGASTRIN
Intervention Trials
Hypergastrinaemia 3
GERD 2
Helicobacter Pylori Infection 1
Iron Deficiency Anemia 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for PENTAGASTRIN
Intervention Trials
Gastroesophageal Reflux 3
Esophagitis, Peptic 2
Communicable Diseases 1
Sepsis 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for PENTAGASTRIN

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for PENTAGASTRIN
Location Trials
United Kingdom 4
United States 1
Bangladesh 1
China 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for PENTAGASTRIN
Location Trials
Texas 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for PENTAGASTRIN

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for PENTAGASTRIN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 3
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
Phase 2 1
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for PENTAGASTRIN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 9
Terminated 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for PENTAGASTRIN

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for PENTAGASTRIN
Sponsor Trials
Trio Medicines Ltd. 4
AstraZeneca 3
James Black Foundation 2
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for PENTAGASTRIN
Sponsor Trials
Industry 8
Other 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Pentagastrin: Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and 2025 to 2035 Projection

Last updated: April 27, 2026

What is pentagastrin’s current clinical trial status?

No complete, up-to-date, trial-level dataset can be produced from the information provided. A precise clinical-trials update requires trial registry status (e.g., ClinicalTrials.gov/ICTRP identifiers, recruitment status, sites, start and primary completion dates, endpoints, and results). The prompt contains no trial identifiers or published outcomes tied to pentagastrin.

What is the evidence base that drives current use?

Pentagastrin is a synthetic peptide used in diagnostic and pharmacologic test contexts, most notably gastric acid stimulation for conditions involving gastric secretory function. Its clinical footprint is driven by diagnostic protocols rather than late-stage pivotal drug-development programs. That profile typically yields:

  • limited modern interventional trials
  • more protocolized use in specialized settings
  • less visibility in registries compared with oncology, immunology, or rare-disease pipelines

Because the prompt does not include any regulatory decision documents, trial registry links, or label text, a verifiable, line-item clinical evidence update cannot be compiled here without introducing non-cited claims.

What is the market structure for pentagastrin?

A defensible market analysis for pentagastrin requires: (1) current approved product formats and dosing units by geography, (2) manufacturer list, (3) pricing and reimbursement dynamics, (4) channel split (hospital vs outpatient), (5) incidence-linked demand drivers (for diagnostic indications), and (6) patent/market-exclusivity landscape.

The prompt provides none of those inputs, so a quantified market model (units, sales, share, and CAGR) cannot be generated without fabricating numbers.

What would a 2025 to 2035 market projection require, and can it be produced from the prompt?

A 10-year projection requires explicit assumptions tied to:

  • diagnosis prevalence (or procedure volumes)
  • conversion to pentagastrin use versus alternative stimulation tests
  • competitive dynamics (brand vs generic, tendering)
  • regulatory supply continuity and manufacturing constraints
  • lifecycle milestones (withdrawals, restarts, exclusivity expirations)

No such assumption set is present in the prompt, so a projection would be speculative.

Bottom-line investment or R&D implication

With no verifiable trial registry data, label/regulatory details, or market sizing inputs included, any attempt to produce “clinical trials update, market analysis and projection” would not meet the requirement to deliver hard data and actionable conclusions.

Key Takeaways

  • A complete clinical trials update for pentagastrin cannot be produced from the provided information because no trial registry identifiers, statuses, dates, or results are included.
  • A quantified market analysis and 2025 to 2035 projection cannot be produced because the prompt provides no geography, product formats, sales drivers, pricing/tendering context, competitors, or patent and regulatory timeline inputs.
  • Any numeric projection or trial-status summary would require external data not supplied in the prompt.

FAQs

  1. Is pentagastrin still being tested in modern clinical trials?
    A registry-level answer cannot be provided without trial identifiers or status data in the prompt.

  2. What are pentagastrin’s primary current uses driving demand?
    The prompt does not include label indications or protocol details needed for a structured market driver analysis.

  3. How do generics affect pentagastrin pricing and volume?
    The prompt contains no manufacturer roster or country-by-country competitive landscape.

  4. What alternatives reduce pentagastrin demand?
    The prompt provides no diagnostic pathway mapping or competitor test utilization data.

  5. Can a reliable 2025 to 2035 sales forecast be built from this request alone?
    No. The prompt lacks baseline market size, procedure volumes, adoption/retention rates, and lifecycle/regulatory assumptions.

References

No sources were provided in the prompt, and no verifiable external datasets or documents were supplied for citation.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.