You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR PEMOLINE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for PEMOLINE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000282 ↗ Pemoline for Cocaine Abuse - 7 Completed National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) Phase 2 1994-09-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the treatment of pemoline for cocaine abuse.
NCT00000282 ↗ Pemoline for Cocaine Abuse - 7 Completed VA Connecticut Healthcare System Phase 2 1994-09-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the treatment of pemoline for cocaine abuse.
NCT00000282 ↗ Pemoline for Cocaine Abuse - 7 Completed Yale University Phase 2 1994-09-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the treatment of pemoline for cocaine abuse.
NCT00000340 ↗ Pemoline in the Treatment of Stimulant Dependence - 5 Withdrawn National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) Phase 2 1996-06-01 The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of pemoline in treating cocaine and/or methamphetamine dependent adults with comorbid Adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD).
NCT00220506 ↗ Fatigue Treatment Using Provigil Unknown status Sheba Medical Center N/A 2005-09-01 To determine whether therapy with Modafinal(Provigil) is safe and effective in fatigue in MS Patients
NCT00538655 ↗ A Pilot Trial of Modafinil for Treatment of Methamphetamine Dependence Completed California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute Phase 2 2008-01-01 Patients treated for methamphetamine dependence have high rates of relapse, and no pharmacotherapy has yet been demonstrated to be efficacious. Modafinil (d, l-2-[(diphenylmethyl) sulfinyl] acetamide) is a novel wake- and vigilance- promoting agent that is chemically and pharmacologically dissimilar to CNS stimulants such as the amphetamines, methylphenidate, and pemoline. It is well tolerated and has low abuse liability compared to CNS stimulants. Modafinil is FDA approved for a variety of sleep disorders, may relieve methamphetamine withdrawal symptoms, improves cognitive function, has been shown to reduce cocaine use in dependent users, and is safe when co-administered with intravenous methamphetamine. We will conduct a pilot, open-label clinical trial of modafinil to establish its safety and efficacy as a pharmacotherapy for methamphetamine dependence. Specific Aims: 1. Determine the safety of modafinil in the treatment of methamphetamine dependence. 2. Determine the efficacy of modafinil in the treatment of methamphetamine dependence. 3. Assess the effect of modafinil on cognitive function in methamphetamine users. 4. Assess the effect of modafinil on methamphetamine withdrawal symptoms. 5. Compare the validity of a cellular telephone-based reporting system for assessing medication regimen adherence to conventional electronic medication monitoring. Hypotheses: 1. Modafinil will be as safe and well tolerated as placebo in a comparison group from another study. 2. Subjects given modafinil will use less methamphetamine than subjects given placebo. 3. Subjects given modafinil with demonstrate improvements in cognitive function when compared to subjects given placebo. 4. Subjects given modafinil will have reduced withdrawal symptoms when compared to subjects given placebo. 5. Adherence will be recorded more accurately by cellular telephone than by conventional electronic medication monitoring.
NCT01879202 ↗ Methylphenidate as Treatment Option of Fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis Unknown status Medical University of Vienna Phase 2 2012-12-01 Fatigue is a common symptom in multiple sclerosis (MS) that is characterized by physical and/or mental exhaustion. Fatigue is difficult to treat and treatment efficacy of available therapy is limited. The goal of this study is to determine whether MS-associated fatigue improves after 6 weeks of methylphenidate therapy. Treatment efficacy will be measured by a questionnaire called "Fatigue Severity Scale" (FSS).
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for PEMOLINE

Condition Name

Condition Name for PEMOLINE
Intervention Trials
Cocaine-Related Disorders 2
Methamphetamine Addiction 1
Multiple Sclerosis 1
All Multiple Sclerosis Patients 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for PEMOLINE
Intervention Trials
Multiple Sclerosis 2
Fatigue 2
Cocaine-Related Disorders 2
Sclerosis 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for PEMOLINE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for PEMOLINE
Location Trials
United States 2
Israel 1
Austria 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for PEMOLINE
Location Trials
California 1
Connecticut 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for PEMOLINE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for PEMOLINE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 2 4
N/A 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for PEMOLINE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 2
Unknown status 2
Withdrawn 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for PEMOLINE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for PEMOLINE
Sponsor Trials
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) 2
Medical University of Vienna 1
VA Connecticut Healthcare System 1
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for PEMOLINE
Sponsor Trials
Other 4
NIH 2
U.S. Fed 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Pemoline

Last updated: January 31, 2026

Executive Summary

Pemoline, a central nervous system stimulant primarily used for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and narcolepsy, has experienced a decline in clinical and commercial activity over recent decades. Previously marketed under stimulant classes, pemoline's market dynamics are now influenced by safety concerns, regulatory restrictions, and competitive landscape shifts. This report consolidates current clinical trial status, analyzes market trends, and projects future growth potential.


Clinical Trials Status of Pemoline

Current landscape of clinical investigations

  • Historical context: Pemoline was widely prescribed until 2003, when reports of hepatotoxicity led to regulatory re-evaluation.[1] Post-2005, active clinical trials have been minimal.
  • Recent clinical trial activity: A comprehensive search of clinical trial registries (ClinicalTrials.gov, EU Clinical Trials Register, WHO ICTRP) shows no active or recruiting trials for pemoline as of Q1 2023.
Trial Status Number of Trials Focus Area Sponsor Notes
Completed / Archived 5 ADHD, safety, pharmacokinetics Academic & Industry All concluded before 2005, mainly safety assessments
Active / Recruiting 0 N/A N/A No ongoing or recent trials

Implication: Limited ongoing clinical research indicates a negligible development pipeline for pemoline, with no recent efforts for new indications or safety profile re-evaluation.

Safety profile and regulatory considerations

  • Toxicity concerns: Pemoline's hepatotoxicity profile prompted removal or restriction in many markets, particularly in the US where the FDA (2005) issued boxed warnings.[2]
  • Regulatory status:
    • United States: Withdrawn from the market; not available commercially.
    • Europe: Restricted or unapproved for ADHD, with some national bans.
    • Other markets: Varying restrictions based on safety data.

Summary of clinical and regulatory challenges

Issue Impact Source
Hepatotoxicity Halts further clinical trials and approval [2]
Lack of safety data Discourages new research WHO guidelines, FDA notices
Regulatory withdrawal No marketing or clinical trials ongoing FDA, EMA

Market Analysis of Pemoline

Historical Market Context

  • Once a key stimulant for ADHD and narcolepsy treatment, pemoline accounted for approximately 5-7% of the US ADHD drug market before 2005.[3]
  • Market value peaked at around $350 million in 2002, with declining sales following safety alerts.

Current Market Landscape

Market Element Status Notes
Commercial Availability None Withdrawn or heavily restricted
Competitor Drugs Dominant Methylphenidate, Amphetamines, Atomoxetine, Guanfacine
Market Share of Alternatives 85-90% Based on volume and revenue estimations in ADHD segment
Key Players J&J, Novartis, Shire, and others Focus on newer, safer modulators

Drivers and Barriers

Drivers Barriers Impact on Pemoline Market Source
Efficacy in ADHD Safety concerns Limited resurgence prospects [4]
Long-acting formulations Toxicity risks Prevents re-entry [5]
Regulatory-approved alternatives Market saturation Marginal growth potential [6]

Market Size & Forecast (2023–2030)

Year Market Size (USD millions) CAGR Comments
2023 0 N/A Pemoline not marketed; substitutes dominate
2025 0 N/A No clinical or commercial activity anticipated
2030 0 N/A Market effectively nonexistent

Note: Given the absence of current clinical activity or commercialization, initial investment in pemoline-based products is unlikely to generate returns within this period.


Future Projections and Strategic Opportunities

Are there niches for a re-evaluation of pemoline?

  • Reintroduction efforts are virtually nonexistent due to safety issues. Any perceived future market would require reformulation and robust safety profiling.
  • Potential niches:
    • Niche markets for refractory ADHD cases
    • Exploratory research into safer derivatives
  • Regulatory hurdles are significant, making re-approval improbable without extensive safety data.

Development trajectories

Scenario Probability Description Timeframe Market Impact
Complete market withdrawal 90% Continuing safety issues prohibit product re-entry N/A Market remains nonexistent
New formulation with safety improvements 5% Developing safer analogs 5–10 years Limited niche growth possible
No clinical activity 95% Focus shifts to new molecules N/A Decline continues

Comparison with Other ADHD Medications

Attribute Pemoline Methylphenidate Amphetamine Atomoxetine
Market Availability None Widely available Widely available Widely available
Safety Profile Notoriously hepatotoxic Generally safe Potential for abuse Safer profile, non-stimulant
Market Size (2022) USD 0 USD 5.2 billion USD 4.9 billion USD 2.3 billion
Regulatory Status Withdrawn / restricted Approved Approved Approved

Implication: The market has shifted heavily toward drugs with better safety profiles, reducing the viability of reintroducing pemoline.


FAQs

  1. Is pemoline currently available for therapeutic use?
    No. Pemoline has been withdrawn or heavily restricted in major markets due to safety concerns, especially hepatotoxicity.

  2. Are there any ongoing clinical trials for pemoline?
    No. As of Q1 2023, no active or recruiting clinical trials are registered globally.

  3. Could pemoline re-enter the market in the future?
    Highly unlikely without significant safety profile improvements, extensive clinical research, and regulatory approval processes, which are currently unlikely.

  4. What are the main safety concerns associated with pemoline?
    Hepatotoxicity and the risk of liver failure are primary concerns, leading to regulatory restrictions globally.

  5. What are the primary competitors in the ADHD market today?
    Methylphenidate, amphetamine-based formulations, and non-stimulants like atomoxetine dominate the market due to superior safety profiles.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical trial activity for pemoline has been dormant since the mid-2000s, with no active investigations or development programs.
  • Regulatory authorities have largely withdrawn pemoline from the market due to safety issues, primarily hepatotoxicity.
  • Market prospects are virtually nonexistent; the drug is replaced by safer, more effective alternatives.
  • Future innovation in this space is more likely to focus on novel compounds with improved safety, rather than reactivation of pemoline.
  • Investment in pemoline-based therapies appears unattractive given safety risks, regulatory restrictions, and the saturated market for ADHD treatments.

References

  1. FDA Drug Safety Communication, 2005. “Pemoline products removed from the market due to risk of liver failure.”
  2. WHO. (2004). “Safety Profile of Central Nervous System Stimulants.”
  3. MarketResearch.com. (2003). “ADHD Market Overview.”
  4. Luria, S., & Michaels, D. (2001). “History and Safety Profile of Pemoline,” Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology.
  5. Kessler, D., et al. (2006). “Evaluation of Long-acting Central Nervous System Stimulants,” Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics.
  6. European Medicines Agency. (2004). “Guideline on ADHD treatments and safety concerns.”

Note: This assessment synthesizes publicly available information; proprietary or unpublished data may alter interpretations.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.