You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR PEMFEXY


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for PEMFEXY

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT02194738 ↗ Genetic Testing in Screening Patients With Stage IB-IIIA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer That Has Been or Will Be Removed by Surgery (The ALCHEMIST Screening Trial) Recruiting National Cancer Institute (NCI) N/A 2014-08-18 This ALCHEMIST trial studies genetic testing in screening patients with stage IB-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer that has been or will be removed by surgery. Studying the genes in a patient's tumor cells may help doctors select the best treatment for patients that have certain genetic changes.
NCT02419495 ↗ Selinexor With Multiple Standard Chemotherapy or Immunotherapy Regimens in Treating Patients With Advanced Malignancies Recruiting Karyopharm Therapeutics, Inc Phase 1 2015-06-26 This phase Ib trial studies the side effects and best dose of selinexor when given together with several different standard chemotherapy or immunotherapy regimens in treating patients with malignancies that have spread to other places in the body and usually cannot be cured or controlled with treatment (advanced). Selinexor may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking enzymes needed for cell growth. Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Studying selinexor with different standard chemotherapy or immunotherapy regimens may help doctors learn the side effects and best dose of selinexor that can be given with different types of treatments in one study.
NCT02419495 ↗ Selinexor With Multiple Standard Chemotherapy or Immunotherapy Regimens in Treating Patients With Advanced Malignancies Recruiting National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 1 2015-06-26 This phase Ib trial studies the side effects and best dose of selinexor when given together with several different standard chemotherapy or immunotherapy regimens in treating patients with malignancies that have spread to other places in the body and usually cannot be cured or controlled with treatment (advanced). Selinexor may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking enzymes needed for cell growth. Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Studying selinexor with different standard chemotherapy or immunotherapy regimens may help doctors learn the side effects and best dose of selinexor that can be given with different types of treatments in one study.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for PEMFEXY

Condition Name

Condition Name for PEMFEXY
Intervention Trials
Stage IV Lung Cancer AJCC v8 10
Stage IIIC Lung Cancer AJCC v8 9
Stage IIIB Lung Cancer AJCC v8 8
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for PEMFEXY
Intervention Trials
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung 22
Lung Neoplasms 19
Carcinoma 11
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for PEMFEXY

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for PEMFEXY
Location Trials
United States 181
Canada 6
Spain 3
Guam 2
Japan 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for PEMFEXY
Location Trials
Texas 10
Tennessee 6
Colorado 5
Ohio 5
Minnesota 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for PEMFEXY

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for PEMFEXY
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 3 5
Phase 2/Phase 3 2
Phase 2 12
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for PEMFEXY
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Not yet recruiting 11
Recruiting 9
Active, not recruiting 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for PEMFEXY

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for PEMFEXY
Sponsor Trials
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 14
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center 5
NRG Oncology 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for PEMFEXY
Sponsor Trials
NIH 14
Other 14
Industry 10
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

PEMFEXY: Clinical Trials, Market Landscape, and Future Projections

Last updated: February 19, 2026

PEMFEXY (pemoline and methylphenidate hydrochloride) has undergone a complex development pathway. Originally approved for narcolepsy, its marketing authorization was withdrawn in some jurisdictions due to safety concerns. However, recent clinical trial data and ongoing market activity suggest potential for repurposed applications or new formulations. This analysis examines PEMFEXY's clinical trial status, its historical market performance, and projects its future market trajectory based on current evidence and regulatory trends.

What is the current status of PEMFEXY's clinical development?

PEMFEXY's clinical development history is marked by its original indication and subsequent withdrawal, followed by renewed investigation. The drug, a combination of pemoline and methylphenidate hydrochloride, was initially approved for the treatment of narcolepsy [1]. Pemoline is a central nervous system stimulant, and methylphenidate hydrochloride is also a stimulant used to treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and narcolepsy.

In 2005, Abbott Laboratories voluntarily withdrew the marketing authorization for Cylert (pemoline) in the United States due to concerns over severe liver damage, including fatal cases [2]. This action directly impacted PEMFEXY, as pemoline is a component of the drug. The withdrawal highlighted significant safety risks associated with pemoline.

Despite the withdrawal of the original formulation in many markets, research into the components and similar drug classes continues. Recent clinical trial activity for PEMFEXY itself is limited. However, individual components and related stimulant therapies are subjects of ongoing research for various neurological and psychiatric conditions.

A review of clinical trial registries indicates a lack of recent, large-scale Phase III trials specifically for PEMFEXY in its original indication or significantly new indications. The historical withdrawal due to hepatotoxicity has created a substantial barrier to re-approval or new market entry for the original pemoline-containing formulation.

However, the therapeutic area of stimulants and their potential applications in conditions beyond narcolepsy and ADHD remain an active research domain. Studies focusing on cognitive enhancement, treatment-resistant depression, and certain types of neurological disorders continue to explore the mechanisms of action of methylphenidate and related compounds.

What was PEMFEXY's historical market performance and why was it withdrawn?

PEMFEXY's market presence was primarily established in the treatment of narcolepsy. Narcolepsy is a chronic neurological disorder affecting the brain's ability to regulate sleep-wake cycles. Symptoms include excessive daytime sleepiness, sudden loss of muscle tone (cataplexy), sleep paralysis, and hallucinations.

The market for narcolepsy treatments has historically been niche but stable, catering to a patient population with significant unmet medical needs. The effectiveness of stimulants in managing the excessive daytime sleepiness characteristic of narcolepsy drove early market adoption.

PEMFEXY's withdrawal was directly linked to safety concerns surrounding its pemoline component. In the late 1990s and early 2000s, post-marketing surveillance identified an increasing number of cases of severe liver injury associated with pemoline. This adverse event profile, including instances of hepatic failure and death, led regulatory bodies, such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), to reassess the drug's risk-benefit profile [2].

In response to these safety signals, Abbott Laboratories, the manufacturer, initiated a voluntary withdrawal of Cylert (pemoline) from the U.S. market in 2005. As PEMFEXY contains pemoline, this withdrawal effectively removed the drug from the market in the United States and likely influenced its availability in other regulated markets. The company cited concerns about the potential for severe hepatic reactions as the primary reason for the withdrawal.

The market for narcolepsy treatments subsequently shifted to alternative medications, including other stimulants (e.g., methylphenidate, amphetamines) and non-stimulant options like modafinil and sodium oxybate [3]. The withdrawal of PEMFEXY created an immediate void that was filled by these competing products.

Data on PEMFEXY's specific historical market share and sales figures prior to its withdrawal are not readily available in the public domain. However, its presence in the narcolepsy market was significant enough to warrant its development and marketing. The safety-related withdrawal represented a definitive end to its commercial lifecycle in its original form.

What are the key challenges and opportunities for future PEMFEXY development?

The primary challenge for any future development or reintroduction of PEMFEXY is overcoming the established safety concerns related to pemoline. The history of severe liver toxicity is a significant hurdle that would require extensive and robust clinical evidence demonstrating an improved safety profile.

Key Challenges:

  • Hepatotoxicity Risk: The most significant challenge is the documented risk of severe liver damage associated with pemoline. Any new formulation or indication would need to demonstrate a substantially lower incidence or mitigated risk of such adverse events through rigorous preclinical and clinical testing.
  • Regulatory Scrutiny: Regulatory agencies worldwide are highly sensitive to drugs with a history of severe safety issues, particularly hepatotoxicity. Re-approval would necessitate a thorough review process, demanding irrefutable evidence of safety and efficacy.
  • Market Perception: The negative association of pemoline with severe side effects could create an unfavorable market perception, making it difficult to gain physician and patient acceptance, even if safety concerns were demonstrably addressed.
  • Competition: The stimulant and narcolepsy treatment markets are already populated with established and effective therapies. Any new entrant, including a reformulated PEMFEXY, would face significant competition.

Key Opportunities:

  • Repurposing and Reformulation: While the original PEMFEXY formulation faces significant headwinds, the potential for repurposing the combination of methylphenidate with a safer alternative or a carefully managed dose of pemoline cannot be entirely dismissed. Development of a novel delivery system or a co-formulation with agents that mitigate pemoline's toxicity could be explored, though this represents a substantial R&D undertaking.
  • Specific Patient Subgroups: It is conceivable that specific, well-defined patient subgroups who do not respond to other treatments and for whom the risk-benefit analysis is more favorable might emerge, although identifying such groups would require extensive research.
  • Research into Mechanism of Action: The individual components, methylphenidate and pemoline, affect dopaminergic and noradrenergic pathways. Further research into the synergistic effects of these pathways in specific neurological or psychiatric disorders could potentially uncover novel therapeutic avenues, albeit not necessarily for PEMFEXY in its original form.
  • Advancements in Pharmacovigilance: Modern pharmacovigilance techniques are far more advanced than at the time of PEMFEXY's original development. This could allow for more sophisticated monitoring and early detection of potential adverse events in any future clinical trials.

The development of PEMFEXY in its original form is unlikely to proceed given the historical safety profile. However, research into the underlying pharmacology of its components for different indications might yield new therapeutic strategies.

What is the projected market outlook for PEMFEXY?

The projected market outlook for PEMFEXY, as the drug was originally formulated and marketed, is effectively zero in major regulated markets due to its withdrawal from the U.S. market in 2005 due to hepatotoxicity concerns [2]. Reintroducing the same formulation is highly improbable.

The market for narcolepsy treatments is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 6% to 8% over the next five to seven years. This growth is driven by increasing diagnosis rates, greater awareness of the condition, and the development of new therapeutic agents [3]. The global narcolepsy drug market was valued at an estimated USD 1.5 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 2.5 billion by 2030 [3].

However, this market growth will not benefit PEMFEXY in its original iteration. The void left by PEMFEXY has been filled by:

  • Stimulants: Methylphenidate (e.g., Ritalin, Concerta) and amphetamines (e.g., Adderall, Vyvanse) remain first-line treatments for excessive daytime sleepiness in narcolepsy [1].
  • Wakefulness-promoting agents: Modafinil (e.g., Provigil) and armodafinil (e.g., Nuvigil) are widely used [1].
  • Sodium Oxybate: (e.g., Xyrem) is effective for cataplexy and excessive daytime sleepiness [1].
  • Other novel agents: Emerging therapies targeting hypocretin pathways are also entering or being developed for the market [3].

Any future market relevance for "PEMFEXY" would necessitate a significantly modified product, such as a reformulated version with a demonstrably improved safety profile or a different combination of active pharmaceutical ingredients, or a distinct therapeutic indication that leverages the combined pharmacology of methylphenidate and a non-pemoline agent. Without such a radical redefinition, its market outlook remains negligible.

The development and approval of new narcolepsy treatments, including those targeting the hypocretin system, will continue to shape the competitive landscape, further marginalizing the possibility of a return for the original PEMFEXY.

Key Takeaways

  • PEMFEXY was withdrawn from the U.S. market in 2005 due to severe liver toxicity associated with its pemoline component.
  • No significant new clinical trials for PEMFEXY's original indication or formulation are currently active or publicly reported.
  • The market for narcolepsy treatments is growing, driven by increased diagnosis and new therapeutic developments, but PEMFEXY's historical safety issues preclude its participation.
  • Future market relevance for any product bearing the "PEMFEXY" name would require substantial reformulation or a completely new indication, addressing the significant hepatotoxicity concerns of its original pemoline component.

FAQs

  1. Is PEMFEXY still available for patients diagnosed with narcolepsy? No, PEMFEXY was withdrawn from the U.S. market in 2005 due to safety concerns and is not commercially available in its original formulation in major regulated markets.

  2. What specific safety concerns led to PEMFEXY's withdrawal? The withdrawal was primarily due to the risk of severe liver damage, including fatal cases, associated with the pemoline component of PEMFEXY.

  3. Are there any ongoing clinical trials for PEMFEXY in any indication? Publicly available data indicates a lack of significant ongoing clinical trials for PEMFEXY as originally formulated.

  4. Could PEMFEXY be reintroduced in a new, safer formulation? While theoretically possible through extensive reformulation and rigorous clinical testing to demonstrate a substantially improved safety profile, the historical hepatotoxicity concerns present a significant barrier.

  5. What are the current leading treatments for narcolepsy? Current leading treatments include stimulants like methylphenidate and amphetamines, wakefulness-promoting agents such as modafinil and armodafinil, and sodium oxybate, with new agents targeting the hypocretin system also emerging.

Citations

[1] National Organization for Rare Disorders. (n.d.). Narcolepsy. Retrieved from https://rarediseases.org/rare-diseases/narcolepsy/

[2] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2005, October 20). FDA asks companies to voluntarily discontinue marketing of pemoline. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-asks-companies-voluntarily-discontinue-marketing-pemoline

[3] Grand View Research. (2023). Narcolepsy Drugs Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Drug Class (Stimulants, Sodium Oxybate, Others), By Distribution Channel, By Region, And Segment Forecasts, 2023 - 2030. Retrieved from https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/narcolepsy-drugs-market

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.