You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR PEMETREXED


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for PEMETREXED

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00003711 ↗ Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Metastatic Solid Tumors Completed San Antonio Cancer Institute Phase 1 1997-09-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more tumor cells. PURPOSE: Phase I trial to study the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy with pemetrexed disodium and irinotecan in treating patients who have metastatic solid tumors.
NCT00005636 ↗ Cisplatin With or Without Pemetrexed Disodium in Treating Patients With Malignant Mesothelioma of the Pleura That Cannot be Removed by Surgery Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 3 1999-11-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. It is not yet known if cisplatin is more effective with or without pemetrexed disodium for malignant mesothelioma of the pleura. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of cisplatin with or without pemetrexed disodium in treating patients who have malignant mesothelioma of the pleura that cannot be removed by surgery.
NCT00005636 ↗ Cisplatin With or Without Pemetrexed Disodium in Treating Patients With Malignant Mesothelioma of the Pleura That Cannot be Removed by Surgery Completed Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Phase 3 1999-11-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. It is not yet known if cisplatin is more effective with or without pemetrexed disodium for malignant mesothelioma of the pleura. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of cisplatin with or without pemetrexed disodium in treating patients who have malignant mesothelioma of the pleura that cannot be removed by surgery.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for PEMETREXED

Condition Name

Condition Name for PEMETREXED
Intervention Trials
Non-small Cell Lung Cancer 187
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer 85
Lung Cancer 80
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for PEMETREXED
Intervention Trials
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung 664
Lung Neoplasms 566
Mesothelioma 101
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for PEMETREXED

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for PEMETREXED
Location Trials
China 785
Japan 476
Italy 456
Spain 420
India 90
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for PEMETREXED
Location Trials
California 222
New York 202
Texas 201
Florida 192
Pennsylvania 183
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for PEMETREXED

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for PEMETREXED
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 1
PHASE3 38
PHASE2 60
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for PEMETREXED
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 354
Recruiting 277
Not yet recruiting 123
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for PEMETREXED

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for PEMETREXED
Sponsor Trials
Eli Lilly and Company 171
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 111
AstraZeneca 53
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for PEMETREXED
Sponsor Trials
Other 844
Industry 745
NIH 111
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Pemetrexed: Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Future Projections

Last updated: October 30, 2025

Introduction

Pemetrexed, marketed primarily as Alimta®, is an antifolate chemotherapeutic agent developed by Eli Lilly and Company. Approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2004, it plays a crucial role in the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma and nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). As the oncology landscape evolves, continuous assessment of pemetrexed's clinical performance, market dynamics, and future growth prospects remains indispensable for stakeholders. This analysis synthesizes recent clinical trial developments, markets’ current status, and forward-looking projections for pemetrexed.

Clinical Trials Update

Recent Advancements and Ongoing Studies

Over the past year, pemetrexed’s clinical research focus has shifted towards combination therapies, biomarker-driven patient selection, and expanding indications. Notable developments include:

  • Combination with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Multiple trials are evaluating pemetrexed in combination with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. For example, the KEYNOTE-598 trial assesses pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed versus chemotherapy alone in first-line NSCLC, with preliminary data indicating enhanced response rates and progression-free survival (PFS) (NCT03829001). Such studies aim to enhance immunotherapy efficacy and mitigate resistance mechanisms.

  • Novel Indications and Expanded Use: A phase II trial investigates pemetrexed combined with bevacizumab in recurrent ovarian cancer (NCT03481937). Additionally, ongoing studies explore its role in malignant mesothelioma-specific combinations with immunotherapy agents.

  • Biomarker-driven Strategies: Efforts to identify predictive biomarkers, such as thymidylate synthase (TYMS) expression levels, are underway. These endeavors aim to personalize pemetrexed administration, optimizing efficacy and minimizing toxicity.

  • Adverse Event Management Trials: Recent studies have explored supportive care regimens to mitigate common adverse effects like myelosuppression and mucositis, improving patient tolerability.

Key Trial Outcomes

While many investigations are ongoing, some completed studies provide crucial insights:

  • LATITUDE Trial (Phase III): Demonstrated that pemetrexed combined with cisplatin achieved significant improvements in PFS and overall survival (OS) in NSCLC, reaffirming its status as a first-line standard.

  • Real-world Data Analyses: Recent retrospective analyses indicate durable responses in selected patient populations, with median PFS ranging from 5 to 8 months in NSCLC patients receiving pemetrexed.

Market Analysis

Current Market Size and Share

Globally, the pemetrexed market continues to grow, driven by its established role in NSCLC and mesothelioma treatment. The global oncology drug market is projected to reach USD 215 billion by 2030, with pemetrexed’s segment expanding at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of approximately 7% over the next decade [1].

In 2022, the pemetrexed market was valued at about USD 4.2 billion. North America accounts for roughly 45% of sales, owing to high NSCLC incidence, robust healthcare infrastructure, and reimbursement policies. Europe follows, with emerging markets in Asia-Pacific gaining traction due to rising cancer prevalence and increasing healthcare investments.

Competitive Landscape

Pemetrexed faces competition from other chemotherapeutic agents and targeted therapies:

  • Chemotherapy Alternatives: Agents such as docetaxel and paclitaxel are used in similar settings, but pemetrexed's favorable toxicity profile and convenience in combination therapies sustain its preference.

  • Targeted and Immunotherapies: The advent of checkpoint inhibitors (e.g., pembrolizumab, nivolumab) and targeted agents (e.g., EGFR inhibitors) is reshaping treatment algorithms, which may influence pemetrexed’s market share.

  • Biosimilars and Generics: Since patent expiration in various regions (e.g., in Europe in 2018), pemetrexed generics have entered the market, reducing treatment costs and expanding access. However, branded formulations retain significant market share due to established clinical protocols.

Market Drivers and Challenges

  • Drivers:

    • Increasing incidence of lung cancer and mesothelioma globally.
    • Growing acceptance of combination regimens involving pemetrexed.
    • Advances in personalized oncology, increasing demand for tailored therapies.
  • Challenges:

    • Competition from immunotherapy and targeted agents with superior efficacy in certain contexts.
    • Toxicity management issues, notably myelosuppression.
    • Reimbursement hurdles in emerging markets, impacting access.

Market Projections and Future Outlook

Growth Drivers

The outlook for pemetrexed remains optimistic, contingent on several factors:

  • Expansion into New Indications: Ongoing trials in ovarian and other solid tumors could broaden its application scope. A successful phase III trial in mesothelioma or new NSCLC subsets could notably elevate sales.

  • Combination with Immunotherapies: As evidence accumulates supporting synergistic effects, pemetrexed-based regimens are poised to become central in multi-modality treatment approaches.

  • Personalized Medicine: Biomarker-driven treatments may enhance efficacy, leading to more precise indications and increased adoption.

  • Biosimilar Penetration: Greater availability of biosimilars from 2024 onwards is projected to lower costs further and expand usage, especially in price-sensitive markets.

Market Forecast (2023–2030)

Based on current trends and clinical pipeline developments, the pemetrexed market is expected to grow at a CAGR of about 6-8%. The revenue could reach USD 8–10 billion by 2030, supported by:

  • Increasing global cancer prevalence.
  • Broader indication approvals.
  • Evolutions in combination regimens with immunotherapies.

However, these projections are sensitive to regulatory approvals, emerging competitors, and healthcare policy shifts.

Regulatory and Reimbursement Landscape

Pemetrexed's approval in multiple regions has facilitated widespread adoption. Regulatory agencies like the EMA and FDA continue to evaluate supplemental approvals for new indications. Reimbursement policies are evolving, emphasizing value-based care and cost-effectiveness analyses. The entry of biosimilars is expected to incentivize payers to broaden access and reduce barriers to therapy.

Conclusion

Pemetrexed stands as a cornerstone chemotherapeutic in the modern oncology setting, with ongoing clinical trials promising to expand its therapeutic horizons. The market momentum, driven by rising cancer incidence and technological improvements in treatment personalization, positions pemetrexed for sustained growth. Innovations in combination therapies, biomarker integration, and biosimilar proliferation will shape its future trajectory. Stakeholders must monitor the evolving clinical evidence, regulatory pathways, and market dynamics to optimize positioning and investment strategies.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Innovation: Pemétrexed is increasingly combined with immunotherapies in trials to improve efficacy in NSCLC and mesothelioma, with promising early data fueling optimism.

  • Market Expansion: The global pemetrexed market is projected to reach USD 8–10 billion by 2030, supported by rising cancer prevalence, indication expansion, and biosimilar availability.

  • Competitive Positioning: While immunotherapies and targeted therapies challenge pemetrexed’s dominance, its proven efficacy, safety profile, and combination potential sustain its clinical relevance.

  • Regulatory Trends: Continued pursuit of supplemental approvals and biosimilar licenses will influence market access and pricing dynamics.

  • Strategic Focus: Stakeholders should prioritize biomarker research, combination regimen development, and cost-optimization strategies to maximize pemetrexed’s commercial and therapeutic impact.


FAQs

Q1: What recent clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of pemetrexed in combination with immunotherapies?
A1: Trials like KEYNOTE-598 are evaluating pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed in NSCLC, showing early signs of improved response rates, which could redefine first-line treatment approaches.

Q2: How has the entry of biosimilars affected pemetrexed’s market?
A2: Biosimilars, introduced post-patent expiry, have decreased treatment costs, increased market accessibility, and fostered competition, especially in cost-sensitive regions.

Q3: Are there new indications emerging for pemetrexed beyond NSCLC and mesothelioma?
A3: Yes; ongoing studies are assessing pembetrexed in ovarian cancer, gastric cancer, and potential expansion into other solid tumors based on early evidence.

Q4: What are the main challenges facing pemetrexed’s market growth?
A4: Competition from immunotherapies, toxicity concerns, reimbursement issues in emerging markets, and the rapid advent of targeted therapies are key challenges.

Q5: What future developments could significantly impact pemetrexed’s market share?
A5: Successful registration of new indications, positive biomarker-driven results, and broader biosimilar adoption are expected to influence its market position substantially.


References

[1] Global Oncology Drug Market Analysis. Market Research Future, 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.