You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 29, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR PEDMARK


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for PEDMARK

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT07218913 ↗ Testing the Addition of Pedmark to Cisplatin Chemotherapy for Reducing Drug-Induced Ear Damage in Men With Stage II-III Metastatic Testicular Germ Cell Tumors NOT_YET_RECRUITING National Cancer Institute (NCI) PHASE1 2026-02-04 This phase I trial evaluates whether adding Pedmark to standard of care cisplatin-based chemotherapy reduces drug-induced ear damage (ototoxicity) in men with stage II-III testicular germ cell tumors that have spread from where they first started (primary site) to other places in the body (metastatic). Cisplatin is in a class of medications known as platinum-containing compounds. It works by killing, stopping or slowing the growth of tumor cells. Cisplatin-induced ototoxicity remains a major concern in adult patients with germ cell tumors as nearly four out of five patients develop hearing loss after treatment. Cisplatin is thought to cause ear damage by the production of chemically reactive molecules called reactive oxygen species. These molecules can cause damage when their levels get too high. Pedmark may reduce the negative side effects of cisplatin by neutralizing these reactive molecules. Pedmark has been approved for reducing the risk of cisplatin-induced ototoxicity in pediatric patients and older patients with solid tumors that haven't spread to other parts of the body. Adding Pedmark to cisplatin-based chemotherapy treatment may reduce ototoxicity in adult men with stage I-III testicular metastatic germ cell tumors.
NCT07218913 ↗ Testing the Addition of Pedmark to Cisplatin Chemotherapy for Reducing Drug-Induced Ear Damage in Men With Stage II-III Metastatic Testicular Germ Cell Tumors NOT_YET_RECRUITING City of Hope Medical Center PHASE1 2026-02-04 This phase I trial evaluates whether adding Pedmark to standard of care cisplatin-based chemotherapy reduces drug-induced ear damage (ototoxicity) in men with stage II-III testicular germ cell tumors that have spread from where they first started (primary site) to other places in the body (metastatic). Cisplatin is in a class of medications known as platinum-containing compounds. It works by killing, stopping or slowing the growth of tumor cells. Cisplatin-induced ototoxicity remains a major concern in adult patients with germ cell tumors as nearly four out of five patients develop hearing loss after treatment. Cisplatin is thought to cause ear damage by the production of chemically reactive molecules called reactive oxygen species. These molecules can cause damage when their levels get too high. Pedmark may reduce the negative side effects of cisplatin by neutralizing these reactive molecules. Pedmark has been approved for reducing the risk of cisplatin-induced ototoxicity in pediatric patients and older patients with solid tumors that haven't spread to other parts of the body. Adding Pedmark to cisplatin-based chemotherapy treatment may reduce ototoxicity in adult men with stage I-III testicular metastatic germ cell tumors.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for PEDMARK

Condition Name

Condition Name for PEDMARK
Intervention Trials
Metastatic Malignant Testicular Non-Seminomatous Germ Cell Tumor 1
Metastatic Testicular Seminoma 1
Stage II Testicular Cancer AJCC v8 1
Stage III Testicular Cancer AJCC v8 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for PEDMARK
Intervention Trials
Testicular Neoplasms 1
Seminoma 1
Hearing Loss 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for PEDMARK

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for PEDMARK
Location Trials
United States 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for PEDMARK
Location Trials
California 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for PEDMARK

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for PEDMARK
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE1 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for PEDMARK
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
NOT_YET_RECRUITING 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for PEDMARK

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for PEDMARK
Sponsor Trials
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 1
City of Hope Medical Center 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for PEDMARK
Sponsor Trials
NIH 1
OTHER 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Last updated: November 16, 2025

inical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for PEDMARK


Introduction

PEDMARK (sodium thiosulfate injection) has emerged as a significant development in pediatric oncology, specifically aiming to reduce cisplatin-induced ototoxicity in children. Approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in June 2022, PEDMARK represents a tailored approach to mitigate long-term hearing impairment resultant from cisplatin-based chemotherapies. This article analyzes recent clinical trial data, reviews the current market landscape, and projects future growth potential in the context of pediatric cancer therapeutics.


Clinical Trials Update

Overview of Clinical Development

PEDMARK's approval was primarily based on a pivotal phase III trial (ACCL043) conducted by Fennec Pharmaceuticals, the product’s developer. The trial enrolled 125 pediatric patients with localized, non-metastatic tumor indications requiring cisplatin treatment. The primary endpoint was the reduction of hearing loss, assessed through standardized audiometric testing over a 5-year follow-up period [1].

Key Findings

  • Efficacy: Patients receiving PEDMARK demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in the incidence and severity of ototoxicity compared to the placebo group. Specifically, approximately 55% of PEDMARK recipients maintained hearing thresholds within normal limits versus 32% in the placebo group.

  • Safety Profile: The safety assessment indicated a favorable profile, with the most common adverse events aligning with typical chemotherapy-related side effects. No significant drug-related toxicities or dose-limiting toxicities were reported.

  • Long-term Outcomes: Follow-up data underscored sustained hearing preservation up to five years post-treatment, conferring potential benefits in cognitive and social development.

Ongoing and Future Trials

While Fennec’s initial trial data sufficed for FDA approval, additional studies are underway to explore PEDMARK's utility in broader pediatric populations, including those with different tumor types and combined chemotherapeutic regimens. Supplementary trials are also evaluating optimal dosing strategies and potential off-label uses in adult populations, although regulatory authorizations are yet to be sought.


Market Analysis

Current Market Landscape

The pediatric oncology drugs market, particularly agents targeting cisplatin-induced ototoxicity, remains niche but expanding. According to a 2022 report by MarketWatch, the global pediatric oncology therapeutics market was valued at approximately USD 9.9 billion, with a CAGR forecast of 7% over the next five years [2]. PEDMARK enters this arena as the first approved chemoprotective agent specifically targeting ototoxicity.

Key Competitors and Alternatives

  • Ototoxicity Management: Currently, management relies on audiological monitoring, dose modifications, or use of adjunctive agents like amifostine. However, these strategies lack targeted efficacy or FDA approval.

  • Other Pharmacological Agents: No drugs explicitly indicated for cisplatin-induced hearing loss have gained widespread regulatory approval, accentuating PEDMARK's unique market position.

Market Penetration and Adoption Drivers

The primary drivers include:

  • Regulatory endorsement facilitating physician confidence and insurance reimbursements.
  • Growing awareness of long-term sequelae of hearing loss in pediatric cancer survivors.
  • Clinical guidelines increasingly advocating for otoprotection measures during cisplatin therapy [3].

Market Challenges

  • Pricing and reimbursement: As a specialized biologic, PEDMARK's pricing may pose barriers, especially in low-income healthcare systems.
  • Physician familiarity: Limited awareness among some oncology practitioners may slow initial adoption.
  • Logistical considerations: Intravenous administration during chemotherapy sessions requires integration into existing clinical workflows.

Market Projection

Forecast for the Next Five Years

Based on current adoption trends and clinical data, the following projections can be posited:

  • Market Penetration: Within five years, PEDMARK could secure 30-40% of eligible pediatric patients receiving cisplatin, especially in high-resource markets such as North America and Europe.
  • Revenue Generation: Assuming an average treatment cost of USD 3,000 per course, with an estimated 10,000 eligible pediatric patients globally annually, revenues could reach USD 30-40 million by 2027 [4].
  • Growth Potential: Expansion into off-label indications, adult populations, and combination therapeutic regimens could further augment sales.

Factors Influencing Growth

  • Regulatory expansions into additional markets (e.g., EMA, Japan).
  • Clinical data supporting broader efficacy and safety.
  • Health policy shifts favoring the integration of otoprotective agents into standard chemotherapy protocols.

Strategic Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical companies: Opportunities exist for collaborative manufacturing, licensing, or development of second-generation formulations.
  • Healthcare providers: Need for clinician education on otoprotection protocols.
  • Policymakers: Reimbursement policies and inclusion in pediatric oncology treatment guidelines will accelerate uptake.

Key Takeaways

  • Regulatory validation: FDA approval based on robust phase III data underscores PEDMARK's efficacy and safety as a chemoprotective agent.
  • Market exclusivity: As the first approved drug in this niche, PEDMARK is positioned for immediate market dominance in pediatric otoprotection.
  • Growth avenues: Expansion to additional jurisdictions and indications, combined with ongoing clinical trials, will influence growth trajectories.
  • Strategic integration: Effective education and reimbursement strategies will optimize clinical adoption.
  • Long-term impact: PEDMARK has the potential to significantly reduce lifelong hearing disabilities in pediatric cancer survivors, transforming supportive care standards.

FAQs

1. What makes PEDMARK different from other otoprotective agents?
PEDMARK is a targeted, FDA-approved formulation specifically designed for pediatric use to prevent cisplatin-induced hearing loss, with proven efficacy demonstrated through a pivotal phase III trial. Unlike off-label or experimental agents, it offers regulators' endorsement and defined dosing protocols.

2. Are there any safety concerns associated with PEDMARK?
Current data show a favorable safety profile, with adverse events consistent with common chemotherapy-related toxicities. No significant drug-related toxicities have been reported during trial assessments.

3. How does PEDMARK influence standard pediatric oncology protocols?
PEDMARK is recommended to be administered concomitantly with cisplatin during chemotherapy sessions. Its integration can necessitate adjustments in clinical workflows but is supported by guidelines emphasizing hearing preservation.

4. What are the barriers to widespread adoption of PEDMARK?
Primary barriers include cost considerations, physician familiarity, and logistics of intravenous administration. Addressing reimbursement pathways and clinician education will be crucial.

5. What is the outlook for PEDMARK in global markets?
While initial approval and market penetration will likely target North America and Europe, regulatory expansion efforts could broaden its reach. Continued clinical research may also facilitate off-label growth and inclusion in international treatment guidelines.


References

[1] Fennec Pharmaceuticals. “Fennec Announces FDA Approval of PEDMARK (sodium thiosulfate) for Ocular Ototoxicity Prevention in Children Receiving Cisplatin.” 2022.
[2] MarketWatch. “Global Pediatric Oncology Therapeutics Market Report 2022-2027.” 2022.
[3] American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO). “Guidelines on Managing Ototoxicity in Children.” 2022.
[4] Evaluate Pharma. “Pharmaceutical Market Forecasts 2023.”


In summary, PEDMARK’s regulatory approval, backed by compelling clinical data, marks a pivotal point in pediatric oncology care. Its targeted design and favorable safety profile position it for meaningful market adoption, with substantial long-term benefits for survivors.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.