Last Updated: November 4, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR OXYCONTIN


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for OXYCONTIN

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00254631 ↗ Preemptive Analgesia With OxyContin Versus Placebo Before Surgery for Long Bone Fractures Completed Rambam Health Care Campus Phase 4 2007-04-01 We would like to check whether pre-operative administration of an oral controlled-release opioid formulation (Oxycodone hydrochloride (OxyContin)) could result in a clear effect of preemptive analgesia.
NCT00399048 ↗ An Effectiveness, Safety and Quality of Life Measures With Hydromorphone HCL, Dilaudid CR (Controlled Release) Completed Alza Corporation, DE, USA Phase 3 1969-12-31 The purpose of this study was to characterize the effectiveness and safety of OROS hydromorphone HCL and OxyContin in patients with chronic osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee or hip who are receiving chronic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) or other nonsteroidal, non-opioid analgesic (ie, acetaminophen or aspirin) therapy.
NCT00414453 ↗ Trial of Analgesia With Lidocaine or Extended-release Oxycodone for Neuropathic Pain Treatment in Multiple Sclerosis Terminated Endo Pharmaceuticals Phase 4 2007-01-01 This study will determine whether treatment with an extended-release opioid or topical lidocaine is effective in relieving distal symmetric lower extremity burning pain associated with multiple sclerosis (MS). If treatment with topical lidocaine is efficacious, it will have important implications for understanding this chronic pain syndrome, which is widely assumed to be caused by central nervous system pathology.
NCT00414453 ↗ Trial of Analgesia With Lidocaine or Extended-release Oxycodone for Neuropathic Pain Treatment in Multiple Sclerosis Terminated University of Rochester Phase 4 2007-01-01 This study will determine whether treatment with an extended-release opioid or topical lidocaine is effective in relieving distal symmetric lower extremity burning pain associated with multiple sclerosis (MS). If treatment with topical lidocaine is efficacious, it will have important implications for understanding this chronic pain syndrome, which is widely assumed to be caused by central nervous system pathology.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for OXYCONTIN

Condition Name

Condition Name for OXYCONTIN
Intervention Trials
Healthy 9
Pain 8
Pain, Postoperative 7
Healthy Volunteers 4
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for OXYCONTIN
Intervention Trials
Pain, Postoperative 13
Chronic Pain 5
Osteoarthritis 3
Opioid-Induced Constipation 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for OXYCONTIN

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for OXYCONTIN
Location Trials
United States 139
Korea, Republic of 4
China 4
Israel 3
Norway 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for OXYCONTIN
Location Trials
Texas 9
New York 7
Alabama 6
California 6
Florida 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for OXYCONTIN

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for OXYCONTIN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 14
Phase 3 11
Phase 2 9
[disabled in preview] 19
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for OXYCONTIN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 46
Recruiting 5
Terminated 4
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for OXYCONTIN

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for OXYCONTIN
Sponsor Trials
Purdue Pharma LP 10
Pfizer 3
PRA Health Sciences 3
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for OXYCONTIN
Sponsor Trials
Other 36
Industry 36
NIH 7
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

OxyContin (oxycodone HCl) Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Revenue Projection (2026-2031)

Last updated: July 27, 2026

Executive summary: OxyContin remains a long-established, generic-penetrated opioid branded franchise in the US, with growth driven mainly by unit durability (pain management) and pricing dynamics, not by new-entity launches. Publicly reported clinical activity for OxyContin (as a brand) is limited relative to earlier years, with most late-stage efforts in the opioid space shifting toward reformulated extended-release products, abuse-deterrent technologies, and combination or competing molecules. Near-term revenue exposure is tied to (1) continued US market share defense versus generic extended-release oxycodone, (2) payer and formulary restrictions that increasingly favor abuse-deterrent and lower-cost generics, and (3) opioid utilization controls and litigation-driven supply and contracting behavior across distributors and pharmacies.

What clinical trials are currently active or recently completed for OxyContin (oxycodone HCl) in 2024-2026?

No complete, up-to-date clinical-trials listing set can be produced from the information provided in the request. Producing a trial-by-trial “clinical trials update” with study identifiers (NCT numbers), endpoints, enrollment status, and timelines requires a source-backed dataset (ClinicalTrials.gov and sponsor press releases). The prompt does not include those data.

Are there new FDA filings or label expansions for OxyContin that could change market trajectory?

No complete, source-anchored FDA filing or label-expansion inventory can be produced from the information provided in the request. A defensible update requires Orange Book review (if applicable), FDA labeling change logs, and supplement histories tied to specific submission types and dates.

What is the OxyContin market size today and what drives demand for extended-release oxycodone?

OxyContin’s demand is dominated by extended-release opioid prescribing for chronic pain, with utilization shaped by:

  • Formulary tiering and prior authorization rules for long-acting opioids
  • Safety policy constraints (dose limits, quantity limits, monitoring requirements)
  • Transition patterns from brand to AB-rated generics
  • Payer preference for formulations with abuse-deterrent positioning
  • Litigation and settlement-linked contracting dynamics in the opioid distribution channel

A market projection is therefore mostly a function of share and net price rather than total category growth. Without current, sourced US sales numbers for OxyContin and without explicit assumptions for share and net price, a precise numerical projection cannot be constructed in a way that meets high-stakes business standards.

How does OxyContin compare with generic extended-release oxycodone on pricing, access, and payer coverage?

OxyContin faces a classic branded-opioid economics profile:

  • Generic extended-release oxycodone typically captures the majority of volume once AB substitution is operational and formularies are aligned.
  • Branded durability depends on negotiated reimbursement, status in specific integrated delivery networks, and carve-outs in insurer-specific contracts.
  • Abuse-deterrent and tamper-resistant claims affect payer and clinician selection, but generic competitors increasingly mirror or compete on comparable product attributes.

A quantified head-to-head comparison requires sourced net price and formulary access data by payer segment, which is not included.

When does OxyContin lose exclusivity and what patents expire first in the US?

No patent estate timeline for OxyContin can be provided from the prompt alone. A valid exclusivity and patent-expiration analysis requires:

  • Orange Book drug-product and patent listings by dosage form/strength
  • Expiration dates and patent types (composition, method of use, formulation, polymorph, manufacturing)
  • Any pediatric exclusivity extensions
  • Market exclusivity milestones tied to the approved NDA/BLA history for each strength and dosage form

The request does not include those listings or dates, and generating them without sources would be unreliable for litigation and licensing planning.

What is the Orange Book status of OxyContin by dosage form and strength?

An Orange Book status table (listed patents, submission numbers, exclusivity codes, and expirations) cannot be constructed from the request’s provided information.

How many patents cover OxyContin formulations, manufacturing, and method-of-use claims?

A count by patent family and by claim category requires the Orange Book listings and corresponding patent documents. The request does not provide patent numbers or listing data.

Which companies are challenging OxyContin with Paragraph IV ANDAs, and what litigation results affect launch timing?

A Paragraph IV and litigation update is not possible without a source-backed Paragraph IV dataset and court docket outcomes tied to specific ANDA applicants and Orange Book patents.

What settlement agreements or consent decrees affect OxyContin generic entry?

Settlement and consent decree terms need case identifiers and documented agreement details. The prompt provides none.

What generic entry risks exist for OxyContin, including 505(b)(2) and authorized generics?

A quantified risk register requires:

  • Whether any eligible 505(b)(2) reformulations are in review
  • Presence of authorized generic strategies by relevant manufacturers
  • The patent and exclusivity landscape by strength and dosing schedule
  • Timing signals from FDA acceptance and approval letters

No such dataset is provided.

How does OxyContin compare with competing abuse-deterrent extended-release opioids?

A defensible comparative analysis requires a competitor list (by molecule and formulation), current FDA status, and outcome claims from clinical pharmacology and abuse-deterrence studies. The request does not include competitor product names or datasets.

What regulatory pathway changes could accelerate or slow generic and biosimilar-like competition for OxyContin?

OxyContin is an NDA small-molecule opioid, not a biologic. “Biosimilar” competition is not applicable. Regulatory acceleration or delay depends on ANDA readiness, patent carving, and FDA labeling changes. A precise regulatory risk analysis again requires specific FDA submission status data that is not present.

Market projection for OxyContin: US sales outlook 2026-2031 with scenario logic

A numerical projection cannot be responsibly generated without:

  • Baseline annual OxyContin US sales (preferably by strength and channel)
  • Current net price and rebate structures
  • Share trajectory versus generic extended-release oxycodone
  • Expected formulary policy changes
  • Any known supply or distribution constraints affecting availability

The request provides none of these inputs, and producing figures without sourced baselines would violate the requirement for actionable, high-stakes accuracy.

Key Takeaways

  • OxyContin’s near-term outlook is constrained by generic penetration and payer opioid utilization controls rather than by brand-level clinical innovation.
  • A true clinical trials and FDA update for OxyContin in 2024-2026 requires source-backed NCT and FDA submission data not included in the prompt.
  • A patent/exclusivity and Paragraph IV litigation outlook for OxyContin requires Orange Book listings and court records not included in the prompt.
  • Numerical US revenue projection (2026-2031) cannot be produced to business-standard accuracy without baseline sales, net pricing, and share trajectory data.

FAQs

  1. Does OxyContin have active NCT studies for chronic pain in 2025-2026, and what are their endpoints?
  2. What is the Orange Book list of patents for OxyContin extended-release tablets by strength and expiration date?
  3. Have any ANDA applicants filed Paragraph IV certifications against OxyContin patents, and what is the litigation status?
  4. How do payer prior authorization and quantity limits typically change demand for long-acting opioids like OxyContin?
  5. What kinds of formulation or manufacturing changes most often differentiate branded extended-release oxycodone from generics for reimbursement?

References

No sources were provided in the prompt, and none are permitted to be cited without being explicitly supported by available data.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.