You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR OSMOPREP


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for OSMOPREP

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT01427296 ↗ Safety and Efficacy of OsmoPrep® Tablets Versus HalfLytely® and Bisacodyl Tablet Bowel Prep Kit for Colon Cleansing Completed Bausch Health Americas, Inc. Phase 4 2011-09-16 The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of OsmoPrep tablets versus HalfLytely and Bisacodyl Tablet Bowel Prep Kit in subjects who are undergoing colonoscopy.
NCT01427296 ↗ Safety and Efficacy of OsmoPrep® Tablets Versus HalfLytely® and Bisacodyl Tablet Bowel Prep Kit for Colon Cleansing Completed Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. Phase 4 2011-09-16 The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of OsmoPrep tablets versus HalfLytely and Bisacodyl Tablet Bowel Prep Kit in subjects who are undergoing colonoscopy.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for OSMOPREP

Condition Name

Condition Name for OSMOPREP
Intervention Trials
Colon Cleansing 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for OSMOPREP
Intervention Trials
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for OSMOPREP

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for OSMOPREP
Location Trials
United States 13
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for OSMOPREP
Location Trials
New York 1
New Jersey 1
Missouri 1
Michigan 1
Maryland 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for OSMOPREP

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for OSMOPREP
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for OSMOPREP
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for OSMOPREP

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for OSMOPREP
Sponsor Trials
Bausch Health Americas, Inc. 1
Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for OSMOPREP
Sponsor Trials
Industry 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Osmoprep

Last updated: November 7, 2025

Introduction

Osmoprep (whole bowel irrigation with sodium phosphate) is a prescription pharmacologic agent primarily utilized for bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy procedures. As the landscape of gastroenterological therapeutics evolves, understanding the current status of Osmoprep’s clinical development, market dynamics, and future outlook becomes essential for industry stakeholders. This report provides a comprehensive analysis of Osmoprep, emphasizing recent clinical trial updates, market trends, and projections within the context of the broader gastrointestinal (GI) preparation sector.

Clinical Trials Update

Regulatory and Clinical History

Initially, Osmoprep received FDA approval in 2001 for bowel cleansing. However, safety concerns around phosphate-based preparations led to regulatory scrutiny and eventual market restrictions. The FDA issued a black box warning in 2008 concerning the risk of acute phosphate nephropathy, especially in vulnerable patients with comorbidities such as renal impairment, heart failure, or electrolyte disturbances (FDA, 2008).

Recent Clinical Investigations

Despite these safety concerns, research persists around optimizing osmoprep's use and mitigating side effects. Notably:

  • Safety Profile and Population-specific Studies: Recent trials, such as the observational study published in Gastroenterology (2021), evaluated renal outcomes in patients with varying baseline renal functions administered phosphate-based bowel cleansers. Findings emphasize the importance of patient selection, reaffirming the need for cautious use in at-risk populations.

  • Comparative Effectiveness Trials: Several recent head-to-head studies compare Osmoprep to polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based preparations. A notable randomized controlled trial (RCT) in The Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology (2022) demonstrated comparable cleansing efficacy but highlighted increased risks of electrolyte imbalance with Osmoprep, consistent with historical data.

  • Innovations in Formulation: Ongoing efforts aim to develop modified formulations to lower phosphatemia risks, such as combining phosphate solutions with antioxidants or protective agents. However, these remain predominantly in early-phase clinical trials, with no recent data indicating a shift toward new approved formulations.

Regulatory Status and Market Impact

In the wake of safety warnings, the FDA heavily restricted Osmoprep’s indications, limiting use to patients with no renal impairment and no contraindicated comorbidities. Some manufacturers voluntarily withdrew non-compliant formulations. Consequently, clinical development has largely stagnated outside ongoing observational research, and the drug’s market presence has diminished significantly.

Market Analysis

Current Market Landscape

The global bowel preparation market is highly competitive, driven by the rising prevalence of colorectal cancer and increased screening programs. The market was valued at approximately $1.2 billion in 2022, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) projected around 4.2% through 2027 [1].

Osmoprep’s market share has declined markedly since regulatory restrictions, with many healthcare providers shifting to safer alternatives such as PEG-based solutions (e.g., GoLYTELY, MoviPrep) and newer low-volume preparations (e.g., NER1006). These alternatives typically exhibit lower toxicity profiles, especially concerning renal safety.

Market Drivers and Challenges

  • Drivers:

    • Increasing colorectal cancer screening rates.
    • Patient preference for less volume and improved tolerability.
    • Innovations in bowel prep formulations.
  • Challenges:

    • Safety concerns associated with phosphate-based preps.
    • Regulatory hurdles restricting Osmoprep's use.
    • Stringent guidelines favoring safer agents, reducing Osmoprep’s prescription volume.
    • Limited ongoing clinical development for reformulations.

Segment-Specific Dynamics

The market segments are divided into institutional settings, outpatient clinics, and home-use preparations. PEG-based formulations dominate prescriptions owing to their safety profile, especially in elderly or comorbid populations -- the primary consumers of bowel preparations.

Osmoprep’s positioning is largely restricted to niche subpopulations, such as patients intolerant to PEG solutions but with preserved renal function. The limited applicability hampers its growth prospects.

Competitive Landscape

Key competitors include:

  • PEG-based solutions (e.g., GoLYTELY, MoviPrep).
  • Low-volume hyperosmotic agents (e.g., NER1006).
  • Novel agents, such as oral sulfate tablets, with enhanced tolerability.

Given the safety profile, these alternatives have gained favor among clinicians, pressuring Osmoprep’s overall market share.

Market Projection and Future Outlook

Short-term Outlook (Next 2–3 Years)

The immediate future for Osmoprep remains constrained. Regulatory restrictions and safety concerns will sustain demand suppression. Only niche markets with strict patient screening criteria may continue to utilize it. Nonetheless, unforeseen reformulations or safety enhancements could stem declining use.

Long-term Outlook (3–10 Years)

The broader bowel prep market is poised for steady growth, driven by increased screening compliance. However, Osmoprep's future hinges on:

  • Reformulation: Development of phosphate preparations with improved safety profiles may renew interest, especially if they demonstrate reduced nephrotoxicity.
  • Regulatory Revisions: Regulatory agencies may relax restrictions if new data shows significant safety improvement.
  • Emerging Technologies: Integration of digital health solutions for monitoring prep adherence and safety could redefine market preferences.

Projected Market Share

Given current trends, Osmoprep’s global market share is expected to decline further, potentially stabilizing at a 0.5–1% fraction of the total bowel prep market within five years. Significant growth is unlikely unless notable safety advances occur.

Financial and Business Implications

Pharmaceutical companies with existing Osmoprep assets might consider strategic divestments or repurposing, focusing on safer phosphate derivatives or related gastrointestinal therapeutics. Investment in development efforts for reformulations could lead to revitalized market presence if regulatory and safety hurdles are addressed.

Conclusion

Osmoprep’s clinical status is characterized by a legacy of effectiveness overshadowed by safety issues. Its market has contracted following regulatory restrictions and shifting clinician preferences toward safer alternatives. The future of Osmoprep depends on innovative reformulation efforts, regulatory revisits, and evolving clinical evidence supporting its safe use. Currently, the outlook remains cautiously optimistic for niche applications but discouraging for broad-based market resurgence.

Key Takeaways

  • Regulatory and safety concerns significantly limit Osmoprep use, with current restrictions emphasizing renal safety.
  • Clinical trial activity has stabilized due to safety issues, with recent studies confirming efficacy but underscoring nephrotoxicity risks.
  • The market is dominated by safer PEG-based solutions, constraining Osmoprep's growth prospects.
  • Future innovation in formulation or safety management is essential for Osmoprep’s market re-entry.
  • The overall bowel prep market continues to grow, but Osmoprep’s share is expected to decline, remaining mostly niche unless significant safety improvements are achieved.

FAQs

  1. What are the primary risks associated with Osmoprep?
    Acute phosphate nephropathy and electrolyte disturbances, especially in vulnerable populations with renal impairment, limit its safe use.

  2. Is Osmoprep still available and prescribed?
    Its use is restricted and largely limited to specific indications; many formulations have been withdrawn due to safety concerns.

  3. Are there ongoing efforts to reformulate Osmoprep?
    Early-stage research is exploring modified formulations and combination therapies, but no approved reformulations exist as of now.

  4. How does Osmoprep compare to PEG-based bowel preparations?
    While similarly effective, Osmoprep carries higher nephrotoxicity risks, making PEG solutions safer and more widely preferred.

  5. What is the future outlook for Osmoprep in the market?
    Expect limited niche use unless significant safety enhancements or regulatory acceptability are achieved through reformulation or new clinical data.


Sources

[1] Grand View Research, "Bowel Preparation Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report," 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.